0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views4 pages

Group Presentations on Global Issues

Uploaded by

tthuyen1402
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views4 pages

Group Presentations on Global Issues

Uploaded by

tthuyen1402
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

15/09/2024

 Group presentation:
 Presentation: Group 1 on Week 9 to Group 6 on Week 14 (each
week one group will present)
 Slides: 15-20 slides; 20 minutes (max) presentation + Q&A;
encourage multiple presenters in each group.
 Group assignment:
 Deadline: submit by Week 15 (last lecture)
 Recommended structure:
1. Introduction

2. Issue 1

3. Issue 2

4. Issue 3

5. Discussion / Recommendation / Critical analysis

6. Conclusion

7. References

 Submit along with Member’s contribution sheet


1

 Group assignment:
 Be appropriately structured, written, presented and referenced
(using the Harvard style)
 Feature an appropriate argument with sufficient data,
evidence and theory related to this course to merit analysis
and debate
 Provide substantial reference from reliable sources: academic
> news, wiki and blogs are not reliable
 Provide a critical debate which evinces deep insight into a
contextual awareness of the topic in hand (originality and
critical thinking)
 Aim for a comprehensive analysis: consider all stakeholders
involved, different viewpoint/theory

1
15/09/2024

 Group 1 (Week 9):

The Ukraine-Russia conflict has shaken the world in the recent


years. The impact of the conflict has been felt all over the world,
yet, there is still no sign of peace prospect in the near future.
 Discuss the sources for this conflict from geopolitical
perspective
 Discuss potential impacts of this conflict on global economy
and global politics?
 Discuss the prospect of Ukraine joining NATO from realism,
liberalism and constructivism perspective

 Group 2 (Week 10):

The trade war between US and China has been in place since 2018.
Initiated under the unpredicted Trump presidency, the trade tension
between two largest economies in the world has not been defused
even when Trump left office. Under Biden presidency, while the
trade war has not been escalated further, there were no signs of
concessions either.
 What is strategic trade policy? Analyze the use of strategic
trade policy by the US.
 What were the stated reasons for a trade war with China by
Trump presidency? Do you think these reasons are valid?
 Discuss the source of China-US trade war from realism,
liberalism and constructivism perspective
 What is your outlook of China-US trade war in short- to
medium- term? 4

2
15/09/2024

 Group 3 (Week 11):


Trade theories suggest that countries should trade according to
their comparative advantage or factor abundance, which usually
result in inter-industry trade and specialization. However, in reality
we see countries increasingly conduct intra-industry trade (for
example, US exports cars to Japan, and Japan exports cars to US;
Vietnam exports rice to Thailand, and Thailand exports rice to
Vietnam; Vietnam exports textile to other countries, but also
imports textile from other countries…).
 Discuss the intra-industry pattern of trade: through statistics,
its impact on countries
 Provide both theoretical and practical explanation for the
intra-industry trade pattern
 Is there any link between the intra-industry trade and intra-
regional trade observed in regions such as North America,
West Europe or East Asia?
5

 Group 4 (Week 12):

East Asian countries in general have achieved remarkable


economic growth in the XX century. While growth process has
been initiated and implemented at different time and pace, the
success stories are very similar in many aspects in these countries.
 What is the “Flying geese” development model? What are its
main characteristics? What are the main stages of
development in this model?
 Do you think East Asian countries follow the “Flying geese”
model (pattern, paradigm)? Is economic growth guaranteed
for all countries following this model?
 Discuss the prospect of “Flying geese” model in current
regional (and global) context?

3
15/09/2024

 Group 5 (Week 13):

The world has gone through a remarkable period of growth since


the mid-XX century to this day. During this period, close to a
billion people have been lifted out of extreme poverty. The UN
goal to end extreme poverty is within our reach. However,
inequality is growing for more than 70 per cent of the global
population, exacerbating the risks of divisions and hampering
economic and social development. This rising inequality trend is
particularly evident since the 1980s around the world.
 What is the elephant curve? What are the possible causes for
this curve from 1980s onwards?
 What is role in explaining the elephant curve for:
International institutions (WTO, IMF, WB)? MNCs? Global
North and South divide? Globalization and trade?
Development strategies?
 What are the recommendations to reduce global income
inequality? 7

