Entrepreneurship Support Framework India
Entrepreneurship Support Framework India
net/publication/348938660
CITATIONS READS
0 689
3 authors:
Anupama Panghal
National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management
40 PUBLICATIONS 154 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Vikas Singh on 11 February 2023.
Chapter 3
by Mr. Vikas Sehrawat on 01/17/21. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
Framework in India
3.1 Introduction
Entrepreneurship creates value by organising efforts of individuals and
groups to meet demand through innovation and uniqueness in a state of
limited resources.1 Entrepreneurship helps to give direction of modern
economics and constitutes one of the four mainstream economic factors:
land, labour, capital and entrepreneurship. India is the fastest emerging
economy and has the potential to become the first global power by 2050.2
Its increasing population offers it a competitive advantage in terms of
labour. The current population of India is 1,370,339,445, which contributes
to 17.74 percent of the total world population3, with the rural population
share at 65.97 percent of India’s total population.4 Indeed, a huge popula-
tion gives a competitive advantage to the country, but at the same time, it
can be a hinderance in terms of unemployment. India’s unemployment
1
Coulter, M.K. (2001). Entrepreneurship in Action. Prentice Hall.
2
India’s Culture. “India, A Fast-Emerging Economy”. [Link]
[19 September 2019].
3
Worldometersinfo. [Link]
[19 September 2019].
4
World Bank. “Rural Population (% of Total Population)”. [Link]
indicator/[Link]. [19 September 2019].
47
rate is currently hovering around 8.0 percent5 and the unemployment rate
is observed more in rural areas as compared to urban areas. The majority
of the rural population is dependent on agriculture or agricultural-related
services which only contributes 15.87 percent of total Gross Value Added
(GVA) at current prices. The different sectors of the economy show varied
by Mr. Vikas Sehrawat on 01/17/21. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
changes in the Gross Value Added (GVA) at basic prices. The service sec-
tor has the highest percentage of GVA at current prices and has shown
Organising Entrepreneurship and MSMEs Across India Downloaded from [Link]
5
CMIE. “Unemployment Rate in India”. [Link]/kommon/bin/
[Link]?kall=wshowtab&dtype=rural%20[Link] [19 September 2019].
6
Press Information Bureau, Government of India, Ministry of Commerce & Industry.
“Transport and Marketing Assistance (TMA) for Specified Agriculture Products Notified”.
[Link] [19 September 2019].
7
Branson, A., Mani, R., & Anthony, R. (2018). “India’s Food Processign Sector Poised for
Growth:Global Agriculture Information Network”. USDA Foreign Agriculture Service,
Report No.IN8302, pp. 1–11.
8
Ministry of Finance, Government of India (2017). “Economic Survey”.
9
Dana, L.-P. (2000a). “Creating Entrepreneurs in India”. Journal of Small Business
Management, 38 (1), 86.
10
Dana, L.-P. (1995). “Small Business in a Non-entrepreneurial Society: The Case of the Lao
People’s Democratic Republic (Laos)”. Journal of Small Business Management, 33 (3), 95.
11
Dana, L.-P. (1997). “The Origins of Self-employment in Ethno-cultural Communities:
Distinguishing Between Orthodox Entrepreneurship and Reactionary Enterprise”. Canadian
Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 14
(1), 52–68.
12
Dana, L.-P. (1998). “Small Business in Xinjiang”. Asian Journal of Business and
Information Systems, 3 (1), 123–36.
13
Dana, L.-P. (1999). “Entrepreneurship as a Supplement in the People’s Republic of
China”. Journal of Small Business Management, 37 (3), 76–80.
14
Dana, L.-P. (1999). Entrepreneurship in Pacific Asia: Past, Present and Future. World
Scientific Publishing Company.
