Work Location XXXXXXX

CORROISON MAPPING INSPECTION REPORT

SUMP TANK (XXXX)

WORK ORDER #:

REPORT:

OCTOBER 2022

ORIGINAL

MPNU USE ONLY

 Report Number
Client:
Contract Number
Date of Inspection 20 OCTOBE
Location
Inspected By
Vessel Operating Procedures
Test Code API 510 Acceptance Criteria Client’s requirement

INTRODUCTION:
At the request of UNM Programmatics Department, Corrosion Mapping Inspection was carried
out on XXXXX) at XXXXXX platform of XXXX facilities.

CONTENTS

Page
S/N Description
No.
1 Summary of Inspection Results
2 Vessel General Data
3 External Visual Inspection
3.1 External Surface of The Vessel
3.2 Auxiliary Components Associated with Vessel
3.3 Instrumentation and Associated Hardware
4 Vessel Photographic Details
5 AUT Corrosion Mapping Inspection
5.1 AUT HydroForm Technique- Introduction and
Limitations
5.2
Sketch Showing AUT Inspection Scheme
5.3
Sketch showing Scan Orientation
5.4
AUT Data Acquisition
5.4.1
Data Acquisition Between Dome Circumferential Welds
5.4.2
Data Acquisition After Dome Circumferential Welds
5.4.3
Data Acquisition Along Vertical Weld Seam
5.4.4
Data on Anomaly Indications- Minimum & Max Inclusion
Depth (Along Vertical weld scan)
5.5
AUT Scan Thickness Data Overview
6 Manual Ultrasonic Thickness Measurement on
Nozzles
7 Ultrasonic Shear Wave Examination of Nozzle
/Shell Circumferential Welds
Annex-1 Data Interpretation of Colour Coding Image
1. SUMMARY OF INSPECTION RESULTS

1.1 Visual Inspection

 Top of tank was seen with heap of blasting grits on it (Photo # 2)
 North shell of tank was seen with light to moderate scattered localized corrosion and
scale build up (Photo # 4)
 Scale build /moderate corrosion on the access ladder attached to the platform toward
the east side of the platform (Photo #26-28)
 Top cover of electric motor was seen cut off due to heavy corrosion (Photo #29)

1.2 AUT Inspection

 Lowest remaining wall thickness of 12.66 mm representing 2.6% wall loss was
observed on the data acquisition @ 100- 150mm index (while scanning along vertical
weld) and 301mm scan area from the top.
 Maximum thickness of 12.96mm representing a wall loss of 0.3% of 13mm
thickness observed @100- 150mm index and 420mm scan area, north of the vessel
as at time of inspections (Ref. details as shown on data acquisition tables).
 Inclusions were noted at varying depths of scan 0-50 scanned area of south shell with a
depth of 6.10mm and 7.22mm (Ref. South shell acquisition 1 on page 23-24 for further
information)

Ref: Page 20 AUT Scan Thickness Data Overview

1.3 MUT inspection

 Nozzles: No significant reduction in thickness noticed.
 Man-way: No significant reduction in thickness noticed.

1.4 Shear wave UT of Welds

 Vessel Circumferential weld no.2: No defect indication noticed.
 Nozzles: No defect indication was noticed from any of the nozzle welds.
 Man-Way: No defect indication was noticed man-way weld.
2. VESSEL GENERAL DATA

Vessel Tag No

Vessel Name
Design Data: Obtained from nameplate
Design Pressure …..PS I at… ° F Maximum Allowable P S I at 200° F
pressure
MDMT …….. PSI Test pressure …. PSI
Size 18’ L X 6’ W X 6’ H Head Thickness 0.375”=9.52m
m
Shell Thickness 0.375”= 9.52mm Vessel Dia. ’’ ID
Empty Wt. 14000 LBS
Serial No. FP-F-1220
Year of manufacture 1996
P.O. No.

