Audit Committee Impact on Cosmetic Accounting
Audit Committee Impact on Cosmetic Accounting
net/publication/377807409
CITATIONS READS
2 120
3 authors:
Yasin Fattahi
Imam Khomeini International University
12 PUBLICATIONS 77 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Abbas Ali Daryaei on 01 February 2024.
1. Introduction
Ideally, the purpose of financial reporting is to provide reliable information about a
company’s financial position and performance to a wide range of users that will be useful in
their economic decisions (Barth et al., 2018). Financial reporting quality is the extent to which
financial reporting conveys information about the company’s operations, in particular its
Received 3 May 2023
expected cash flows (Biddle et al., 2009). Earnings are one of the most important indicators Revised 24 September 2023
that users of financial statements consider when evaluating a company’s financial reporting 25 December 2023
Accepted 30 December 2023
quality and performance (Leong et al., 2015). However, the global financial crisis has put the
The authors are grateful to the
spotlight on accounting and financial reporting. Following a series of high-profile financial three anonymous reviewers for
scandals, the confidence of the investors and creditors in financial reporting has been their time and efforts. The
authors would also like to thank
undermined, and earnings quality has become a major factor in the credibility and reliability the Journal editor-in-chief,
of financial reporting (Ahmadpour and Ahmadi, 2008). Earnings management, also known in Professor Eweje Gabriel, for his
support and assistance.
the literature as cosmetic accounting (CA), income smoothing and creative accounting, is a
Disclosure statement: No
measure of low earnings quality (Dechow et al., 2010). Existing studies on earnings potential conflict of interest was
management are mostly based on the agency theory (Albersmann and Hohenfels, 2017). reported by the authors.
According to this theory, information asymmetry and conflicts of interest between the
management and shareholders enable managers to mislead investors by using judgment in
financial reporting (Healy and Wahlen, 1999). In this regard, internal and external monitoring
mechanisms can deter managers from opportunistic reporting by increasing the risk of
detection and potential penalties, thus reducing information asymmetry (Albersmann and
Hohenfels, 2017). The audit committee (AC) is recognized as an important corporate
governance mechanism for improving financial reporting quality (Mili and Alaali, 2023;
Sarbanes and Oxley, 2002). Through continuous monitoring of managers’ opportunistic
behaviors, the AC plays a major role in improving the quality and accuracy of financial
information and reducing information asymmetry between managers and shareholders, thus
reducing agency costs (Archambeault et al., 2008). In listed companies, an effective AC is
expected to improve stock market transparency (McMullen and Raghunandan, 1996;
DeZoort et al., 2002) and improve the quality of accounting information (Beasley, 1996;
Abbott et al., 2004; Pucheta-Martı́nez and De Fuentes, 2007). Financial scandals and
successive losses of shareholders and investors erode trust in financial reporting, and it is
the duty of the management, including the AC, to improve the quality of information for the
benefit of all stakeholders, especially the shareholders (Alavi and Ghaemi, 2017).
ACs have a unique and vital role in increasing earnings reliability in countries with weak
accounting standards (Poretti et al., 2018). Over the past two decades, the AC has become
one of the most important corporate governance mechanisms worldwide. Legislative and
regulatory bodies in many countries have required the establishment of the AC and the
expansion of its roles and responsibilities (Firoozi and Magnan, 2022). In Iran, the Audit
Committee Charter (2013) approved by the Securities and Exchange Organization (SEO)
requires the establishment of the AC and specifies its responsibilities for companies listed
on the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). Numerous studies have highlighted the role of ACs in
reducing opportunistic behaviors and increasing financial reporting quality (e.g. Baxter,
2010; Abbadi et al., 2016). Regarding the relationship between the AC and earnings
management, various characteristics such as financial expertise (Tajvidi and Ghaempanah,
2021; Be dard and Gendron, 2010; Karamanou and Vafeas, 2005; Sharma and Kuang,
2014), independence (Beasley et al., 2000; Abbott et al., 2000; Baxter and Cotter, 2009:
Tajvidi and Ghaempanah, 2021), female membership (Bala et al., 2019; Khlif and Achek,
2017), and tenure (Tamoradi et al., 2020; Adeyemi, 2006; Yang and Krishnan, 2005;
Schrader, 2017) have been investigated. Among these characteristics, financial expertise
and independence have been examined more frequently, but female membership has
received less attention, especially in Iran as an emerging country.
The AC comments upon and approves the accounting practices of a company, and thus it
can influence the company’s approach to financial reporting, level of disclosure and
compliance. Both scholars and professional bodies have argued that the AC can improve
financial reporting (e.g. Marsh and Powell, 1989; Auditing Practices Board, 1994). However,
the Enron scandal is evidence that the financial expertise of AC members does not necessarily
improve its effectiveness (Benston and Hartgraves, 2002); rather, other characteristics such as
independence, female membership and tenure can also play a role. Article 9 of the Audit
Committee Charter of TSE-listed firms specifies the responsibilities and powers of the AC in
relation to the independent auditor (Berkman and Zuta, 2018). Among other things, the AC is
responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the independent auditor.
From the users’ point of view, the existence of an AC improves auditor independence and thus
increases the quality of financial reporting (Gwilliam and Kilcommins, 1998). In this study, the
independent auditor fee is included as a moderator variable and a proxy for audit effort in the
relationship between AC characteristics (ACC) and creative accounting.
The rationale for examining abnormal audit fee is that it reflects the special relationship between
the auditor and the client. According to the literature, abnormal audit fee occurs in the form of
economic rent or bribes related to audit services and increases the auditor’s dependency on
j CORPORATE GOVERNANCE j
Downloaded from [Link]
[Link] [Link]
the client (Kinney and Libby, 2002; Choi et al., 2010). The results of this research can provide
insights into the effect of certain ACC on financial reporting quality, which can be helpful for
boards’ AC appointment decisions. Moreover, the moderating role of audit fee is investigated
as a proxy for auditor effort, which can be useful for increasing the effectiveness of the AC and
its relationship with the independent auditor. The contributions of this research are threefold:
䊏 The AC is relatively new in Iran, and extensive investigation is needed into the
characteristics that improve its performance and effectiveness. According to Alavi and
Ghaemi (2017), various factors such as insufficient oversight by the SEO, revision of the
Audit Committee Charter and insufficient compensation challenge AC effectiveness in
Iran. Therefore, the present research explains an important role in identifying the
consequences of the AC and examining its relationship with the companies’ reporting
approaches. This research deals with the ambiguous relationship between the AC and
CA in Iran’s economic environment, which introduces this important variable (CA) as one
of the creative methods in financial reporting and one of the methods of profit
management, which is partially in the literature related to the reporting environment. Iran’s
finance has been neglected, and the present study intends to improve the literature of this
field to some extent and to show the role of the AC in this regard in an experimental way.
䊏 This study focuses on nonfinancial information and the internal control system, which
are two of the areas within the purview of the AC as per Articles 13 and 17 of the Audit
Committee Charter.
䊏 In this study, the effect of the interaction between the AC and the independent audit fee
on the quality of financial reporting is investigated. In other words, by examining the
moderating role of audit fees in the relationship between ACC and CA, this research
depicts the efforts of independent auditors to help the AC to improve the status and
quality of financial reporting of companies.
As the entity responsible for overseeing the work of the auditors, the AC not only has a say
in the volume and scope of audit procedures but also determines audit fees in accordance
with the Audit Committee Charter (Abbaszadeh et al., 2020). In Iran, unlike in developed
countries, the corporate governance structure is weak and requirement to establish ACs in
Iranian firms has been carried out by TSE in recent years. In the late 2012, TSE approved
the AC charter to establish the corporate governance system. Therefore, these unique
socioeconomic features mentioned above along with other foreign and political factors such
as economic and trading sanctions against Iran that differentiate this capital market from
other countries make Iranian capital market as a unique context for our study and with
considering the nascent formation of ACs in Iran as well as the role of effective ACs in
alleviating the agency problems, protecting the investors’ interests and increasing the firms
value, we investigate the effect of effective AC on CA in Iranian firms. Therefore, our study
attempts to fill the gap and extend the literature on AC and CA in emerging markets. Hence,
the focus of our study is to acquire an understanding of whether the dimensions of AC affect
the CA among Iranian firms. So, we selected a sample of 1,218 firm-year observations from
companies listed on the TSE. Because of the unavailability of AC data, our study period
encompasses only seven years (2014–2020).
