Teaching Skills for Effective Learning
Teaching Skills for Effective Learning
Introduction
Objectives
Teaching: An Analysis
Concept of Teaching Skills
Teaching Skills
6.5.1 Introducing a Lesson
6.5.2 Explaining
6.5.3 Questioning
6.5.4 Increasing Student Participation
6.5.5 Providing Reinforcement
6.5.6 Using Teaching Aids
6.5.7 WritingonBoard
6.5.8 Evaluating
Micro Teaching Approach
Problem Solving
Attribute Listing
Morphological Analysis
Brain Storming
Inquiry Training
6.1 1.1 Inquiry Training Process
6.1 1.2 Phases in Inquiry Training
Synectics
Let Us Sum Up
Unit-end Exercises
Answers to Check Your Progress
Suggested Readings
6.1 INTRODUCTION
You have already studied the meaning of the term teaching and also of related
concepts. In this unit, you will study about teaching skills. In the besming, an
analysis of functions of a teacher is given. After this, the concept of teaching
skills is explained. It is followed by an explanation of some of the important
teaching skills. Finally the microteaching approach is discussed.
6.2 OBJECTIVES
After studying this unit, you should be able to:
make an analy& of teacher functions,
explain the concept of teaching skills,
explain the nature of micro teaching,
describe inquiry training and synetics in teaching.
Teaching for Effective
6.3 TEACHING: AN ANALYSIS Learning: Development
of Concepts of Skills and
Competencies
Teaching can be analysed in terms of teacher behaviour at least at three levels,
namely, teaching skills, general teaching behaviours and specific teaching
behaviours. At 'the first level, teaching can be analysed into component
teaching skills. Following the analysis at this level, teaching can be defined as
a set of component skills for the realization of a specified set of instructional
objectives. It means teaching itself is a complex skill comprising of a set of
i
teaching skills. These teaching skills can be further analysed into sets of
general teaching behaviours at the second level. Thus, teaching skills can be
defined as a set of interrelated teaching behaviours for the realization of
specific instructional objectives. The set of instructional objectives to be
realized by a particular skill will be limited in number as compared to the
totality of instructional objectives. These teaching behaviours can be further
analysed into specific teaching behaviours at the third level of analysis. These
teaching behaviours of a skill, therefore, can be defined as a set of interrelated
specific teaching behaviours contributing to the realization of some aspects of
the instructional objective to be realized by a particular teaching skill.
b) Compare your answers with those given at the end of the unit.
2. Define teaching.
I
3. Quote any definition of a teaching skill.
You have already understood the concept of a teaching skill. Let us now try to
know about some important teaching skills in details. These are given below.
When one introduces a stranger to you, your reactions towards himher or your
responses during the conversation with h i d e r depend upon the introductory
statements that are made about h i d e r .
6.5.2 Explaining
In our day to day life you find persons explaining some idea or phenomenon
, by going deep into the matter with appropriate examples, logically organizing
: the ideas, using certain nonverbal gestures etc. You also find persons who
cannot explain clearly. They jumble up ideas. They not only confuse the
audience but also get confused themselves. This is because they do not present
ideas in a logical sequence.
b) Compare your answers with those given at the end of the unit.
.........................................................................
.........................................................................
...........................................................................
.........................................................................
6.5.3 Questioning
Structure refers to the grammatical aspect and the content part of the question.
Various criteria for a well structured questjon are (i) grammatical correctness,
(ii) conciseness, (iii) relevance,'and (iv) specificity. .
(i) Grammatical correctness: A question should be grammatically correct. If Teaching for Effective
Learning: Development
it is not correct, it will create confusion in the minds of the students. of Concepts of and
Therefore, a teacher should be careful while framing a question. Competencies
(ii) Conciseness: A concise question does not have unnecessary or extra words.
A question should be direct and straightforward.
The teacher should not frame the questions in t& manner given below:
(a) Does any one know when did India get freedom?
(b) Who can tell me the name of the President of India?