.
3. EXTERNAL VISUAL INSPECTION

3.1. External Surface of The Vessel

S/N Vessel Components Observations Photos

3.1.1 Shell And Transition Cone North shell plate with light to moderate
(If Applicable) scattered localized corrosion and scale 04
build up
3.1.2 Lower Head (North Or Scale build / rust stain and patches of
West Head If Horizontal) localized corrosion on North side of tank’s 14
shell
3.1.3 Upper Head (South Or
East Head If Horizontal) -

3.1.4 Nozzles And Man way Manway 1 and 2 with heavy crevice 09, 11
Including Reinforcement corrosion on flange
Pads
3.1.5 Small Piping Connections
-
Including Gussets
3.1.6 Platform, Ladder Or Other Scale build /moderate corrosion on the 26-a28
Attachments Welds To access ladder attached to the platform
Vessel toward the east side of the tank
3.1.7 Lifting Lugs/Trunions
3.1.8 Insulation N/A
-
Support/Vacuum Rings
3.1.9 Skirt/Support Legs

3.1.1 Insulation/ N/A

0 Weatherproofing / -
Insulation Type?
3.2. Auxiliary Components Associated with Vessel
S/N Vessel Components Observation Photos
3.2.1 Platforms And Handrails N/A -

4.2.2 Ladders / Stairways Scale build /moderate corrosion on the

access ladder attached to the platform 26-28
toward the east side of the tank
3.2.3 Pipe Supports, Guides N/A
-
And Braces
3.2.4 Flanges And Associated Coating breakdown, Light to heavy crevice 15-19,
Hardware corrosion on flanges and fasteners 23,24
and 34
3.2.5 Readable Nameplate Name plate is in readable condition but has 13
(Required For ASME moderate corrosion on its sides
Vessels)
3.2.6 Foundation In good condition 05
3.2.7 Foundation Bolts N/A -
3.2.8 Fireproofing / Type? N/A -
3.2.9 Guy Wires N/A -
3.2.1 Safety Valve And Heavy corrosion on the associate valves 32
0 Associated Piping connected to nozzle 10,11, safety switch
board and its support

3.3. Instrumentation and Associated Hardware

S/N Vessel Components Observation Photos

3.3.1 Level Gauges

3.3.2 Pressure Indicating In good condition 31
Gauges/Instruments
3.3.3 Thermowells / N/A
Temperature Indicating -
Instruments
4. PHOTOGRAPHIC DETAILS

Photo # 01: General view of tank

Photo # 02: Top of tank with heap of blasting Photo # 03: View showing North side of tank
grits on it with patches of light to moderate corrosion and
rust stain
 # 04: Close view of North shell of tank with Photo # 05: South side of tank showing AUT
light to moderate scattered localized corrosion grid marks
and scale build up

Photo # 06: East side of tank

Photo # 07: West side of tank pix not taken yet

Photo # 08: Bottom of tank pix not taken yet

 # 09: Manway 2 was seen with crevice on flange, Photo # 10: Manway 1 with heavy crevice
moderate corrosion on associate piping and blasting corrosion on flange and moderate corrosion on
grits on it handle

Photo # 11: Close view of manway 1 with heavy Photo # 12: Close view of manway handle
crevice corrosion on flange with moderate corrosion

# 13: Name plate is in readable condition but has Photo # 14: Scale build / rust stain and patches of
moderate corrosion on its sides localized corrosion on North side of tank’s shell
 # 15: Nozzle 1 has heavy crevice corrosion on Photo # 16: Nozzle 2 has a moderate crevice
flange corrosion on flange

Photo # 17: Nozzle 3 was seen with light crevice Photo # 18: light crevice on Nozzle 4
and coating breakdown on flange flange and moderate corrosion on fasteners

# 19: Nozzle 5 with light coating failure Photo # 20: Nozzle 6 in good condition
Photo # 21: Light coating breakdown on nozzle 7 Photo # 22: Nozzle 8 and 9 half way
covered with blasting grits

# 23: Nozzle 10 was seen with moderate crevice Photo # 24: Nozzle 11 with moderate crevice
on flange and heavy corrosion on flange fasteners corroion

# 25: Moderate corrosion on earth cable terminal Photo #26: Scale build /moderate corrosion on the
access ladder attached to the platform toward the
east side of the tank
 # 27: Close view of attached access ladder
with scale build and moderate corrosion Photo # 28: More view

Photo # 29: Top cover of electric motor was Photo # 30: Heavy crevice corrosion
seen cut off due to heavy corrosion on instrument flanges and fasteners

# 31: Pressure gauge in good condition Photo # 32: Heavy corrosion on the
associate valves connected to nozzle 10,11,
safety switch board and its support
5. AUT CORROSION MAPPING INSPECTION

5.1 AUT Hydroform Technique - Introduction and Limitation

This report details the work undertaken and relates to the measurement of wall thickness
using the HydroForm Scanner along with the Omniscan MX2 equipment.

