Subsequent Disbursement Testing Procedures
Subsequent Disbursement Testing Procedures
authorization or signature
AUDIT OBJECTIVE TYPICAL AUDIT PROCEDURES ● Recorded cash disbursements are ● Compare cancelled checks/EFT w/ the
accurate PJ and cash disbursements journal
● Recorded acquisitions are for goods and ● Review Purchases Journal, General entries
services received Ledger, and A/P master file for large or ● Recalculate cash discounts
unusual amounts ● Reconcile recorded cash disbursements
● Examine underlying documents for w/ the cash disbursements on bank
statement
reasonableness
● Cash Disbursements transactions are ● Test mathematical accuracy by footing
● Existing acquisitions are recorded ● Trace from a file of receiving report to correctly included in the A/P subsidiary the journals and tracing postings to GL,
record and are correctly summarized A/P subsidiary records
PJ
● Cash Disbursements are correctly ● Compare classification w/ chart of
● Trace from a file of VI and trace to PJ classified accounts
● Search for unrecorded liabilities ● Cash Disbursements are recorded on ● Compare dates on cancelled checks/
correct dates Electronics file transfer (EFT) with the
● Recorded acquisitions are accurate ● Recalculate mathematical accuracy of Cash Disbursements Journal
VI including discounts and freight ● Disbursements are properly aggregated ● Read contracts/terms & agreements
and disclosed in the Financial with supplier
● Acquisitions are correctly included in the ● Test mathematical accuracy by footing Statements ● Discuss with the client management
A/P and Inventory subsidiary records the journals and tracing postings to GL,
A/P, and Inventory subsidiary records
1. Substantive Analytical Procedures for A/P
● Acquisitions are correctly classified ● Compare classification w/ chart of accts
SUBSTANTIVE ANALYTICAL POSSIBLE MISSTATEMENT
● Acquisitions are recorded on correct ● Compare dates of RR and VI with PJ PROCEDURE
dates ● Compare acquisition-related expense ● Misstatement of A/P and Expenses
account balances with prior periods
● Acquisitions are properly aggregated ● Read contracts/terms & agreements ● Review list of A/P for unusual, ● Classification misstatement for
and disclosed with supplier non-operating, and interest bearing non-trade liabilities
● Discuss with the client management payables
● Compare individual A/P with previous ● Unrecorded or non-existent accounts or
years misstatements
● Calculate ratios ● Misstatement in A/P and related
2. Substantive Tests of Transactions over Cash Disbursements expenses
5. Assess Control Risk for acquisition and payment cycle Ex. Inventory turnover. To determine whether
● Auditors assess CR for A/P after setting performance materiality and COGS and purchases are (reasonable?)
assessing ROMM
● The effectiveness of ICs over p2p cycle can impact the auditor’s STs over A/P
● Effective ICs, such as pre-numbered vouchers and automatic reconciliation, 8. Design TODs of A/P and related disclosures
can reduce the need for extensive audit efforts to verify A/P
● While inadequate ICs, such as lack of RRs and delayed payment of bills, can AUDIT OBJECTIVE TYPICAL AUDIT PROCEDURES
increase the likelihood of understatement in A/P and require extensive testing
● A/P in A/P List agree with related master ● Verify mathematical accuracy of the A/P
to verify accuracy
file (aka subsidiary record), and the total subsidiary record (or ledger)
● Monthly reconciliation of vendor statements and A/P master file w/ the GL
is correctly added and agrees w/ the GL - Review PJ.
should be performed.