Process: The word 'process' implies the way of asking questions. The
following two issues need to be mentioned:
i) Speed of asking questions: The teacher should ask question neither too
hurriedly nor too slowly. If the questions are asked too rapidly, the students
may find it difficult to comprehend. They will take much time to
understand the question. On the other hand, if the questions are uttered too
slowly, they will decrease the fluency as it is time consuming.
ii) Voice of the teacher: Teacher's voice should be audible and clear to all the
students in the class otherwise they may not follow the question. They may
ask the teacher to repeat the question or may not respond at all.
You must be aware that when a student participates in the learning process,
hisiher learning becomes more effective. A student is said to participate when
helshe takes active part which is observable by responding to what the teacher
asks for, by contributing hisiher own ideas related to the topic being taught by
the teacher or by reacting to others' ideas in the classroom. Student
participation is an observable behaviour of students and includes responding
and initiating. When a student is listening to the teacher he/she is not
participating, because listening behaviour of the student is not observable.
i) Students are more attentive towards the lesson when they are participating.
ii) Students' urges of social recognition and social acceptance are satisfied.
iii) There will be better understanding on the part of the students when they
participate.
iv) A teacher can evaluate hisiher teaching, that is, whether it is being effective
in bringing about learning or not.
b) Compare your answers with those given at the end of the unit.
.........................................................................
.........................................................................
..........................................................................
..........................................................................
You know that all the students need social approval for their behaviour. When
they are answering or responding in the class, they are eager to know whether
their answers or responses are correct or not. When the students come to know
that the answers given by them are correct, they feel happy and get
encouraged. Thus, their participation in the class increases. In such a situation,
we say that the student's behaviour of responding correctly is 'reinforced' or
strengthened. In other words, it may be said that there is positive reinforcement
in the student's behaviour.
(3) Negative reinforcers are those behaviours of the teacher which discourage
, the students to participate. Skill of reinforcement involves more and more
I
the use of the positive reinforcers and decrease the use of negative
reinforcers so that the students to the maximum.
i
Teaching Learning
Strategies i) In positive verbal reinforcement the teacher gives positive
reinforcement through various verbal (with words) expressions. The
teacher makes encouraging remarks such as 'that', 'good', 'right',
'yes', 'correct', 'excellent', 'well done7,'continue', etc.
I
i) Objects: Real objects can be used as examples to clarify some concepts and
principles. Usage of parts of flowers and branches of trees in botany
t
lessons; cycle pumps, thermometers in science lessons; beads, match
sticks, etc. in mathematics lessons are the common examples of objects
being used during teaching.
iii) Pictures: When objects are not available for use in classrooms, pictures
may be used for explaining an idea or concept or principle. Pictures are
handy and sometimes economical too. Pictures themselves can be abstract,
but they can help in illustrating a point with oral explanation.
Teaching Learning
Strategies
iv) Diagrams, maps and sketches: These are useful in teaching history,
geography, science etc. They help in clarifying and bringing out essential
points in a lesson. In science lessons, diagrams and sketches help a lot in
describing an idea or principle. The teacher can draw them on the
blackboard. A teacher who wants to describe parts of the body like eye,
ear, mhcular system etc., can take the help of diagrams k d sketches.
*
v) Practical demonstration: This is'an important device in the teaching of
science and geography. In physics when a teacher explains a principle or
law, helshe call d:, it with the help of experimentation. In order to describe Teaching for Effective
Learning: Development
the idea that sunlight is essential for plant in food preparation, a teacher of conceDts of Skills and
can conduct the required experiment. Competencies
Thus, there are various types of teaching aids. But none of them can be
effectively used without an oral explanation either by teachers or by
students. It is also essential to see that the teaching aid used is appropriate
to the age level, grade level, maturity level of the students and to the topic
taught.
Check Your Progress 4
b) Compare your answers with those given at the end of the unit.
You know that black board or chalk board is the visual aid most widely used
by the teacher for classroom instruction. The components of the skill of using
black board are: (i) legibility of handwriting (ii) neatness in the black board
work and (iii) appropriateness of written work on the black board. Now, let us
discuss about them in detail.
Write only the salient points one after another as they are being
developed.