The HydroForm Scanner consists of a specially designed carriage for inspecting Tanks and
vessels using immersion technique. The measurements ascertain vessel thickness which is a
function of probe positioning for the area scanned, and may be provided in pure numerical
form or as color coded maps. Data and measurements results for the vessel are detailed in the
reports. The purpose of the measurement is to establish the condition in order to aid decisions
related to the vessel integrity and maintenance timing and priority.

The HydroForm probe is a localized immersion technique held in an automatic scanner in order
to create corrosion mapping images.

The corrosion mapping images contains useful information about the spatial extent of the
corrosion as well as the ligament left between the corrosion and the test surface. Corrosion
mapping will reveal the presence of internal corrosion pits that would be missed in point of
ultrasonic thickness measurements.

Also proper couplant should be ensured between the probe and the testing surface in order to
transmit the ultrasonic sound into the examining surface.

Limitations
As with ultrasonic thickness measurements, the presence of plate laminations can create false
images of corrosion. Corrosion mapping cannot be done 100% on inaccessible areas such as
welded surroundings, curvatures, nozzles and its surrounding and support structures (e.g.
support plates, platforms, etc.). Here manual UT can be used to give indication of any material
loss in selected areas.
SOUTH PLATE NORTH PLATE

A B C
WEST PLATE BOTTOM PLATE

EAST PLATE
0
5.4 AUT Data Acquisition:

Stage of Test In-service Inspection Date of Inspection 23-10-2018

Material Carbon Steel Couplant Water
Material Sump Tank Surface Condition Coated
Specifications
Circumferential 1700mm Equipment Omniscan MX2
length
Direction of vessel East – West Reference Point North
Scan Length 1700mm Vessel thickness 9.5 mm
Scanning Direction From North Vessel temperature Ambient

NORTH PLATE DATA ANALYSIS (SCAN DIRECTION: EAST-WEST)

Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
0-50 1700 9.5 9.2 2.3 1141

Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
50-100 1700 9.5 9.0 4.8 1111
 Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
100-150 1700 9.5 8.7 8.5 431

Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
150-200 1700 9.5 9.4 0.4 373
 Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
200-250 1700 9.5 7.4 22.1 212

Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
250-300 1700 9.5 7.9 16.5 1508
SOUTH PLATE DATA ANALYSIS (SCAN DIRECTION: EAST-WEST)

Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
Inclusions
0-50 1550 9.5 749 observed

NOTE: On the above south shell scan from 0-50, two discontinuities were observed and the details are
as follows;
DISCONTINUITY 1
Depth = 6.10mm, Width=3.30mm, Length=14.86mm at index offset of 5.51mm and scan offset of
749mm
DISCONTINUITY 2
Depth = 7.22mm, Width= 1.80mm, Length= 11.43mm at index offset of 8.51mm and scan offset of
912mm
SOUTH PLATE DATA ANALYSIS (SCAN DIRECTION: EAST-WEST)

Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
0-50 1550 9.5 8.9 5.4 620

Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
50-100 1550 9.5 9.4 0.4 516

Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum Wall Loss Location Remark
 (Circum length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
100-150 1550 9.5 9.2 2.9 235

Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
( mm) ( mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
150-200 1550 9.5 9.4 1 341
 Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
( mm) ( mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
200-250 1550 9.5 9.4 1 1152

Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
( mm) ( mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
250-300 1550 9.5 7.4 22.1 531

EAST PLATE DATA ANALYSIS (SCAN DIRECTION: EAST-WEST)

 Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
0-50 5480 9.5 9.2 2.9 5085

Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
50-100 5480 9.5 9.0 4.8 4923

Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum Wall Loss Location Remark
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness (%) (Circum. length)
 clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
100-150 5480 9.5 9.3 1.7 4633

Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
( mm) ( mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
150-200 5480 9.5 9.3 1.7 4263

Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum Wall Loss Location Remark
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness (%) (Circum. length)
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) clockwise
 (mm)
200-250 5480 9.5 9.4 0.4 4993

Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
250-300 5480 9.5 9.2 2.9 1200

