0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views4 pages

KP Operations and Settlement Effectiveness

Uploaded by

Aaron
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views4 pages

KP Operations and Settlement Effectiveness

Uploaded by

Aaron
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

I.

EFFICIENCY IN OPERATIONS 42

 Observance of Settlement Procedure and Settlement Deadlines 20


 Systematic Maintenance of Records 5
 Timely Submission of Reports to Concerned Agencies 7
 Conduct of monthly meetings exclusively on KP matters 10

II. EFFECTIVENESS IN SECURING THE SETTLEMENT OF INTERPERSONAL


DISPUTE OBJECTIVE OF THE KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY (KP) 20

 Quantity of settled cases against filed 10


 Quality of Settlement of Cases 2
 At least 80% compliance with the terms of settlement or award after the cases
have been settled 8

III. CREATIVITY AND RESOURCEFULNESS OF THE LUPONG


TAGAPAMAYAPA
30
 Settlement Technique 10
 Coordination with concerned agencies relating to disputes filed 5
 Sustained information drive to promote KP 5
 KP Training or seminar within the assessment period 10

I. EFFICIENCY IN OPERATIONS 35

 Observance of Settlement Procedure and Settlement Deadlines 15


 Systematic Maintenance of Records 5
 Timely Submission of Reports to Concerned Agencies 5
 Conduct of monthly meetings exclusively on KP matters 10

II. EFFECTIVENESS IN SECURING THE SETTLEMENT OF INTERPERSONAL


DISPUTE OBJECTIVE OF THE KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY (KP) 30

 Quantity of settled cases against filed 10


 Quality of Settlement of Cases 10
 At least 80% compliance with the terms of settlement or award after the cases
have been settled 10

III. CREATIVITY AND RESOURCEFULNESS OF THE LUPONG


TAGAPAMAYAPA 25

Settlement Technique 5
Describe the settlement technique used by the Lupong Tagapamayapa and explain
briefly how each settlement technique helps in the speedy settlement of disputes and
attached two (2) photos with caption of application of each settlement technique.

Coordination with concerned agencies relating to disputes filed 5


Coordination with Concerned Agencies relating to disputes filed (PNP, DSWD,
DILG, DAR, DENR, Office of the Prosecutor, Court/s, DOJ, CHR, volunteer
groups/organizations, NGOs, CSOs, Barangay Justice Advocates)
 Explain briefly how the Lupong Tagapamayapa coordinates with concerned
agencies relating to disputes filed.
 Attach proofs of coordination such as any form of communication such as letters,
emails or any written or verifiable means of communication, two (2) Photos with
caption, Visitor's Log Book dated within the assessment period.

Sustained information drive to promote Katarungang Pambarangay 5


 Identify and briefly explain each information drive strategies practiced by the
Lupong Tagapamayapa to create greater awareness to the community in promoting
Katarungang Pambarangay (KP)
 Attached two (2) photos with caption of the information drive used by the Lupong
Tagapamayapa in the promotion of KP in their community.

Note: Innovative Campaign Strategy Examples: Use of social media such as FB and other
innovative strategies like distribution of flyers, installation of tarpaulins or information
board about KP.

D. KP Training or seminar within the assessment period 10

 Conducted by the Barangay- Kindly fill-out the information needed in the table
below. Provide brief explanation about the training and attached two (2) photos
with caption of each training conducted and attended.
 First line is filled-out as guide. - Training conducted by government or non-
government organizations participated by Lupon members
 Building structure or space- Please describe briefly the building structure or space
provided by the Barangay exclusively for KP and Lupong Tagapamayapa
concerns and attach three (3) photos with caption.

Note: Area or Facility should have table and chairs to accommodate the
parties and the Lupon and record book or computer for documentation
purposes. It should also have a filing cabinet/s where KP documents are
maintained.

 City, Municipal or Provincial Government and NGAs


 People’s Organization, NGOs or Private Sector and others

 Explain briefly how the Lupong Tagapamayapa was able to acquire such
grant from those provided in the criteria.

 Please attach proof of granting a support such as Deed of Donation, MOA,


Resolution, Appropriation Ordinance of higher Sanggunian,
Acknowledgment Receipt, Vouchers, etc.
Settled Cases are those cases that undergone KP process such as Mediation, Conciliation
and Arbitration without repudiation and recurrence of cases settled by the Lupon.

