Chapter5 [Link]

htm

5. ______________________________

Solar Collectors

Solar collectors capture incident solar radiation energy and either convert it to heat (thermal
energy) or directly to electricity (photovoltaic cells). In Chapter 4 we developed the equations
necessary to predict the amount of solar irradiance or energy falling on a solar collector. We
looked at different cases of tilting and tracking the collectors to optimize the solar input. In this
chapter, we study how a solar collector absorbs and converts solar energy into thermal energy or
electricity as in the case of photovoltaic panels. The topics covered in this chapter are:

Thermal collector capture and loss mechanisms

Optical energy capture
Heat loss mechanisms
Thermal energy balance
Selective surfaces
Parabolic trough end-loss
Photovoltaic panel capture and loss mechanisms
Optical energy capture
Heat loss
Energy balance
Panel performance
Collector efficiency
Optical efficiency
Flat-plate collectors
Concentrating collectors
Non-imaging concentrators
Models of collector performance
Flat-plate collectors
the curve
Parabolic troughs
the non-linear curve
Parabolic dish and central receivers
constant-T models
Photovoltaic collectors
Measuring collector performance
Thermal performance measurements
Photovoltaic performance measurements
Summary

1 of 30 8/21/2010 5:02 PM
Chapter5 [Link]

We will first look at solar thermal collectors and then at photovoltaic modules. Here we derive the
energy balance for thermal collectors, without regards to the specific type; that will be dealt with in
the following chapters. We will also understand the energy balance for a photovoltaic module,
without going into the details of the electro-physics of the processes happening within the cells.

Prior to an examination of specific collector concepts, this chapter shows the development of a
widely used yet simple model for prediction of the thermal energy output (i.e., performance) of
various solar collectors. The model is applicable to all (including the central receiver with some
extension) collector concepts and hence is discussed separately from any one collector concept to
avoid the misunderstanding that the model is useful only for that one concept.

Although the presentation of a model for computation of collector performance before discussion
of the individual collector design concepts may seem strange, system design can proceed if
certain thermodynamic characteristics are known, without detailed knowledge of what the collector
looks like. Usually, collector performance is determined from experimental data of prototype
hardware. A particularly important feature of the performance models discussed in this chapter is
that it exploits such data and extends it to different operating conditions. If experimental data are
not available, the designer must resort to an analytical description of the collector’s performance,
which is always risky.

In a similar manner, a simple model of photovoltaic panel performance is presented. Like the
thermal collector performance model, it is based on experimental data that is modified for
operating parameters different from a ‘standard’ condition.

5.1 Thermal Collector Capture and Loss Mechanisms

To perform an energy balance on a solar thermal collector, one usually isolates the surface that
absorbs the incoming radiation, and balances energy inflow and outflow to and from it. In a
flat-plate collector, this is called the ‘absorber plate’ and for a concentrating collector, it is often
called the ‘receiver’. In subsequent chapters we will describe many details of construction,
surfaces for each type of collector, but for now, this is not important. The energy balance on a
solar collector absorber or receiver can be written as;

(5.1)

where:

- rate of ‘useful’ energy leaving the absorber (W)

- rate of optical (short wavelength) radiation incident on absorber (W)

- rate of thermal energy loss from the absorber (W)

The ‘useful’ energy for a solar thermal collector is the rate of thermal energy leaving the collector,
usually described in terms of the rate of energy being added to a heat transfer fluid passing
through the receiver or absorber, i.e.:

(5.2)

2 of 30 8/21/2010 5:02 PM
Chapter5 [Link]

where:

- mass flow rate of heat transfer fluid (kg/s)

cp - specific heat of heat transfer fluid (J/kg .K)

Tout - temperature of heat transfer fluid leaving the absorber (K)

Tin - temperature of heat transfer fluid entering the absorber (K)

These losses are shown schematically in Figure 5.1.

Figure 5.1 Energy balance on a solar collector absorber / receiver.

5.1.1 Optical Energy Capture

The rate of optical (short wavelength) radiation incident on absorber/receiver will be the solar
irradiance resource for that type of collector and its tracking (global (total) solar irradiance for a
flat-plate collector and direct (beam) solar irradiance for a concentrating collector). Since the
capture area of the collector may not be aimed directly at the sun, this resource must be reduced
to account for the angle of incidence as described previously in Section 4.1. The area of the
collector on which the solar irradiance falls is called the aperture (opening) area of the collector.
The incident solar resource then is:

(5.3)

where:

Ia - solar irradiance entering the collector aperture (global (total) or direct (beam))
(W/m2)

3 of 30 8/21/2010 5:02 PM
Chapter5 [Link]

Aa - aperture area of the collector (m2)

This solar resource is reduced by a number of losses as it passes from the aperture of the
collector to the absorber. These processes depend on the type and design of the specific
collector, but here we include the important optical loss mechanisms, and will drop the
unimportant terms in future chapters as we discuss specific types of collectors. The rate of optical
(short wavelength) energy reaching the absorber or receiver is the product of the incoming solar
resource multiplied by a number of factors, all less than 1.0 describing this reduction:

