Human Rights Violations in Zambia Case Study
Human Rights Violations in Zambia Case Study
The Human Rights Commission in Zambia, established under Article 230 of the Constitution, is a national human rights institution tasked with promoting and protecting human rights within Zambia. In contrast, the United Nations Human Rights Committee is an international body that monitors implementation of the ICCPR, while the UN Human Rights Council is responsible for strengthening human rights worldwide and addressing human rights violations globally. The Zambian Commission is specifically focused on domestic human rights issues .
Limitation clauses in the context of constitutional rights allow for constitutionally protected rights to be partially limited under certain justifiable conditions. Such limitations are suited to specific purposes including protecting the rights of others, ensuring public health, maintaining national security, and upholding public morals. For instance, freedom of assembly can be limited to maintain law and order .
Banda and Hamududu can submit their complaint to the African Commission because Zambia is a state party to the African Charter, which allows individuals from member states to submit communications. However, their communication will only be entertained by the African Commission if they have exhausted all domestic remedies, as specified by Article 56 of the African Charter .
The First Optional Protocol to the ICCPR allows individuals to complain directly to the Human Rights Committee if they believe their rights have been violated, provided that all domestic remedies have been exhausted. This protocol provides an essential avenue for individuals to seek redress at an international level when local systems fail to protect their rights .
The African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights has several unique features: it protects all three generations of human rights, places duties on individuals, does not contain a provision permitting derogations from the protected rights, and does not protect certain rights such as the right to privacy and the right to vote .
National human rights institutions like the Human Rights Commission in Zambia perform functions of promoting and protecting human rights, leveraging their mandate to influence government policies and legal frameworks. They may engage in advocacy, provide recommendations for legislative changes, and address human rights violations directly. Their effectiveness can depend on their level of independence, resources, and governmental cooperation. They play a critical role in translating international human rights obligations into local contexts .
Mwila Hamududu and Fred Banda experienced several human rights violations: (1) the right to be protected from torture and cruel or inhuman treatment was violated when they were severely beaten and held in leg irons and handcuffs for days; (2) the right to life was violated when Banda was denied access to his diabetes medicine; (3) the right to liberty was violated as they were detained without charge for over two months; and (4) the right to association and freedom of expression was violated when the state declared that Better Zambia should cease to be a political party. All these rights are protected under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).
Derogations in human rights law refer to a temporary suspension of certain human rights obligations during a national emergency. However, certain rights remain non-derogable, such as the right to life and the freedom from torture or cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment or punishment. These are protected under Article 4 of the ICCPR, as well as Articles 25 and 30 of the Constitution of Zambia .
Article 45 of the African Charter mandates the African Commission to protect and promote human rights and interpret the provisions of the African Charter. This includes handling individual and interstate complaints, reviewing state reports, and providing advocacy and advisory opinions .
Second generation rights are social, economic, and cultural rights such as the right to work, education, and cultural participation. These rights are positive rights, meaning that their realization requires state intervention. They are enshrined in Articles 22-27 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR).