CONTENT VALIDATION INSTRUMENT
Rating
Items
5 4 3 2 1
1. The directions given are clear in all sections of
the data gathering instrument.
2. Each item is clearly stated.
3. Each item is readable i.e. the items are easily
read.
4. Each item is attractive to read; enough space
is provided to avoid crowding among items.
5. The data gathering instrument is
comprehensive i.e. it covered all areas that
are important in the study.
6. Each item is focused on a particular thought
or idea.
7. The items are objective i.e., the responses to
be elicited are neither biased nor reactive.
8. The items are formulated in accordance to the
explicit/implicit objectives of the study.
9. The items are systematically arranged
according to a desirable sequence.
[Link] items do not overlap with each other; no
duplication of items is observed.
Average weighted mean: ____________
Rate Scale Interpretation
5 4.51-5.00 Highly Valid
4 3.51-4.50 Valid
3 2.51-3.50 Moderately Valid
2 1.51-2.50 Fairly Valid
1 1.00-1.50 Not Valid
Summary and suggestions:
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________
Signature over Printed Name of Expert Validator
Position/Designation
Name of Institution