(5.4)

where:

- capture fraction (fraction of reflected energy entering or impinging on receiver)

- reflectance of any intermediate reflecting surfaces

- transmittance of any glass or plastic cover sheets or windows

- absorptance of absorber or receiver surface

The first two terms above apply only to concentrating collectors. The capture fraction is a
measure of both the quality of the shape of the reflecting surface, and the size of the receiver.
Often this is described in terms of ‘spillage’ i.e. the fraction of reflected energy not impinging on or
entering the receiver. A poorly shaped concentrator, or a receiver too small will make this number
considerably less than 1.0. An analytical method for calculating this term is presented in Chapter
8, Concentrator Optics.

Reflectance is a property of any reflecting surface associated with the collector. The importance
of this property will also will be discussed in more detail in Chapter 8 (Concentrator Optics).
Properly designed concentrators will have capture fractions of 0.95 or higher, and silver/glass
mirrors can have a reflectance of 0.94 and new aluminum reflecting surfaces have a reflectance of
about 0.86.

The transmittance is the fraction of solar radiation passing through all transparent cover material
that sunlight passes through on its way to the absorber. Cover sheets of glass or plastic are used
on flat-plate collectors, above the absorber to reduce convective heat loss.

For parabolic trough collectors a glass tube surrounds the absorber tube for the same reason.
High-temperature cavity receivers may incorporate a quartz glass cover to keep the gas in the
receiver separate from outside air or to permit pressurization of the gas within the cavity. In all
cases, the use of a cover sheet reduces the solar radiation passing to the receiver/absorber. Their
benefit for reducing heat losses from the absorber must at least balance this reduction.

The transmittance in Equation (5.4) is the average overall transmittance and represents the total
reduction in transmitted energy in the solar spectrum by all covers. For example, flat-plate
collectors may have two or more cover sheets, sometimes of different materials, with the
transmittance, being the product of each individual cover transmittance.

Transmittance of the cover also depends on the wavelength of light passing through it. Glass for
example transmits most radiation in the visible spectrum, but does not transmit much in the
infrared region. Therefore, an absorber covered with glass will receive most of the incoming, short

4 of 30 8/21/2010 5:02 PM
Chapter5 [Link]

wavelength radiation, but will not transmit much of the long wavelength radiation loss coming from
the absorber. This characteristic of glass is the reason that glass greenhouses loose very little
energy at nighttime. Carbon dioxide buildup gives our atmosphere a similar property and therefore
the name ‘greenhouse effect’.

On the other hand, plastic covers have high transmittance values at very long wavelengths. Solar
collectors using plastic covers can be used for nighttime cooling since radiation loss to the
nighttime sky can be significant. This is also why greenhouses in warm climates use plastic rather
than glass as a cover. Without nighttime long-wavelength radiation loss, the average temperatures
would be too high for optimal plant growth.

The absorption term represents the fraction of solar energy incident upon the surface, that is
absorbed (the remainder being reflected). A good black surface can have an absorption of greater
than 0.98, however, as surfaces degrade, this value can decrease. It is important to point out that
this property is for radiation in the solar or ‘visible’ spectrum. For most real surfaces, the
absorption varies as a function of the wavelength of the incident energy. We will discuss below
that there is a class of surfaces used in solar collectors, called ‘selective surfaces’ that have a
higher absorptance in the visible spectrum than at longer wavelengths, thereby reducing thermal
radiation loss.

In summary then, when performing an energy balance on the absorber plate or receiver of a solar
collector, there are four important mechanisms that reduce the amount of solar energy that is
incident on the collector aperture; imperfect reflection, imperfect geometry, imperfect transmission
and imperfect absorption. This is a general statement, and different collector types will either
include or not include these losses depending on the design.

5.1.2 Heat Loss Mechanisms

Once the solar energy resource (short wavelength radiation) has made its way down to the surface
of the absorber or receiver of a collector, it raises the temperature of the absorber above ambient
temperature. This in turn starts a process of heat loss from the absorber as with any surface
heated above the temperature of the surroundings. These loss mechanisms are convection,
radiation and conduction, and all are dependent on, among other things, the difference in
temperature between the absorber and the surroundings.

(5.5)

Because a solar thermal collector is designed to heat a fluid, there is a balance between the rate
of heat being removed by the heat transfer fluid and the heat loss by radiation, convection and
conduction as defined by Equation (4.1). Since heat loss increases with temperature, this balance
between heat removal and heat loss defines the operating temperature of the collector.

If the heat transfer fluid removes too much heat, the temperature of the absorber decreases,
reducing heat loss. If not enough heat is removed from the absorber, the absorber temperature
increases, increasing the rate of heat loss. This can pose a major problem for concentrating
collectors, because when not enough heat is being removed (as can happen if the flow of heat
transfer fluid is interrupted), the temperature of the absorber can increase to its melting
temperature.

