0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views2 pages

Rites of Passage and Identity Transformation

GE 1 Undertsnading the self

Uploaded by

Charmiel Medina
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views2 pages

Rites of Passage and Identity Transformation

GE 1 Undertsnading the self

Uploaded by

Charmiel Medina
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

ANTHROPOLOGY

• Anthropology is the study of humanity through the application of biology, cultural studies,
archaeology, linguistics, and other social sciences
• Anthropology is from the New Latin word anthropologia ("the study of humanity") and shares its
ultimate root in Greek, anthropos ("human being)

• Social interaction builds characters and identities. As a person, what you are now is not solely
dependent on your biological characteristics, but by your experiences with people and your
environment.
• Aristotle once said: "man is a social animal." Humans are, by nature, social beings that regularly
interact with their environment. Interpersonal interaction is therefore innate and common among
human beings.

EDWARD B. TAYLOR
1832-1917
Anthropological perspective of the self is based on the assumption that the construction of the self is
influenced by culture through socialization and enculturation with the society we are immerse in.
• Culture, according to Edward Taylor is "a complex whole which includes knowledge, belief, art,
morals, law, customs, and any other capabilities and habits acquired by man as a
member of society.

THE CULTURAL CONSTRUCTION OF SELF AND IDENTITY?


There are two ways to view the concept of the self: egocentric and sociocentric:
• Egocentric - the self is seen as an autonomous and distinct individual. Each person is defined as
replica of all humanity but capable of acting independently from others?
• Sociocentric - the self is contingent on a situation or social setting.

In social anthropology, the concept of identity was used mostly in the context of "ethnic identity",
pointing out the sameness of the SELF with others; a consciousness of sharing certain characteristics
(e.g., language, culture, clothing) within a group.
• According to Christie Kiefer, sociocentric view of the self is evident among Japanese through the
interdependence between the person and the group which is more valued than independence. Social
interaction should be characterized by restraint.
• The very essence of interpersonal relations is mutual dependence. They do not value self-reliance
but importance to compliance and subordination of one's will to the authority figures in the family.
• Sociocentric view of the self is also attributed to the Chinese, according to anthropology Francis
Hsu. Chinese prioritizes kin ties and cooperation
In contrast with the Japanese and the Chinese, the Americans are egocentric. They believe that they
should be assertive and independent.
• From the similarities and differences in characteristics among individuals, people construct their
social identities.
• The identity toolbox refers to the features of a person's identity that he or she chooses to
emphasize in constructing a social self.
• Some characteristics such as kinship, gender, and age are almost universally used to differentiate
people.
Other characteristics, such as ethnicity, personal appearance, and socioeconomic status are not
always used in every society.
Family membership could be the most significant feature to determine a person's social identity.
Another important identity determinant that is often viewed as essential for the maintenance of a
group identity is language.
In other societies, religious affiliation is an important marker of group identity.
• Personal naming is a universal practice with numerous cross- cultural variations, establishes a
child's birthright and social identity.
• A name is an important device to individualize a person and legitimize him/her as a member of a
social group such as family.
• A person's name may represent his or her cultural self.
Many marks the naming of a child with special ceremony.
• Aymara Indians do not consider an infant as a true human until a name is given until two years old
when he/she is ready to speak Aymara language.
• Icelanders name their infants soon after birth. Paternal given name is the last
name. The boy's given name is added with
a suffix "sen" or "son" and the girl's name with "dottir"
• In Minangkabau matronymic culture, in Indonesian island of Sumatra children
inherit their mother's family name instead of father's.
• Children in Arctic Canada are named after
their deceased relatives and other people with admirable qualities which they believe helpful for their
character formation.

The 3-phased Rite of Passage?


• One's identity is not inborn. It is something people continuously develop in life. Rites of passage
usually involve ritual activities to prepare individuals for new roles from one stage of life to another.
• Arnold van Gennep believes that changes in
one's status and identity are marked by a
three-phased rite of passage:
1. Separation phase - people detach from their former identity to another.
2. Liminality phase - a person transitions from one identity to another
3. Incorporation phase - the change in one's
status is officially incorporated.

Arnold van Gennep


• Rites of passage help a person adjust from one social dimension of his or her life to the others.
However, sometimes individuals disagree on their respective identities.
• Identity struggles, coined by Anthony Wallace and Raymond Fogelson to characterize interaction
in which there is a discrepancy between the identity a person claims to possess, and the identity
attributed to that person by others.
• Moreover, individuals may also be confused in defining their personal identity when there is a clash
between self-identification and inherited collective identification emerging from the cultural changes
and conflicting norms and values in the postmodern society.