This paper proceeds as follows. Section 2 discusses relevant literature and develops the
hypotheses. Section 3 provides details of the data and methodology adopted. Section 4
presents the primary analysis. Section 5 provides additional analyses, and Section 6 concludes.
j CORPORATE GOVERNANCE j
Downloaded from [Link]
[Link] [Link]
value and prevent financial distress (Soleimani and Moghadasi, 2014). As an internal
corporate governance mechanism, ACs have a unique and vital role in increasing earnings
reliability in countries with weak accounting standards (Poretti et al., 2018). There is
sufficient empirical evidence of the relationship between the AC and financial reporting
quality (e.g. Dechow et al., 1996; Beasley et al., 2000). The present research focuses on
creative accounting as a measure of financial reporting quality. The concept of creative
accounting has been defined in various ways. Jameson (1988) defined it from an
accountant’s perspective as follows: “The accounting process consists of dealing with
many matters of judgement and of resolving conflicts between competing approaches to
the presentation of the results of financial events and transactions [. . .] this flexibility
provides opportunities for manipulation, deceit and misrepresentation. These activities—
practiced by the less scrupulous elements of the accounting profession—have come to
be known as ‘creative accounting’” (Setayesh and Gholami, 2012). Following the
Sarbanes–Oxley Act, monitoring financial reporting quality has become a major concern for
ACs and the main focus of corporate governance reforms (Shankaraiah et al., 2017). By
closely monitoring the accounting practices of the company, the AC can improve the quality
of financial reporting and information disclosure and deter the management from
aggressive accounting practices (Alavi and Ghaemi, 2017). The AC is an essential
mechanism for monitoring management decisions regarding financial reporting. It can curb
opportunistic behavior of managers and align their interests with those of stakeholders to
enhance the company’s earnings quality (Jahanian, 2016). Research shows that ACCs
have a significant effect on its ability to reduce opportunistic behaviors and enhance
financial reporting quality (Bala et al., 2019). In fact, the effectiveness of the AC is a function
dard and Gendron, 2010; Li et al., 2012). For example, larger ACs
of its characteristics (Be
consisting of members with diverse expertise can oversee financial reporting practices
more effectively (Vafeas, 2005). The literature on AC effectiveness is extensive, and the
results have been mixed. However, several factors that influence AC effectiveness have
been identified, including stock ownership, power, financial expertise and industry
expertise (DeZoort, 1998; Kalbers and Fogarty, 1993; DeZoort et al., 2002; Abbott et al.,
2004; Carcello et al., 2002; Beasley, 1996). The present research focuses on ACCs such as
financial expertise, independence, tenure and female membership. Based on these
discussions, the first hypothesis is developed as follows:
H1. There is a negative significant relationship between audit committee characteristics
with cosmetic accounting.
j CORPORATE GOVERNANCE j
Downloaded from [Link]
[Link] [Link]
plays a key role in ensuring the control of financial reports that leads to improved
performance of the company (Oroud, 2019). According to the agency theory, members with
financial expertise improve the AC’s ability to evaluate auditors’ judgment and can be
effective in creating a strong internal control system (Sultana, 2015). Financial expertise
allows AC members to discuss a wide range of topics related to financial reporting quality
with the management and independent auditors (Be dard and Gendron, 2010). It is
expected that the financial expertise of AC members will improve financial reporting quality
and transparency. Article 5 of the Audit Committee Charter states that “the audit committee
should be made up of three to five members, with the majority being independent and
having financial expertise.” As such, Iranian companies are required to have financial
experts on their AC, which is expected to minimize agency conflicts caused by managers’
opportunistic behaviors (Umar et al., 2023). Based on this, the existence of financial
expertise among the committee members is a basic prerequisite. According to Be dard and
Gendron (2010), the financial expertise of AC members allows them to ask demanding
questions from the management and independent auditors and be demanding in the quality
of answers provided. ACs with financial expertise can control accrual management more
effectively (Dhaliwal et al., 2010). Prior research has shown ACs with financial expertise can
better understand technical accounting procedures and standards, allowing them to
perform the responsibilities more competently (DeZoort and Salterio, 2001; Cohen et al.,
2002). In addition, AC expertise is associated with lower levels of earnings management
(Albersmann and Hohenfels, 2017; Krishnan et al., 2011; Naiker and Sharma, 2009; Soliman
and Ragab, 2014; Nasirzadeh et al., 2018). Accordingly, the first subhypothesis is
developed as follows:
H11. There is a negative significant relationship between audit committee financial expertise
with cosmetic accounting.
j CORPORATE GOVERNANCE j
Downloaded from [Link]
[Link] [Link]
j CORPORATE GOVERNANCE j
Downloaded from [Link]
[Link] [Link]
always have a risk nature and can also have a risk-taker character (Budi, 2019).
Justifying the presence of women in ACs according to the principle of gender balance
and measuring the diverse experiences and perspectives that each gender can bring to
a committee. This diversity in decisions and opinions can help improve the reporting
process. According to the liberal feminist point of view, emphasizing the power of joint
decision-making and the sharing of authority between women and men in ACs, as an
example of gender equality, can have a positive effect on the quality of decision-making
and the implementation of appropriate procedures based on reporting standards.
According to the liberal feminist approach, emphasis on audit ethics and the importance
of avoiding gender discrimination in the audit process can justify the active presence of
women in this field. Organizational structures and market mechanisms can reduce
agency conflicts (Fama and Jensen, 1983). According to Bathala and Rao (1995),
outside (nonexecutive) directors improve supervision and thus mitigate agency
problems. Female nonexecutive directors with financial expertise can transfer different
experiences, knowledge and ideas to the boards they are serving (Hillman et al., 2002).
Diverse backgrounds and other personality traits of female directors and AC members
can enhance the committee’s ability to manage risks and prevent financial distortions.
According to institutional theory, gender-diverse boards conduct higher-quality deliberations
and discussions on tough issues that may be considered unsavory in all-male boards (Huse
and Solberg, 2006). Institutional theory expands the traditional agency–theoretic view of
corporate governance by recognizing that boards and AC serve not only to monitor
management but also to provide symbolic legitimacy to the firm (Cohen et al., 2008).
According to the institutional theory, the presence of women in ACs can be considered as an
institutional change compared to the traditional and institutional structures of corporate
management. This institutional change may lead to increased transparency, the importance
of audit ethics and improved corporate governance. The presence of women with different
views and values can lead to diversity in decisions and optimal implementation of
conservative procedures in financial reporting. Female representation on board committees
has been shown to be positively associated with firm performance (Green and Homroy,
2018). This includes the AC, and examining the effect of female representation on this
committee can be useful. Regarding ACs, prior research has shown that gender diversity is
associated with better oversight and less earnings management (Lara et al., 2017; Zalata
et al., 2018). According to Srinidhi et al. (2011), female representation on the board of
directors and the AC can enhance earnings quality through better oversight. Moreover,
research has shown that female auditors are more sensitive to risks than male auditors (Gold
et al., 2009). In the Iranian context, Kazemi Olum and Abdi (2019) showed that AC gender
diversity is positively associated with earnings quality. Abdi et al. (2019) found that female
representation on the AC is negatively associated with information asymmetry. Oradi and
Izadi (2020) found a positive relationship between female membership on the AC and the
reliability of financial statements. Sepasi and Abdoli (2016) showed that companies with
female board members or female CEOs exhibit a higher degree of conditional conservatism;
that is, women tend to require a higher degree of verification to recognize good news as
gains than to recognize bad news as losses.
Prior research has also documented that the presence of female directors on the AC
reduces aggressive accrual management and the likelihood of receiving a going concern
opinion (Dobija et al., 2018; Firoozi et al., 2016; Ittonen et al., 2016; Martinez et al., 2016).