Convection Loss - Convective heat loss of a solar collector receiver is proportional to the surface
area of the absorber or receiver, and the difference in temperature between the absorber surface
and the surrounding air. It can be written in general terms as:

5 of 30 8/21/2010 5:02 PM
Chapter5 [Link]

(5.6)

where:

- average overall convective heat transfer coefficient (W/m2.K)

- surface area of receiver or absorber (m2)

- average temperature of receiver (K)

- ambient air temperature (K)

As with the other heat loss equations below, this is a simplified, instructive model. Usually there
are a number of convective processes that cause an absorber or receiver to loose heat to the
surroundings. For example, a flat-plate collector often has a glass cover sheet between the
absorber plate and outside ambient air. There is one convection process between the hot absorber
and the cover sheet, and a second between the cover sheet and outside air. Also, wind increases
the heat transfer coefficient on the cover sheet and must be included in any serious analysis of
convective heat loss.

For parabolic dish concentrators, the absorbing surface is typically placed inside of a cavity. This
protects it from wind, and naturally driven air currents. Little is known about convective heat loss
from an open cavity, but it is clear that the position of the cavity and its internal temperature, along
with wind speed and direction all affect the rate of heat loss from a cavity (Stine & McDonald,
1989, Paitoonsurikarn et. al., 2003).

Finally, the average temperature of the absorber / receiver, is not a fixed or measurable quantity.
The temperature of the absorber / receiver near the heat transfer fluid inlet will be lower than near
the outlet, and both will be less than intermediate surfaces not in contact with the heat transfer
fluid. Further, since convection is a surface phenomenon, also is driven by the surface
temperature, this temperature may be that of a paint or coating rather than the metal below.

Even with all of these imperfections, it is instructive to consider the convective heat loss as being
proportional to surface area and the difference between some average temperature, and ambient
temperature.

Since convective heat loss is the major heat loss term for most solar collectors, inventors and
designers have incorporated many features to collector design to reduce this term. Examples that
will be discussed under the different collector designs are; multiple transparent cover sheets for
flat-plate collectors, glass tubes surrounding linear absorbers with a vacuum drawn in the
intervening space, concentration of solar energy so that the absorber area is small relative to the
capture area, absorbers within cavities incorporating glass windows, just to name a few.

Radiation Loss - Radiation heat loss is important for collectors operating at temperatures only
slightly above ambient, and becomes dominant for collectors operating at higher temperatures.
Figure 5.2 illustrates this transition for a black vertical surface in still air. The rate of radiation heat
loss is proportional to the emittance of the surface and the difference in temperature to the fourth
power. Described in equation form, we have:

(5.7)

where:

6 of 30 8/21/2010 5:02 PM
Chapter5 [Link]

- emittance of the absorber surface (or cavity in the case of a cavity receiver)

- the Stefan-Boltzmann constant (5.670 × 10-8 W/m2 K4)

- the equivalent black body temperature of the sky (K)

Figure 5.2 Comparison of radiation and convection heat loss for a black, vertical surface in free air at 25oC.

Terms in this equation over which the collector designer has some control, are the surface
emittance and receiver. Surfaces that have a low emittance often have a low absorptance as well,
reducing the absorbed solar energy as described in Equation (4.4). However there is a class of
surface coatings called ‘selective coatings, that have low values of emittance when the surface is
at relatively low temperatures, but high values of absorptance for solar energy. These surfaces are
discussed in Section 4.1.4 below.

The other term, which may be minimized, is the receiver surface area. As with convection loss,
concentration of solar energy is the main design tool for reducing radiation heat loss by reducing
receiver surface area. In addition, cavity receivers can be used since they have small openings
through which concentrated solar energy passes, onto larger absorbing surfaces.

Since solar collectors operate out of doors, and generally face the open sky, they exchange
radiation with the sky. The equivalent radiation temperature of the sky depends on the air density
and its moisture content. When the relative humidity is high and at sea level, the sky temperature
can be assumed to be the same as ambient air temperature. However, for low relative humidity or
at high altitudes, the sky radiation temperature can be 6 to 8oC less than ambient temperature. Of
course if there is no atmosphere as with space applications, the equivalent sky temperature
approaches 0K.

Conduction Loss - The final mode of heat loss to consider in collector design is heat conduction.
This is generally described in terms of a material constant, the thickness of the material and its
cross-section area:

(5.8)

7 of 30 8/21/2010 5:02 PM
Chapter5 [Link]

where:

- equivalent average conductance (W/m.K)

- the average thickness of insulating material

Conduction loss is usually small compared to convection and radiation losses and therefore is
combined with the convection loss term in most analyses. However, it is displayed here for
completeness, and to emphasize the importance of ensuring that this mode of heat loss is
minimum in any collector design.

In flat-plate collectors, the sides and back surface of the absorber plate should incorporate good
insulation (low k) and the insulation should be thick enough to render this heat loss insignificant.

