0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views10 pages

Marketing Simulation Models for SMEs

Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views10 pages

Marketing Simulation Models for SMEs

Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice

Volume 6(1), 2014, pp. 501–509, ISSN 1948-9137

MODELS OF MARKETING SIMULATIONS FOR SMES


IN ROMANIA: STRATEGIC GAME FOR
MARKETING MIX SIMULATION

LUMINIŢA PISTOL
[Link]@[Link]
Spiru Haret University
ROCSANA ŢONIŞ (BUCEA-MANEA)
[Link]@[Link]
Spiru Haret University

ABSTRACT. SMEs in Romania are facing a lack of funds for financing, poor
information, inadequate legislative restrictions for developing the economic
environment, low level of accessing European funds etc. Funding problem could be
partially solved if the marketing department did different marketing simulations
before making the marketing budget and the business plan. In this article we review
some of the marketing simulation models that can be achieved without the need for
investment and as a case study we have chosen to simulate a marketing mix
strategy using strategic games.

Keywords: SME marketing simulation game strategy; marketing mix; budget;


linear programming

1. Introduction

Nowadays, the new enterprises are recognized as the main source of job
creation, innovation and development. In today’s business world, new
enterprises are recognized as an important source of job creation,
innovation and development (Azimzadeh, 2013).
Over the world the company has determined its goal mainly at stability,
further at quality, development and profit. Small companies follow more
quality and development, but medium sized companies follow mainly
development and profit (Holátová, 2013).
In the last three years many SMEs in Romania (about 90,000) have
become insolvent. 19,900 of these companies became insolvent in 2009,
501
21,700 in 2010, 24,078 in 2012 and about 28,000 in 2013 as it is shown by
the National Office of the Trade Registry. Only 4-6 % of Romanian firms
entered in insolvency avoided bankruptcy compared to 20 % of EU firms.
One of the management tools that could help SMEs to avoid insolvency
is a well-founded budget.

2. Literature Review

Unfortunately, in her paper work (Sabou, 2009) dedicated to small and


medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) from Maramures County, the author
observed that the number of SMEs that have drawn and used the marketing
budget is small. Furthermore, only 35% of SMEs have a marketing
department, 41% of SMEs have specialized human resources for marketing
activity, 44% of SMEs have the budget for entire activity, 44% of SMEs
have the budget for the marketing activity. Taking into account the
importance of this working tool in managerial activity, namely the budget,
the number of those who use an income and marketing budget in their
activity should be by far greater. This result can sometimes explain the
incertitude that hovers above the SMEs concerning their activities in the
future (Sabou, 2009). SME managers should be better informed and should
have a thorough study of management and marketing, so one can make an
informed decision. Thus, in order to prepare a budget that meets future
market requirements, SME managers can make different marketing
simulations (strategic games, Monte Carlo simulation, decision trees, what
if analysis, joint analysis, Markov chains, Bayesian analysis, distribution
models, marketing forecast, etc.)
 Romanian SMEs can use The Theory of Games which studies
mathematical models in conflictual situations (competitive). Such
situations often arise in business practices that can be resolved through The
Theory of Games, for example, the competitive aspects of the business,
advertising and advertising campaigns to promote products and services on
the market, etc.
 Monte Carlo simulation can be used to
estimate the average return and the level of risk of new products - to
determine the products that will enter the market;
forecast the net income, estimate structural costs, acquisition costs,
determination of net income sensitivity to various risk factors (such as
changes in interest rate and exchange rate fluctuations);
determine the optimal production materials that should be included in
the final product;
determining how many units of each product range can be ordered
from suppliers per time unit
502
choosing the best options of two or more possibilities: extending a
contract or postpone a project;
 Decision trees represent a simple, but relevant tool for the analysis
of multiple variables that apply to very complex decision situations,
involving randomly successive events. The chosen option will be the one
which corresponds to the largest or smallest expected profit loss possibly
with the highest expected value. Using decision trees leads to choosing, for
example, the optimal distribution strategy.
 What-if analysis is a quick way to change the values of calculation
formula so that multiple solutions should result leading to the optimal
choice. It can be used as a tool to estimate the marketing budget or to
determine the optimal mix of products.
 Conjoint analysis is used to analyze and forecast consumer behavior
in relation to new products to be launched on the market or enhancements
to existing products. Conjoint analysis is used to predict possible market
share or profit generated by the introduction of a new product in a market
where competitors’ products are present. Conjoint analysis is used to
design an optimal product concept and to identify the market segments that
would appreciate it.
 In marketing simulations, Markov chains are often use to forecast
market shares of competing products in a given time horizon and to
determine the steady state, at which customers do not switch from one
brand to another, staying loyal to a single brand.
 Product distribution models contain algorithms that address the
special logistics products. These models allow the forecast of products
stocks, calculate the minimum cost of transport in rapport with the
distances to be travelled, the quantities required, the type of means of
transport, the type of product (which requires special transportation
conditions: refrigeration, shock protection, theft, etc.).
 Bayesian models fall into the category of multi-criteria decision
models that are useful for problems with few options: choosing the product
/ price strategy in a well predicted market etc.
 Marketing forecast is often used to estimate the trend, the lifecycle,
seasonal variation and random variation of some time series formed by
sales value, market share, profits, number of employees, expenses, income,
etc. for a certain period of time. Marketing projections are often used in the
last phases of the development of new products, estimation of market
penetration, sales volume and market share.