15
Dana, L.-P. (2000b). “Change and Circumstance in Kyrgyz Markets”. Qualitative Market
Research: An International Journal, 3 (2), 62–73.
regulations, but now the emphasis is given on changing mindsets and pro-
moting entrepreneurship.16 This chapter discusses the policy structure and
infrastructural framework for entrepreneurs in India.
process from its initial phase of inception until the early post-start-up
phase to frame the way of delivering motivating perception, skills, and
opportunities.17 The objective of policy should not only be to maximise a
certain indicator of entrepreneurship; rather, it must be focused on creat-
ing a context, a system, in which productive entrepreneurship can flour-
ish.18 Furthermore, entrepreneurship must foster opportunities in terms of
enhancing value-addition by manifesting innovation and increasing mar-
ginal labour productivity.19 Collectively, adopting innovation and improv-
ing marginal labour productivity results in employment growth and
diversifying the market which consequently impacts positively on the
social and economic development of a nation.20
Edoho21 suggests that entrepreneurship is a central part of economic
growth and social development, and for policymakers in search of a sus-
tainable and competitive entrepreneurial economy, a policy can be defined
in various ways.22 The policy is a guiding tool for individuals or groups of
16
Dana (2000a). op. cit.
17
Dana, L.-P., Etemad H., & Wright R.W. (2008). “Toward a Paradigm of Symbiotic
Entrepreneurship”. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 5 (2),
109–126.
18
Lundström, A & Stevenson, L.A. (2005). Entrepreneurship Policy: Theory and Practice.
Springer, New York, NY.
19
Acs, Z.J. & Szerb, L. (2007). “Entrepreneurship, Economic Growth and Public Policy”.
Small Business Economics, 28 (2–3), 109–122.
20
Stam, E. (2015). “Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic
Critique”. European Planning Studies, 23 (9), 1759–1769.
21
Edoho, F.M. (2016). “Entrepreneurship Paradigm in the New Millennium: A Critique of
Public Policy On Entrepreneurship”. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies,
8 (2), 279–294.
22
Akbaba, A. (2012). “Business Performance of Small Tourism Enterprises: A Comparison
Among Three Sub-sectors of the Industry”. Anatolia, 23 (2), 177–195.
23
Tsai, W.H. & Kuo, H.C. (2011). “Entrepreneurship Policy Evaluation and Decision
Analysis for SMEs”. Expert Systems with Applications, 38 (7), 8343–8351.
24
Stevenson, L. & Lundström, A. (2001). “Entrepreneurship Policy for the Future: Best
Practice Components”. Keynote Speech for the ICSB Conference, Taipei.
25
Anderson, J.E. (2014). Public Policymaking. Cengage Learning.
26
Rigby, J. & Ramlogan, R. (2013). “The Impact and Effectiveness of Entrepreneurship
Policy”. Nesta Working Paper 13/01.
27
Norbäck, P.J, Persson, L., & Douhan, R. (2014). “Entrepreneurship Policy and
Globalisation”. Journal of Development Economics, 110, 22–38.
28
Stevenson, L. & Lundström, A. (2007). “Dressing the Emperor: The Fabric of
Entrepreneurship Policy”. Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship Policy, 94–129.
29
Henrekson, M. & Stenkula, M. (2010). “Entrepreneurship and Public Policy”. In Acs Z.,
Audretsch D. (Eds.) Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, pp. 595–637. Springer,
New York, NY.
30
Acs, Z.J. & Virgill, N. (2010). “Entrepreneurship in Developing Countries”. In: Acs Z.,
Audretsch D. (Eds) Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, pp. 485–515. Springer,
New York, NY.
33
National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganised Sector, Academic Foundation
(2008). “Report on Conditions of Work and Promotion of Livelihoods in the Unorganised
Sector”. New Delhi, India.
3.5.1 Legex
Legex was founded in January 2019 with a vision to make legal processes
accessible to individuals and organisations alike using technical infra-
structure and assistance from professionals (Figure 2). In terms of imple-
mentation, the startup intends to cover Delhi NCR, after which other
major cities will also be covered.