Another important mode of conduction loss is the way the high-temperature absorber is attached
to the frame and support structure. Use of low conductance materials such as stainless steel can
reduce conduction loss into the frame or support casing. However, since most design issues
around conduction can be handled without reducing the solar input, the term is generally
combined with the convective heat loss term.

5.1.3 Thermal Energy Balance

In order to provide a single expression for the useful energy produced from a solar collector based
on an energy balance of the receiver or absorber, we can combine Equations (4.1) through (4.8)
into a single equation. This equation will be repeated in the next few chapters as we develop an
understanding of how and why specific types of collectors are designed the way they are.

(5.9)

where:

- combined convection and conduction coefficient (W/m2K)

This equation states that the rate of useful energy produced by a solar collector equals the optical
(short wavelength) energy absorbed on the absorber surface, minus the rate of heat loss from the
absorber. We have combined the convection heat loss term with the convection term for simplicity.

5.1.4 Selective Surfaces

At this point in developing an understanding of solar energy capture and loss mechanisms, we
have introduced two important properties in solar collector design, absorptance, and emittance,
. A category of surfaces called ‘selective surfaces’ has been developed to optimize these
parameters for the collection of solar energy and it is important to understand their physical
principles.

Looking at Equation (4.9), one can see that, to maximize the useful heat collected by a solar
collector, the absorber or receiver of a solar collector should have a high absorptance and a low
emittance. However, we remember from radiation heat transfer theory that, at least for black body
and gray surfaces, the absorptance equals the emittance . However for all surfaces, Kirchoff’s
Law states that they are equal only for radiation at a specific wavelength, not as an average
property integrated over a spectrum. Kirchoff’s law states that:

8 of 30 8/21/2010 5:02 PM
Chapter5 [Link]

(5.10)

where the subscript indicates that these are ‘spectral’ properties and must be integrated over all
wavelengths to represent the properties used in Equations (4.4) and (4.7). If the spectrums are
different, the integrated properties can be different.

In solar collectors, the spectrum of the energy being absorbed is from a 6,050K black body emitter
with peak intensity at a wavelength of 0.48 microns (see Table 2.3). The spectrum of the energy
being emitted by the absorber / receiver is defined by the temperature of the absorber surface, Tr
which is considerably less. For example if the receiver surface temperature is 80oC, the peak
intensity is at a wavelength of 8.21 microns.

Selective surfaces have a high absorptance (and emittance) for short wavelength (visible) light and
have low average absorptance and emittance for long wavelength radiation (thermal or infra-red
radiation). They do not violate Kirchoff’s law, however, we say that they have ‘high absorption and
low emittance’ meaning high absorption for short wavelength radiation, and low emittance for long
wavelength radiation. The end result is a surface that absorbs solar energy well, but does not
radiate thermal energy very well.

The concept of a selective surface is illustrated in Figure 5.3. Consider a hypothetical surface with
0.95 absorptance at wavelengths shorter than 5 microns and 0.25 for longer wavelengths. Since
99.5% of solar energy occurs at wavelengths below 5 microns as discussed in Chapter 2, Section
2.1.2, the effective absorptance of such a surface is 0.945. The integrated emittance for this
hypothetical surface depends on its temperature. If this surface is 80oC as is typical for hot water
system collectors, 99.1% of its radiant energy is at wavelengths above microns and the integrated
emittance for this surface is 24.8%.

On the other hand, the effect of using a selective surface is less dramatic on higher temperature
absorbers. If the absorber surface is at a temperature of 700oC as is typical for receivers in
parabolic dish concentrating collectors, only 43.6 % of its radiated energy is at wavelengths above
5 microns and the integrated emittance is 64.5%.

Figure 5.3 Radiation properties of a hypothetical selective surface.

Selective absorbers have been developed that employ composite coating to produce absorbers

9 of 30 8/21/2010 5:02 PM
Chapter5 [Link]

with the combined properties of high absorptance in the solar spectrum and low emittance in the
IR part of the spectrum.

Several coatings have been examined for potential application as selective absorbers. Perhaps the
most widely used selective surface in thermal collectors is black chrome. Typically, a thin (2-3 m
thick) black chrome coating is electro-deposited on a mild steel receiver tube that has been
electroplated with 25 m of bright nickel.

The coating is deposited, as microscopic particles of chromium metal that, because of their
geometry, effectively trap the incident light, making the coating look black. Although the black
chrome coating is highly absorbing in the visible spectrum, it is transparent in the IR region. Thus
the receiver takes on the lower emittance of the bright nickel substrate. The resultant composite
bright nickel-black chrome coating thus has high absorptance (approximately equal to 0.95) for
the incident solar radiation and low emittance (less than 0.25) in the infrared region.

5.1.5 Parabolic Trough End-loss

One final loss mechanism to consider, which is particular to parabolic troughs, is called end-loss.
This is the fraction of energy being reflected from the trough that falls beyond the receiver. This
loss is proportional to the angle of incidence. End-loss will be illustrated in Chapter 9 of this text.

