0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views1 page

Concrete Pouring Interruption Report

cvbccdddd
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views1 page

Concrete Pouring Interruption Report

cvbccdddd
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Republic of the Philippines

City Engineer’s Office


Seminary Road, Pala-o, Iligan City 9200, Philippines
Tel. No.: (063) 221-4645

Project : CONSTRUCTION OF 2-STOREY 4 CLASSROOM


BUILDING FOR NAPOCOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
BRGY. MARIA CRISTINA, ILIGAN CITY
Location : Iligan City
Contractor : Graeco Builders
Date : November 13, 2024
Subject : Notice of Concrete Pouring Interruption and Recommended Action

FIELD REPORT NO. 1

This is in relation to the on-going implementation of the above-stated project.

Pouring of concrete activity for the 2nd floor slabs and beams was executed by the above-
mentioned contractor on November 12, 2024 which started from 4:00 p.m. and stopped at
3:00 a.m. the following day, November 13, 2024.

First and foremost, though the pouring permit was approved by the City Engineer’s Office, it
should be noted that the contractor have never requested for an overtime for the presence
of CEO inspectors during the pouring activity.

Upon inspection on November 13, 2024 conducted by the Quality Control team headed by
yours truly, it was observed that the pouring was cut/stopped on a critical point/line and that
the one-bagger concrete mixer was placed at the same level (2 nd floor line) and connected
with the structures that were being poured upon.

Given the existing situation and condition, we recommended the following to wit;

1. Concrete bagger mixer be placed on a separate platform or taking it down to ground


level so that it won’t disturb the newly placed concrete.
2. Apply concrete epoxy at the joint where the concrete was stopped or interrupted.

Prepared by: Conformed by:

MARK ARQUE B. LACANARIA MARCELY B. MERCADO


Engineer III Engineer IV
Quality Control Division Head - Quality Control Division
City Engineer’s Office City Engineer’s Office

Common questions

Powered by AI

Continuous concrete pouring is crucial to ensure a monolithic structure without weaknesses or cold joints, which can occur if pouring is interrupted. These weaknesses may result in reduced structural performance and increased risk of structural failure .

Neglecting the recommended actions could lead to structural weaknesses, increasing the likelihood of cracking or failure under load. This can result in costly repairs, potential safety hazards, and compromised project timelines and budgets .

On-site inspections are critical for identifying real-time issues that may not be apparent in plans, such as improper equipment placement or premature stopping of work. In the NAPOCOR project, inspection identified a critical interruption point and the inappropriate placement of a concrete mixer, which were addressed to prevent potential structural problems .

The location in Iligan City may require specific attention to local environmental and regulatory conditions, affecting practices such as ensuring structural resilience against regional weather phenomena. This necessitates stringent oversight to adapt to these conditions effectively during construction .

Placing the concrete mixer at the same level as the newly poured concrete can cause vibrations or physical disturbances, leading to inconsistencies in the concrete setting and potential weaknesses in the structural integrity of the slabs and beams .

The recommended measures aim to mitigate risks by addressing potential weak points in the structure due to interrupted pouring and mechanical disturbance. By relocating the mixer and applying epoxy, structural integrity is maintained, minimizing risks of future structural failures .

The recommendations were due to the observation that concrete pouring was stopped at a critical point, which could compromise structural integrity. Additionally, the concrete mixer was placed at the same level as the pouring area, connected with the structures, potentially disturbing the newly placed concrete .

The contractor's expertise, resource management, adherence to safety protocols, and responsiveness to inspections directly affect project quality and timelines. Inadequate performance by the contractor can lead to delays, increased costs, and compromised structural integrity .

Concrete epoxy is recommended to bond the new concrete with the old at the joint where pouring was interrupted. This helps to mitigate the risk of cold joints, ensuring structural integrity and continuity by creating a strong bond between the disconnected concrete sections .

The key procedural oversight was the lack of an overtime request for City Engineer’s Office inspectors during the pouring activity. This meant there was no continuous oversight to identify and address issues as they occurred, compromising quality assurance .

You might also like