The points written on the blackboard should have continuity (one 'point
logically linked with the previous one) in them.
The blackboard summary should be brief and simple so that the
students can recollect the whole lesson at a glance.
Underline only those points to which you want to draw the students'
attention.
Use coloured chalks sparingly to bring about contrast with other matter
presented on the blackboard.
Illustrations and diagrams should be simple, large and clear enough to
convey the ideas presented.
i) Right to equality
ii) Right to freedom
iii) Right against exploitation
iv) Cultural and educational rights
v) Right to fieedom of religion
vi) Right to constitutional remedies
6.5.8 Evaluating
b) Compare your answers with those given at the end of the unit.
.........................................................................
.........................................................................
.........................................................................
.........................................................................
............................................................&.............
.........................................................................
The plan, teach, feedback, replan and refeedback sessions will constitute a
single microteaching cycle.
x*
Micro-Lesson Plan -
b) Compare your answers with those given at the end of the unit.
Research on problem solving has had a varied history. Before the 1930's' most
textbooks still treated logic in considerable detail, making it the basis for
intelligent or rational behaviour. This was quite natural since psychology was
an offshoot of the philosophy of mind. Later, text books carried chapters on
thinking, and questions of consciousness, imageless thought, associative 'set'
and concept formation were the subject matter or research in thinking
(Woodworth, 1938).
Perhaps the greatest impetus to research in problem solving came from studies
of animals seeking to investigate into the rationality. History reveals that
philosophers had attributed reason and soul to man alone. Thorndike initiated
an experimental approach to the analysis of problem solving behaviour by
developing the p'roblem box and observing how cats found their way to food.
This led to a whole series of problem box investigations, and Watson described
problem box mastery as the development of motor habits and grouped it with
maze learning. The problem solving became classified with learning. The
method used in the problem solving has been referred to as trial and error
method.
Various types of puzzles have been used to study human problem solving, as a
result, trial and error has become a generally accepted mechanism. Dewey
used the concept to account for human problem solving by describing a
process he called mental trial and error. In this way, the problem solving
capacity of the trial and error process was expanded. At the sqne time, it gave
man a kind of superiority over animals in that he could eliminate incorrect
alternatives without trying them out behaviourally.
Teaching Learning
Strategies It was only after World War I1 when research funds for investigations of
creativity and originality were made available, a new name for a higher type of
problem solving was accepted, the implication being that creativity included
more than learning and intelligence. Although it had long been recognized that
intelligence and problem solving ability had a limited relationship, the recent
research had revived tbe importance of distinguishing between intelligence (the
ability to learn) and creativity. The work of Getzels and Jackson (1962), and
Torrance (1965) reveal this trend, which lays emphasis on unusual innovative
types of personality. This, of course, is required when an individual is faced
with a new situation that poses a problem. A problem becomes difficult when
its solution requires responses that deviate from the common ones or from
previously learned ones. Approached in this way, it follows that the creative
person should be a good problem solver because helshe can solve not only
routine problems but all those that require more than a learning mechanism.
Problem solving methods being used are often classified as 'traditional' and
'new'. Traditional methods are more rational and logical while the new
methods attempt to train the individual through freeing hirn~herfrom hislher
emotional inhibitions. Generally problem solving method involves the
following steps:
There are different techniques of creative problem solving such as, attribute
listing, brain storming, inquiry training and synectics. These techniques
facilitate solutions that are creative, i.e. solutions characterized by freshness, Teaching for Effective
Learning: Development
appropriateness, imagination, new relationship between even common place of Concepts of Skills and
facts or ideas, and significant transformation of the initial definition -of the Competencies
problem.
In attribute listing, the attempt first is made to list the basic but modifiable
attributes or properties or specifications of a particular object or activity. Then
an attempt is made to search for alternatives to the present attribute. An
example of 'attribute listing' can be seen in the search for a better method of
cutting cheese. At first, the initial problem is how to develop a better knife; this
problem leads to another problem, i.e., how to arrange attributes of a better
wedge; also the undesirable attributes are listed that are to be eliminated.