Abdullah and Ismail (2016) found a negative relationship between female membership on
the AC and discretionary accruals management. Therefore, female membership is expected
to increase AC effectiveness and have a positive effect on financial reporting quality, and the
fourth sub-hypothesis is developed as follows:
H14. There is a negative significant relationship between female audit committee
memberships with cosmetic accounting.
j CORPORATE GOVERNANCE j
Downloaded from [Link]
[Link] [Link]
3. Methodology
3.1 Sample
The present study adopts a quantitative, ex-post-facto research design to investigate the
relationships between variables. The data derives mainly from audited financial statements
and board’s reports of the TSE and Rahavard Novin software. The population of the study
encompasses all TSE firms for the period 2014–2020. However, the study compiles a
purposive sampling; Following these criteria, the study includes 174 firms (1,218 firm-year).
To select a representative sample, purposive sampling is used with the following four
inclusion criteria (see Table 1). In this research, the data is first analyzed using Excel
software and then using Eviews software, 11th version.
j CORPORATE GOVERNANCE j
Downloaded from [Link]
[Link] [Link]
X
SCAit ¼ b0 þ b1 ACCit þ b2 CONTROLit þ «it
X
SCAit ¼ b0 þ b1 ACCit þ b2 ACC AUFEE it þ b3 CONTROLit þ «it
j CORPORATE GOVERNANCE j
Downloaded from [Link]
[Link] [Link]
Dependent
Cosmetic accounting SCA CV of change in income divided by CV of change Ashari et al. (1994), Carlson and Bathala
in sales. A firm is categorized as income smoother (1997)
if it is CVDI/CVDS < 1 (smoothers coded as 1 and
otherwise 0)
Independent (ACC)
AC financial accounting ACFAE Proportion of AC members with recognized Abernathy et al. (2014), Krishnan et al.
experts professional accounting qualifications (2011) and Bala et al. (2019)
AC independence ACINDP Measured as proportion of independent direction Bala and Kumai (2015), Krishnan et al.
in AC to the total number of AC members (2011) and Sultana (2015)
Female AC membership FACM Measured as proportion of female direction in AC Martinez et al. (2016) and Thiruvadi and
to the total number of AC members Huang (2011)
AC tenure ACTTN Mean tenure on the AC Schrader (2017) and Majiyebo et al. (2018)
Moderator
Audit fee AUFEE Natural logarithms firm audit fee Carcello et al. (2002)
Control
AC size ACSZ Total number of AC members Sultana (2015) and Sun et al. (2014)
Board financial expertise BFE Proportion of financial expertise on the board Bala and Kumai (2015) and Baxter and
Cotter (2009)
Board independence BI Percentage of independence directors on the Krishnan et al. (2011) and Sultana (2015)
board
Firm age AGE Natural logarithms firm age of start
Firm size FSZ Natural logarithms of total assets Krishnan et al. (2011) and Sultana (2015)
Leverage LEV Long-term debt to total assets Jizi and Nehme (2018) and Krishnan et al.
(2011)
Sales growth SGROW Change in sales divided by previous sales
Source: Created by authors
4. Empirical results
4.1 Descriptive statistics of continuous and dichotomous continuous
Table 3 reports the descriptive statistics of the quantitative variables. To ensure the normal
distribution of the data, the data are winsorized at the 1% confidence interval to reduce the
effect of outliers. Table 3 shows that, on average, 0.732 of the AC members had financial
expertise, with a minimum value of 0.2 and a maximum value of 1. This finding indicates
the high proportion of members with financial expertise on Iranian ACs. The mean value
of AC independence is 0.362, with a minimum value of 0.2 and a maximum value of 1.
This finding suggests that compared to financial expertise, less importance is placed
on independence when selecting AC members. Regarding female membership, the
results show that 0.036 of AC members are female, with a minimum value of 0 and a
maximum value of 0.67. This indicates that female representation on the ACs is low,
which is a major weakness, especially given that there are companies without any
female AC members. According to the literature, gender diversity in the board of
directors and its committees, especially the AC, can strengthen supervisory and
governance mechanisms and help improve financial reporting quality. The mean tenure
of the AC members is 3.062, with a minimum value of 1 and a maximum value of 7.33.
The relatively high mean obtained for tenure suggests that the sample firms seek to
create stability in their ACs, taking into account the benefits of longer tenure. Audit fee
as the moderator variable has a mean value of 5.324, with a minimum value of 0 and a
maximum value of 8.52. The high mean value obtained for audit fee observations can
be attributed to the tenure and financial expertise of AC members. That is, AC members
j CORPORATE GOVERNANCE j
Downloaded from [Link]
[Link] [Link]
with longer tenure and more financial expertise pay more attention to the existing
agency relationships and are more likely to hire higher-quality auditors, which leads to
higher audit fees. The minimum value of 0 is reported because of the wide range of
audit fees and the low audit fees of some firms to avoid reducing the number of
samples.
Among the control variables, board financial expertise has a mean value of 0.155, with a
minimum of 0 and a maximum value of 0.6. Given the structure of the board of directors and
its relationship with the AC, the results indicate the relatively low level of financial expertise
among the board members of Iranian firms, and in some cases, the board of directors has
no members with financial expertise. High financial expertise is necessary for the board to
support the AC and act on its recommendations, which lack of financial expertise can
undermine the quality of financial reporting. Board independence has a mean value of
0.666, with a minimum value of 0.2 and a maximum value of 1. The mean values obtained
for firm size and age are also 14.830 and 3.627, respectively. The results indicate that
boards of directors in the sample firms have a higher ratio of independent directors than
directors with financial expertise. The mean value of financial leverage (0.067) suggests that
the investigated companies are less willing to finance through debt. Sales growth has a
mean value of 0.34. AC size has a mean value of 3.143, with a minimum value of 1 and a
maximum value of 5. A larger AC is expected to have better results, provided that other
influential characteristics of the AC are also considered in the selection of members. The
smallest observations mainly belong to the early years of the establishment of ACs in Iran
(around 2014).
The second part of Table 3 reports the descriptive statistics of the qualitative (dichotomous)
variable, creative accounting, which takes the value of 1 for firms that engage in creative
accounting, and 0 otherwise. For variables with nominal and ordinal scales, it is not
appropriate to use measures of central tendency and dispersion and instead frequency
distribution is used to describe these variables. The results in Table 3 show that out of a
total of 1,218 observations, 600 firms (49%) engage in creative accounting. Also, Table 4
shows the correlation coefficient between the variables .
Subhypotheses H1.1–H1.4 are tested using a probit regression model, and the results are
provided in Table 5. For H1.1, a significant negative relationship is observed between AC
financial expertise and creative accounting. The coefficient of financial expertise is
j CORPORATE GOVERNANCE j
Downloaded from [Link]
[Link] [Link]
1 SCA 1
2 –
ACFAE 0.407 1
0.000 –
ACINDP 0.255 0.174 1
0.000 0.000 –
ACTTN 0.115 0.072 0.038 1
0.000 0.012 0.180 –
FACM 0.045 0.067 0.012 0.026 1
0.114 0.019 0.672 0.361 –
AUFEE 0.063 0.017 0.032 0.112 0.044 1
0.029 0.554 0.272 0.000 0.122 –
ACSZ 0.039 0.054 0.034 0.007 0.014 0.061 1
0.176 0.059 0.239 0.811 0.620 0.035 –
AGE 0.110 0.050 0.058 0.033 0.099 0.038 0.037 1
0.000 0.083 0.044 0.252 0.001 0.184 0.197 –
BFE 0.029 0.197 0.091 0.100 0.001 0.031 0.010 0.069 1
0.315 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.961 0.273 0.722 0.017 –
BI 0.097 0.044 0.011 0.014 0.033 0.071 0.055 0.120 0.011 1
0.001 0.121 0.700 0.619 0.249 0.013 0.053 0.000 0.700 –
FSZ 0.162 0.062 0.023 0.114 0.108 0.232 0.263 0.000 0.038 0.078 1
0.000 0.030 0.427 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.989 0.185 0.006 –
LEV 0.070 0.024 0.057 0.027 0.072 0.056 0.034 0.049 0.015 0.036 0.009 1
0.015 0.409 0.046 0.340 0.012 0.049 0.237 0.090 0.593 0.204 0.750 –
SGROW 0.241 0.134 0.106 0.030 0.007 0.046 0.016 0.014 0.031 0.004 0.101 0.017 1
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.297 0.795 0.105 0.570 0.617 0.275 0.883 0.000 0.561 –
1 Correlation
2 p-value
Source: Created by authors
2.319706 with a p-value of 0.0000, which is significant at the 95% level. Consistent with
the theoretical framework, this finding indicates that greater financial expertise in the AC
leads to lower levels of creative accounting as a measure of poor financial reporting quality.