IDENTITY
• In order to attain self-identification, individuals have to overcome many obstacles such as
traditionally established habits and externally imposed self-images.
• The world continuously reconstitutes themselves into new selves in response to internal and
external stimuli.
• Therefore, the cohesiveness and continuity of the self is illusory according to Katherine Ewing in
her "Illusion of Wholeness". Yet, the most important philosophical task of the post- modern man
today is to "work on yourself" just
like in the Socratic message "know thy self".

THE SELF EMBEDDED IN CULTURE


• Clifford Geertz (1973), an American anthropologist, defines culture as a system of inherited
conceptions expressed in symbolic forms by means of which people communicate, perpetuate, and
develop their knowledge about and attitudes toward life.
• Man is defined by his genetic potentials
shaped into actual accomplishments which is made possible by culture. Geertz also emphasizes that
human nature is interdependent with culture. "Without men, no culture, certainly; but equally, and
more significantly, without culture, no men.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Edward B. Taylor emphasizes that culture, which includes knowledge, beliefs, art, and customs, significantly influences the construction of self through socialization within a society . Clifford Geertz expands this by defining culture as a system of symbols through which people perpetuate knowledge, suggesting that human achievements and identity are shaped by cultural context. Both underscore that cultural frameworks critically shape individual and collective identities, highlighting the role of cultural immersion in defining the 'self' .

Family membership and language serve as key determinants of social identity because they foster a sense of belonging and continuity. Family ties often provide a foundational element in one’s identity, as seen in cultures like those of the Arctic Canadians and Icelanders, where familial connections are integral to personal naming practices. Language serves as a marker of group identity, as it not only facilitates communication but also perpetuates cultural practices and traditions, reinforcing identity through shared linguistics .

The egocentric perspective sees the self as an autonomous and distinct individual where each person is a replica of humanity but acts independently. In contrast, the sociocentric perspective views the self as contingent on social settings, emphasizing mutual dependence within a group. While egocentric identity is more apparent in American culture, valuing independence and assertiveness, sociocentric identity is prevalent in cultures like Japanese and Chinese, where interdependence and compliance with social structures are emphasized .

Identity struggles in postmodern societies arise from conflicts between self-identified and culturally imposed identities, as individuals navigate evolving norms and values. Traditional anthropological views, such as those by Anthony Wallace and Raymond Fogelson, describe these struggles as discrepancies in perceived versus attributed identities, highlighting complexities in identity formation. In such contexts, individuals face challenges reconciling personal aspirations with inherited cultural identities, underscoring the dynamic and contested nature of identity .

Naming practices influence cultural identity by legitimizing individuals as members of a social group and establishing cultural continuity. For example, in Arctic Canada, children are named after deceased relatives to imbue those qualities, and in Iceland, the father's given name becomes part of the child's surname, reflecting family lineage. Meanwhile, in Minangkabau culture, a matronymic system is followed where children inherit their mother's family name .

Rites of passage mark transitions between different life stages, helping individuals adjust their social identity accordingly. Arnold van Gennep describes these as a three-phased process: separation (detaching from a previous identity), liminality (transitioning state), and incorporation (integration into a new status). These rites are crucial in facilitating personal change and adaptation within society's structure, although they sometimes lead to identity struggles when an individual's self-perception conflicts with societal expectations .

The postmodern philosophical task of 'working on yourself,' echoes the ongoing cultural construction of self-identity, as noted by anthropologists. Personal identity is continuously reshaped in response to changing internal and external stimuli, suggesting that the self is not a cohesive, static entity. This aligns with Clifford Geertz's idea that human nature and culture are interdependent, and Katherine Ewing's assertion that the continuity of self-identity is an illusion .

Katherine Ewing's concept of the 'illusion of wholeness' challenges the notion of a fixed, cohesive identity by suggesting that self-perception is frequently reshaped by cultural influences and external circumstances. This perspective contributes to understanding identity as a fluid construct, continuously altered by cultural interactions, aligning with the anthropological view that the self is not innate but dynamically constructed and reconstructed through cultural engagements and personal experiences .

In sociocentric cultures, the concept of 'mutual dependence' underscores the importance of social ties and group coherence over individual aspirations, as seen in Japanese and Chinese societies where kin ties and cooperation are prioritized. This contrasts sharply with egocentric cultures, such as in the United States, which value self-reliance and assertiveness, advocating for independence as a core aspect of personal identity. This dichotomy reflects differing cultural priorities and social expectations regarding community and autonomy .

Geertz's definition of culture as a system of inherited symbols that communicates and perpetuates knowledge highlights the dynamic interplay between culture and identity formation. This paradigm implies that human identity is not static but evolves through cultural interpretations and symbolic exchanges. It underscores the argument that, without cultural frameworks, human potential cannot be actualized, thus recognizing culture as an essential element in shaping and reshaping identities .

You might also like