● Trace the total of SL against the GL
● After assessing CR, auditor design and performs TOCs and STs of
● Trace individual vendor’s invoices to
Transactions for acquisitions and cash disbursements
subsidiary record for names and
amounts
6. Design and Perform TOCs and STs of Transacts for acquisition and payment
● A/P in the A/P List liabilities ● Trace from A/P List to vendor’s invoices
and statements
- We can vouch from A/P List to
Vendor’s invoices & statements
7. Design and Perform Substantive Analytical Procedures for A/P
● Confirm A/P with the supplier, liabilities, long-term payables, and debit
emphasizing large and unusual amounts balances (if material) are appropriately
- Often not necessary, because presented and disclosed
suppliers usually sends - Whether correct info related to
supplier statements periodically purchases are disclosed
- Problem is—statements are
often acquired from the client
because suppliers sends it to 9. Test of Details for Accounts Payable
them, hence reliability is o Auditing liabilities focuses on detecting understated or omitted liabilities to avoid
diminished legal liability
- That is why, if the auditor
believes there is a need for o Auditors should also design tests to detect material understatement of earnings
confirmation, he must ask the and owner’s equity, including those arising from material overstatements of A/P
supplier to send them a copy - But overstatement of liabilities is possible also. Because its corresponding
● Existing A/P are included in the A/P List ● Perform search for unrecorded A/P expenses will be recorded higher, the earnings will be understated. This is
- Highlight of audit of liab possibly done to evade taxes
● A/P in the A/P List are accurate ● Perform same procedures as those - Hence, the tests to be performed must be both for completeness,
used for existence objective & search occurence and existence
for unrecorded A/P
- Ex. Vouching; o The balance-related audit objectives for verifying liabilities are similar to those of
- Ex. Recalculate the VI receivables, with minor modifications
- Recalculate/ verify the
mathematical accuracy of the o Realizable value and rights aspects are not applicable to liabilities, and the focus is
ledgers on detecting understatements. Auditor tests the obligations aspect instead of rights
● Transactions in the acquisition and ● Perform search for unrecorded liabilities
payment cycle are recorded in the ● Perform purchase cut-off test o The auditor’s procedures depend on the nature of the entity, materiality of A/P,
proper period - To determine whether effectiveness of ICs, and inherent risk
purchases are recorded in the
correct accounting period
● Perform tracing Primary Audit Procedure: Search for Unrecorded Liabilities
- From source docu to acctng o Examine underlying documentation for subsequent cash disbursements
rec - Ex. The client has a policy regarding paying the suppliers w/in 30 days from the
● Perform detailed tests as part of date of invoice.
physical observation of inventory - But the auditor saw, that on 1st week of january, they made a payment for merch.
● Test for inventory in transit - This means that the purchase happened on the prior year.
● A/P in the A/P List are correctly ● Review the list of subsidiary record for - Hence, the auditor should conclude that it is part of the liabilities as of December
classified related parties, notes, or other 31.
interest-bearing liabilities, long-term - Therefore, that purchase must be traced if it is recorded as part of the liability in the
payables, and debit balances FS of the client as of December 331.
- Review A/P List or A/P SL for - And if it turned out that it is not part of the liabilities as of December 31, it will be a
unusual items. Non-trade or case of unrecorded liability, making liabilities be understated
interest-bearing liabilities must
be excluded from A/P o Examine underlying documentation for invoices not paid several weeks after
● The company has an obligation to pay ● Examine suppliers’ statements, year-end
the liabilities included in the A/P invoices, and confirm A/P - However, not all invoices are paid weeks after year-end, hence this procedure.
- For terms & conditions to - Ex. The client receive billing statement from electric utilities (e.g. MERALCO) or
establish the obligation of client communication companies (e.g. PLDT).
● A/P are properly presented and ● Determine whether related parties, - In that case, billings received few weeks after year-end pertains to utilities incurred
disclosed notes, or other interest-bearing from previous month.
- Hence, even it is not yet paid, it must also be traced back to their accruals as of
December 31.
- So, if those expenditures already incurred in the last period, but not yet recorded
by the entity as of December 31, it is a case of unrecorded liabilities, which also
understates liabilities.
o Trace statements from suppliers that show a balance due to the A/P trial
balance
o Another procedure: use of supplier’s statement which shows the entity’s due
balance as of year-end. If it shows variances, it is a possible unrecorded liabilities
o Cutoff Tests
- GR: once goods are received, liability is recognized
- Relationship of cutoff to physical observation of inventory
- Inventory in transit (include purchase in transit shipped FOB SP)
Reliability Of Evidence
o Supplier’s Invoices
- Supplier sends it every time a client has a transaction with a supplier
o Supplier’s Statement
- At the end of each period, monthly or yearly, a supplier will send a statement of
account summarizing transactions of suppliers with our client during that period
- Includes opening balance of liab, purchases during the period, and payment of
client to the supplier, and the ending bal.
- Recipient: Client
o Confirmation of AP
- Practically, supplier’s statement and confirmation of AP are similar. The only
difference is the recipient.
- Recipient: Auditor directly