Vascularized Long Thoracic Nerve Transplant
Vascularized Long Thoracic Nerve Transplant
B
BRRIIT
TIIS
SHH JJO
OUUR
RNNA
ALL O
OFF O
ORRA
ALL &
&MMA
AXXIIL
LLLO
OFA
FAC
CIIA
ALLS
SUUR
RGGE
ERY
RY
SUMMARY. Microsurgical techniques have improved functional and morphological reconstruction of the face in
recent years. An important factor is the re-establishment of neuronal function. The aim of this study was a follow-up
of the regeneration of sensation in the inferior alveolar nerve after partial resection of a tumour and reconstruction
with a vascularized long thoracic nerve graft. Five patients were examined in monthly intervals to assess the degree
of re-establishment of sensation. Pressure and pain responses were elicited as early as three months postoperatively,
sense of touch and vibration were found after five months, and sensitivity to temperature after seven months
postoperatively. In four patients nine months postoperatively, sensory qualities in the region of the mental nerve were
identical on both sides. The vascularized long thoracic nerve is therefore an adequate nerve graft for covering defects
as a result of resection of the inferior alveolar nerve patients with tumours.
differentiation the region of the opposite mental nerve on the morphological aspects of reconstruction, but
was tested with a two-point compass; simultaneous microvascular transplants have enabled satisfactory
stimuli were applied. The shortest distance identifying coverage of extensive defects from an aesthetic point
two separate points was measured in millimeters and of view. Without neuronal reconstruction, however,
identified as the discrimination point. The sense of this was only a substitution of functionless morpho-
vibration in the transplant was tested by applying a logical structures. The removal of the inferior alveolar
60-Hz tuning fork. nerve (which is often necessary when tumours of the
mandible are excised) leads to loss of sensitivity in the
chin and lower lip. This sensory deficit results in
RESULTS inability to chew or to feel liquid or solid food running
out of the mouth. These symptoms are even more
The examinations were made monthly, and showed apparent in patients with chewing difficulties after
initial return of pressure sensation for three patients transplant reconstruction. After the neuronal interpo-
during the third month and for two during the fourth sition and anastomosis of the vascularized long tho-
month postoperatively. When pressure was applied racic nerve distally to the severed alveolar nerve, our
sensations of pain were elicited. Pain sensation patients were able to differentiate several sensation in
increased over the following two months, when pro- the area originally supplied by the mental nerve. The
nounced hyperaesthesia on exertion of pressure was long thoracic nerve turned out to be ideally suited for
described as painful. This hypersensitivity lessened nerve interposition in the case of large defects after
after the fifth and sixth months to reach a normal removal of the inferior alveolar nerve. Gailliot and
level within a further month. The next sensation to Core21 reported an excellent potential for regeneration
return was that of slight touch with sharp and blunt of the ulnar nerve. We found the same for the long
discrimination for four patients five months postoper- thoracic nerve with the sense of pressure returning as
atively; only one patient had to wait seven months. At early as three months postoperatively, followed by
this point, all patients were able to differentiate two continuous re-establishment of sensory qualities the
points in the original area of the mental nerve with region supplied by the reconstructed nerve.
the distance initially being significantly greater than The vascularized nerve is more useful than the non-
on the opposite side. Within two months, the distance vascularized nerve, as Kanya et al.22 described more
between discriminated points balanced out and ended accurate discrimination and better regeneration. The
up identical on both sides. Senses of vibration and excellent result of full bilateral differentiation between
touch returned at about the same time. Thermal stim- sensation was achieved by four of our patients nine
uli were sensed by two patients six months postopera- months after nerve transplantation. Shibata et al.23
tively, by one patient after seven months, and by one found that vascularized nerves were able to produce
patient after eight months. Nine months after the more axons and neuronal endorgans, which may be
primary neuronal reconstruction of the mental nerve one of the main reasons for the good result. For re-
four patients had similar sensitivity bilaterally. Only establishment and persistence of sensitive function,
one patient had a permanent deficit in thermal sensa- long-term axonal bridging in the form of myelin
tion. The individual values for re-establishment of sheets is the mainstay of nerve regeneration. Long-
sensory ability are shown in Table 1. term persistence of myelin sheets seems to be particu-
Four patients judged the sensitivity of the lower lip larly important for poorly perfused tissues as well as
as normal compared with the other side and only one those treated by radiotherapy, as found by Frey et
felt all sensations in the lower lip, but not as much as al.,15 particularly in the case of nerve defects larger
on the other side. than 6 cm. The vascularized nerve transplant seems to
be better able to regenerate, according to Doi et al.24
The regenerative potential of the vascularized long
DISCUSSION thoracic nerve does not seem to be affected by radia-
tion.