Finally, if any other problem arises, its attributes both desirable as well as
undesirable, are listed, and the undesirable are to be eliminated to arrive at the
best possible solution.
It is important to note that the attribute listing would g v e better results when
the object or activity one wishes to change is more specific; when the
modifiable attributes are separated fiom the unmodifiable attributes of the
objects in order to concentrate one's attention on the modifiable attributes.
Some important points that need to be considered in attribute listing are
explained briefly as under:
6.9 ,MORPHOLOGICALANALYSIS
Arnold has pointed out that there is one basic difference between attribute
listing and morphological analysis. Attribute listing works best when the
object, activity, product sought to be modified is very specific such as 'this
chair' rather than 'chair' in general. On the other hand, morphological analysis
can also be applied profitably to modify general objects or activities, such as
air transportation, health care or political machinery etc.
Attribute listing and morphological analysis are not mere techniques, they
embody important values and attitudes favouring to creativity. The chief such
value is one of trylng out a new combination which fosters experimental;
innovative bent of mind and also alerts one to possible new application of
ideas.
6.10 BRAINSTORMING
Brainstorming is a popular method of group thinking. Alex Osborn established
the 'Creative Education Foundation' at the University of Buffalo in 1957; it is
here that he developed the method of brainstorming. This method is widely
used by businessmen, scientists and others to tap the tremendous source of
creative power. It is a technique with which problem is attacked from all
possible angles to generate a large number of ideas in order to arrive at the best
solution.
Brainstorming has been widely used in American Government and Industry;
Osborn, the father of brainstorming, has cited several examples. In one
brainstorming session in a federal government officers' conference, the group
brainstormed on 'what can federal employees do to give visitors to Washington
a truer and better impression of their government? Within 30 minutes, 121
ideas were elicited. In another brainstorming session, some U.S. Treasury
Teaching Learning
Strategies personnel produced 103 ideas in 40 minutes on 'How can we get more federal
employees to sell more U.S. saving bonds?' In yet another brainstorming
session, the group brainstormed on 'How to reduce absenteeism?' They
produced 89 ideas in 30 minutes, and on 'How to free bond-selling employees
from office duties1 they produced 61 ideas in 30 minutes. In a telephone
company, a brainstorming panel brought out over 100 new ways to recruit
employees.
In a brainstorming session, a group of people sits around a table to brainstorm
a specific problem. Each participant presents the ideas, that come to hisher
mind. No member of the group is allowed any criticism on the idea put forward
by another member. The objective underlying this is that of freeing a person
from the usual inhibitions that operate to block hisher creative process.
Principles: The main principles of brainstorming are:
i) Deferring evaluation during the idea production phase, especially
evaluation of a negative, critical kind. This means that the participants must
withhold adverse judgement of ideas put forward by other members of the
group.
ii) Free wheeling of ideas should be encouraged rather welcomed. The
participants must cheerfully accept even wild,.silly and crazy ideas put
forward by other members. The more fantastic the ideas, the better it is. A
fantastic idea can be one that does not seem at all practical but still it
serves the important function of going off the beaten track, i.e., thinking
divergently instead of conventional patterns of thinking. While the idea
itself may not be practical, somehow it may hit upon other ideas that might
not only be novel but also useful.
iii) Quantity begets quality: The more the ideas are generated, the higher will
be the [Link] hitting upon some brilliant ones. Participants must
express ideas that come to their mind readily and spontaneously. The
objective is to generate more and more ideas, i.e., first quantity and then it
would lead to quality.
iv) Hitch-hiking on previously expressed ideas. Participants should aim at
building upon and improving each other's suggestions. Besides
contributing their own ideas, the participants should suggest how ideas of
others can be turned into better ideas or how different ideas can be joined
together into new possible combinations to form new ideas. Moreover, no
participant should feel ashamed of in building on others' ideas or one's
own previous ideas. This simply means one should be open to the
suggestive power of others or one's own earlier ideas.
v) In one session, one aspect of the problem should be brainstormed so that a
large number of ideas are collected.