503
3. Theoretical Substantiation

The Theory of Games studies mathematical models of conflictual


(competitive) situations. A conflictual situation is characterized by the
existence of two or more participants (decision makers) and a set of
alternatives (courses of action) of which they should be free to choose one
or more, with some probability, according to a certain objective - a
conflictual situation in which each participant follows a particular purpose
being independent in choosing their own actions, but dependent on the
results determined by the set of actions, is formalized in game model
(Blajina, 2006). The participants use smart strategies to achieve contrary
objectives such as: maximizing gain, respectively minimizing loss.
In other words, within the strategy games, all the actions of the
participants are taken into account as well as if they comply with the rules
so that the values to be distributed among the players in order to gain. Each
player chooses their own strategy, their own decision rule, in order to make
the best choice among possible variants depending on the probability
distribution of the shares.
The Theory of Games postulates the following assumptions:
- Each participant can choose between action strategies;
- Participants know the strategic alternatives of the opponents;
- The outcome of the game will materialize through a loss or gain;
In many cases the choice of the most suitable strategy for a number of
possible alternatives can be done by using a matrix formulation of the
problem: each row / column will be a strategy (either Ai, i = 1,... m and Bj,
j = 1,..., n, these strategies) and decision criterion will be given the right
choice of strategy (Suciu).

4. Case Study – The Marketing Mix

On the consumer goods market there are two competitors A and B, which
seek to gain a greater number of customers.
 In this respect Company A is considering several strategies for action.
- Increase investment in product quality (Strategy A1);
- Expanding product distribution in depth (strategy A2);
- Price reduction by half in the second product purchased (Strategy A3).
 Company B is to choose one of the strategies of action:
- Expanding public relations - strategy B1;
- Increasing the amount of product, maintaining constant price (strategy
B2);
- Product distribution through supermarkets chain (B3 strategy);
- Developing an enhanced product (strategy B4).
504
Reorient buyers from one company to another as a result of practicing
the strategies mentioned is shown in the matrix below. For example, when
company A chooses strategy A1, and company B chooses B1 strategy, it is
expected that 1% of company A’s customers will change their buying
decision in favor of the company’s products.
Requirements:
The marketing manager wants the evaluation of the results of each
strategy and the identification of the equilibrium points of the matrix game.
Solution:
Matrix M probabilities shift customers from one firm to another:

The game has no pure strategy equilibrium points (Blajina, 2006) because
the maximum of the lowest values in each row { 0, -2, -1 } is 0 and is
different from the minimum of all the maximum values { 1, 2, 1, 3 } in
each column which is 1.
max (min.(mij)) = max {0, -2, -1} = 0 = ml4
i=l,3 j=1,4
min(max(mij )) = min {1, 2, 1, 3} = 1 = m11 = m33.
j=1,4 i=1,3
The game contains no dominated strategies. A strategy is dominated if each
element of a row/column is less than or equal to another element of the
same row/column. Dominated strategy is eliminated.
Since not all elements of the matrix M are greater than 0, we add the
number k = 4 to each element of the matrix M to obtain the matrix M with
all values positives:

5 6 3 4
4 3 2 7
4 2 5 3

We build linear programming problems of maximum and minimum to


determine the optimal mixed strategies of the two players. Assuming a
rational behavior, the firm will seek to maximize the expected gain
regardless of the choice made by competitors. It results the form (1) of
economic and mathematical model which formalizes reasoning company
A.

