0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views2 pages

Distributed Practice in ALEKS Algorithms

Practice

Uploaded by

monzer more
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views2 pages

Distributed Practice in ALEKS Algorithms

Practice

Uploaded by

monzer more
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Distributed Practice and ALEKS’s Memory Stacks Algorithms

Facts and skills are more efficiently and more permanently mastered if the learning
experiences are spaced over time rather than massed in a short period. This was
recognized by the German psychologist Hermann Ebbinghaus as early as 1885, and
was confirmed by numerous experimental studies since then. The name attached to
this method is distributed practice1 . Its superiority over massed practice has been
demonstrated for a wide variety of contents, including the retention of mathematical
facts and rules (see, among many other relevant references Caple, 1996; Clayton, 1974;
Good and Grouws, 1979; Reynolds and Glaser, 1964).
The design of ALEKS QuickTables is based on this important principle. In the case
of the multiplication table, QuickTables initially presents the student with only a very
small number of problems, say: 3 × 7, 4 × 6 and 5 × 4. This means that the student
may be asked to solve, in a random succession, a sequence of multiplication problems
such as
3 × 7 =?, 4 × 6 =?, 5 × 4 =?, 3 × 7 =?, . . . etc.
When the student reliably responds 21 when presented with 3 × 7 in this context
of only 3 different problems, the 3 × 7 problem is moved into a larger context involving
more multiplication problems, and then gradually into larger and larger ones, until
perfect recall is achieved, which implies a permanent storage of the association (between
the operation and its result) in long-term memory. Obviously, the sizes of the successive
contexts and other details of these temporal successions are critical, and may vary with
the type of operation.
This concept is implemented in ALEKS by a computer algorithm based on a number
of memory stacks as illustrated by Figure A. We outline this algorithm here without
going into all the intricate details
3 x 7 is mastered and
.
of the program. During the ini- stored in permanent
.........

memory
tial stage of memorizing the result Figure A. Schema of the memory
of 3 × 7, this operation is stored stacks algorithm. The number of
stacks and the number of problems
in the computer in Memory Stack in each stack are adjustable.
Memory stack 3
1 which is equipped with a small
.....

number of slots, say three. Thus,


.
New problem: 3 x 7
three operations are stored there.
Memory stack 2
The computer presents these three
.
..

operations in a random sequence Memory stack 1

until the student’s responses have


reached a predetermined criterion of successful recall for a particular problem, say
3 × 7 = 21. This problem is then moved into Memory Stack 2, which contains a larger
number of slots. When this memory stack is filled, the student is tested for the problems
in that stack, also presented in a random sequence. As Memory Stack 2 contains more
slots than Memory Stack 1, the time interval between two tests of 3 × 7 = 21 tends
to be longer. As a consequence, the recovery of the association between 3 × 7 and 21
from memory is more demanding, and begins to exercise long-term memory retrieval
mechanisms.
1
Also called spaced practice.

1
Ultimately, 3 × 7 = 21 ends up in the last stack and is tested as before. Whenever
the student’s response for 3 × 7 reaches the criterion for that stack, that particular
problem is removed from Memory Stack 3 and the problem is regarded as having been
mastered, which is a reasonable surmise in view of the large number of problems in
that stack.
For obvious reasons, the various parameters of this memory stack algorithm, namely,
the number of stacks, the number of slots in each stack, and the criterion of success
for each stack, are optimized on the basis of experimental data to ensure both the
efficiency of the learning process and the permanence of the acquisition. The design of
the other ALEKS QuickTables—for addition, subtraction and division—is similar.

The references listed below are but a small sample from the literature on the dis-
tributed practice phenomenon, which is considerable.

References
C. Caple. The effect of spaced practice and space review on recall and retention using
computer assisted instruction. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann
Arbor, MI, 1996.

M. Clayton. The differential effects of three types of structured reviews on the learning
and retention of mathematics. Dissertation Abstract International, 35A:904–905,
1974.

T.L. Good and D.A. Grouws. The Missouri mathematics effectiveness project: An
experimental study in fourth-grade classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology,
71:355–362, 1979.

J.H. Reynolds and R. Glaser. Effects of repetition and spaced review upon retention of
a complex learning task. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55(5):297–308, 1964.

Common questions

Powered by AI

ALEKS QuickTables handles the transition from short to long-term memory storage by using a series of memory stacks. Initially, when a student is mastering a new operation, it is stored in Memory Stack 1, which includes a small number of problems presented in quick succession, promoting initial memorization. As mastery is demonstrated, operations are transitioned to memory stacks with more problems and longer intervals between reviews, thus requiring re-engagement of the material over progressively extended periods. This spaced testing nurtures the cognitive transition from short-term to long-term memory by facilitating more challenging recall tasks, which helps to engrain the associations into long-term storage .