An AC with greater financial expertise can better mitigate agency conflicts arising from
management’s opportunistic behavior and will have a positive effect on earnings quality and
financial reporting quality. According to Article 7 of the Audit Committee Charter of firms
listed on the TSE, AC financial expertise plays a vital role in effective corporate governance,
internal control and financial monitoring. The results also indicate that firm age, sales growth
and firm size are negatively associated with creative accounting, while financial leverage
and board independence are positively associated with creative accounting. For H1.2, a
significant negative relationship is observed between AC independence and creative
accounting (Table 5). The coefficient of independence is 2.57858 with a p-value of 0.0000,
which is significant at the 95% level. This finding indicates that as AC members become
more independent, the company will be less likely to engage in creative accounting. In fact,
because of the distinct position of independent members and their greater ability to
withstand management pressure for earnings manipulation, they are more effective in
curtailing opportunistic management behaviors and enhancing the quality of financial
reporting. The results also show that firm age, sales growth and firm size are negatively
associated with creative accounting, while board independence and financial leverage are
positively associated with creative accounting.
For H1.3, a significant negative relationship is observed AC tenure and creative accounting
(Table 5). The coefficient of tenure is 0.093626 with a p-value of 0.0004, which is
significant at the 95% level. This finding indicates that as the average tenure of AC
j CORPORATE GOVERNANCE j
Downloaded from [Link]
[Link] [Link]
Table 5 Panel data probit regression between AC characteristics and cosmetic accounting
H1
Variable H11 H12 H13 H14
members increases, the firm will be less likely to engage in creative accounting. Longer
tenure is associated with more experience and expertise in monitoring the financial
reporting process, as well as long-term commitment and reputation capital that have been
developed over time, which can mitigate factors that undermine financial reporting quality.
Moreover, longer-tenured directors are more likely to hire higher-quality auditors because of
their greater knowledge of the firm’s operations, which can improve financial reporting
quality and reduce creative accounting. The results also show that firm age, sales growth
and firm size are negatively associated with creative accounting, while board
independence and financial leverage are positively associated with creative accounting.
For H1.4, a significant negative relationship is observed between female membership on
the AC and creative accounting (Table 5). The coefficient of female membership is 0.8027
with a p-value of 0.0269, which is significant at the 95% level. This finding indicates that
higher female representation on the AC decreases the likelihood of the firm engaging in
creative accounting. Based on the institutional theory, gender diversity enables the
committee to conduct higher-quality deliberations. The results are consistent with the
theoretical framework in that because of their specific personality traits, higher
representation of women on the board of directors and the AC leads to greater
effectiveness in risk management and financial fraud prevention. More specifically, traits
such as greater sensitivity to issues and higher conservatism in gender-diverse ACs with
strong female presence can improve oversight mechanisms and reduce earnings
management. The results also show that firm age, firm size and sales growth are negatively
associated with creative accounting, while board independence and financial leverage are
positively associated with creative accounting.
Subhypotheses H2.1–H2.4 are also tested using a probit regression model, with audit fee
as the moderator variable (Table 6). For H2.1, the results show that audit fee moderates the
relationship between AC financial expertise and creative accounting. The coefficient of
audit fee is 0.169437 with a p-value of 0.0000, which is significant at the 95% level. Audit
fee is a measure of audit quality, and as noted earlier, the presence of members with
financial expertise on the AC increases the likelihood of hiring higher-quality auditors with
higher fees, thus helping the AC curtail creative accounting and improve the quality of
financial reporting. For H2.2, the results show that audit fee moderates the relationship
between AC independence and creative accounting (Table 6). The coefficient of audit fee is
j CORPORATE GOVERNANCE j
Downloaded from [Link]
[Link] [Link]
Table 6 Panel data probit regression between AC characteristics and cosmetic accounting with audit fee moderator affect
H2
Variable H21 H22 H23 H24
0.465956 with a p-value of 0.0000, which is significant at the 95% level. According to the
agency theory, conflicts of interest arise from the separation of ownership from
management, and shareholders must incur costs to ensure that their interests and
objectives are aligned with those of the management. Agency cost is paid to the auditor
as audit fee to act as an independent agent and provide assurance of the reliability of
financial statements. The significant moderating effect indicates the greater ability of
independent directors to guide and support the independent audit process, which
reduces the likelihood of creative accounting and improves the quality of financial
reporting.
For H2.3, the results show that audit fee moderates the relationship between AC tenure and
creative accounting (Table 6). The coefficient of audit fee is 0.071997 with a p-value of
0.0000, which is significant at the 95% level. Longer-tenured members of the AC have more
experience and knowledge of the business, which can have a positive effect on the quality
of financial reporting. Given the fact that determining audit fee is one of the responsibilities
of the AC as per the Audit Committee Charter, longer-tenured members have a better
understanding of the company and are more likely to hire higher-quality auditors, which
entails a higher audit fee. Finally for H2.4, the results show that audit fee moderates the
relationship between female membership on the AC and creative accounting (Table 6). The
coefficient of audit fee is 0.6719 with a p-value of 0.0000, which is significant at the 95%
level. The literature on the personality traits of female AC members suggests that a gender-
diverse AC tends to be more sensitive to the oversight aspects of corporate governance
because of its higher degree of conservatism and lower risk tolerance, thus opting for
higher-quality audits as a means to mitigate agency problems, curtail creative accounting
practices and enhance financial reporting quality. Gender-diverse ACs are also better able
to establish an effective relationship with the independent auditor and pay more attention to
the scope and quality of audits, which leads to an increase in the audit fee, but reduces
creative accounting and improves the quality of financial reporting.
The results of the research hypotheses are summarized in Table 7.
j CORPORATE GOVERNANCE j
Downloaded from [Link]
[Link] [Link]
5. Additional analysis
Audit fee is affected by the risk associated with the characteristics of the client such as size,
complexity and internal controls (Simunic, 1980; Francis, 1984; Palmrose, 1986) as well as
business risk (Bentley et al., 2013). When the risk of material misstatement is high, audit
standards require independent auditors to show greater effort and perform additional tests to
obtain more reliable evidence (Heninger, 2001; Patterson and Smith, 2003; Zhao, 2010). In
addition, as audit risk increases, the auditor will demand a risk premium to cover the potential
loss related to litigation risk, which results in higher audit fees (Heninger, 2001; Lyon and
Maher, 2005). Article 9 of the Audit Committee Charter discusses the responsibilities and
powers of the AC in relation to the independent auditor. These include the selection of
an independent auditor, the independent auditor’s fee and the independence of the
auditor. The interaction between the AC and the independent auditor has the potential
to improve earnings quality oversight (Yousefiasl et al., 2018). For additional analysis,
the effect of abnormal audit fee on the relationship between ACC and creative
accounting is investigated. Abnormal audit fee is the difference between the actual
audit fee paid to the auditor and the expected (normal) audit fee (Simunic, 1980; Choi
et al., 2009).
The rationale for investigating abnormal audit fee is that it is dependent upon the special
relationship between the auditor and the client. According to the literature, abnormal audit
fee can occur in the form of economic rent or bribes related to audit services and increases
the auditor’s dependency on the client (Kinney and Libby, 2002; Choi et al., 2010).
Numerous studies have examined the relationship between audit fees and financial
reporting quality (e.g. Chen et al., 2011; Ettredge et al., 2014; Asthana and Boone, 2012;
Blankley et al., 2012), but little research has been done on the different aspects of abnormal
audit fees that may be associated with different degrees of financial reporting quality.