505
Clearly, for company B, which aims to minimize the loss, similar
reasoning would lead to linear programming model (2):
min(x1+x2+x3) max(y1+y2+y3+y4)
5x1+4x2+4x3>=1 5y1+6y2+3y3+4y4<=1
6x1+3x2+2x3>=1 (1) 4y1+3y2+2y3+7y4<=1 (2)
3x1+2x2+5x3>=1 4y1+2y2+5y3+3y4<=1
4x1+7x2+3x3>=1 y1, y2,y3,y4>=0
x1, x2,x3>=0

Optimal mixed strategy of player I (company A) is obtained by writing


the coefficients of the objective function coefficients restrictions,
limitations and value of the objective function formula in Excel sheet, as
shown in Fig. 1:

The formulas used in G columns:


Restrictions
=SUMPRODUCT(B6:D6;B$11:D$11) >= 1
=SUMPRODUCT(B7:D7;B$11:D$11) >= 1
=SUMPRODUCT(B8:D8;B$11:D$11) >= 1
=SUMPRODUCT(B9:D9;B$11:D$11) >= 1
For the objective function in cell J11 write the
formula:
Objective
function
value =MIN(SUMPRODUCT(B11:D11;B4:D4))
For optimal mixed strategy of player I (Company A) in row 14 are written formulas:

=B11/$J$9 =C11/$J$9 =D11/$J$9

506
After entering formulas in Excel to choose a linear programming model
(Assume Linear Model) with positive (Non-Negative assume) from Menu
Data-Solver (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Setting for a linear model with positive values

Fig. 3. Setting model parameters (cell displays the function value objectively, the
function of min., Cells whose values will be modified and restrictions)

Optimal mixed strategy of Player II is obtained by writing the


coefficients of the objective function coefficients restrictions, limitations
and value of the objective function formula in Excel sheet, as shown in Fig.
4:

507
Fig. 4 Data to the maximization of profit
The formulas used are:
Restrictions
=SUMPRODUCT(B22:E22;B$27:E$27) <= 1
=SUMPRODUCT(B23:E23;B$27:E$27) <= 1
=SUMPRODUCT(B24:E24;B$27:E$27) <= 1
Value of objective
function: =MAX(SUMPRODUCT(B27:E27;B20:E20))
Optimal mixed strategy of Player II
=B27/$J$25 =C27/$J$25 =D27/$J$25
Therefore, matrix game given by the matrix M admits equilibrium in mixed
strategies.
As shown, the outcome is a mixed strategy to obtain a probability
associated with the strategies A1, A2, A3 0.43, 0.1, 0.46 and strategies
associated with B1, B2, B3, B4 of 0, 0.16, 0.5, 0.33, and the value of game
V = 0.3529 (Fig. 1 and 4.)
Company A can count on increased investment in product quality
(Strategy A1) and reduction to half price on the second item bought
(Strategy A3). Company B can rely on product distribution through
supermarket chains (strategy B3) and achieving an enhanced product
(strategy B4).

508
5. Conclusions

After applying The Theory of Games to calculate the marketing mix, it is


obvious that the firm can choose the optimal strategy to minimize
loss/maximize profits in conditions of market competition. Knowing the
optimal strategy fosters the achievement of a more accurate budget,
sustainable. In conclusion, Romanian SME managers must certainly use
simulation models in order to be proactive in market terms.

REFERENCES

Azimzadeh, Seyed Morteza, Brenda Pitts, Mohammad Ehsani, Asadollah


Kordnaeij, (2013), “The Vital Factors for Small and Medium Sized Sport
Enterprises Start-ups,” Asian Social Science 9(5): 243-253.
Blăjină, O. A. (2006), Produse software aplicate în programarea matematică şi
teoria jocurilor. Cluj-Napoca: Albastra, 35.
Holátová, Darja, Monika Březinová (2013), “Basic Characteristics of Small and
Medium-Sized Enterprises in Terms of Their Goals,” International Journal of
Business and Social Science 4(15): n/a.
Ratiu-Suciu, Camelia, Florica Luban, Nadia Ene, Daniela Hincu (2002), Modelarea
şi simularea proceselor economice. Bucharest: Editura ASE.
Sabou, Felicia (2009), “Marketing Budget in Romanian Small and Medium-Sized
Enterprises,” The Proceedings of the International Conference “Marketing -
from Information to Decision.” Cluj-Napoca: Babes Bolyai University, 457-
465.

509
Copyright of Contemporary Readings in Law & Social Justice is the property of Addleton
Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted
to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may
print, download, or email articles for individual use.

You might also like