Which way are cryptocurrencies headed?
The emerging view is that virtual digital assets (VDAs) and cryptocurrencies shall remain
part of the formal economy for the long haul and that discouraging their existence is not
a solution. This is a reasonable inference since India is one of the largest markets for
cryptocurrencies. Imposing a unilateral blanket ban is not wise. The finance minister
shared a reasoned view that the decision to ban or prohibiting these intriguing assets
should be undertaken after “significant international collaboration on the risks, benefits,
evolution of common taxonomy and standards.”
A fiat currency supported by the Indian rupee would facilitate speedier and low-cost
inward remittances as well as fast worldwide payments. However, there is scepticism
about its acceptability as a store of retail value. With the Reserve Bank of India (RBI)
undertaking its inescapable journey of the digital rupee as a Central Bank Digital Currency
(CBDC), keeping a close eye on developments outside India’s political and financial
capitals is crucial. Understanding how other countries are going about adopting and
regulating their CBDCs will be as important as assessing the impact on commercial and
retail banking.
The recent rapid meltdown in the crypto market has further cemented this view. In the
past several weeks, more investors have exited the crypto markets rather than enter it.
Vault, a once promising digital asset-based borrowing and lending platform founded in
2018, is one of many projects that have collapsed recently. The majority of investors and
users of Singapore-based Vault are Indians. These developments correlated with the
precipitous decline in the value of crypto assets, including Terra UST and Luna.
Several decentralized finance (DeFi) projects were considered big, but they failed to
preserve the wealth of the investors. The resulting erosion of billions of dollars from the
market dented the confidence and value ascribed to the evolving global DeFi ecosystem.
In the aftermath of these financially destructive events, the Governor of RBI reiterated
that cryptocurrencies are a “clear danger” and a “make-believe idea” with a sophisticated
name.
At the time of writing this article, Bitcoin and some other strong cryptocurrencies and
stable coins are making a gradual recovery. Unlike previous trends where prices of most
cryptocurrencies were away with the fairies, the markets will not be witnessing a striking
boom for some time. Nevertheless, it would be a gaffe for regulators and investors to
assume that crypto markets have lost their footing.
Page 1 of 69
The first step towards indirectly curbing crypto trading was taken in the announcement of
the Union Budget in March 2022. The finance minister (FM) announced the imposition of
a 30% tax for transactions in digital assets from July 2022. Confusion prevailed in the
industry and tax circles about the real meaning and operational dynamics that might be
caught between the traditional ways of taxation and the unconventional nature of the
technological beast.
In the same budget speech of March 2022, the FM announced that India would be
releasing its own digital currency as a digital rupee to give the economy a big boost. It is
important to understand that although CBDCs are significantly dissimilar from
cryptocurrencies, regulatory bodies are racing to develop a fiat-based model that would
integrate the most exemplary characteristics of the crypto environment.
The looming uncertainty in the Indian regulatory environment pushed the Internet and the
Mobile Association of India (IAMAI) to dissolve the Blockchain and Crypto Assets Council
(BACC) in July 2022. Three days later, replying to questions in the Parliament, the FM
alluded to two key messages. She stated that digital or crypto currency cannot be treated
as ‘currency’, and their value rests solely on the speculations and expectations of high
returns that are not well anchored. Some clarity emerged when last month, the Lok Sabha
cleared the Finance Bill 2022 giving its approval to the proposal of taxing VDAs (or, crypto
tax) in India.
The advocates of a stable cryptocurrency ecosystem have been arguing that as digital
assets and their foundational technical architecture gain momentum and recognition over
time, the volatility would reduce and security of the technical architecture would
strengthen. Only time will tell if this claim will hold true. But systems need to be built ahead
in time so that small-time investors do not see their wealth erode. These stakeholders
have extended arguments criticising RBI's conservative approach towards a promising
technology.
We can be sure that there will be synergies and non-complementarities that will have
implications for the profitability of some financial institutions. When combined with the
dual dynamics of Open Data Policy and inter-industry digital ecology, CBDCs can
accelerate the transformation of the rigid exchange paradigm that exists today to an
innovative, technology-led, equitable paradigm of the future.
The RBI has been candid about its aversion towards cryptocurrencies, which it believes
to be risky and disruptive to the financial system. In a circular released last year, RBI
urged regulated entities to proceed in carrying out customer due diligence procedures for
Page 2 of 69
digital asset transactions in accordance with regulations for KYC (Know Your Customer),
AML (Anti-Money Laundering), CFT (Combating Financing of Terrorism), and
commitments under the PMLA (Prevention of Money Laundering Act), 2002. The
objective was to ensure adherence with applicable provisions under the Foreign
Exchange Management Act for all kinds of digital overseas transactions.
While countries are polarised in how and what kind of regulations should be framed, there
is consensus that the crypto markets must be regulated. Instead of adopting the traditional
methods of taxation, India can take some inspiration from other countries to create
legislations to monitor, regulate and tax digital assets.
The current stand of the United States (US) Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
is that the crypto tokens and stable coins must be treated as ‘securities’ irrespective of
how much and where investors channel their money. The UAE government is putting in
place a system for digital assets to be reported to tackle money laundering in real estate
and anti-terrorism laws.
Japan and Australia have accorded legal status to cryptocurrencies. China, US, and the
UK have created frameworks to keep a close check on them. The Financial Conduct
Authority of Britain is firm on the need for harmonised international norms that govern the
cryptocurrency market. Singapore, the hub of cryptocurrency companies, has recently
released regulations for its crypto-players. The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS)
currently monitors the digital asset sector through laws prohibiting money-laundering and
terrorism. MAS is proactively thinking about creating and strengthening a forum where
users or investors can lodge complaints for fraud committed by crypto companies,
platforms or exchanges.
Russia, a critical node in the global cryptocurrency ecosystem, has expressed concerns
of potential financial instability of digital assets due to extreme volatility. However, Russia
continues to allow the use of cryptocurrencies for international settlements along with
related transactions in digital assets. This will help track transactions and identify users –
an anathema to the crypto community that considers anonymity, encryption and
untraceability as the holy grail of the system. The point is that Russia avoided a knee-jerk
reaction of imposing a blanket ban or a blanket tax net.
The plummeting of crypto valuations could be linked with the larger macroeconomic
fluctuations, including inflationary pressures, bull run in the equity markets, outflow of FIIs,
and global shocks in metals and crude oil. Some believe that the risk profile of crypto
markets is NOW similar to those of oil prices and technology stocks. However, data also
Page 3 of 69
suggests that while the overall value of the crypto market tumbled by two-thirds to $1
trillion, there is still unwavering faith in the future of crypto and blockchain technology.
Despite the hit the sector took in the past few months, large investors and venture
capitalists are not pulling their money out. In fact, they have been pouring more money
than the last year into digital currencies, digital financials backed by blockchain, and
fintech startups that have promising use case for these technologies. The Indian
government is also trying to move forward. RBI hiking the repo rate by 50 basis points to
5.4% to control surging inflation is unlikely to impact the prices or trade pressures in the
crypto market in India.
At the end of the day, if we believe in market efficiency view, then prices of major
cryptocurrencies are a reflection of the overall assessment of the future prospects of
digital assets. There is a need to have serious deliberations on the rules, regulations, and
laws governing sale, purchase, investment, transfer and overseas transactions in
cryptocurrencies. For this to happen, globally harmonised international rules and
standards are vital for all stakeholders.
The article has been authored by Ashish Bharadwaj, dean, O.P. Jindal Global University
and Parishti Kaushik, law student, Gujarat National Law University.
[This article was published in the Hindustan Times and can be accessed through
this link.]
Page 4 of 69