In oral and maxillofacial surgery, extensive recon- According to Koshima et al.25 the ideal nerve trans-
structive measures are required for extensive facial plant for routine use should have a constant anatomy,
defects. In previous years, most attention was focused minimal functional loss after removal, and sufficient
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
blood supply along the whole transplant. According 15. Frey M, Girsch W, Gruber J, Happak W, Gruber H.
to Frey et al.,21 it is important for a transplant to Vaskularisiertes Nerventransplantat: theoretische Vorteil und
Nachteile. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 1988;
regenerate well in a poorly vascularized transplant 20: 76–82.
site. As the long thoracic nerve has these qualities, it 16. Hausamen J-E. Mikronervenchirurgie im Mund-, Kiefer- und
seems to be ideally suited for coverage of neuronal Gesichtsbereich. In: Horch HH, ed. Mund-, Kiefer- und
defects of the inferior alveolar nerve. The simultane- Gesichtschirurgie. Munich: Urban und Schwarzenberg, 1990:
213–236.
ous removal of the transplant with a scapula-latis- 17. Terzis JK, Skoulis TG, Soucacos PN. Vascularized nerve graft.
simus dorsi transplant to enable reconstruction of the A review. Int Angiol 1995; 14: 264–277.
defect and the nerve with a single vascular pedicle is 18. Ozcan G, Shenaq S, Mirabi B, Spira M. Nerve regeneration in
an advantage of the vascularized nerve transplant. As a bony bed: vascularized versus nonvascularized nerve grafts.
it is easy to obtain, we expect that the long thoracic Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 91: 1322–1331.
19. Koshima J, Harii K. Experimental study of vascularized nerve
nerve will be widely used as vascular transplant in grafts: a morphometric study of axonal regeneration of nerves
neuronal reconstruction of the face. transplanted into silicone tubes. Ann Plast Surg 1985; 14:
235–243.
20. Ikeda M, Oka Y. Nerve sutures and nerve grafts for repairing a
References gap in peripheral nerve injury: an experimental study. Nippon
Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasschi 1995; 69: 1014–1026.
1. Phillipeaux JM, Vulpian A. Note sur les essais de greffe d’un 21. Gailliot R-V, Core G-B. Serratus anterior intercostal nerve
proncox de nerf lingual entre les deux bouts de 17 hypoglosse. graft: a new vascularized nerve graft. Ann Plast Surg 1995; 35:
Arch Physiol Norm Path 1870; 3: 618–625. 26–31.
2. Albert E. Einige Operationen an Nerven. Wien Med Presse 22. Kanaya F, Firelli J, Tsai TM, Breidenbach WC. Functional
1885; 26: 1285–1292. results of vascularized versus nonvascularized nerve grafting.
3. Millesi H. Wiederherstellung durchtrennter peripherer Nerven Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 89: 924–930.
und Nerventransplantationen. Münch Med Wochenschr 1969; 23. Shibata M, Tsai TM, Firelli J, Breidenbach WC. Experimental
111: 2669–2674. comparison of vascularized an nonvascularized nerve
4. Millesi H. Wiederherstellung der Kontinuität nach grafting. J Hand Surg 1988; 13 A: 358–365.
Durchtrennung peripherer Nerven durch Nervennaht oder 24. Doi K, Tamaru K, Sakai K, Kuwata N, Kurafuji Y, Kawai S.
Nerventransplantation. Ther Umsch 1975; 32: 446–452. A comparison of vascularized and conventional sural nerve
5. Edshage S-P. Peripheral nerve suture. Acta Chir Scand 1964; grafts. J Hand Surg 1992; 17 A: 670–676.
331(Suppl): 1–7. 25. Koshima J, Okumoto K, Umeda N, Moriguchi T, Iscii R,
6. Smith JW. Factors influencing nerve repair. Arch Surg 1966; Nakayama Y. Free vascularized deep peroneal nerve grafts. J
93: 335–343. Reconstr Microsurg 1996; 12: 131–141.
7. Crumley R-L. Interfascicular nerve repair. Is it applicable in
facial nerve injuries? Arch Otolaryngol 1980; 106: 313–316.
8. Taylor GI. Nerve grafting with simultaneous microvascular
reconstruction. Clin Orthop 1978; 133: 56–63.
9. Taylor GI, Ham FJ. The free vascularized nerve graft. A The Authors
further experimental and clinical application of microvascular
technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 1976; 57: 413–419. Günter Schultes MD, DDS
10. Lewis HP, McLaurin RL. Application of tissue transplant Alexander Gaggl MD, DDS
technique to experimental nerve grafting. J Trauma 1969; 9: Surgeons
227–134. Hans Kärcher MD PhD
11. Kärcher H. Das gefäβgestielte Nervtransplantat; eine neue Head
experimentelle Technik an der Ratte. Dtsche Zeitschr Mund Clinical Department of Oral and Maxillolacial Surgery
Kiefer Gesichtschir 1985; 9: 380–386. University Hospital Graz
12. Kärcher H, Eskici H Zwitting P. The vascularized cross-face Graz, Austria
nerve graft. In: Riediger D, Ehrenfeld M, eds. Microsurgical
tissue transplantation. Berlin: Quintessenz, 1989: 193–199. Correspondence and requests for offprints to: Univ. Doz. Dr. Dr.
13. Terzis JK, Breidenbach W. The anatomy of free vascularized Günter Schultes, Abteilung für Mund-, Kiefer- und
nerve grafts. In: Terzis JK, ed. Microreconstruction of Nerve Gesichtschirurgie, Auenbruggerplatz 7, A-8036 Graz, Austria.
Injuries. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1987: 101–111. Tel: +43 316 385 2565; Fax: +43 316 385-3511
14. Kärcher H, Kleinert R. Regeneration in vascularized and free
nerve grafts. A comparative morphological study in rats. J Paper received 6 January 1999
Maxillofac Surg 1986; 14: 341–344. Accepted 22 February 1999