5.2 Photovoltaic Panel Capture and Loss Mechanisms

An energy balance on a photovoltaic panel provides less useful information to the solar energy
system designer. However since the photovoltaic cell efficiency decreases with increases in panel
temperature, it is important for the rate of heat loss from the panel to be high rather than low! In
other words, while the solar thermal panel must be hot to provide useful energy, photovoltaic
panels should remain cool to maximize their output of useful energy (electricity in this case).

An energy balance of a photovoltaic cell incorporated within a panel can be written as:

(5.11)

where:

i - electrical current through the cell (amps)

v - voltage across the cell (volts)

and the rate of optical radiation incident on the cell and the rate of thermal energy loss from the
cell have the same meaning as in Equation (5.1).

There is a physical limit to the fraction of useful energy that can be produced from the incident
optical radiation. Depending on the type and design of the cell this can be from 1 percent to 30
percent. This requires that the rest of the remaining 70% to 99% of the incident energy, be lost
through heat loss mechanisms.

5.2.1 Optical Energy Capture

10 of 30 8/21/2010 5:02 PM
Chapter5 [Link]

Just as Equation (4.4) was instructive in understanding the potential loss mechanisms for a
thermal collector, it likewise describes the potential loss mechanisms for a photovoltaic cell. In a
concentrating photovoltaic panel, energy incident on the cell is reduced by the reflectance, of
the intermediate reflecting surfaces, and the fraction of reflected energy that falls on the cell, .
The transmittance, of the cover sheet used to physically protect the cell surface and to keep
moisture and oxygen away from the electrical contacts, further reduces the optical energy incident
on the cell.

5.2.2 Heat Loss

Heat loss from the panel follows the same three paths, convection, radiation and conduction.
Optimizing those factors that increase heat loss without increasing cell temperature are important
for well designed photovoltaic panels. Maximizing heat loss for concentrating PV collectors is more
difficult due to the reduced cell surface area resulting from concentration.

5.2.3 Energy Balance

The detailed energy balance for a photovoltaic cell in a panel can be written in a manner similar to
Equation (4.9), replacing the receiver/absorber temperature term with the temperature of the cell:

(5.12)

where:

Tc- temperature of the cell (K)

Ac - area of the cell surface (m2)

5.2.4 Photovoltaic Panel Performance

Performance of a photovoltaic panel or concentrating photovoltaic collector can be described in

terms of its voltage and current output. The electrical power output from the panel is the product
of these two variables. Voltage and current vary with the intensity of the solar irradiance and the
temperature of the cell, all of which are described in the following figures. These figures were
derived from real data taken on a commercial photovoltaic panel of approximately 0.65 m 2.
However, only the trends are important here and the solar designer should obtain similar
information from the manufacturer of the specific panel or concentrator to be used in their design.

The I-V Curve - The fundamental performance of a photovoltaic panel is represented by Figure
5.4, called an I-V curve. It is a plot of the voltage across the panel for different values of current.
Since the voltage is a product of the current and the load resistance, lines of constant load
resistance are shown to complete the description.

11 of 30 8/21/2010 5:02 PM
Chapter5 [Link]

Figure 5.4 Photovoltaic panel output current as a function of the voltage across the panel. These I-V curves are shown
for different levels of insolation. Also superimposed on graph are lines of constant load resistance. Data are for a cell
temperature of 25oC and an air mass of 1.5.

At low values of load resistance, the current is a maximum and the voltage across the cell
approaches zero. This condition is equivalent to a short-circuit across the cell, and the current
output at zero voltage is called the short-circuit current or Isc. This current is a function of the size
of the photovoltaic cell, and the number of cells connected in parallel.

It can also be seen that the short-circuit current is also directly proportional to the level of solar
irradiance. This characteristic is why photovoltaic cells can be used as a transducer to measure
solar irradiance as discussed in Chapter 2.

As the load resistance increases, the current decreases slightly until a point is reached where the
cell can no longer maintain a high current level, and it falls to zero. The point at which the panel
current falls to zero represents an infinite resistance or an open circuit. The voltage across the
panel at zero current is called the open-circuit voltage, Voc, and represents the output of the
unloaded panel. Note that the open-circuit voltage varies only a small amount as a function of
solar irradiance (except at very low levels).

A single silicon photovoltaic cell produces an open-circuit voltage of slightly over 0.55 volts. The
voltage produced by a photovoltaic panel is a function of how many cells are connected in series.
In the case of the panel described below, there must be about 36 photovoltaic cells connected in
series in order to produce over 20 volts.

Peak Power Point The basic performance parameter required for a photovoltaic panel is neither
voltage nor current but electrical power. Since electrical power is the product of current times
voltage, one notes that there is no power produced at either extreme of the I-V curve. However, as

12 of 30 8/21/2010 5:02 PM
Chapter5 [Link]

the load resistance increases from the short-circuit current condition, the voltage rises until the I-V
curve starts falling to the open circuit point. There is a point along the curve where the maximum
power is generated which occurs just as the I-V curve ‘breaks’. This point is called the peak power
point (PPP). Figure 5.5 shows the electrical power output of the photovoltaic panel in Figure 5.4.

