0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views3 pages

US-China Tensions and Africa's Future

English

Uploaded by

oliviaquadjovie
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views3 pages

US-China Tensions and Africa's Future

English

Uploaded by

oliviaquadjovie
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

AMC :

How do the tensions between the US and China impacts Africa ?

Intro :
China and the U.S have experienced periods of tensions since 1949, but
these tensions have not disappeared, on the contrary they have intensified.
China is the world’s second largest economy under the USA and they are
now in a trade war which negatively impacts Africa. Not to mention Africa
is now an area competition and both China and the USA WN
Part I :
Again, Africa has become an area of competition, this time primarily between China
and the West, with important implications for the continent’s development potential
given the dire impact of superpower competition previously.
China’s activities in Africa began with Beijing’s support of liberation movements
fighting colonial rule. Beginning in the late 1990s, China’s commercial engagement
intensified, being formalized in 2013 with the Belt and Road Initiative, a well-resourced
effort to build political influence and grow commercial relationships throughout the
developing world. Key activities include lending for infrastructure development
engineered and constructed by Chinese companies and resource extraction by
Chinese mining and energy firms. While certain countries, including Ethiopia, Angola
and Zambia, have been a priority, China has grown its presence in most every African
country. Over the decades since the Cold War, Chinese influence in Africa has
increased significantly, while U.S. influence has flatlined.

African leaders recall with concern the Cold War, when the United States and Soviet
Union fought proxy wars in Africa, making them wary of great power rivalry. Some
Africans view China as a positive development model. This favorable impression is
actively cultivated by Chinese diplomacy throughout Africa. Sometimes U.S. interests
will require pressuring Africans to choose, such as when the United States pressed
African states to vote to condemn Russia’s brazen invasion of Ukraine at the United
Nations (China abstained). But in general, U.S. diplomacy in Africa will be more
effective when it’s not framed as an “us-or-them” proposition, especially versus China.
Early in the Biden administration, Secretary of State Antony Blinken told allies that the
United States would not expect them to choose between Washington and Beijing. This
approach, however, will come under increasing pressure if relations between the two
major powers worsen.

Géraud Neema (GN): We believe it’s the same old same old. Africans don’t want to
pick sides between China and Western countries, we want the freedom to choose. We
can’t deny that the amount of money China has spent has changed Africa for the
better. Many African countries will say that when we needed money, you [Western
countries] weren’t there. China was though, despite the conditions. Moving forward, in
terms of values and democracy, the West can serve [as] a model. But when it comes
to political stability and governance, we look at China as a model. It’s a buffet, we
want to have the best of both worlds.
Part II :

U.S. tariffs, combined with several domestic and external pressures, are
slowing down Chinese production and reducing Beijing’s demand for raw
materials from sub-Saharan Africa. Diminished Chinese demand could
further reduce annual exports of $75.26 billion from Africa. A slowdown
in the global economy could lead to a decline in demand for Africa’s
exports
Part III :

U.S. officials have expressed concern over China’s military activities in Africa. In
2017, China completed its first overseas military base in Djibouti. There have
been reports of China looking to build naval bases on Africa’s Atlantic Ocean
coast, including in Equatorial Guinea, where Chinese companies have
constructed and upgraded port facilities. Equatorial Guinea is indebted to
China, raising speculation of Beijing using its economic leverage to acquire a
port, which rightly concerns the Pentagon. This led the Biden administration
to ramp-up engagement with Equatorial Guinea.

Americans and Africans have a shared interest in seeing business practices


throughout Africa become more transparent. Waste, fraud and abuse happen
outside of public scrutiny. Africans in several countries are pressing for greater
transparency of their government’s business dealings. This includes in Kenya,
where parliamentarians and civil society successfully pressed for public
scrutiny of the $5 billion loan agreement Kenya made with the Export–Import
Bank of China to finance the largest infrastructure project in their country’s
history, the now complete Mombasa-Nairobi railway. This exposure overrode a
confidentiality clause, whose usage is now standard practice for Chinese
lending in Africa, raising critical questions about accountability. Without a
general understanding of project financing terms, it is impossible for Africans to
determine whether infrastructure projects are positively contributing to their
development. U.S. businesses will fare better in more transparent African
markets.

Common questions

Powered by AI

The strategic interests of the United States and China in Africa primarily revolve around access to resources, economic opportunities, and geopolitical influence. The U.S. focuses on promoting transparency, democratic values, and countering China's influence, while China's interests are largely economic, involving infrastructure investments and resource extraction under initiatives like the Belt and Road. China's military presence aims to secure these interests further. These strategic goals influence Africa's political and economic landscape by encouraging infrastructural development and international trade. However, they also risk fueling dependency on foreign powers and fostering political conditions that may not align with Western democratic practices .

