IT Special Project
ATTACHMENT J
RECOMMENDATION SHEET
PROJECT TITLE
PROJECT GROUP MEMBERS PROJECT GRADES
DATE OF DEFENSE TIME SCHOOL CAMPUS
LEAD PANELIST SIGNATURE
PANELIST SIGNATURE
PANELIST SIGNATURE
ADVISER SIGNATURE
RECOMMENDATION
PASS WITH NO REVISION
CONDITIONAL PASS WITH MINOR REVISIONS*
To be checked by the Project Adviser
To be checked by the Panelists
CONDITIONAL PASS WITH MAJOR REVISIONS*
With a re-demonstration of the project
*Revisions needed to be complied with are in the Revision List Form.
REDEFENSE
FAIL**
**Indicate the names of students who failed (no listing means all members of the group):
Student Reason(s) for Failure Signature
**Reason(s) for Failure (as a group):
incompleteness of the output
incorrectness of the output
non-original (copied from existing sources)
output(s)/deliverable(s) were made by individuals other than members of the group
Others (specify):
**Condition(s) of Failure:
Change the entire project by submitting a new proposal for approval
Continue working on the same topic including the necessary revisions and requirements
Others (specify):
Attachments * Property of STI
Page 13 of 25
IT Special Project
ATTACHMENT K
PANELIST LIST OF QUESTIONS FORM
Indicate the questions you intend to ask to the members of the project group. Questions may include
but are not limited to the project document contents, requirements, analysis, design and programming of
the software. Please indicate short comments, which will serve as your evaluation of the response(s)
given to the question.
Questions Comments
Attachments * Property of STI
Page 14 of 25
IT Special Project
ATTACHMENT L
PROJECT DEFENSE EVALUATION FORM
PROJECT TITLE
PROJECT GROUP MEMBER
DATE OF DEFENSE TIME SCHOOL CAMPUS
EVALUATOR SIGNATURE OF EVALUATOR
PURPOSE OF EVALUATION
The Project Evaluation Form is a means to analyze and evaluate the project in the context of content,
form, methodology, software, and presentation of students by the panel members assigned to the project
group. The quantitative rating given by the panel member is to be used as a guide for the
recommendation or final evaluation at the end of the project defense. All policies and procedures as
stated in the IT Special Project Guidelines shall apply.
INSTRUCTION TO THE EVALUATOR
Place a tick/check mark at the appropriate box given the following evaluation scores:
4 Outstanding
3 Exceeds Minimum Requirements Most of the Time
2 Meets Minimum Requirements
1 Meets Minimum Requirements Sometimes
0 Poor
EVALUATION CRITERIA*
I. DOCUMENT 4 3 2 1 0
1. Correctness of the statement of the problem, current state of the
technology, objectives, and theoretical framework
2. Clarity of defined requirements
3. Completeness of analysis discussions and consistency with
design discussions (document content and organization)
4. Correctness of the design and implementation issues with respect
to the theories used in the study
5. Presence of citations for non-original material and sufficiency of
the list of references used
*Refer to Guidelines for the Evaluator
Attachments * Property of STI
Page 15 of 25
IT Special Project
II. METHODOLOGY 4 3 2 1 0
6. Definition and application of the software development
methodology
7. Appropriateness of research, data gathering, and analysis tools
utilized
8. Appropriateness of the chosen methodology
9. Adequacy of data gathered for the study
10. Adequacy, completeness, and effectiveness of diagrams, graphs,
charts, tables, and notations used
III. PRESENTATION 4 3 2 1 0
11. Clarity and organization of presentation delivery
12. Adequacy of visual aids and other tools used for the presentation
13. Ability to answer questions analytically and convincingly
14. Ability to convince the panelists of the ideas being presented
15. Ability to discuss / revise program modules as required by the
panel members
IV. SOFTWARE 4 3 2 1 0
16. Executability of the software
17. Ease of use / user-friendliness
18. Ability to ensure data accuracy and validity
19. Effectiveness and efficiency of the software in meeting necessary
user requirements and objectives of the study
20. Completeness of software features / components / modules to
meet user requirements and objectives of the study
21. Completeness of software features / components / modules
consistent with existing systems similar to the study
22. Correctness and completeness of appropriate theories in the
development of the software
23. Consistency of design and implementation with the principles of
software development
24. Absence of errors
25. Results of the study
RATING (Total Score)
Attachments * Property of STI
Page 16 of 25
IT Special Project
ATTACHMENT M
PRESENTATION EVALUATION FORM
This form is used to evaluate how each member of the group performed during the defense.
INSTRUCTION TO THE EVALUATOR
Place a tick/check mark at the appropriate box given the following evaluation scores:
4 Excellent
3 Exceeds Expectations
2 Meets Expectations
1 Meets Expectations Sometimes
0 Does Not Meet Expectations
Group Member:
I. Communication Skills 4 3 2 1 0
1. Voice Projection (distance reached)
2. Voice Modulation(pleasantness of voice
3. Diction/Pronunciation
4. Grammar/Syntax; Understandability
II. Work Organization
5. Preparedness
6. Ability to present the assigned topic(s) clearly
7. Participation in the defense
III. Effectiveness
8. Ability to answer questions
9. Ability to convince the panelists of the ideas being presented
Other Comment(s):
RATING (Total Score/36 x 100)
Group Member:
I. Communication Skills 4 3 2 1 0
1. Voice Projection (distance reached)
2. Voice Modulation(pleasantness of voice
3. Diction/Pronunciation
4. Grammar/Syntax; Understandability
II. Work Organization
5. Preparedness
6. Ability to present the assigned topic(s) clearly
7. Participation in the defense
III. Effectiveness
8. Ability to answer questions
9. Ability to convince the panelists of the ideas being presented
Other Comment(s):
RATING (Total Score/36 x 100)
Attachments * Property of STI
Page 17 of 25
IT Special Project
Group Member:
I. Communication Skills 4 3 2 1 0
1. Voice Projection (distance reached)
2. Voice Modulation(pleasantness of voice
3. Diction/Pronunciation
4. Grammar/Syntax; Understandability
II. Work Organization
5. Preparedness
6. Ability to present the assigned topic(s) clearly
7. Participation in the defense
III. Effectiveness
8. Ability to answer questions
9. Ability to convince the panelists of the ideas being presented
Other Comment(s):
RATING (Total Score/36 x 100)
Group Member:
I. Communication Skills 4 3 2 1 0
1. Voice Projection (distance reached)
2. Voice Modulation(pleasantness of voice
3. Diction/Pronunciation
4. Grammar/Syntax; Understandability
II. Work Organization
5. Preparedness
6. Ability to present the assigned topic(s) clearly
7. Participation in the defense
III. Effectiveness
8. Ability to answer questions
9. Ability to convince the panelists of the ideas being presented
Other Comment(s):
RATING (Total Score/36 x 100)
Attachments * Property of STI
Page 18 of 25
IT Special Project
ATTACHMENT N
REVISIONS LIST FORM
The following revisions need to be complied with by the project group. Further evaluation on the
project will be done depending on the indicated result in the Recommendation Sheet.
Attachments * Property of STI
Page 19 of 25