DeFond and Zhang (2014) argued that abnormal audit fee can indicate additional audit
effort, which will increase the quality of financial reporting. On the contrary, it could reflect
auditors’ higher risk appetite or collusion between the client and the auditor (e.g. DeFond
and Zhang, 2014; Kinney and Libby, 2002), in which case the quality of financial reporting
j CORPORATE GOVERNANCE j
Downloaded from [Link]
[Link] [Link]
will be compromised. In this research, the regression model of Simunic (1980) is used to
measure normal and abnormal audit fees:
The results of estimating this probit regression model are provided in Table 8. For the
relationship between financial expertise and creative accounting, the moderating effect of
abnormal audit fee is positive, but not statistically significant. This means that where there is
abnormal audit fee, increasing the number of members with financial expertise cannot
Table 8 Additional analysis panel data probit regression between AC characteristics and cosmetic accounting with
abnormal audit fee moderator affect
ACC
Variable ACFAE ACINDP ACTTN FACM
j CORPORATE GOVERNANCE j
Downloaded from [Link]
[Link] [Link]
increase the effectiveness of the AC. That is because in the presence of abnormal audit
fees, members with financial expertise can more effectively advance the objectives of the
management by virtue of their experience and expertise in financial reporting, which
diminishes the role of financial expertise in preventing financial statement manipulation and
creative accounting. Regarding tenure, the results are similar to those obtained for financial
expertise. That is, longer tenure in situations where there is abnormal audit fee has a
negative effect on creative accounting, and the long-term dependencies developed
between members and the management can reduce the effectiveness of the AC.
As for AC independence, the results indicate a significant negative effect at the 10% level.
According to the agency theory, conflicts of interest lead to misalignment of objectives,
which has an adverse effect on creative accounting as a measure of poor financial reporting
quality in case of abnormal audit fees. However, this relationship is moderated by the
presence of independent members on the AC and the corporate governance system.
Regarding female membership, a negative moderating effect is observed, but it is not
statistically significant. According to the literature, because of the conservatism, greater
sensitivity to financial statement manipulation and lower propensity for aggressive earnings
management, abnormal audit fee is expected to moderate the relationship between female
membership and accounting creativity. However, given the nature of the abnormal audit
fees and the low representation and influence of women in the ACs of Iranian firms, the
results indicate the ineffectiveness of the AC in case of abnormal audit fee payment.
In general, the results relating to the moderating effect of abnormal audit fee should be
interpreted with caution. According to the theoretical and empirical literature, characteristics
such as financial expertise, independence and tenure are negatively associated with
creative accounting, which are also robust when audit fee is used as a moderator variable.
However, the presence of abnormal audit fee challenges the effectiveness of the AC, with
only independence remaining significant.
j CORPORATE GOVERNANCE j
Downloaded from [Link]
[Link] [Link]
serving on the AC increase the committee’s effectiveness in risk management and financial
fraud prevention. According to Green and Homroy (2018), board gender diversity creates a
strong corporate structure that improves firm performance. Female representation on the
board of directors and the AC is an effective way to improve reporting quality and increase the
reliability of financial statements for users.
These findings can be analyzed from the perspective of different theories. According to the
agency theory, members with financial expertise improve the AC’s ability to evaluate
auditors’ judgment and can be effective in creating a strong internal control system.
Furthermore, from the perspective of RDT, it is assumed that the multiple abilities,
knowledge and expertise of ACs lead to superior corporate results.
According to the RDT, the expertise of the AC plays a key role in ensuring the control of
financial reports that leads to improved performance of the company. According to this
theory, appropriate expertise of AC members can reduce dependence on external sources
and create confidence in the financial reporting process. In addition, according to the
theory of social feminism, women spend more energy than they can find a special place in
society. Therefore, it can be said that the efforts of women in the AC have strengthened the
reporting environment as well as the supervisory role of the AC in this environment. Based
on the social feminist theory, it can be argued that these findings point to the presence of
women in the AC and their role in regulating the interests of managers and shareholders.
Therefore, it can be said that based on the ability of women in the AC, the amount of profit
has decreased. Also, according to the theory of liberal feminism, women mainly have a risk-
taking character and tolerate risk to some extent. Therefore, it can be said that the
conservative character of women has led to more discipline in the reporting environment
and played an important role in reducing CA. The liberal feminist theory interprets these
results to share the roles of responsibility and women’s participation in financial decisions in
the organization and highlights the independent role of women in accounting decisions and
providing financial reports free of any manipulation and bias. In general, the analysis of
these findings from the perspective of social feminist theory and liberal feminist theory can
confirm and explain the positive and effective role of women in the financial and accounting
complex and help improve the transparency and quality of financial reports. These
characteristics of women’s conservatism have helped to strengthen the credibility and
supervisory power of the AC in the financial reporting process and have had a positive
effect on increasing the honesty and accuracy of the company’s financial information.
Regarding the moderating effect of audit fee, it must be noted that audit fee is an agency
cost (monitoring fee) and a measure of auditor effort. Audit fee increases with the volume
and quality of audits. According to Schroeder et al. (1986), AC members believe that larger
audit firms with higher audit fees are more likely to detect material errors and misstatements.
Therefore, the effect of audit fee on the relationship between ACC and creative accounting
was tested, and the results indicated that these relationships are negatively moderated by
audit fee. This suggests that when the audit fee of a company increases, the likelihood of
engaging in creative accounting decreases, and the increase in audit fee can be viewed as
an indicator of audit quality. Given the roles and responsibilities of the AC and the board of
directors, we can conclude that independent auditors are largely responsible for ensuring
fair financial reporting (Cohen et al., 2008; Sulaiman, 2017). The results also support the
hypothesis that expert members of the AC demand greater effort from independent auditors
by paying higher audit fees (Goodwin-Stewart and Kent, 2006). These findings are in
accordance with the assumptions of the agency theory and show that the audit mechanism
and the greater effort of independent auditors lead to the reduction of agency problems.
Francis and Wilson (1988) also considered more demand for auditing as one of the ways to
reduce agency conflict. Therefore, these findings are a reaffirmation of agency theory.
In additional tests, the effect of abnormal audit fees on the relationship between ACC and
creative accounting was investigated. The results showed that this effect was only
j CORPORATE GOVERNANCE j
Downloaded from [Link]
[Link] [Link]
significant for AC independence, which can be in line with agency theory and the role of the
AC in reducing conflicts of interest and aligning divergent objectives. The moderating effect
of abnormal audit fee in relation to other ACC. Regarding financial expertise and tenure,
given the nature of abnormal audit fee as an indicator of the auditor’s dependency on and
special relationships with the client, such payments could mean that the AC is moving away
from its main role, which will undermine its effectiveness. In relation to female membership,
contrary to the literature, the results show that the effect of audit fee is not significant, which
can be attributed to the low proportion of female membership on Iranian ACs.
Based on the findings of the research, it is suggested that regulatory bodies and standard
setting organizations should encourage companies to form ACs with members with diverse
financial expertise, independence and relevant tenure, and emphasize on increasing the
presence of women in ACs. Because the findings of this research consistently highlight the
positive impact of financial expertise, autonomy and tenure on creative accounting restraint.
This recommendation is consistent with the literature showing that a well-formed AC is
effective in increasing the quality of financial reporting and reducing agency costs.
Therefore, policymakers should support policies that promote gender diversity in ACs. This
may include setting goals for women’s representation and creating incentives for
companies to actively involve women in these governance structures.
Our findings can help investors and other users of financial statements to understand the
role of the AC as a key corporate governance mechanism in enhancing financial reporting
quality, as well as the role of the independent auditor in AC effectiveness. The results are
also useful for accounting policymakers in promoting the role of the AC in reducing earnings
management, understanding the characteristics conducive to a dynamic AC and
developing guidelines that are tailored to the specific conditions of the country. These
findings allow investors to better understand the important role of independent auditors’
efforts on the effectiveness of the AC in increasing the credibility of financial information
disclosure, which in turn will increase investor confidence. This study can also be useful for
policymakers and regulators, as it enables them to understand the importance of these
distinctive characteristics of the AC in reducing financial opportunistic activities, which is one
of the most important elements of increasing the quality of financial reporting. In particular,
these findings help policymakers and regulators to understand the potential impact of
women members in the AC and make the position and absence of women in the economic
environment and Iranian companies, which still have a very low share in the board of
directors and corporate committees, fully felt. Therefore, it is recommended that
contemporary laws be updated and the presence of female expert members in the AC and
board structure of Iranian companies is mandatory in the new laws.
The present research investigated the relationship between ACC and creative accounting
with an emphasis on the moderating role of audit fees. Future research can explore other
oversight mechanisms such as internal audit as well as other moderators such as
ownership structure. One of the limitations of this research was the large variance in the
amount of audit fees paid by the sample firms, which forced us to give zero values to firms
with very low audit fees. Moreover, the establishment of ACs in Iran became mandatory in
2014, which limited the studied time period and the available data.