Figure 5.5 Power output of a photovoltaic panel at different levels of solar irradiance. The notation PPP defines the peak
power point. Data are for a cell temperature of 25oC and an air mass of 1.5.

Note that the peak power output occurs at a panel voltage of about 80% of the maximum
open-circuit voltage, for a wide range of solar irradiance levels. In order to maintain maximum
electrical power output from a photovoltaic panel, the load resistance should match this point. As
can be seen on Figure 5.4, the load resistance must increase as solar irradiance decreases in
order to maintain maximum power output from the panel.

Since the resistance of most electrical loads are fixed (except for electrical motors and batteries),
special consideration must be taken in the system design to ensure that the maximum potential of
the solar panel is utilized. There are electronic devices, called peak power trackers that ensure that
the panels are operating close to their peak power point.

Cell Temperature Loss - An important characteristic of the photovoltaic cell is the reduction of
output voltage as cell temperature increases. Figure 5.6 shows this characteristic for the
photovoltaic panel described in Figures 5.4and 5.5. Although not obvious on this curve, the short
circuit current increases slightly with temperature. Typical values for these changes are 4% Voc
and +0.5% Isc for a 10oC change in cell temperature.

13 of 30 8/21/2010 5:02 PM
Chapter5 [Link]

Figure 5.6 Effect of cell temperature on photovoltaic panel output. Data shown are for an irradiance of 1,000 W/m2 and
an air mass of 1.5.

All of the data presented so far have been for photovoltaic cells at a temperature of 25oC. In a real
system design, this is seldom the case. Photovoltaic cells are usually encapsulated in a panel to
provide rigidity and physical protection of the front surface. Since panels must reject 80% to 90%
of the solar energy incident upon them, and usually this transfer is to the ambient air, both the air
temperature and the wind speed and direction have great effects on this.

The concept of a normal operating cell temperature (NOCT) has been defined in order to provide
some sense of the ability of a specific panel to reject heat and provides a design guideline for
system performance analysis. Normal operating cell temperature is the cell temperature under
‘standard operating conditions’, ambient air temperature of 20oC, solar irradiance of 800 W/m2 and
wind speed of 1 m/s. NOCT values are specific to a particular panel or collector, but generally are
about 50oC for flat-plate panels.

All data presented above are for an air mass of 1.5 (AM=1.5). The concept of air mass was
introduced in Chapter 2, Section 2.2.2. The air mass is an indication of the path length that solar
irradiance travels through the atmosphere. An air mass of 1.0 means the sun is directly overhead
and the radiation travels through one atmosphere (thickness). The air mass is approximately equal
to the reciprocal of the cosine of the zenith angle and an air mass of 1.5 would represent a zenith
angle of 48.2 degrees or an altitude angle of 41.8 degrees.

5.3 Collector Efficiency

At this point in our discussion of how solar energy is collected, we will define the basic
performance parameter, collector efficiency. We will then describe how this is measured and then
how these measurements can be combined into an analytical model to predict collector output.
This is done in general terms, applicable to flat-plate and concentrating collectors for either

14 of 30 8/21/2010 5:02 PM
Chapter5 [Link]

thermal or photovoltaic applications.

The solar energy collection efficiency, of both thermal collectors and photovoltaic collectors is
defined as the ratio of the rate of useful thermal energy leaving the collector, to the useable solar
irradiance falling on the aperture area. Simply stated, collector efficiency is:

(5.13)

where:

= rate of (useful) energy output (W)

Aa = aperture area of the collector (m2)

Ia = solar irradiance falling on collector aperture (W/m 2)

This general definition of collector efficiency differs depending on the type of collector. The rate of
useful energy output from thermal collectors is the heat addition to a heat transfer fluid as defined
by Equation (5.2) whereas the useful energy output of a photovoltaic collector is electrical power
defined in Equation (5.11). The incoming solar irradiance falling on the collector aperture, Ia,
multiplied by the collector aperture area represents the maximum amount of solar energy that
could be captured by that collector.

5.3.1 Optical Efficiency

In some of the development that follows, we will use the concept of optical efficiency. The optical
efficiency of a solar collector is defined as the rate of optical (short wavelength) energy reaching
the absorber or receiver, divided by the appropriate solar resource. Dividing Equation (4.3) by
Equation (4.4), we have for optical efficiency;

(5.14)

This term is often used in separating out the non-thermal performance of a solar collector. It also
forms the maximum limit for collection efficiency as will be seen in our discussions below.

5.3.2 Flat-plate Collectors

Since flat-plate collectors (both thermal and photovoltaic) are capable of absorbing both direct
(beam) and diffuse solar irradiance, the appropriate aperture irradiance is the global (total)
irradiance falling on the collector aperture.

(5.15)

where It,a is the global irradiance on a collector aperture.

Equations for calculating global (total) irradiance on an aperture were the subject of Chapter 4,
Section 4.2.1 and for the general case we may use Equation (4.29). Various schemes of
orientation and tracking were discussed in Section 4.1 and may be applicable to determining the
angle of incidence. Equation (4.29) includes both direct (beam) and scattered and reflected
energy.