In view of the usefulness and practicability of brainstorming, educationists,
teaihers, and students can use this technique very successfully to find out the
best solutions to the, problems that are faced by the existing system of
.education. For example, in the classroom it can be used to promote discipline,
teaching-learning process; check delinquency, truancy, dropping out tendency
of students; causes as well as preventive measures can be identified in regard
to student unrest and copying in the examinations. This technique can be of
great help to the teachers in developing problem-solving attitude among
students and also in stimulating their imaginative and creative powers. This is
possible only when teachers or others who wish to use brainstorming are fully Teaching for Effective
Learning: Development
abreast with its inherent potential. of Concepts of Skills and
Competencies
i) Brainstorming is not useful as a technique where the solution of a problem
can be reached by analysis. For instance, if the problem is to find the
square root of 5000, there is no need of brainstorming. It is particularly
useful for problems that can have multiple solutions, of which some may
be better than others, such as, 'how one can make a child more interested in
studies'.
ii) Brainstorming gives fruitful results when the topic selected for
brainstorming is specific. If the topic is vague, the brainstorming will carry
different frames of reference and the ideas generated will have a diffused
applicability. For instance, the topic 'how to get ahead in life' is not clear.
Different people will draw different meanings out of it. No doubt, it may
generate many ideas, but since what 'to get ahead' means to different
people is not clear, the ideas generated are likely to be too disparate. On the
other hand, a topic like 'how to get promoted in a @articularorganisation'
is likely to yield more useful and pertinent solutions.
iii) During the brainstorming session, the leader should encourage the
members to provide concrete suggestions or ideas instead of abstractions.
These abstractions sometimes become not only difficult but also impossible
to turn into practice. Sometimes members also provide such suggestions,
which are mere good intentions, but it is difficult to put them to actual use.
The members should, therefore, be advised and encouraged to concretize
their ideas. The concrete ideas stimulate hitching and action orientation.
They have an energy charge that abstractions lack. It is better that the ideas
expressed should be concise, brief, clear and specific.
iv) In order to select the most useful ideas among the host of generated ideas,
it is necessary to identify a few ideas for more intensive investigation. One
usehl technique can be to have each member of a panel vote on the
potential of each idea for solving the problem in hand or the ideas can be
grouped into classes and then each idea within a group may be voted upon.
Better it would be to formalize the criteria first for assessing the potential
of the ideas generated before the ideas are voted upon.
If the ideas initially generated are large, voting may have to be done more than
once. That is td say, ideas voted the best in the initial round of voting may
again be put to a vote to get a small number of high potential ideas. These
ideas may then be taken up for much more intense scrutiny. In this way, high
potential ideas are selected and put to use.
The research of Sidney Pames (1959) indicates the positive effects of
'brainstorming'. His research also provides evidence that creative productivity
can be developed by deliberate procedures. He studied the development of
creative behaviour by devising several courses for the students of various
streams. While evaluating the problem solving course he demonstrated that
the students who completed the creative problem solving course performed
significantly better on six out of eight tests of creative thinking than did
comparable students who had not taken the course. His second observation
was that increased productivity in creative thinking produced by the creative
problem solving course persists for a period of eight months or more after the
completion of the course. His research also provides evidence that individuals
working along often accumulate more and better ideas than they do when
I Teaching Learning
Strategies working in a group. On the basis of research findings he mentions certain
points that need to be considered in the conduct of brainstorming sessions:
The first of these is the principle of deferred judgement during the idea
production phase.
Avoiding critical analysis of the idea after a quantity of alternatives is
listed.
I
Suchman bases his inquiry training approach on four postulates. First, children
are curious and eager to grow by nature. He emphasizes that when children are
faced with a puzzling situation they naturally get motivated to explore the data
surrounding the discrepant event and think of arranging the data in a new way
to find tinswers to the problem. The general goal of inquiry training is to help
students develop the intellectual discipline and skills necessary to raise
questions and search out answers stemming from their curiosity. Secondly, the
process of inquiry can be taught to students. Suchman believe that students can
become increasingly conscious of their process of inquiry, and that they can be
taught scientific procedures directly. He emphasizes that we can not analyse
and improve our thinking unless we are conscious of it. Thirdly, team approach
is more useful than the individual approach to find solution to a problem.