References
Abbadi, S.S., Hijazi, Q.F. and Al-Rahahleh, A. (2016), “Corporate governance quality and earnings
management: evidence from Jordan”, Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, Vol. 10
No. 2, pp. 54-75.
Abbaszadeh, M.R., Fakor, H. and GHanad, M. (2020), “Investigating the relationship between audit
committee characteristics and audit fees”, Journal of Financial Accounting Knowledge, Vol. 4 No. 3,
pp. 47-64.
j CORPORATE GOVERNANCE j
Downloaded from [Link]
[Link] [Link]
Abbott, L., Parker, S. and Peters, G. (2004), “Audit committee characteristics and restatements”,
Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 69-87.
Abbott, L.J., Park, Y. and Parker, S. (2000), “The effects of audit committee activity and independence on
corporate fraud”, Managerial Finance, Vol. 26 No. 11, pp. 55-67.
Abdi, M., Sanaeimohamadi, M.H., Kazemioloum, M. and Heydari, Y. (2019), “Effectiveness audit committee
and information asymmetry agency theory review”, Journal of Audit Science, Vol. 19 No. 74, pp. 209-236.
Abdullah, S.N. and Ismail, K.N.I.K. (2016), “Women directors, family ownership and earnings
management in Malaysia”, Asian Review of Accounting, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 525-550.
Abernathy, J.L., Beyer, B., Masli, A. and Stefaniak, C. (2014), “The association between characteristics of
audit committee accounting experts, audit committee chairs, and financial reporting timeliness”,
Advances in Accounting, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 283-297.
Adeyemi, S.B. (2006), “Impact of accounting standards on financial reporting in Nigeria”, Unpublished
PhD Thesis, University of Lagos.
Ahmadpour, A. and Ahmadi, A. (2008), “Using the qualitative characteristics of financial information in
evaluating the earnings quality”, Journal of Accounting and Auditing Review, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 3-16.
Alavi, S.M. and Ghaemi, M.S. (2017), “Pathology of the audit committee”, Journal of Accounting
Knowledge, Vol. 17 No. 68, pp. 127-147.
Albersmann, BT. and Hohenfels, D. (2017), “Audit committees and earnings management –evidence
from the German two-tier board system”, Schmalenbach Business Review, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 147-178.
Archambeault, D., DeZoort, F. and Hermanson, D. (2008), “Audit committee incentive compensation and
accounting restatements”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 965-992.
Ardillah, K. (2022), “Do environmental performance, feminism in commissioner, female audit committee,
and corporate visibility affect corporate environmental disclosure?”, Journal of Accounting and Strategic
Finance, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 193-214.
Ashari, N., Koh, H.C., Tan, S.L. and Wong, W.H. (1994), “Factors affecting income smoothing among
listed companies in Singapore”, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 24 No. 96, pp. 291-301.
Asthana, S.C. and Boone, J.P. (2012), “Abnormal audit fee and audit quality”, Auditing: A Journal of
Practice & Theory, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 1-22.
Audit Committee Charter (2013), Securities and Stock Exchange Organization, Tehran.
Auditing Practices Board (1994), The First Ten Years, APC, London.
Bala, H. and Kumai, G.B. (2015), “Board characteristics and earnings management of listed food and
beverages firms in Nigeria”, European Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance Research, Vol. 3
No. 8, pp. 25-41.
Bala, H., Amran, N.A. and Shaari, H. (2019), “Audit committee attributes and cosmetic accounting in
Nigeria: the moderating effect of audit price”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 177-206.
Barth, M.E., Landsman, W.R., Lang, M.H. and Williams, C.D. (2018), “Effects on comparability and capital
market benefits of voluntary IFRS adoption”, Journal of Financial Reporting, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 1-22.
Bathala, C.T. and Rao, R.P. (1995), “The determinants of board composition: an agency theory
perspective”, Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 59-69.
Baxter, P. (2010), “Factors associated with the quality of audit committees”, Pacific Accounting Review,
Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 57-74.
Baxter, P. and Cotter, J. (2009), “Audit committees and earnings quality”, Accounting & Finance, Vol. 49
No. 2, pp. 267-290.
Bazrafshan, A., Hejazi, R., Rahmani, A. and Bastani, S. (2015), “Metaanalysis independence audit committee
and financial reporting quality”, Journal of Management Accounting, Vol. 8 No. 25, pp. 101-117.
Beasley, M. (1996), “An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and
financial statement fraud”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 71 No. 4, pp. 443-465.
Beasley, M.S., Carcello, J.V., Hermanson, D.R. and Lapides, P.D. (2000), “Fraudulent financial reporting:
consideration of industry traits and corporate governance mechanisms”, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 14
No. 4, pp. 441-454.
j CORPORATE GOVERNANCE j
Downloaded from [Link]
[Link] [Link]
dard, J. and Gendron, Y. (2010), “Strengthening the financial reporting system: can audit committees
Be
deliver”, International Journal of Auditing, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 174-210.
Benston, J. and Hartgraves, L. (2002), “Enron: what happened and what we can learn from it”, Journal of
Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 105-127.
Bentley, K.A., Omer, T.C. and Sharp, N.Y. (2013), “Business strategy, financial reporting irregularities,
and audit effort”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 780-817.
Berkman, O. and Zuta, S.D. (2018), “Reconsidering the mandate of the audit committee: evidence from
corporate governance in Israel”, International Corporate Governance and Regulation (Advances in
Financial Economics, Vol. 20, pp. 189-209.
Biddle, G., Hilary, G. and Verdi, R.S. (2009), “How does financial reporting quality relate to investment
efficiency”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 48 Nos 2/3, pp. 112-131.
Blankley, A., Hurtt, D. and McGregor, J. (2012), “Abnormal audit fees and restatements”, Auditing: A
Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 79-96.
Bruynseels, L. and Cardinaels, E. (2014), “The audit committee: management watchdog or personal
friend of the CEO?”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 89 No. 1, pp. 113-145.
Budi, P.N. (2019), “The role of gender diversity on the board of directors and tax avoidance”, Russian
Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, Vol. 87 No. 3, pp. 107-115.
Carcello, J.V., Hermanson, D.R., Neal, T.L. and Riley, R.A. (2002), “Board characteristics and audit fees”,
Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 365-384.
Carlson, S.J. and Bathala, C.T. (1997), “Ownership differences and firms’ income smoothing behavior”,
Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 179-196.
Chan, A.M.Y., Liu, G. and Sun, J. (2012), “Independent audit committee member’s board tenure and
audit fees”, Accounting and Finance, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 46-62.
Chen, L., Krishnan, G. and Yu, W. (2011), “The relation between audit fee cuts during the global financial
crisis and earnings quality and audit quality (September 15, 2016)”, available at SSRN: [Link]
abstract¼2839901 or doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2839901.
Chen, B. and Komal, B. (2018), “Audit committee financial expertise and earnings quality: a meta-
analysis”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 84 No. 1, pp. 253-270.
Choi, J., Kim, J. and Zang, Y. (2010), “Do abnormally high audit fees impair audit quality?”, Auditing: A
Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 115-140.
Choi, J.H., Kim, J.B., Liu, X. and Simunic, D.A. (2009), “Cross-listing audit fee premiums: theory and
evidence”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 84 No. 5, pp. 1429-1463.
Cohen, J.R., Krishnamoorthy, G. and Wright, A.M. (2008), “Form versus substance: the implications for
auditing practice and research of alternative perspectives on corporate governance”, Auditing: A Journal
of Practice & Theory, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 181-198.
Cohen, J., Gaynor, L.M., Krishnamoorthy, G. and Wright, A.M. (2007), “Auditor communications with the
audit committee and the board of directors: opportunities for future research”, Accounting Horizons,
Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 165-187.
Cohen, J., Krishnamoorthy, G. and Wright, A.M. (2002), “Corporate governance and the audit process”,
Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 573-594.
Dakhlallh, M.M., Rashid, N., Abdullah, W.A.W. and Al Shehab, H.J. (2020), “Audit committee and Tobin’s
Q as a measure of firm performance among Jordanian companies”, Journal of Advanced Research in
Dynamical and Control Systems, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 28-41.
Dechow, P., Ge, W. and Schrand, C. (2010), “Understanding earning quality: a review of the proxies, their
determinants and their consequences”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 50 Nos 2/3,
pp. 344-401.
