0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views12 pages

Software Engineering Process Models Overview

Uploaded by

wimov50071
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views12 pages

Software Engineering Process Models Overview

Uploaded by

wimov50071
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Software Engineering

Chapter 2

Process Models

CS 4513 – Software Engineering


Learning Objectives

2.1 Generic Process Model

2.2 Defining a Framework Activity

2.3 Identifying a Task Set

2.4 Process Assessment and Improvement

2.5 Prescriptive Process Models

2.6 Product and Process

CS 4513 – Software Engineering


Overview

CS 4513 – Software Engineering


Generic Process Model

CS 4513 – Software Engineering 4


Process Flow

CS 4513 – Software Engineering 5


Identifying a Task Set
A task set defines the actual work to be done to accomplish the
objectives of a software engineering action.

A task set is defined by creating several lists:


• A list of the tasks to be accomplished.
• A list of the work products to be produced.
• A list of the quality assurance filters to be applied.

CS 4513 – Software Engineering 6


Process Assessment and Improvement
• The existence of a software process is no guarantee that software
will be delivered on time, meet the customer’s needs, or exhibit
long-term quality characteristics.
• Any software process can be assessed to ensure that it meets a
set of basic process criteria that have been shown to be essential
for successful software engineering.
• Software processes and activities should be assessed using
numeric measures or software analytics (metrics).

CS 4513 – Software Engineering 7


Prescriptive Process Models 1

Prescriptive process models advocate an orderly approach to


software engineering.

That leads to two questions:


• If prescriptive process models strive for structure and order, are
they appropriate for a software world that thrives on change?
• If we reject traditional process models and replace them with
something less structured, do we make it impossible to achieve
coordination and coherence in software work?

CS 4513 – Software Engineering 8


Waterfall Process Model

Pros
• It is easy to understand and plan.
• It works for well-understood small projects.
• Analysis and testing are straightforward.
Cons
• It does not accommodate change well.
• Testing occurs late in the process.
• Customer approval is at the end.

CS 4513 – Software Engineering 9


Prototyping Process Model
Pros

• Reduced impact of requirement changes.


• Customer is involved early and often.
• Works well for small projects.
• Reduced likelihood of product rejection.

Cons

• Customer involvement may cause delays.


• Temptation to “ship” a prototype.
• Work lost in a throwaway prototype.
• Hard to plan and manage.

CS 4513 – Software Engineering 10


Spiral Process Model
Pros

• Continuous customer involvement.


• Development risks are managed.
• Suitable for large, complex projects.
• It works well for extensible products.

Cons

• Risk analysis failures can doom the


project.
• Project may be hard to manage.
• Requires an expert development team.

CS 4513 – Software Engineering 11


Unified Process Model
Pros

• Quality documentation emphasized.


• Continuous customer involvement.
• Accommodates requirements changes.
• Works well for maintenance projects.

Cons

• Use cases are not always precise.


• Tricky software increment integration.
• Overlapping phases can cause
problems.
• Requires expert development team.

CS 4513 – Software Engineering 12

You might also like