Unsettled Cases are defined as follows:


 Dismissed Cases –cases where complainant and/or respondent after due notice,
refuses or willfully fails to appear without justifiable reason on the date set for
mediation, conciliation or arbitration. Such dismissal ordered by the Punong
Barangay/Pangkat Chairman after giving the complainant and/or respondent an
opportunity to explain his non-appearance shall be certified by the Lupon or
Pangkat Secretary as the case may be, and shall bar the complainant and/or
respondent from seeking judicial recourse for the same cause of action as that
dismissed.
 Pending - those cases which have been filed within assessment period but was not
able to settle within the assessment period.
 Dropped/Withdrawn - cases where either party shows no intention to continue the
process of settling their dispute and decided to withdraw or dropped the case in the
Barangay level. This should be proven by a written document signed by both
parties stating their lack of intention to continue the case.
 Repudiated is where one of the parties refused to perform the settlement or the
arbitration award and file a repudiation to the Punong Barangay within the
prescribed period set under the Revised Katarungang Pambarangay Law. Within
10 days from the date of settlement in case of settlement agreement while within
five (5) days from the date of the arbitration award.

Outside the Jurisdiction of the Barangay. These are cases which may be brought
to the Barangay level but shall only be recorded in the Barangay and later on endorsed
to the proper office which can give it the appropriate action. This is not included in the
total number of cases filed.
NATURE OF CASES ACTION TAKEN
(1) SETTLED NOT SETTLED
(2) (3) OUTSIDE
CERTIFI BUDGET
DROP- THE TOTAL
CONCI ED TO ALLO-
CRI MEDI ARBIT- DIS- REPU- PED/ JURISDICTIO (cases
CIVI OTHER TOTA - TOTA PEN- FILE TOTA CATED
MI- A- RATIO MISSE DIATE WITH-- N OF THE filed)
L S L LIATIO L DING ACTION L (6)
NAL TION N D D DRAW BARANGAY
(1b) (1c) (1D) N (2D) (3a) IN (3F) (5)
(1a) (2a) (2c) (3b) (3c) N
(2b) COURT
(3e)
(3d)

Common questions

Powered by AI

The Lupong Tagapamayapa coordinates with external agencies such as the PNP, DSWD, and the Department of Justice to facilitate comprehensive settlement processes . By engaging these agencies, they ensure that all aspects of the dispute are considered and handled appropriately, leveraging additional resources and expertise for more effective resolutions .

The Lupong Tagapamayapa employs several strategies to ensure efficient and timely settlement of disputes. These include systematic maintenance of records, timely submission of reports to concerned agencies, and conducting monthly meetings on KP matters . By ensuring the observance of settlement procedures and deadlines, they align with the objectives of the Katarungang Pambarangay, which focus on the effective settlement of disputes and compliance with settlement terms .

The structure and space provided by the Barangay, equipped with necessary facilities like tables, chairs, and record-keeping tools, significantly influence the operations of the Lupong Tagapamayapa by providing a dedicated environment conducive to conducting mediation, conciliation, and other dispute resolution activities effectively . This infrastructure underpins the logistical side of the KP processes, ensuring that cases are addressed professionally and consistently .

The Katarungang Pambarangay ensures compliance through monitoring adherence to settlement terms, aiming for at least 80% compliance . This involves continuous engagement with the parties involved to ensure that the agreed-upon terms are honored and implementing follow-up mechanisms to address any lapses promptly .

Unsettled cases within the KP system fall into categories such as dismissed, pending, dropped/withdrawn, or repudiated . These cases have implications such as preventing parties from seeking judicial recourse if a case is dismissed and indicating potential challenges in the KP process that need addressing, such as ensuring parties' commitment and availability .

Creativity and resourcefulness contribute significantly to the effectiveness of the Katarungang Pambarangay system by employing innovative settlement techniques, coordinating with relevant agencies, and conducting sustained information drives to promote KP . These strategies help address disputes in a more comprehensive manner and educate the community about the KP system, increasing the likelihood of successful settlements .

Systematic record maintenance impacts the Katarungang Pambarangay by ensuring accurate documentation of disputes, enabling thorough analysis and tracking of cases over time . This promotes transparency, accountability, and helps in identifying patterns or recurring issues, ultimately enhancing decision-making processes and operational effectiveness .

Continuous learning is cultivated through KP training or seminars conducted within the assessment period, often organized with participation from government or non-government organizations . These sessions are designed to enhance the skills of members in dispute resolution and increase their effectiveness in managing community conflicts .

Critical components include observance of settlement procedures, systematic record maintenance, timely report submission, and monthly KP meetings . These components are essential as they ensure that disputes are managed systematically and responsively, maintaining trust in the Barangay's capacity to resolve issues efficiently. Compliance with these components directly impacts the quality and speed of dispute resolution .

The use of innovative communication strategies, such as social media, flyers, and tarpaulins, aids the promotion of KP by increasing visibility and accessibility of information to the community . These methods help demystify the KP process, encourage community participation, and enhance understanding of its benefits, thereby strengthening its position in local conflict resolution.

You might also like