The idea of Legex was a collective vision of Mr. Vishesh, Mr. Akshit,
Mr. Aayush and Mr. Niraj. They feel that the service sector has plenty of
challenges, but with right business acumen, they can be channeled into
opportunities. The best way to identify opportunities is to observe and
discuss. These two abilities help one to connect ideas and perceptions,
which is necessary to build something that people need. The founders feel
that “As for the problems, no one can explain the problem in a better way
than the actual stakeholder in the process”. So, the most efficient way
they have found to date is to identify people who can discuss the problems
frankly, the issues, and underlying reasons for those problems, be it exist-
ing processes or the product. They believe that problem identification is
the first task and later, in handling these problems there can never be ‘one’
person who can do everything; therefore, start-ups need to understand this
as early as possible. So, to solve any major problem, they seek people,
friends, connections or even LinkedIn who can help them focus on their
work. This also helps them to remaining on-track and getting their devel-
opments validated regularly from these external parties.
In recent years, there has been a major push for digital develop-
ment in India, which in turn has made people more aware and tech-
trusting. Even for legal processes, they are witnessing a strong trust
factor in the market, which they feel would not have been present four
years ago.
As for the legal domain, one of the main hindrances is closed access.
It is difficult for those outside of the legal profession to get acquainted
with the law and understand the know-how of the market. Also, there has
by Mr. Vikas Sehrawat on 01/17/21. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
not been much emphasis from the government on reform of the legal sec-
tor and processes are not dissimilar to those of a decade or two ago. One
Organising Entrepreneurship and MSMEs Across India Downloaded from [Link]
of the other biggest hurdles is the recognition of the sector. There are not
a lot of government bids or ‘Call-for-Proposals’ that even consider legal
accessibility as a cause for the betterment of society. The same applies to
investors as well. If these things are addressed properly, the domain will
surely get a technical and infrastructure boost, which is crucial for the
ecosystem. There will be a huge upsurge if the government and investors
begin taking consideration of the legal-tech domain.
the OOH advertising industry, the major problem they are facing is find-
ing talent in the hardware domain and getting it protected through patent
or copyright. They believe the government or other agencies should
ensure consultancy to early-stage ventures.
quality and the farmers are getting the real monetary value of their prod-
ucts. The enterprise works on a two-pronged strategy:
quality
— Encouraging use of technology to improve supply chain efficiency
Organising Entrepreneurship and MSMEs Across India Downloaded from [Link]
3.6 Conclusion
Entrepreneurship in India is emerging and the complete ecosystem of the
country is in support of it. There is increasing scope for entrepreneurs in
the fields of agriculture, food processing, service sector and other indus-
tries. The Government of India is also coming up with supportive policies
and institutions to align + with the needs of entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurs
are finding scope in niche areas of food, technology and sustainability.
Government policies have a profound impact on shaping India's entrepreneurial landscape by creating conducive environments for business growth in sectors like agriculture, services, and manufacturing. Policies such as Agriculture Export Policy, Make in India, and Startup India provide necessary frameworks for innovation, skill enhancement, and infrastructure development. These initiatives encourage foreign investments, streamline business processes, and support technical and financial advancements. However, challenges remain in policy implementation and addressing sector-specific bottlenecks. A critical assessment reveals that while these policies foster entrepreneurial growth, continuous evaluation and adaptation are needed to ensure they meet changing market needs and remove procedural barriers .
Technology facilitates entrepreneurship in India's health sector by enabling startups like Wellversed Health to innovate clinical food production through a technologically advanced personalization framework. Wellversed Health uses this framework to customize food products according to an individual's clinical, dietary, and physiological requirements, representing a paradigm shift in food manufacturing. Advanced machine learning algorithms help determine the right combination and ratio of ingredients to meet specific nutritional and taste standards, thereby addressing lifestyle-related health problems with precision. Wellversed Health’s success illustrates technology’s critical role in developing niche health products that cater to specific dietary needs .