Africa can manage its relations with China and the United States by adopting a non-aligned diplomatic stance that capitalizes on opportunities from both powers while minimizing geopolitical risks. By maintaining sovereignty and encouraging transparent, fair international business practices, African nations can negotiate terms that enhance economic benefits without over-reliance on any single country. This involves a strategic blend of Chinese economic investments, tailored to meet critical infrastructure needs, and Western support for governance improvements and capacity building. Engaging in regional cooperation can strengthen bargaining positions, ensuring that Africa's growth is the primary focus rather than being secondary to global power dynamics .

African countries often face significant transparency challenges in international business dealings, as highlighted by Kenya's $5 billion loan agreement with the Export-Import Bank of China for the Mombasa-Nairobi railway project. Confidentiality clauses in such agreements are standard practice for Chinese loans in Africa, obscuring the terms and complicating accountability efforts. In Kenya, public pressure led to greater scrutiny of this agreement, demonstrating the challenges in achieving transparency. Without clear understanding and disclosure of project financing terms, it becomes difficult for Africans to assess the impact on development and prevent waste or corruption, hampering economic growth and governance improvements .

China's military presence in Africa, marked by the establishment of its first overseas military base in Djibouti and considering additional bases, carries strategic significance impacting U.S.-Africa relations. This presence allows China to protect its commercial interests and expand its geopolitical influence, which raises concerns for the United States, particularly about potential strategic encroachment and security threats. The Pentagon is especially worried about China's economic leverage translating into military influence, such as potentially acquiring a port in Equatorial Guinea. These developments compel the U.S. to increase its diplomatic and strategic engagements with African nations to counterbalance China's influence, ensuring mutual interests and security are upheld .

Reduced Chinese demand for raw materials, exacerbated by U.S. tariffs and global economic pressures, poses significant risks to African economies. With diminished demand from China, Africa's annual exports, which currently stand at $75.26 billion, could further decline, potentially leading to economic instability in many sub-Saharan countries dependent on these exports. This slowdown may hamper economic growth and reduce foreign exchange earnings necessary for infrastructure and development projects, deeply impacting countries that are financially reliant on raw material exports .

China's economic involvement in Africa is characterized by massive infrastructure investments and extensive resource extraction activities, often through loans and construction projects handled by Chinese companies. China's approach has led to increased political and commercial ties, and some African leaders see it as a development model due to the financial support provided when needed . On the other hand, the United States remains more cautious, preferring diplomatic engagement without forcing African states to choose sides between Washington and Beijing. These differing approaches have led to varied perceptions: while some Africans see China as a positive influence due to its investments, the U.S. is viewed as a more stable and values-driven partner, albeit less engaged financially .

U.S. tariffs play a significant role in influencing China's economic engagement by slowing down Chinese production and reducing demand for African raw materials. This policy, coupled with internal and external pressures, could lead to decreased Chinese imports from Africa, potentially reducing Africa's annual exports drastically. This decrease affects African economies that rely heavily on such exports for their economic stability and growth, exacerbating financial challenges and reducing development funding from foreign income .

The "us-or-them" approach in U.S. diplomacy towards Africa has limitations in effectiveness, especially as China strengthens relations in the region. Historically, African nations have resisted choosing sides in global power struggles, valuing their autonomy in international relations. While the U.S. attempts to frame diplomatic efforts without requiring African states to choose between Washington and Beijing, this is challenged by increasing bilateral tensions. American diplomacy may be more successful when emphasizing mutual benefits and avoiding binary choices, although pressure tactics have been used in scenarios like voting against Russia's actions in Ukraine. This indicates a need for a more nuanced approach that respects African countries' desires to benefit from both China's investments and the West's developmental models .

The U.S.-China tensions impact Africa's development prospects significantly, as the continent becomes an area of competition between these major powers. Historically, superpower competition during the Cold War led to destructive proxy wars, which African leaders are wary of repeating. Currently, China's influence in Africa has grown substantially compared to the U.S., due to its energetic commercial engagement and initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative. This has fostered a favorable perception of China in some African countries as a development model. Nonetheless, the competition between the U.S. and China risks destabilizing Africa if it forces countries to choose sides, affecting their ability to independently develop and manage relations with external powers .

The competition between China and Western countries is influencing African governance and development models by providing diverse models from which African countries can learn. While the West offers a model based on democratic values and human rights, many African nations view China's model of political stability and rapid development favorably. This competition allows African countries to select aspects of each model that best suit their national context, potentially leading to hybrid governance structures that blend elements of democracy with economic policies focused on rapid infrastructure development . This buffet approach enables African states to pursue growth while tailoring governance styles that maintain stability and sovereignty.

You might also like