0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views28 pages

Sequential Lobing in Tracking Radar

Uploaded by

iker.moreno
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views28 pages

Sequential Lobing in Tracking Radar

Uploaded by

iker.moreno
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

RADIOLOCATION

Tracking Radar

Jordi Mateu
Jordi Berenguer

RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer


Course Contents
I. Introduction to Air Navigation and Surveillance
Functions
II. Pulsed Radar
[Link] Clutter
[Link] Radar
V. Tracking Radar
[Link] Radar (SSR)
[Link] Dependent Surveillance (ADS‐B)
[Link] Radar
[Link]‐collision and Ground Proximity Warning
Systems

RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer


Tracking Radar ‐ Outline
1. Angle Tracking

2. Monopulse Tracking
1. Amplitude Comparison
2. Phase Comparison

3. Canonical Scan & Sequential Scan

4. Limitation of Tracking Accuracy


1. Glint or Angle noise
2. Low noise Tracking

RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer


Tracking Radar

Normal RADAR detects the presence of a Target (Surveillance Sensor).


Nevertheless RADAR may locate targets in space (2D ‐ 3D), track targets and
predict its position.

Types of Tracking RADAR:


• Rapid Tracking of a single target
• High observation rate 100 measures/s
• STT (Single Target Tracking) • Main Appl.: Aircraft & missile tracking

• Tracking of many thousands of aircrafts


• ADT (Automatic Detection Tracking) • Low observation rate 10‐12 measures/s
• Main Appl.: ATC

• Tracking of many thousands of aircrafts


• PART (Phased‐Array Radar Tracking) • High observation rate 100 measures/s
• STT + ADT
• Main Appl.: Air‐defense weapon system
• TWS (Track while scan) • Main Appl.: ATC

RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer


TRACKING RADAR

ANGLE TRACKING

RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer


Tracking Radar: Angle Tracking

Pencil Beam antenna

The antenna switches the beam


between two different angular
Narrow beam <> Large antenna positions, with a SQUINT angle φQ
respect the boresight line.
CONCEPT

a1 a1

a2 a2

 q q  q q

RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer


Tracking Radar: Angle Tracking

Pencil Beam antenna

Narrow beam <> Large antenna

CONCEPT

RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer


Tracking Radar: Angle Tracking

Pencil Beam antenna

Narrow beam <> Large antenna

CONCEPT

RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer


Tracking Radar: Angle Tracking Systems

Angle Tracking

Simulatenous lobbing Time sharing lobbing


(Monopulse) (Canonical & sequential)

Amplitude comparison Phase Comparison

Target Tracking

RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer


ANGLE TRACKING

MONOPULSE RADAR

RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer


Tracking Radar: Monopulse Radar

Simultaneous lobbing Monopulse RADAR

Parabolic Reflector

Feeding horn

RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer


Monopulse Radar with 2 antennas

Tx
Rx Σ

θ
Rx
Δ

Σ Δ

θ θ

RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer


Monopulse Radar: Block diagram

RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer


X‐Band Magic Tee (Hybrid)

|S11| >10dB
Isolation: 20 dB H & E arms
Bandwidth: 9,8 – 10,8GHz

RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer


Monopulse Radar: Two Coordinate Angle
Tracking

Merrill I. Skolnik, “Introduction to Radar Systems”. 3rd. Edition.


Mc Graw Hill 2001

RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer


ANGLE TRACKING

PHASE COMPARISON MONOPULSE

RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer


Angle Tracking: Phase comparison

Interferometric radar

2
 sin 

RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer


ANGLE TRACKING

TIME SHARING LOBE

RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer


Time sharing lobe: SEQUENTIAL LOBING

Limitation of accuracy due to time variation of the compared measurements

RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer


Time sharing lobe: CONICAL SCAN

PRF >> Conical Scan Frequency (CSF)


Minimum PRF > 4∙(CSF)

RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer


Time sharing lobe: CONICAL SCAN

Merrill I. Skolnik, “Introduction to Radar Systems”. 3rd. Edition.


Mc Graw Hill 2001

RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer


LIMITATIONS TO TRACKING
ACCURACY

RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer


Glint or Noise angle

RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer


Glint from complex targets

One possible solution to solve it, is to


make use of frequency agility, with a
minimum frequency separation of



2

being D the target depth.


Merrill I. Skolnik, “Introduction to Radar Systems”. 3rd. Edition.
Mc Graw Hill 2001

RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer


LOW ANGLE TRACKING

RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer


Tracking Radar: Low Angle

RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer


Low angle: Multipath error

• Sidelobe region:
– The surface is illuminated by the near side lobes.
– The degradation begins with an elevation angle < 6 beamwidths
above the horizon.
• Main‐beam region:
– The degradation is severe for an elevation angle < 0,8
beamwidth.
• Horizon region:
– The phase difference between the directed and the reflected
path is more or less equal, that means that the signal is
cancelled at the target, thus providing a very low scattered
signal.

RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer


TRACKING RADAR COMPARISON

Monopulse Conical Scan


SNR 2 to 4 dB > ‐
Precision High Low
Complexity Very High Low
Minimum number of pulses 1 4
Countermeasures Robust Vulnerable

RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer

You might also like