Suchman believes that the view point of a second person enriches our thinking;
and that it is the cooperative inquiry that leads to the development of new
knowledge. Fourthly, all knowledge is tentative. Suchman emphasizes that the
students should be made aware of the fact that all knowledge is tentative.
Scholars constantly generate theories and explanations. After sometime, these
theories are replaced by new ones, which conveys that there are no permanent
answers to problems; new and sophisticated ways are investigated to' reach the
solution of the problem, or new ways are detected to look at the problem itself.
In 'Inquiry training', the students are presented with a problem situation such
as, an episode, experiment, story, etc., and are asked to inquire into it. In
whatsoever form it is presented, it must essentially cany a discrepancy leading
to a puzzle. Sincetthe ultimate goal is to have students experience the creation
of new knowledge, the confrontation should be based on discoverable ideas.
Thus, at the first stage of the inquiry process, the students are taught to verify
the facts of the situation, i.e., the nature and identity of the objects, the events,
Teaching Learning
Strategies and the conditions surrounding the puzzling event. As the students become
aware of the facts, they form hypotheses, which guide them in their future
inquiry. Using their knowledge about the behaviour of objects, students can
turn their questions to the variables in the situation. This they can do by
conducting verbal or actual experiments to test these causal relationships,
selecting new data, or organizing the'existing data in a new way to see what
will happen if things are done differently. It may not be possible for the
students to frame proper questions to test the causal relationships between
variables unless they have sufficient information about the nature of the
problem situation and its elements, and it is likely that they are to be
overwhelmed by the maply possible causal relationships.
Finally, the students'try to develop hypotheses that will fully explain what
happened. In other words, it means that they reach the final explanation.
However, they need to be cautioned that there can be many possible
explanations, therefore, they should not be satisfied with the first explanation
that appears to fit the fact.
There are five phases (steps) in the inqulry process. The first phase is the
student's confrontation with the puzzling situation. The second and third
phases concern with the data gathering mechanisms of verification and
experimentation. In the fourth phase, students organize the data and try to
explain the discrepancy. Finally, in the fifth phase, the students reflect on the
problem solving strategies they use during the inquiry. These phases are
explained in some more details given below:
Phase-I: Encounter with the problem: In this phase, the teacher is required
to present the problem situation or puzzling event and explain the inquiry
procedures to the students. The teacher is required to satisfy himselVherself
that the students have understood the inquiry procedure (pattern of the yes-no
question) and also the objectives fully. Then helshe can present problem
situation to the students, which should essentially carry a discrepancy. The
problem to be posed should be simple such as a puzzle, riddle, or magic trick
that does not require'much background knowledge. However, every puzzling
situation can not be a discrepant event. It is, therefore, important to note that
distinguishing feature of the dicsrepancy events is that it involves illogical
phenomena that conflicts with the notions of reality. A problem may be
puzzling simply because we do not know the answer, but simultaneously we do
not need new concepts to understand it and therefore we do not need to
conduct an inquiry. Thus, the problem to be taken for inquiry should
essentially accompany a discrepancy but care needs to be taken that it matches
with the cognitive level of the students.
Teaching for Effective
Phase-11: Data gathering verification: In this phase, students gather Learning: Development
information about the problem in hand through observation or experience. of Conce,ts of Skills and
They are required to ask questions about objects, properties, conditions, and Competencies
events in order to verify the information. Objects refer to determining the
nature or identifying of bbjects. Properties refer to veTifying the behaviour of
ol))l:cts and events are related to verifying the occurrence of an action.
Wherever students deviate from verifying all the aspects of the problem, the
teacher reminds them of the rules of the process and makes them aware of the
type of information they are likely to seek and put them to work to change the
questioning pattern.
This all depends when both the students and the teacher try for their balanced
roles. The teacher selects the problem situation in accordance with the
students' cognitive level; acts as a referee throughout the inquiry process;
responds warmly to students' question; brings them back on the right track if
they deviate; facilitate discussion and interaction among students; and finally
helps them to arrive at explanations. The students on the other hand, actively
participate in finding out the discrepancy from the problem; raising pinpointed
questions; process data in a systematic sequence; tolerating ambiguity; and
fohnulating explanatiohs.