Dechow, P., Sloan, R. and Sweeney, A. (1996), “Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: an
analysis of firm’s subject to enforcement actions by the SEC”, Contemporary Accounting Research,
Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 1-36.
DeFond, M. and Zhang, J. (2014), “A review of archival auditing research”, Journal of Accounting and
Economics, Vol. 58 Nos 2/3, pp. 275-326.
j CORPORATE GOVERNANCE j
Downloaded from [Link]
[Link] [Link]
DeZoort, F.T. (1998), “An analysis of experience effects on audit committee members oversight
judgments”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 1-22.
DeZoort, F.T. and Salterio, S. (2001), “The effects of corporate governance experience and financial and
audit knowledge on audit committee members’ judgments”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,
Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 31-47.
DeZoort, T.F., Hermanson, D., Archambeault, D. and Reed, S. (2002), “Audit committee effectiveness: a
synthesis of the empirical audit committee literature”, Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. 21 No. 8,
pp. 38-75.
Dhaliwal, D.A.N., Naiker, V.I.C. and Navissi, F. (2010), “The association between accruals quality and the
characteristics of accounting experts and mix of expertise on audit committees”, Contemporary
Accounting Research, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 787-827.
Dobija, D., Hryckiewicz, A. and Puławska, K. (2018), “From critical mass to ‘voice’ – the effect of gender
diversity on financial reporting quality”, Working paper, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2885789.
Ettredge, M., Fuerherm, E.E. and Li, C. (2014), “Fee pressure and audit quality”, Accounting,
Organizations and Society, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 247-263.
Fama, E.F. and Jensen, M.C. (1983), “Separation of ownership and control”, The Journal of Law and
Economics, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 301-325.
Firnanti, F. and Karmudiandri, A. (2020), “Corporate governance and financial ratios effect on audit report
lag”, GATR Accounting and Finance Review, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 15-21.
Firoozi, M. and Magnan, M. (2022), “Audit committee members’ proximity to corporate headquarters and
audit fees”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 37 No. 8, pp. 1062-1090.
Firoozi, M., Magnan, M., Fortin, S. and Nicholls, S. (2016), “Do foreign directors an audit committees
enhance financial reporting quality?”, Serie Scientifique Scientific Series Montreal, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 1-46.
Fisher, E.M., Reuber, A.R. and Dyke, L.S. (1993), “A theoretical overview and extension of research on
sex, gender, and entrepreneurship”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 151-168.
Francis, J.R. (1984), “The effect of audit firm size on audit prices: a study of the Australian market”,
Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 133-151.
Francis, J.R. and Wilson, E.R. (1988), “Auditor changes: a joint test of theories relating to agency costs
and auditor differentiation”, Accounting Review, Vol. 63 No. 4, pp. 663-682.
Gold, A., Hunton, J.E. and Gomaa, M.I. (2009), “The impact of Clint and auditor gender on auditors
judgments”, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 1-18.
Goodwin-Stewart, J. and Kent, P. (2006), “Relation between external audit fees, audit committee
characteristics and internal audit”, Accounting & Finance, Vol. 46 No. 3, pp. 387-404.
Green, C.P. and Homroy, S. (2018), “Female directors, board committees and firm performance”,
European Economic Review, Vol. 102 No. 2, pp. 19-38.
Gwilliam, D. and Kilcommins, M. (1998), “The impact of audit firm size and audit committees on
perceptions of auditor independence and financial statement reliability in Ireland”, Accounting, Finance
& Governance Review, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 23-56.
Healy, P.M. and Wahlen, J.M. (1999), “A review of the earnings management literature and its
implications for standard setting”, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 365-383.
Heninger, W.G. (2001), “The association between auditor litigation and abnormal accruals”, The
Accounting Review, Vol. 76 No. 1, pp. 111-126.
Heydari, K. (2016), “The effectiveness of the audit committee on the timeliness of financial reporting”,
Master thesis, University of Rzai (Iran).
Hillman, A.J., Cannella, A.A. and Harris, I.C. (2002), “Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: how
do they differ?”, Journal of Management, Vol. 28 No. 6, pp. 747-763.
Hundal, S. (2013), “Independence, expertise and experience of audit committees: some aspects of
Indian corporate sector”, American International Journal of Social Science, Vol. 2 No. 5, pp. 58-75.
Huse, M. and Solberg, A. (2006), “Gender-related boardroom dynamics: how Scandinavian women
make and can make contributions on corporate board”, Women in Management Review, Vol. 21 No. 2,
pp. 113-130.
j CORPORATE GOVERNANCE j
Downloaded from [Link]
[Link] [Link]
Ittonen, K., Tronnes, P. and Vähämaa, S. (2016), “Do former auditors on the audit committee constrain
earnings management? Evidence from the banking industry”, Working paper, available at: [Link]
hk/[Link]
Jahanian, H. (2016), “The effect audit committee charactristic on earnings quality: evidence from Tehran
Stock Exchange”, Master thesis, University of Mazandaran, Iran.
Jameson, M. (1988), A Practical Guide to Creative Accounting, Kogan Page, London.
Jizi, M. and Nehme, R. (2018), “Board monitoring and audit fees: the moderating role of CEO/chair dual
roles”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 217-243.
Juhmani, O. (2017), “Audit committee characteristics and earning management: the case of Bahrain”,
International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 11-31.
Kalbers, L. and Fogarty, T. (1993), “Audit committee effectiveness: an empirical investigation of the
contribution of power”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 24-49.
Karamanou, I. and Vafeas, N. (2005), “The association between corporate boards, audit committees, and
management earnings forecasts: an empirical analysis”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 43 No. 3,
pp. 453-486.
Kazemi Olum, M. and Abdi, M. (2019), “Impacts of gender diversity in board of directors and
audit committee on earnings quality”, Journal of Accounting Knowledge, Vol. 10 No. 1,
pp. 137-168.
Khlif, H. and Achek, I. (2017), “Gender in accounting research: a review”, Managerial Auditing Journal,
Vol. 32 No. 6, pp. 627-655.
Kinney, W.R. and Libby, R. (2002), “Discussion of the relation between auditors fees for non-audit
services and earnings management”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 77 No. s-1, pp. 107-114.
Klein, A. (2002), “Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management”, Journal
of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 375-400.
Krishnan, J., Wen, Y. and Zhao, W. (2011), “Legal expertise on corporate audit committees and financial
reporting quality”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 86 No. 6, pp. 2099-2130.
Lara, J.M.G., Osma, B.G., Mora, A. and Scapin, M. (2017), “The monitoring role of female directors over
accounting quality”, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 45 No. August, pp. 651-668.
Lari, M. and Oradi, J. (2017), “The investigation of the association between CEO tenure and
financial expertise to audit fee”, Accounting and Auditing Review, (in Persian), Vol. 24 No. 1,
pp. 81-102.
Leong, K.S., Wang, J., Suwardy, T. and Kusnadi, Y. (2015), “Audit committees and financial reporting
quality in Singapore”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 28-30.
Li, J., Mangena, M. and Pike, R. (2012), “The effect of audit committee characteristics on intellectual
capital disclosure”, The British Accounting Review, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 98-110.
Liu, G. and Sun, J. (2010), “Director tenure and independent audit committee effectiveness”, International
Research Journal of Finance and Economics, Vol. 51 No. 1, pp. 176-189.
Lyon, J.D. and Maher, M.W. (2005), “The importance of business risk in setting audit fees: evidence from
cases of client misconduct”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 43 No. 1, pp. 133-151.
McMullen, D.A. and Raghunandan, K. (1996), “Enhancing audit committee effectiveness”, Journal of
Accountancy, Vol. 182 No. 2, pp. 79-81.
Mahdavi, G.H. and Monfared Maharlooyi, M. (2011), “Board combination and agency costs”, Accounting
Research Journal, (in Persian), Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 56-72.
Majiyebo, O.J., Okpanachi, J., Nyor, T., Yahaya, O.A. and Mohammed, A. (2018), “Audit committee
independence, size and financial reporting quality of listed deposit money banks in Nigeria”, IOSR
Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 40-47.
Marsh, H.L. and Powell, T.E. (1989), “The audit Committee Charter: Rx for fraud prevention”, Journal of
Accountancy, Vol. 167 No. 1, p. 55.