Apna Haat addresses challenges in the Indian agricultural supply chain by implementing a two-pronged strategy: improving farmers' economic well-being and empowering agri-entrepreneurs. They provide technical know-how for better crop productivity, use technology to improve supply chain efficiency, and link farmers directly to markets to maximize their returns. Additionally, they develop consolidators at the farm level and empower pushcart vendors, thus reducing the role of intermediaries and ensuring better prices for farmers. These strategies enhance the efficiency of the supply chain, ensuring that resources are optimally utilized .
Institutional support systems in India play a crucial role in guiding entrepreneurship development by providing technical, financial, and training support to entrepreneurs, primarily through various institutions such as SIDO, NABARD, and SIDBI. These systems directly influence entrepreneurial behavior by facilitating project proposals, offering technical and managerial consultancy, and creating an environment conducive to entrepreneurship. They help ensure that entrepreneurs receive the necessary resources, which in turn impacts how entrepreneurs behave and operate within challenging environments .
The National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganised Sector (NCEUS) supports worker welfare by ensuring technical, marketing, and credit support to enterprises operating in the unorganized sector. This is achieved through recommendations that emphasize the necessity of creating a safeguard mechanism for these workers. The Commission plays a critical role in promoting policies that secure the well-being of workers and aligns with the National Common Minimum Programme's commitment to improving the livelihoods of unorganized workers .
The Startup India initiative contributes to the entrepreneurial ecosystem by providing startups with simplified procedures, reduced fees for patent filings, and a comprehensive 'Startup Hub' for resources and opportunities. It facilitates networking, mentorship, and capital access, which are essential for early-stage startups. The initiative is designed to enable an environment where startups can thrive by simplifying regulatory requirements, enhancing ease of doing business, and supporting innovation across various sectors .
Legex demonstrates that entrepreneurs can effectively overcome challenges in the service sector by leveraging technology to streamline processes and ensure accessibility. The founders emphasize the importance of identifying challenges through stakeholder engagement and collaboration. By gathering insights from stakeholders and addressing root issues, Legex converts challenges into opportunities, a strategy that can guide other entrepreneurs in the service sector towards identifying and solving complex problems efficiently .
Startups in the Indian service sector face challenges such as transparency issues, procedural bottlenecks, and talent acquisition. These can be addressed through policy measures such as the National Digital Communications Policy, Services Exports from India Scheme (SEIS), and Drafted Trade Facilitation in Services. These policies aim to streamline processes, enhance digital infrastructure, and promote service exports. Opportunities for startups include leveraging technology to innovate service delivery and engage with global markets. The government's emphasis on policy reforms and promotional measures, like organizing the Global Exhibition on Services, further aids startups in overcoming these barriers .
Policy initiatives such as the Agriculture Export Policy 2018, Pradhan Mantri Kisan Samman Nidhi Yojana, Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana, and the Electronic National Agriculture Market (eNAM) aim to support entrepreneurship by enhancing market access, providing financial assistance, and improving agricultural practices. The implementation of these policies helps in reducing waste, increasing farmers' income, leveraging technology, and creating a unified marketplace, thus empowering agri-entrepreneurs to capture value and develop sustainable business models .
'Make in India' and 'Skill India' initiatives have significantly transformed the entrepreneurial landscape in India's manufacturing sector by encouraging skill development, fostering innovation, and attracting foreign investments. 'Make in India' focuses on enhancing the manufacturing infrastructure and simplifying regulations, thereby creating a conducive environment for businesses to grow. 'Skill India' complements this by developing the workforce's skills, ensuring that entrepreneurs have access to qualified labor. Together, these initiatives empower entrepreneurs to innovate, reduce operational complexities, and tap into new markets, thereby boosting the overall growth and competitiveness of the sector .