6.12 SYNECTICS
The word 'Synectics' has been adapted from the Greek word 'Synecticos'
meaning fitting tog';;ther diverse elements. Synectics is based on the use of
metaphors and analogies within a systematic framework to achieve creative
results. The central idea is that better understanding of a problem is attained
when it is strange or unfamiliar and allows us to think of an analogy or
metaphor that makes it more familiar and hence more amenable to a creative
solution. In synectics, then the problem as one is presented with, it initially has
to be restated and looked at in various ways through the use of metaphors or
analogies. During the course of this process, the individual goes on what
synectics proponents crall an 'excursion' and as a result of such a trip creative
solutions are attained.
Initial work with synectics procedures began about 1944 when William J.J.
Gordon undedook an intensive study of individual and group processes in
creativity. This was followed with a systematic exploratiqn of his ideas in
1948 with a group of artists and then went on forming synectics groups in
several companies. Finally, he and his associates designed this new approach
'synectics' for the development of creativity at Cambridge, Massachusetts in
1 96 1..
Gordon and his assopiates believe that the group process in creativity is
analogous to the individual process; that the creative process can be
understood, described and taught; and that individuals can increase their
creativity if they understand and use the process. He also believes that
creativity in arts is anialogous to creativity in sciences, and that emotional and
intellectual, rational and nonrational components are involved in creativity.
Among the various factors that play important roles in synectics are five
psychological states involved in the creative process. The five psychological
states are:
ii) Deferment: Experience has shown that quick and immediate solutions to a
problem are likely to be premature and superficial. They should, therefore,
be deferred until best solutions are arrived at. Deferment refers to the
capacity of both the individual and the group to defer these quick solutions
until they have arrived at the best one.
There are four levels of involvement in personal analogy. (a) The first
person description of facts: It involves a mere statement or listing of facts.
(b) The first person description of emotions: It represents the lowest order
of identification. These two levels are considered the lowest level
analogies. (c) Empathic identification with a living thing: Since it
represents [Link] and emotional involvement with object, it is
regarded as 'true' personal analogy. (d) Empathic identification with a
nonliving object: This is the most sophisticated type of empathy as it is
much more diffcult to attribute human emotions with nonliving objects.
On the other hand, it may be easy to do so with living objects as in the case
of level.
The more far fetched the analogy, the greater the probability that the angle
suggested byetheanalogy has not previously been thought of by anybody.
Gordon (1971) says that analogies with small psychological distance from
the problem can be effective for problems being worked on for the first
time; but for problems that have been worked on great deal, analogies that
reflect great psychological distance - those that are rather remote from the
individual's experience - are required.
Direct analogy is the basic mechanism by which an individual tries to see Teaching for Effective
Learning: Development
problems in new contexts. A direct analogy is clear and straight forward. It of Concepts of and
produces immediate results and its process can be reproduced (Gordon, Competencies
1971).
iii) Symbolic analogy: The symbolic analogy is also called 'book title',
essential paradox, and compressed conflict. This form of analogy makes
use of objective and impersonal images to describe the problem. An
individual effectively uses symbolic analogy in terms of poetic response;
helshe summons up an image which, though technologically inaccurate, is
aesthetically satisfling.
iv) Fantasy analogy: Fantasy analogy is based on Freud's idea that creative
work represents wish fulfillment. The individual states a problem in terms
of how helshe wishes the world would be. In it, the group members are
urged to imagine a constraint free solution in much the same way as our
wish fulfilling day dreams. Group members are asketl to fantasize some
perfect solution even if it flies in the face of known scientific principles.
Gordon regards fantasy analogy as an excellent bridge between problem
stating and problem solving because it also tends to evoke the use of the
other mechanisms.
Steps in synectics process: The main steps involved in the synectics process
as proposed by Gordon are briefly discussed as under:
(i) Problem as given (PAG): The problem may be posed by an outside source
or by an individual in the group and may be explained to the group by an
expert.