 Group 6 (Week 14):

Since the GFC in 2008, and most recently during the Covid crisis,
the share of international trade in global GDP has leveled off and
slightly decreased. This has prompted many researchers to state
“the end of globalization era”, or “slowbalization” era, or reversal
of globalization period.
 Discuss why there is a rising anti-globalization trend in many
countries around the world.
 Does the rise of nationalism, protectionism and anti-
globalization mean that international trade and globalization
does not benefit the world as academics previously believed?
 What is role in explaining the anti-globalization trend for:
international institutions (WTO, IMF, WB)? MNCs?
Neoliberalism world order? Alter-globalization?
 What is your outlook of globalization in the following years? 8

Common questions

Powered by AI

The "Flying Geese" model describes a sequence where industrialization follows a leader nation, here Japan, then spreads to followers like South Korea and China, fostering economic convergence. This model is evident in East Asia's growth, demonstrating stages of industrial upgrades and technological adoption . However, future growth is uncertain as rising wage costs, demographic shifts, and global competition challenge continued development under this model .

Intra-industry trade within regions like North America and Europe is linked to integrated supply chains and economic policies like free trade agreements which facilitate seamless trade flows. Proximity allows for rapid exchange of similar goods influenced by regional consumer preferences and production specialization . Intra-regional trade enhances economic interdependence and growth within these clusters .

Future scenarios for globalization may include a continued trend toward 'slowbalization,' with regional trade blocs becoming more prominent as countries seek to protect local industries. Alternatively, globalization could evolve toward sustainably inclusive frameworks incorporating more equitable trade policies and stronger regulations to manage cross-border challenges. Such shifts would require international cooperation to address rising protectionism while maintaining open global markets .

The Ukraine-Russia conflict arises from complex geopolitical sources including Ukraine's geopolitical position as a buffer between Russia and NATO, historical ties with both Western and Eastern blocs, and Russia's aim to maintain influence over former Soviet territories . These geopolitical tensions have led to significant consequences on global politics, such as increased military spending by NATO countries, and impacted global economies through sanctions on Russia, affecting energy markets and global trade flows .

The rise of nationalism and protectionism indicates that globalization's benefits might not be as universally distributed as once believed. While globalization has driven economic growth and innovation, it has also led to job displacement and wage pressures in developed economies. This backlash suggests a need to rethink globalization to ensure benefits are more equitably shared and include robust domestic policies to support affected workers .

Theoretically, intra-industry trade is explained by economies of scale and differentiated products that meet diverse consumer preferences. Practically, this allows countries like the US and Japan to trade similar products, such as cars, driven by factor intensity and specialization . This pattern is further supported by technological advancements and global supply chains enhancing trade efficiencies .

International institutions like the WTO, IMF, and World Bank have shaped globalization policies that encourage open markets and structural adjustments, contributing to income disparities. While they advocate for poverty reduction and economic stability, their policies have sometimes favored advanced economies, contributing to the growing 'elephant curve.' For example, structural reforms have led to job losses in non-competitive industries, exacerbating inequalities .

Strategic trade policy involves government interventions to boost a nation's competitiveness in specific industries. In the US-China trade war, the US employed tariffs as a strategic tool under the argument of protecting intellectual property and correcting trade imbalances . Although these reasons align with strategic policy goals, the justification of such tariffs is debated; critics argue they can be protectionist and harm global supply chains, while supporters cite long-term strategic benefits .

The neoliberal world order, emphasizing deregulation and free markets, has contributed to the anti-globalization trend by prioritizing corporate interests and capital mobility over equitable economic development. This has led to public discontent as income inequality widens, and social safety nets erode, prompting calls for protectionist measures and national sovereignty to counter neoliberal hegemony .

The 'elephant curve' vividly illustrates global income distribution, showing a surge in income for the emerging middle class and stagnation for the middle-income groups in developed nations. It reflects globalization's mixed impacts, where technological advancements and offshoring have benefited some global segments, while leaving others behind due to outsourcing and wage stagnation . Factors include international trade dynamics and policy decisions that have favored capital over labor .

You might also like