0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views5 pages

Filipino Values in Social Work Assessment

Uploaded by

gallotarajoy
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views5 pages

Filipino Values in Social Work Assessment

Uploaded by

gallotarajoy
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

KORBEL FOUNDATION COLLEGE, INC

Purok Spring, Barangay Morales, Koronadal City


BS in Social Work
(SY 2022-2023 First Semester, First Term )

Subject Code: SWCA2


Subject Name: SOCIAL WORK ASSESSMENT 2
Module No. 5
Topic: The Filipino Personality and Social Work ( The Filipino Psychology)
Instructor: Bella D. Lechonsito, RSW

INTRODUCTION:

In this module, we will walk through Filipino Values to understand the Filipino and
what value does he/she represent. If you are ask what re the Filipino values you
know – you will mention “ hiya”, ” pakikisama”, “ utang na loob” etc – but do you
know if thry truly represent dominant Filipino values.

LECTURE/DISCUSSION:

According to Virgilio Enriquez (1992), a leading proponent of Filipino psychology,


“ The majority of studies on Filipino national character and values rely uncritically
on a borrowed language, in applicable categories of analysis and a token use of a
local language and culture . If ever Philippines norms are use at all, they merely
function as mere labels. More often than not, with very little research and
understanding of their deeper significance and content.

The studies fail to see values in terms of Filipino worldview, experience and
milieu. The organization and logic of the values as it is viewed from the
indigenous perspective is ignored.
In the exploration of values from the indigenous perspectives, Filipino psychology
makes use of the methods and analysis of core meanings of indigenous tems.
Enriquez (1992), for example suggested that “pagkatao” is perhaps best in the
concept of persona, a mask which can be observed from the outside. “
Pagkataong Pilipino” asserts the humanity and the “kapwa” psychology of the
Filipino. Enriques presented an analytical framework which can be useful in
understanding the indigenous Filipino value structure.

From Enriquez framework, it is noted that:


 The Filipino values are classified into four major categories consisting of :
1) Surface values
2) A pivot
3) A core
4) A foundation of human values
 The surface values consist of accommodative surface values ( hiya, utamg
na loob and pakikisama ) and confrontative surface values ( bahala na,
sama ng loob and pakikisama)
 The underlying precondition for the existence of the surface values is the
pivotal interpersonal value “pakiramdam”(shared inner perception) a
person without “pakiramdam” cannot possibly have “pakikisama” and
“utang na loob”. Similarly one cannot expect” hiya” from someone who has
no” pakiramdam”.
 “Pakiramdam” refers to heightened awareness and sensitivity and is
explained and anayzed in terms of its behavioural centrality in the “biro –
lambing-tampo” ( tease-caress-resent) domain. It has internal and external
dimensions- that is social dimension concerning ones’ loob or recognition
of a person individuality.
 The core of the value system, otherwise referred to as “kapwa” psychology,
is explained as extended sense of identity. The concept of the shared inner-
self given as a non-reductionist alternative to the surface idea of smooth
interpersonal relations.
 The values of “kalayaan” (freedom), “Karangalan”, and “katarungan”
(justice) constitute the socio-political elements and foundation of the
Philippines value system. “Kagandahang loob (shared inner nobility) is seen
as the basis to all three and is linking socio-cultural values.
SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONISM

The term symbolic interactionism has come into use as a label for a
relatively distinctive approach to the study of human group life and human
conduct (Blumer, 1969) .

Although Gerofe Herbert Mead (1863-1931) was the leading proponent,


Herbert Blumer was actually responsible for coining the term “symbolic
interactionism”. Nevertheless Mead”s ideas paved the way for the
development of perspective which stresses the social context of human
conduct.

Basic Concepts of Symbolic Interactionism

Mead emphasized that people are thinking and acting individuals, on the
capacity of human being to interact with other and to adjust their
behaviour based on their interpretation of gestures and symbols.

Symbolic interactionism rest on three premises:


1) Human beings act toward the basis of meanings that the things have for
them. Such things include everything the human being may note in the
world-physical objects; other human beings; categories of human
beings; institutions; guiding ideas; activities of others and such situations
as an individual encounter in the daily life.
2) The meaning of such things is derived from the social interaction that
one has with one’s fellow.
3) These meanings are handled and modified through an interpretative
process used by the person in dealing with things he encounters.

Based from the premises, symbolic interactionism holds that people are
passive being who simply react to stimuli presented to them. Rather people
are active beings who think and behave based on their interpretation of
particular situation.
But how do people develop the interpretative process? Basic ideas on
emergences of the self and the process of social interaction is uselful.