Note: West shell is divided into two parts, A and B

WEST SHELL DATA ANALYSIS FOR PART A
SCAN DIRECTION (NORTH-SOUTH)

Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum Wall Loss Location Remark
 (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
0-50 2500 9.5 9.1 3.6 335

Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
50-100 2500 9.5 8.9 5.4 1986
 Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
100-150 2500 9.5 9.4 1.0 1835
 Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
150-200 2500 9.5 9.0 4.8 997

Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
200-250 2500 9.5 9.4 0.4 1808
 Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
250-300 2500 9.5 9.4 1.0 1907

DATA ACQUISITION FOR THE BOTTOM PLATE-COLUMN 1

Stage of Test In-service Inspection Date of Inspection 23-10-2018
Material Carbon Steel Couplant Water
Material Sump Tank Surface Condition Coated
Specifications
Circumferential 1700mm Equipment Omniscan MX2
length
Direction of vessel East – West Reference Point North
Scan Length 1700mm Vessel thickness 9.5 mm
Scanning Direction From North Vessel temperature Ambient

Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
0-50 1700 9.5 7.87 17.2 1540

Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
50-100 1700 9.5 8.34 12.2 1538

Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
100-150 1700 9.5 9.52 -0.2 627
 Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
150-200 1700 9.5 9.87 -3.9 516

Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
200-250 1700 9.5 9.70 -2.1 586
 Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
250-300 1700 9.5 9.81 -3.3 460

Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
300-350 1700 9.5 8.05 -15.3 627

Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum Wall Loss Location Remark
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness (%) (Circum. length)
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) clockwise
 (mm)
350-400 1700 9.5 8.81 7.2 457

Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
400-450 1700 9.5 9.28 2.3 385

Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
450-500 1700 9.5 9.28 2.3 465
 Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
500-550 1700 9.5 9.11 4.1 954

DATA ACQUISITION FOR THE BOTTOM PLATE-COLUMN 2

Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
50-100 1700 9.5 9.52 0.2 86

Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
300-350 1700 9.5 9.40 1.0 1073
 Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
350-400 1700 9.5 9.70 -2.1 324

Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
400-450 1700 9.5 9.76 -2.7 307

Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
450-500 1700 9.5 9.81 -3.3 946
 Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
500-550 1700 9.5 9.76 -2.7 124

Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
550-600 1700 9.5 9.58 -0.8 660

Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum Wall Loss Location Remark
 (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
600-650 1700 9.5 9.76 -2.7 669

Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circum. length)
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)

650-700 1700 9.5 9.99 -4.5 729

 Location
Axial length Axial length Nominal Minimum
Wall Loss (Circumferential
X-axis Y-axis Thickness Thickness Remark
(%) length) clockwise
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
(mm)
Thickness Of North Plate
0-50 1700 9.5 9.2 2.3 1141
50-100 1700 9.5 9.0 4.8 1111
100-150 1700 9.5 8.7 8.5 431
150-200 1700 9.5 9.4 0.4 373
200-250 1700 9.5 7.4 22.1 212
250-300 1700 9.5 7.9 16.5 1508
Thickness Of South Plate
Anomaly Indication-Minimum & Max Inclusion Depth
Inclusion
0-50 observed
 0-50 1550 9.5 8.9 5.4 620
50-100 1550 9.5 9.4 0.4 516
100-150 1550 9.5 9.2 2.9 235
150-200 1550 9.5 9.4 1 341
200-250 1550 9.5 9.4 1 1152
250-300 1550 9.5 7.4 22.1 531
Thickness Of East Plate
0-50 5480 9.5 9.2 2.9 5085
50-100 5480 9.5 9.0 4.8 4923
100-150 5480 9.5 9.3 1.7 4633
150-200 5480 9.5 9.3 1.7 4263
200-250 5480 9.5 9.4 0.4 4993
250-300 5480 9.5 9.2 2.9 1200
Thickness Of West Plate PART A
0-50 2500 9.5 9.1 3.6 335
50-100 2500 9.5 8.9 5.4 1986
100-150 2500 9.5 9.4 1.0 1835
150-200 2500 9.5 9.0 4.8 997
200-250 2500 9.5 9.4 0.4 1808
250-300 2500 9.5 9.4 1.0 1907

