0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views2 pages

Corporal Punishment Debate in Schools

Corporal Punishment

Uploaded by

iradajero9
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views2 pages

Corporal Punishment Debate in Schools

Corporal Punishment

Uploaded by

iradajero9
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

FTC 1 – The Child and Adolescent Learners and Learning Principles

1st Semester, AY 2022 -2023

Name: IRA MARICAR R. DAJERO Score:


Course/Block: BEED 1B Date: Dec. 12,2022

FINAL PROJECT

Proposition:

THIS HOUSE BELIEVES THAT CORPORAL PUNISHMENT SHOULD BE ALLOWED IN SCHOOLS

GOVERNMENT OPPOSITION
(Present at least 3 arguments per side, explain each argument and (Present at least 3 arguments per side, explain each argument and
give example , if necessary) give example , if necessary)

1. Agree, Corporal punishment is the most effective way of 1. Disagree, Not to call them old, but the 1950s/1960s was a
maintaining school discipline and dealing with juvenile crime. long time ago. As time changes, so do problems and the
According to the research of what I've read, Using corporal way you deal with them. A recent Dr. Phil show explained
punishment efficiently and effectively. From one institution, the effects of corporal punishment perfectly. Some children
The dean kept the members of the school’s criminal respond to it but others respond negatively to it. If a child
fraternity out of the justice system giving them a chance to really responds negatively to it, then you have a worse
escape from their backgrounds and make something of their problem than you started [Link] illness is much more
lives. One boy who was caned for vandalism obtained a prevalent today than it was in the 1950s/1960s. If a student
degree in engineering. Another who had been whacked for is acting out due to mental illness and they are punished for
rubbing marmalade into a girl’s hair went to university and it, that will make the mental illness worse. If we have a
graduated with a degree in economics. Because from the student that is about to become a school shooter, a few
doctor that is such an expert, His expertise is wiser than our smacks is not going to stop them. It would just make them
ancestors and our elders who have effectively used corporal more angry and aggressive, if anything. Also, culture had
punishment to discipline their children- our parents and become more “me centered”. People are much more
grandparents even. If we were to listen to them they would self-centered and selfish now than in the 1950s/1960s. It’s a
tell us that corporal punishment is not for everybody lot more likely now that a teacher will abuse their power than
because some children can be settled with a reprimand and in the 1950s/1960s. If a teacher abuses their power,
disapproving look. That being said, they would still rely on students will be abused. This will cause even more trouble
the expediency of the cane because all some of these bad than the corporal punishment was suppose to fix. Also, a
kids need is a good spanking. student can falsely claim that they were abused by a
teacher. This could ruin the teacher’s career and lower the
2. Yes, Assuming the person punishing knows exactly what chances of them getting another job. I could continue with
they are doing and knows how to control themselves, there the problems of corporal punishment but I won’t for time’s
should be no problem with Corporal Punishment at all, the sake. And I I believe, There are too many problems for
rules of Corporal Punishment would need to be altered, corporal punishments to be brought back in all schools in
obviously. Because as they are they could hurt the child, today’s society.
But if altered it would be perfectly reasonable to administer
corporal punishment 2. I agree. But most of the time the “punisher” does not know
I would say speak for yourself, or at least what you know. If how to control himself so we have to keep the law in place.
the majority of administered corporal punishment was done Majority rules. Also if corporal punishment were to be altered
incorrectly then the history of child protective services would to not hurt a child, it would not be called corporal
be a whole lot more radical. Corporal punishment has been punishment. It has no relation to why you should have
used by a majority of households and education centers for corporal punishment the debate topic that we are discussing.
thousands of years until very recently. There will always be
those who abuse the system, but that does not mean the 3. Corporal punishment does not actually administer a direct
system does not work. Now that society- at least Western cause-and-effect link between a behaviour and its bad
society is claiming to be so much better, or wiser than consequences. It is just as likely that it will create an
previous societies then at least it can come up with a more unwanted association with the presence of the one
regulated and consistent implementation of such a practice. administering the punishment (e.g. the parents) as the bad
consequence itself or its cause, contributing to further
3. If you speak to people who have been subjected to corporal rebellious or sneaky behaviour, making its effect temporary.
punishment, they state that it was good for them and taught Education and nonaggressive, impersonal deterrents (such
them discipline. Most times they regret they did what they as educating them about the financial and psychological
did in the first place to get spanked. I have witnessed adults consequences of teen pregnancy) are far more effective if
talk about their youth and go up to their parents and thank you want to show them a direct cause-and-effect
them for correcting them when they were foolish. I’ve also relationship.
heard of some people who were locked up who wished
someone had been tougher on them or gave them some
more spankings. Some of these same inmates have ended
up forming closer relationships with their parents, mainly
their mothers, because they now realize what their mothers
were trying to prevent and feel sorry to have become such a
burden.

CNSC-OP-VPA-01F11 Page 1 of 2
Revision: 0
FTC 1 – The Child and Adolescent Learners and Learning Principles
1st Semester, AY 2022 -2023

ADJUDICATOR’S DECISION
(Based on your sound judgment (critiquing your own answers) which side should win, and why?

Corporal punishment, in my opinion, should not be reinstated. As stated in the argument that I've read while conducting knowledge
about the topic, 21 countries once supported corporal punishment; nevertheless, what changes have occurred? Is there a decrease in
violence? No. So what's the point? Instead of beating the child, which fosters hatred, which breeds violence, the child should be
treated with love and compassion. It should be made clear to her or him. After all, a child's mind is innocent, and instead of nurturing
it, we should scare it. How can the mind have the flexibility to learn? If someone had punched or otherwise acted violently, you would
essentially be applying physical punishment by beating them, and stating that violence is not the solution. Also, We the teachers,
Educators and acting as their second parent should handle them the best that we could. We will treat them and teach them patiently to
correct their mistakes.

Prepared by:

NICOLE ANNE G. PANOTES


Faculty

CNSC-OP-VPA-01F11 Page 2 of 2
Revision: 0

You might also like