15 of 30 8/21/2010 5:02 PM
Chapter5 [Link]

Adding the appropriate useful energy term to Equation (5.13) we have for thermal and photovoltaic
flat-plate collectors, the following definitions of collector efficiency

Flat-plate thermal collectors: (5.16)

Flat-plate photovoltaic collectors: (5.17)

5.3.3 Concentrating Collectors

Concentrating collectors on the other hand can only concentrate direct (beam) solar irradiance
and therefore the appropriate irradiance term is direct (beam) normal solar irradiance, reduced by
the cosine of the angle of incidence. For two-axis tracking collectors, the angle of incidence is
zero.

(5.18)

where Ib,a is the direct (beam) irradiance on a collector aperture.

Equations for calculating direct (beam) irradiance on an aperture were the subject of Chapter 4,
Section 4.2.1 and for the general case we may use Equation (4.28). Various schemes of
orientation and tracking were discussed in Section 4.1 and may be applicable in determining the
angle of incidence. Equation (4.28) includes both direct (beam) and scattered and reflected
energy.

Adding the appropriate useful energy term to Equation (5.13) we have for thermal and photovoltaic
concentrating collectors, the following definitions of collector efficiency:

Concentrating thermal collectors: (5.19)

and

Concentrating photovoltaic collectors: (5.20)

5.3.4 Non-imaging Concentrators

One further caveat must be mentioned for non-imaging concentrators such as vee-troughs,
conical concentrators and compound parabolic concentrators (CPC). Since these accept some
diffuse solar irradiance, the appropriate Ia would be the direct (beam) normal, reduced by the
cosine of the angle of incidence plus the circumsolar diffuse solar irradiance falling within the
acceptance angle of that specific concentrator.

(5.21)

where the terms Id,aa and Ir,aa are the sky diffuse and reflected diffuse energy that are available
within the acceptance angle of the non-imaging concentrator. The definition of these terms is
beyond the scope of this book. However, this solar irradiance may be easily measured by reducing
the tube length of a pyrheliometer and attaching this to the aperture of the non-imaging
concentrator.

16 of 30 8/21/2010 5:02 PM
Chapter5 [Link]

5.4 Models of Collector Performance

Models of collector performance that will predict collector output under varying solar irradiance,
operating temperature and weather conditions, are important to the system designer. This type of
model can be used in system performance prediction programs such as SIMPLES, to predict the
output of the collector field.

The most prevalent solar collector performance model is called the ‘delta-T over I curve’ and
permits prediction of useful energy out under varying solar irradiance, ambient temperature and
system operating temperature. Although its required simplifications work well for low- temperature
flat-plate collector systems, it has been modified for use with higher temperature systems as
described below. This model has no applicability to photovoltaic collectors.

Figure 5.7 summarizes the performance of a typical flat-plate collector. Plots a) and b) show that,
the rate of useful energy produced decreases as the temperature of the fluid entering the collector
increases. As expected the higher the solar irradiance level, the higher the rate of useful energy
produced. Curve b) shows the same data plotted in inverse order. Plots c) and d) show collector
efficiency rather than useful energy produced. Curve c) shows that efficiency is independent of
solar irradiance when fluid inlet temperature equals ambient temperature. This point defines the
optical efficiency. Curves c) and d) can be combined into a single curve e) defining the
relationship between collector efficiency, solar irradiance and fluid inlet temperature as described
below.

5.4.1 Flat-plate Collectors, The Curve

Starting with Equation (4.9), the following simplifications can be made for a flat-plate collector
operating at low temperatures (below approximately 90oC):

There is no reflection of incoming solar irradiance and therefore and are eliminated.

The aperture area is the same as the absorber area (Aa = Ar)

Radiation heat loss can be combined with convection and conduction into a single overall heat
loss coefficient, UL (W/m2K). This coefficient is a constant for the particular collector being
modeled. (Temperature dependence of this term due to natural convection and radiation causes
non-linear affects to occur and will be discussed below).

The average receiver panel temperature, can be replaced by the temperature of the fluid
entering the collector, Tin , if the useful energy is divided by a ‘heat removal factor’, FR, defined as
the ratio of useful energy if is used rather than . Note that the heat removal factor is a
function of the rate of flow of heat transfer fluid.

The appropriate solar irradiance resource for a flat-plate collector, Ia is the global (total) solar
irradiance on a tilted surface, It,

With these simplifications, Equation (4.9), for normal incident solar irradiance becomes:

(5.22)

17 of 30 8/21/2010 5:02 PM
Chapter5 [Link]

If it is further assumed that FR, , , UL are constants for a given collector and flow rate, then the
efficiency is a linear function of the three parameters defining the operating condition; solar
irradiance, fluid inlet temperature and ambient air temperature. This is the single line shown on
curve e) in Figure 5.7.