(ii) Short analysis of the PAG: At this stage, the expert starts by explaining
the problem in sufficient detail that the group has a common
understanding. Since the expert is also a participant, helshe does not need
to reveal all the minute details of the problem, which can come out later
during the session. In order to understand the problem, and to unravel the
hidden elements, the group members attempt at making the strange
familiar.
Teaching Learning
Strategies
(iii)Purge - immediate suggestions: At this stage, individuals participating in
the process are likely to think of and present varied suggestions or
solutions. Such suggestions are not likely to be perfect solutions; however,
they should be verbalized. The leader should urge group members to rid
themselves of'the superficial ideas and attempt at turning to more
innovative possibilitiks.
It is during this stage of the synectics process that the different operational
mechanisms and the different kinds of analogies are used. Essentially, it is
at this stage that the group tries to make the familiar strange. The leader
questions the members and attempt at evolving responses to his requests
for different kinds of analogies. Next, the leader may ask an evocative
question; such as, hn example from some other field, of an aspect of the
chosen problem as understooci For instance, an evocative question may be
'can you think of a crowded 51tuationfrom biology?' Here the leader is
asking for what is called a direct analogy. A number of responses may be
made to the evocative question 'flies on cow dung' 'virus culture' 'drop of
sperm' etc. could, for example be such responses to the above said
evocative question concerning a crowded situation. At the appropriate
time, the leader may request for a personal analogy. For instance, helshe
may take up 'virus culture' and asks each group member to imagine
himselfierself as Virus in a virus culture. Helshe may ask them to explain
how it feels to be a virus in this culture. Group members may come
forward with different types of responses.
The leader may also ask group members to fantasize (without reservations)
about how one could, as a virus set out to conquer the world. This kind of
analogy is referred to as fantasy analogy. Then, the leader may ask for a
symbolic analogy [book title) - to give book title comprised of two or three
words, poetic or otherwise, that captures the essence of a key work such as
virus culture and contains a paradox. The participants may respond-with
different types of title.
Teaching for Effective
(vi)Force fit: This involves two stages, i.e., (i) Fantasy force fit, (ii) Practical
Learning:
force fit. According to Gordon an attempt is now made to force a fit of Concepts S ~ l l r
between the analogy and the problem as understood. In forcing a fit a very Com~etencies
obvious attempt is-made to make effective use of the last analbgy to solve
1 the problem. ord don calls this stage fantasy force fit because fantasy
provides the individual with greater lrcense and freedom for response.
I During this stage, if the leader senses that a potentially useful approach to
the original problem is at hand, helshe may ask for a force fit, i.e., helshe
may ask the group members to try to think how the present idea or analogy
could suggest a solution to the original problem. The next step is then to
come up with a practical application of the analogy to the problem, i.e.,
practical force fit.
I (vii)View point: The problem solving process ends either in a view point that
1
k
could be used for solution, or in a new problem as understood, and the
recycling of the process takes place again.
Steps
Synectic Process
I v v v v v
Force fit
I
point
suggestions
Teaching Learning
Strategies
Check Your Progress 8
.........................................................................
.........................................................................
.........................................................................
.........................................................................
.........................................................................
.........................................................................
Problem solving methods being used are often classified as 'traditional' and
'new'. The former (traditional) methods are more rational and logical while the
latter(new) methods attempt to train the individual through freeing h i d e r
from hisher emotional inhibitions. Problem solving methods involve five
steps, namely, definition of the problem, searching for different methods and
selecting the suitable one, preparation of the design and its execution, and
generalizing the results and arriving at the best solution. Some of the
techniques of creative problem solving are attribute listing, brainstorming,
inquiry training and synectics. These techniques facilitate solutions that are
creative.
Teaching for Effective
Learning: Development
6.14 UNIT-END EXERCISES of Concepts of Skills and
Competencies
2. For effective use of blackboard the following points may be taken care of:
2. Attribute listing works best when the object, activity or product sought to
be modified is very specific. Morphological analysis is a variant of
attribute listing and can be applied profitably to modify general objects or
activities.