Martinez, M.C.P., Bel-Oms, I. and Olcina-Sempere, G. (2016), “Corporate governance, female directors
and quality of financial information. Business ethics”, Business Ethics: A European Review, Vol. 25 No. 4,
pp. 363-385.
j CORPORATE GOVERNANCE j
Downloaded from [Link]
[Link] [Link]
Mili, M. and Alaali, Y. (2023), “Does corporate governance quality improve credit ratings of financial
institutions? Evidence from ownership and board structure”, Corporate Governance: The International
Journal of Business in Society, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 867-887.
Mishra, M. and Malhotra, K. (2018), “Audit committee characteristics and earnings management:
evidence from India”, International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, Vol. 6 No. 2,
pp. 247-273.
Naiker, V. and Sharma, D.S. (2009), “Former audit partners on the audit committee and internal control
deficiencies”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 84 No. 2, pp. 559-587.
Nasirzadeh, F., Oradi, J. and Rajabalizadeh, J. (2018), “Investigating the effect of audit committee
characteristics on earnings management through accruals”, Accounting & Auditing Studies, Vol. 24
No. 4, pp. 39-52.
Nelson, S.P. and Devi, S. (2013), “Audit committee experts and earnings quality”, Corporate
Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 335-351.
Nikulin, E.D., Smirnov, M.V., Sviridov, A.A. and Bandalyuk, O.V. (2022), “Audit committee composition
and earnings management in a specific institutional environment: the case of Russia”, Corporate
Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, Vol. 22 No. 7, pp. 1491-1522.
Oradi, J. and Izadi, J. (2020), “Audit committee gender diversity and financial reporting: evidence from
restatements”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 35 No. 1, pp. 67-92.
Oroud, Y. (2019), “The effect of audit committee characteristics on the profitability: panel data evidence”,
International Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 104-113.
Pakmaram, A. and Mayan, R.Y. (2017), “Investigating the effect of representation conflict on information
asymmetry”, Journal of Accounting and Management Vision, (in Persian), Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 83-96.
Palmrose, Z. (1986), “Audit fees and auditor size: further evidence”, Journal of Accounting Research,
Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 97-110.
Patterson, E.R. and Smith, R. (2003), “Materiality uncertainty and earnings misstatement”, The
Accounting Review, Vol. 78 No. 3, pp. 819-846.
Pfegger, J. (1972), “Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: the organization and its
environment”, Administrative Science Quality, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 218-228.
Poretti, C., Schatt, A. and Bruynseels, L. (2018), “Audit committee independence and the information
content of earning announcement in Western Europe”, Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. 40 No. 1,
pp. 29-53.
Pucheta-Martı́nez, M.C. and De Fuentes, C. (2007), “The impact of audit committee characteristics on the
enhancement of the quality of financial reporting: an empirical study in the Spanish context”, Corporate
Governance: An International Review, Vol. 15 No. 6, pp. 1394-1412.
Sarbanes, P. and Oxley, M. (2002), “The Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002. US Congress”, Washington, DC,
available at: [Link]/
Schrader, C. (2017), “The impact of audit committee tenure and compensation on audit fees”, A dissertation
submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy.
Schroeder, M.S., Solomon, I. and Vickrey, D. (1986), “Audit quality: the perceptions of audit-committee
chairpersons and audit partners”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 86-100.
Sepasi, S. and Abdoli, L. (2016), “The effect of firm top manager’s gender on conditional conservatism”,
Journal of Women’s Studies (Sociological & Psychological), Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 129-154.
Setayesh, M.H. and Gholami, R. (2012), “Cosmetic accounting”, Accounting Research, Vol. 4 No. 3,
pp. 77-98.
Shankaraiah, K., Masoud, S. and Amiri, S. (2017), “Audit committee quality and financial reporting quality:
a study of selected Indian companies”, Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 1-18.
Sharma, V.D. and Kuang, C. (2014), “Voluntary audit committee characteristics, incentives, and
aggressive earnings management: evidence from New Zealand”, International Journal of Auditing,
Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 76-89.
Simunic, D. (1980), “The pricing of audit services: theory and evidence”, Journal of Accounting Research,
Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 161-190.
j CORPORATE GOVERNANCE j
Downloaded from [Link]
[Link] [Link]
Soleimani, G. and Fasihi, S. (2015), “Relation between audit committee characteristic and real and
accrual earnings management: evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange”, Journal of Accounting Review,
Vol. 2 No. 8, pp. 15-34.
Soleimani, G. and Moghadasi, M. (2014), “The role of internal controls, internal audit and audit committee
in improving the corporate governance system”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 3 No. 12,
pp. 63-77.
Soliman, M.M. and Ragab, A.A. (2014), “Audit committee effectiveness, audit quality and earnings
management: an empirical study of the listed companies in Egypt”, Research Journal of Finance and
Accounting, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 155-166.
Srinidhi, B., Gul, F. and Tsui, J. (2011), “Female directors and earnings quality”, Contemporary
Accounting Research, Vol. 28 No. 5, pp. 1610-1644.
Sultana, N. (2015), “Audit committee characteristics and accounting conservatism”, International Journal
of Auditing, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 88-102.
Tahir, S.H., Ullah, M.R., Ahmad, G., Syed, N. and Qadir, A. (2021), “Women in top management:
performance of firms and open innovation”, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and
Complexity, Vol. 7 No. 1, p. 87.
Tajvidi, E. and Ghaempanah, M. (2021), “Audit committee characteristics and earnings management”,
Accounting & Auditing Researches, Vol. 2021No. 49, pp. 155-174.
Takhtaei, N., Tamimi, M., and Mousavi, Z. (2013), “The role of the audit committee in the quality of
financial reporting”, Certified Accountant Magazine, (in Persian), No. 15, pp. 45-56.
Tamoradi, A., Gheisari, T., Rostaminia, R. and Rezaei, Z. (2020), “The effect tenure audit committee on
earnings management”, Journal of Research in Accounting and Economics Science, Vol. 4 No. 3,
pp. 51-62.
Umar, U.H., Jibril, A.I. and Musa, S. (2023), “Audit committee characteristics and corporate philanthropic
donations before and during COVID-19”, Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in
Society, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 347-366.
Vafeas, N. (2005), “Audit committees, boards, and the quality of reported earnings”, Contemporary
Accounting Research, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 1093-1122.
Yang, J.S. and Krishnan, J. (2005), “Audit committees and quarterly earnings management”,
International Journal of Auditing, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 201-219.
Yousefiasl, F., Rajabdori, H. and Seyedmohseni, S.A. (2018), “Investigating the relationship between audit
committee characteristics and profit quality with the role of quality moderator auditing in companies with
centralized ownership”, Journal of New Researches in Accounting and Auditing, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 33-54.
Zalata, A.M., Tauringana, V. and Tingbani, I. (2018), “Audit committee financial expertise, gender, and
earnings management: does gender of the financial expert matter?”, International Review of Financial
Analysis, Vol. 55 No. 5, pp. 170-183.
Zhao, Y. (2010), “The audit pricing implications of differential reliability of accruals and cash flows”, The
George Washington University.
Further reading
Lari Dasht Bayaz, M. (2017), “Audit committee characteristics and audit fee: evidence from Tehran Stock
Exchange”, Empirical Research in Accounting, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 69-94.
j CORPORATE GOVERNANCE j
Downloaded from [Link]
[Link] [Link]
research interests are corporate governance, political economy and auditing. Abbas Ali
Daryaei is the corresponding author and can be contacted at: [Link]@[Link]
Afshin Balani lives in Iran. He is a PhD candidate at Imam Khomeini International University.
He is very interested in research in the field of accounting, auditing and corporate
governance and has been successful in this field.
Yasin Fattahi lives in Iran. He is a PhD candidate at Imam Khomeini International University.
He is very interested in research in the field of accounting, finance, corporate governance,
social responsibility and sustainability reporting and has been successful in this field. He
has published two books and numerous articles in national and international academic
journals such as Corporate Governance (Emerald), Cogent Economics & Finance (Taylor &
Francis Group), Journal of Risk and Financial Management (MDPI), Iranian Journal of
Finance and Environmental Energy and Economic Research.
For instructions on how to order reprints of this article, please visit our website:
[Link]/licensing/[Link]
Or contact us for further details: permissions@[Link]
j CORPORATE GOVERNANCE j