The Self

How does symbolic interactionism view the self? The following points were
raised by Mead (1934)

 The individual is not a self in the reflexible sense unless he is an


objective to himself
 The self arises in social experience
 Self –consciousness refers to the ability to call out in ourselves a set
of definite responses that belong to the others of the group

Being an object to himself means that people can think about and check
their own actions, can carry on internal conversations with themselves and
can respond to themselves. Blumer (1969)

In asserting that the human being has a self, Mead simply meant that the
human being is an object to himself. The human being may perceived
himself, communicate with himself and at toward himself.
This type of behaviour imply that the human being may become the object
of his own actions. This give him the means of interacting with himself
addressing himself anew.
Such self –interaction takes the form of making indications to him and
meeting this indications by making further indications. With the mechanism
of self-interaction, the human being ceases to be a responding organism
whose behaviour is a product of what plays upon him from the outside,
inside or both. Instead, he acts towards the world, interpreting what
confronts him and organizing his actions on the basis of interpretation.

ASSESSMENT:
A case will be given for students to give an analysis based on Filipino values
framework. A recommendation should be given as to what treatment be
made.

References:

Leonora S. de Guzman, et al. Review Notes in Social Work, SSWAP. Manila,


1978
Thelma Lee Mendoza, SW220 Social Human Behavior and Social Change Unit,
IPOU an UP, 1995
Oscar P. Ferrer, SW/CD 201 Philippine Social Reality and Development. IPOU and
UP, 1996
Isabel Panopio, et al. General Sociology, Focus on the Philippines, Kon,Inc, Quezon
City, 1995
Social Work Review Notes, ADDU 2019
Calvin S. Hall and Gardner Linszey, Theories of Personality

Common questions

Powered by AI

In symbolic interactionism, George Herbert Mead emphasizes the self as an entity that arises in social experiences and can reflect upon itself . This reflection allows individuals to engage in internal conversations and self-interaction, where the person acts as both subject and object, enabling them to modify behaviors based on interpretation . This idea highlights the self's role in active decision-making and identity formation .

"Kalayaan" (freedom), "karangalan" (honor), and "katarungan" (justice) are socio-political values that serve as the foundation of the Filipino value system . These values are interconnected with "kagandahang loob" (shared inner nobility), which acts as a linking socio-cultural value, further solidifying the importance of socio-political concepts in Filipino societal interactions .

Virgilio Enriquez criticizes traditional studies of Filipino values for relying uncritically on borrowed language and categories of analysis that fail to capture the Filipino worldview . He argues that these studies often use Philippine norms merely as labels, with insufficient research and understanding of their deeper significance . Furthermore, Enriquez claims that such studies overlook the indigenous perspective, failing to recognize the organization and logic of values as viewed indigenously .

The indigenous Filipino value system, with its focus on "kapwa" and "pakiramdam," implies that social work practice in the Philippines should be culturally sensitive and community-oriented . Practitioners need to understand these values in the context of interpersonal dynamics and community roles. Applying these insights can guide social workers in effectively engaging with clients by valuing shared identities and empathetic understanding .

"Pakiramdam" is a pivotal interpersonal value in the Filipino value system, which refers to a shared inner perception and heightened sensitivity . It is a precondition for surface values like "pakikisama" and "utang na loob," as well as "hiya" . It embodies a social dimension concerning one's "loob" or recognition of an individual's uniqueness and is critical for interpersonal relationships, impacting behaviors like teasing and resentment .

Symbolic interactionism, coined by Herbert Blumer, views people as active beings who interpret and give meanings to objects and situations, contrary to the view of people as passive beings who react to stimuli . It emphasizes that meanings are derived from social interactions and adjusted through interpretative processes, allowing individuals to actively shape their behavior rather than simply responding to external stimuli .

"Hiya," a surface value representing social propriety and respect, is deeply rooted in "pakiramdam," which is a foundational interpersonal value of sensitivity and shared perception . Without "pakiramdam," individuals may lack the sensitivity necessary to experience "hiya," as it relies on understanding others' emotions and expectations . Thus, "pakiramdam" facilitates the expression of "hiya" by fostering mutual awareness and empathy in interpersonal interactions .

Symbolic interactionism remains relevant in understanding contemporary social interactions by highlighting the agency individuals have in interpreting and responding to social cues . It provides a framework for analyzing how meanings are constructed and altered through interactions in various contexts, such as digital communication platforms and multicultural societies . This perspective aids in comprehending how identity and social roles evolve dynamically, emphasizing active engagement in meaning-making processes .

Self-interaction in symbolic interactionism, as suggested by George Herbert Mead, allows individuals to become objects of their own actions. This mechanism enables them to interpret the world and organize actions based on this interpretation, moving away from the idea of humans as mere responding organisms . Instead of passively reacting to stimuli, individuals actively evaluate and modify their behaviors through self-reflection and internal dialogues .

The "kapwa" psychology proposed by Virgilio Enriquez refers to an extended sense of identity or shared inner-self, offering a non-reductionist alternative to the surface idea of smooth interpersonal relations . It serves as the core of the Filipino value system, emphasizing the interconnected self and social identity . This concept is significant as it provides a framework for understanding deeper, socio-cultural interactions among Filipinos, beyond individualistic interpretations .

You might also like