0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views4 pages

DNA Structure and Replication Insights

biochemistry
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views4 pages

DNA Structure and Replication Insights

biochemistry
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Discussion Worksheet – Fall 2023 - Week 5 (DNA Replication)

Group1
In this experiment a scientist
incubated bacteria with radiolabeled
dTTP and after specific times of
radiolabeling (indicated by 7”, 20”
etc..= 7 seconds, 20 seconds), he
extracted DNA and measured the
radioactivity incorporated in DNA
(dpm, y-axis) as a function of the
size of the DNA molecules (x-axis,
arbitrary units). In the first
experiment (left figure) he used a
normal bacterial strain (=Wild).

A - Describe the change in size in


DNA fragments as a function of time in this strain and explain what the changes in size
correspond to.

B - In the second and third experiment he used bacterial strains which contain mutations
in gene encoding DNA ligase (Lig ts7) or DNA Polymerase I (PolA12). Describe the
differences in DNA synthesis in these strains compared to the wild-type and what this
experiment tells us about the roles of DNA ligase and DNA polymerase I in replication.

C – Side question: why is “ not a proper symbol for seconds as in time units?
Group2
In this experiment, scientists study the properties of
bacterial replisomes containing 2 ([Link]) or 3
([Link]) DNA polymerases. In a first experiment they
incubate each replisome with a primer and a single
stranded DNA template in vitro and study DNA
polymerization as a function of time.
The size of DNA fragments is shown on the y-axis in
kilobases, after incubation with the replisomes for
5,7,10,12,15 or 20 seconds (times are shown at the
top of each lane).

[Link] [Link]

A- Describe the results observed; what property of Di and [Link] replisomes can be
concluded from the results of this experiment?

B- Next, researchers specifically analyze the products generated during


replication in vivo on the leading and lagging strands with Di or [Link]. The
size distribution and abundance of the fragments obtained after incubation of
Di or Tri-Pol III with leading or lagging strand templates is shown below.

- Describe the results obtained in this experiment; based on these results and
on the results obtained in the first experiment, compare the ability of [Link]
and [Link] replisomes to replicate DNA.
Group3

Structural Biologists have studied the structure of


the MCM2 protein (part of the MCM protein
complex present in the replisome in eukaryotes.
They have obtained the structure of MCM2
interacting with the H3 and H4 histones as shown
in the structure on the right.

H4’ means that a second molecule of histone H4


is present. Same for H3 and MCM2.

The formation of the dimer of this structure is an


artefact of structure determination. For the purpose of this problem, only consider that
one MCM2 interacts with one H3 and one H4.
A – What does the dotted line represent?

B- based on what we covered in class, what is the known function of the MCM complex
that MCM2 is involved in?

C- Based on the structure shown above, what other function does this structure suggest
for MCM2 during eukaryotic DNA replication?

The researchers have now obtained a second of structure of MCM2 bound to histones
H3 and H4 in complex with ASF1. The structure is shown on
the right.
D- Describe globally the protein-protein interactions that exist
in this complex. Does the presence of ASF1 change the
structures of H3/H4?

E- Based on the two structures shown and what you know


about the role of the MCM complex during replication,
propose a more specific role for MCM2 during eukaryotic
replication.
Group4

The purified telomerase enzyme is incubated with a 12nt primer made of


telomeric repeats and radio-labeled dNTPs. Two additional proteins Teb1
and/or CST are added(+) or omitted(-) from the reaction accordingly. The
results are run on an autoradiography gel. Numbers on the right indicate
the numbers of nucleotides added to the unextened primer, which is not
shown but would be at the bottom of the gel.

A – In the lower part of the gel for lanes 1 or 2, count the number of faint
bands between each more intense band. What molecular events related to
telomerase activity do the faint and more intense bands represent?

B – What is the effect of the CST protein on telomerase activity especially


related to the presence of faint vs. more intense bands? Justify your
answer by comparing the patterns observed in lanes 1 and 2.

C - What is the effect of the Teb1 protein on telomerase activity? Justify your answer by
comparing the patterns observed in lanes 1 and 3.

D - How does adding both Teb1 and CST affect telomerase activity? Justify your answer
in one or two sentences.

Common questions

Powered by AI

The autoradiography gel shows that faint bands correspond to incremental nucleotide additions by telomerase, while more intense bands indicate periods of more continuous synthesis. The absence or presence of Teb1 and/or CST affects these band patterns. CST appears to regulate telomerase processivity by reducing continuous elongation, as more intense bands are observed in its absence. Teb1 enhances telomerase activity, leading to more intense bands, suggestive of increased nucleotide addition .

The presence of Teb1 enhances the efficiency and processivity of telomerase, reflected in stronger band intensities on the gel. Teb1 likely acts to stabilize the telomerase enzyme on the DNA substrate or increases its binding affinity, thereby promoting more extensive elongation of the telomeric DNA. This highlights Teb1's role as a positive regulator in telomere length maintenance .

Tri-Pol.III replisomes, containing three DNA polymerases, replicate DNA more efficiently than Di-Pol.III replisomes, which contain only two. Tri-Pol.III produces longer DNA fragments, indicating faster and more processive synthesis. This suggests that the presence of an additional polymerase in the Tri-Pol.III complex enhances the replication capability of the replisome, likely by increasing the rate of leading and lagging strand synthesis simultaneously .

The CST complex appears to suppress telomerase processivity, as indicated by the reduction in more intense bands on the gel compared to when CST is not present. This suggests that CST may serve as a negative regulator, potentially involved in terminating telomere extension to ensure proper telomere length and preventing excessive elongation .

In bacterial strains with mutations in DNA ligase (Lig ts7), ligation of Okazaki fragments is impaired, resulting in shorter, incomplete DNA fragments. In mutants lacking DNA polymerase I (PolA12), there is an accumulation of Okazaki fragments due to an inability to remove RNA primers and fill in the resulting gaps with DNA. These differences reveal that DNA ligase is critical for sealing nicks between Okazaki fragments, while DNA polymerase I is essential for primer removal and gap filling during DNA replication .

The faint bands in the telomerase assay represent the sequential addition of single nucleotides to the telomere, indicating the base-pairing DNA synthesis activity of telomerase. The more intense bands suggest multiple nucleotides being added in succession without interruption, indicating a burst of processive telomerase activity. This pattern reflects telomerase's ability to elongate telomeres through both incremental and continuous synthesis phases .

ASF1 binding alters the interaction between MCM2, H3, and H4 by potentially stabilizing the histone complex and facilitating nucleosome assembly or disassembly. This suggests that ASF1 could play a role in regulating chromatin dynamics during DNA replication, perhaps by assisting in the transfer of histones during nucleosome assembly/disassembly in concert with the MCM complex .

Beyond unwinding DNA, MCM2's interaction with histones H3 and H4 suggests a role in nucleosome assembly or disassembly, whereby MCM2 might help manage the exposure and displacement of histones during replication. This indicates that MCM2 might facilitate chromatin dynamics required for successful replication fork progression .

The MCM complex, including MCM2, is responsible for unwinding the DNA helix to facilitate replication fork progression. The interaction of MCM2 with histones H3 and H4 suggests that MCM2 may also play a role in chromatin remodeling, assisting in the disassembly and reassembly of nucleosomes during replication .

In the wild-type bacterial strain, the size of the DNA fragments increases over time, which indicates that DNA replication is proceeding efficiently and continuous strand synthesis is occurring. Initially, smaller DNA fragments appear due to the initiation of replication, and as the replication process continues, the fragment sizes increase, indicating elongation of the DNA strands as more nucleotides are added .

You might also like