RADIOLOCATION
Tracking Radar
Jordi Mateu
Jordi Berenguer
RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer
Course Contents
I. Introduction to Air Navigation and Surveillance
Functions
II. Pulsed Radar
[Link] Clutter
[Link] Radar
V. Tracking Radar
[Link] Radar (SSR)
[Link] Dependent Surveillance (ADS‐B)
[Link] Radar
[Link]‐collision and Ground Proximity Warning
Systems
RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer
Tracking Radar ‐ Outline
1. Angle Tracking
2. Monopulse Tracking
1. Amplitude Comparison
2. Phase Comparison
3. Canonical Scan & Sequential Scan
4. Limitation of Tracking Accuracy
1. Glint or Angle noise
2. Low noise Tracking
RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer
Tracking Radar
Normal RADAR detects the presence of a Target (Surveillance Sensor).
Nevertheless RADAR may locate targets in space (2D ‐ 3D), track targets and
predict its position.
Types of Tracking RADAR:
• Rapid Tracking of a single target
• High observation rate 100 measures/s
• STT (Single Target Tracking) • Main Appl.: Aircraft & missile tracking
• Tracking of many thousands of aircrafts
• ADT (Automatic Detection Tracking) • Low observation rate 10‐12 measures/s
• Main Appl.: ATC
• Tracking of many thousands of aircrafts
• PART (Phased‐Array Radar Tracking) • High observation rate 100 measures/s
• STT + ADT
• Main Appl.: Air‐defense weapon system
• TWS (Track while scan) • Main Appl.: ATC
RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer
TRACKING RADAR
ANGLE TRACKING
RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer
Tracking Radar: Angle Tracking
Pencil Beam antenna
The antenna switches the beam
between two different angular
Narrow beam <> Large antenna positions, with a SQUINT angle φQ
respect the boresight line.
CONCEPT
a1 a1
a2 a2
q q q q
RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer
Tracking Radar: Angle Tracking
Pencil Beam antenna
Narrow beam <> Large antenna
CONCEPT
RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer
Tracking Radar: Angle Tracking
Pencil Beam antenna
Narrow beam <> Large antenna
CONCEPT
RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer
Tracking Radar: Angle Tracking Systems
Angle Tracking
Simulatenous lobbing Time sharing lobbing
(Monopulse) (Canonical & sequential)
Amplitude comparison Phase Comparison
Target Tracking
RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer
ANGLE TRACKING
MONOPULSE RADAR
RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer
Tracking Radar: Monopulse Radar
Simultaneous lobbing Monopulse RADAR
Parabolic Reflector
Feeding horn
RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer
Monopulse Radar with 2 antennas
Tx
Rx Σ
θ
Rx
Δ
Σ Δ
θ θ
RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer
Monopulse Radar: Block diagram
RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer
X‐Band Magic Tee (Hybrid)
|S11| >10dB
Isolation: 20 dB H & E arms
Bandwidth: 9,8 – 10,8GHz
RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer
Monopulse Radar: Two Coordinate Angle
Tracking
Merrill I. Skolnik, “Introduction to Radar Systems”. 3rd. Edition.
Mc Graw Hill 2001
RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer
ANGLE TRACKING
PHASE COMPARISON MONOPULSE
RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer
Angle Tracking: Phase comparison
Interferometric radar
2
sin
RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer
ANGLE TRACKING
TIME SHARING LOBE
RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer
Time sharing lobe: SEQUENTIAL LOBING
Limitation of accuracy due to time variation of the compared measurements
RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer
Time sharing lobe: CONICAL SCAN
PRF >> Conical Scan Frequency (CSF)
Minimum PRF > 4∙(CSF)
RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer
Time sharing lobe: CONICAL SCAN
Merrill I. Skolnik, “Introduction to Radar Systems”. 3rd. Edition.
Mc Graw Hill 2001
RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer
LIMITATIONS TO TRACKING
ACCURACY
RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer
Glint or Noise angle
RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer
Glint from complex targets
One possible solution to solve it, is to
make use of frequency agility, with a
minimum frequency separation of
⁄
∆
2
being D the target depth.
Merrill I. Skolnik, “Introduction to Radar Systems”. 3rd. Edition.
Mc Graw Hill 2001
RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer
LOW ANGLE TRACKING
RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer
Tracking Radar: Low Angle
RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer
Low angle: Multipath error
• Sidelobe region:
– The surface is illuminated by the near side lobes.
– The degradation begins with an elevation angle < 6 beamwidths
above the horizon.
• Main‐beam region:
– The degradation is severe for an elevation angle < 0,8
beamwidth.
• Horizon region:
– The phase difference between the directed and the reflected
path is more or less equal, that means that the signal is
cancelled at the target, thus providing a very low scattered
signal.
RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer
TRACKING RADAR COMPARISON
Monopulse Conical Scan
SNR 2 to 4 dB > ‐
Precision High Low
Complexity Very High Low
Minimum number of pulses 1 4
Countermeasures Robust Vulnerable
RADIOLOCATION J. Mateu ‐ J. Berenguer