Spaced practice, as implemented in ALEKS, offers cognitive benefits such as enhanced long-term memory retention and improved retrieval strength of mathematical facts. This method contrasts with traditional massed learning, which tends to focus on short-term gains but often results in quicker forgetting. The gradual increase in retrieval intervals with spaced practice leads to the deeper processing of information, reduced cognitive load during learning, and the consolidation of facts into long-term memory. This cognitive strategy is advantageous because it aligns with the brain's natural learning processes, resulting in more durable knowledge .

ALEKS utilizes memory stacks to facilitate long-term retention by gradually increasing the intervals between tests after initial mastery is demonstrated. This spaced presentation requires students to recall facts from memory after progressively longer periods, engaging long-term memory retrieval mechanisms and reinforcing retention. In contrast, massed practice involves frequent repetition in a short time span, which does not leverage long-term retention mechanisms, often leading to lower recall rates over time. Research has consistently shown the superiority of distributed practice, as used in ALEKS, for a variety of learning content, including mathematical facts and rules .

Spaced practice, as used in tools like ALEKS, is supported by numerous experimental studies that demonstrate its effectiveness over other strategies. For instance, studies by Clayton (1974) and Good and Grouws (1979) have shown the superior retention of mathematical facts and skills when distributed over time rather than condensed into brief learning sessions. These findings indicate that spaced practice enhances retention and understanding across diverse educational contexts, making it a more effective instructional method compared to massed learning approaches .

The effectiveness of the ALEKS memory stack algorithm is influenced by several critical factors: the number of memory stacks, the number of problems per stack, the criteria for advancing each problem between stacks, and the timing of problem presentations. These factors determine how frequently problems are reviewed and how challenging the recall exercises become. Optimizing these elements based on experimental data ensures the algorithm is both efficient in promoting learning and effective in securing long-term memory retention, adapting to various types of learning material and individual learner needs .

The ALEKS QuickTables' memory stacks adjust for varying difficulty levels of mathematical operations by changing the size of the stacks and the intervals between tests. Problems start in a stack with a small number of slots, accommodating simpler operations initially. More difficult problems remain longer within given stacks as they are periodically reviewed until the learner achieves a predetermined mastery level. As a problem advances through the memory stacks, it undergoes longer intervals between repetitions, aligning with the complexity and difficulty level required for mastering diverse mathematical operations .

The parameters of the ALEKS memory stack algorithm, such as the number of stacks, the number of slots in each stack, and the success criterion per stack, need optimization to ensure the most efficient learning process and the stability of knowledge acquisition. These parameters determine the timing and difficulty of material presentation, which are critical for maximizing learning and retention efficiency. Optimization based on experimental data helps tailor the algorithm for various learners and content types, ensuring that each problem is mastered efficiently while accommodating individual differences in learning .

The design of ALEKS QuickTables is based on the principle of distributed practice, which holds that learning experiences are more effective and knowledge is more permanently retained if they are spaced over time rather than concentrated in a short period. This approach, also known as spaced practice, was first identified by Hermann Ebbinghaus in 1885 and supported by subsequent experimental studies . In ALEKS, this is implemented through a system of memory stacks. Initially, a small number of multiplication problems are presented to the student in Memory Stack 1 until they can reliably recall the answers. As mastery is demonstrated, problems are moved to memory stacks that have an increasing number of slots, thereby extending the time intervals between practice sessions and exercising long-term memory retrieval mechanisms .

Hermann Ebbinghaus's findings on the benefits of distributed practice have significantly influenced modern educational tools, including ALEKS. His work demonstrated that spacing learning sessions over time enhances retention compared to massed practice. This principle is at the core of ALEKS's design, which incorporates memory stacks to space out practice and incrementally challenge the learner, reflecting Ebbinghaus’s insights into memory and repetition. The deliberate development of such features in ALEKS highlights the enduring impact of Ebbinghaus’s research on educational psychology and tool design .

Randomized sequences of problem presentation within the ALEKS memory stack approach function to prevent pattern recognition and rote memorization. By varying the order in which problems are presented, students are forced to engage cognitive processing techniques to recall solutions, thereby improving the robustness of learning and helping prevent mechanical repetition. This strategy challenges students to adapt to different sequences actively and ensures that knowledge retention is based on understanding rather than merely memorizing specific sequences .

You might also like