6. MANUAL ULTRASONIC THICKNESS MEASUREMENT ON NOZZLES

Test parameters

Material Carbon Steel Material Size As Recorded

Equipment USM 36 Surface condition Coated
Equipment Serial 16017629 Couplant Polygel
UT probe: Type/ Dia / Dual crystal/ 10mm
Test Temperature Ambient
MHz /5MHZ
Operating Procedure OIMS 66-LAG-OTS- Inspectors Name
 2009-0010
Acceptance Code API 510

Nozzle Nozzle Nom. Thickness at Test Points (mm) Min

Nos. dia. thk Thk.
A B C D E F G H (mm)
N1 4’’ N/A 16. 16.6
6 N/A 16.6 N/A 16.7 N/A 16.7 N/A
N2 4’’ N/A 16. 16.0
9 N/A 16.6 N/A 16 N/A 16.9 N/A
N3 4’’ N/A 15. 15.5
5 N/A 16.2 N/A 15.2 N/A 16.1 N/A
N4 3’’ N/A 18. 18.1
5 N/A 18.3 N/A 18.1 N/A 19.1 N/A
N5 3’’ N/A N/A 18 N/A 19.2 N/A 18.2 N/A 18.9 18
N6 3’’ N/A N/A 15.6 N/A 15.4 N/A 15.1 N/A 15.7 15.1
N7 3’’ N/A N/A 16.4 N/A 16.6 N/A 16.4 N/A 16.8 16.4
MW 24’’ N/A 31 31.2 31 30.9 30.4 31.1 30.9 30.6 30.4

Legends:

S/N Description
1. Test Points on Nozzles – ‘A’ for Vertical pipes located at NORTH side, counting clockwise & for Horizontal Pipes - ‘A’
located at TOP, counting clockwise, looking in flow direction. For shell” ‘A’ Located AT North side and counting
clockwise.

2. Refer Sketch below for location of TMLs.

3 UTG Readings on Nozzle 14 Not available (N/A) due to confined space restrictions

7. ULTRASONIC SHEAR WAVE EXAMINATION OF NOZZLE /SHELL CIRCUMFERENTIAL

WELDS

Equipment USM 36 Material Carbon Steel

Equipment Serial
16017629 Test temperature Ambient
No:
 Couplant Polygel Material Size As Reported
OIMS66-LAG-OTS-2009-
Surface Condition Rough Operating Procedure
0010
Diameter Crystal Scanning Cal.
Probe MHz Serial no: Ref. dB
θ Type dB Range
3.5 x 10 55927-
0˚ 4 MHz Dual 34 dB Ref + 6dB 60mm
mm 80486
55927-
45˚ 4 MHz 8 x 9 mm Single 36 dB Ref + 6dB 100mm
80487
60˚ 4 MHz 8 x 9 mm Single T035944 36 dB Ref + 6dB 100mm
70˚ 4 MHz 8 x 9 mm Single T043127 38dB Ref + 6dB 100mm
Straight Beam Angle Beam 1.5 mm SDH @ 80%
2nd BWE @ 80% FSH
Sensitivity Sensitivity FSH

Weld Scan Plan Result

Nozzle no. / Discontinuity
Depth Length (Accept /
Circum. Seam Indication Reject)
Nozzle 1 NSI Nil Nil Accept

Nozzle 2 NSI Nil Nil Accept

Nozzle 3 NSI Nil Nil Accept

Nozzle 4 NSI Nil Nil Accept

Nozzle 5 NSI Nil Nil Accept

Nozzle 6 NSI Nil Nil Accept

Nozzle 7 NSI Nil Nil Accept

Man-way NSI Nil Nil Accept

Circum. Seam 2 NSI Nil Nil Accept

Notes:
NSI: No significant indication noticed

ANNEX-1 : DATA INTERPRETATION OF COLOUR CODING IMAGE

Data Interpretation
The data is provided based on color mapping. The mapping (C-Scan) is assigned to show the
signals in Blue, Green, Yellow and Red, representing varying thickness between 0.05 – 13mm.
The white shaded strip in the C-scan image is due to uneven surface, obstructions. The images
might be magnified in the proprietary software for analysis to give better visualization for
sizing. Vessel thickness was not given as at time of inspection although 13mm was taken as at
time observed during time of inspection during actual scanning.
Colour Coding Image Area Showing Minimum Thickness
Colour Coding Strip
Inspectors: Signatures: Verified By: Date:

NDE Advisor