The slope of this line represents the rate of heat loss from the collector. For example, collectors
with cover sheets will have less of a slope than those without cover sheets. The intercept of the
line on the efficiency axis is sometimes called the optical efficiency. Most low-temperature solar
collector performance data are presented in terms Equation (4.21). It

should be remembered that both of these terms are multiplied by the heat removal factor, FR
making them a function of flow rate. Therefore the flow rate for any curve should be specified.

Curve a)

18 of 30 8/21/2010 5:02 PM
Chapter5 [Link]

Curve b)

Curve c)

Figure 5.7 Performance of a typical flat-plate thermal collector (one glass cover, black-painted absorber, water transfer
o
fluid and ambient temperature 25 C). Curve a) shows the performance as a function of the variable described
above. Curve b) and c) for the same collector, show how the output varies with fluid temperature and irradiance. Curves
b) and c) are derived from curve a).

There are two interesting operating points on Figure 5.7, curve a). The first is the maximum
collection efficiency, called the optical efficiency. This occurs when the fluid inlet temperature
equals ambient temperature. For this condition, the value is zero. This is the test point
described above as part of a collector performance measurement procedures.

19 of 30 8/21/2010 5:02 PM
Chapter5 [Link]

The other point of interest on Figure 5.7, curve a) is the intercept with the axis. This point of
operation can be reached when useful energy is no longer removed from the collector, a condition
that can happen if fluid flow through the collector stops (power failure). In this case, the optical
energy coming in must equal the heat loss, requiring that the temperature of the absorber
increase until this balance occurs. This maximum temperature difference or ‘stagnation
temperature’ is defined by this point. For well-insulated collectors or concentrating collectors the
stagnation temperature can reach very high levels causing fluid boiling and, in the case of
concentrating collectors, the absorber surface can melt.

Curves b) and c) of Figure 5.7 are derived from curve a); the curve. Curve b) shows the
dependence of collector output (efficiency) as a function of the water inlet temperature for different
levels of irradiance. Note that more energy is derived from a collector when the water temperature
entering the collector is low. It is important in solar energy system design to only heat the water or
heat transfer fluid to the lowest temperature consistent with system output requirements.

Curve c) of Figure 5.7 shows the relationship of system output to the irradiance level. It shows that
systems operating at low temperature levels (such as swimming pool heating systems) can derive
heat from the sun at very low levels of irradiance. Higher temperature operating systems such as
domestic hot water systems only derive energy from the sun when the irradiance level is high.
Further study of curves b) and c) will reveal most of the important aspects of the thermal design of
solar energy systems.

5.4.2 Parabolic Troughs, The Non-Linear Curve

For parabolic trough collectors operating at higher temperatures, the above assumptions must be
modified. In order to better approximate the temperature at which heat loss takes place, an
average receiver temperature, is calculated as the average between the inlet and outlet fluid
temperatures:

(5.23)

where:

Tin - incoming heat transfer fluid temperature (K)

Tout - outgoing heat transfer fluid temperature (K)

The curves produced during testing have significant non-linearity. Thus the curve must
be fit analytically. Typically this is done using an expansion of Equation (4.21) of the form

(5.24)

where the coefficients a and b are determined by a curve fit to test data.

The addition of the term to Equation (5.22) is a simplified attempt to account for the fact that
UL is, in fact, not independent of temperature. In fact, the temperature dependence of UL is quite
complex. The attempt here is to utilize available test data by using a curve fitting technique. Figure
5.8 shows typical values and trends for these two concentrators.

20 of 30 8/21/2010 5:02 PM
Chapter5 [Link]

Figure 5.8 Collector efficiency for a typical parabolic trough and a typical parabolic dish collector.

The largest source of error arises from the fact that, in using a simple model, one is usually
extrapolating along the curve, not interpolating. As discussed earlier, the test data from which
a curve is generated is obtained at a constant value of Ia (usually near 1,000 W/m2). This is
about as large as Ia becomes. Thus, as Ia decreases in the course of an analysis due to either
poor solar irradiance or at large incidence angles, the quantity increases, usually to an extent
much larger than the range of test data.

Now if the curve is indeed close to a straight line, extrapolation may not introduce much error.
If there is significant curvature, however, extrapolation can lead to large errors and simple models
should be used with caution. Experience has indicated that, if the curve is reasonably
straight, the computed collector performance agrees fairly well with all-day test results, which
include significant incidence angle effects. In addition, long-term (year-long) performance
projections agree well with the results obtained from the very complex thermo-optical design
codes in use at Sandia National Laboratories for parabolic troughs (Harrigan, 198l).

It is noteworthy that in some of the literature, non-linearity on the test data is fit with a
2
polynomial curve having a term. Although this expression may indeed produce a reasonable
fit to the data, there is really no physical reason to introduce an I 2 functional dependence. This
point is discussed in some detail by Tabor (1980).

5.4.3 Parabolic Dish and Central Receivers - Constant-T Models

When a collector operates at a fixed temperature, and it is designed for operation at that
temperature, there is little need to determine its performance under varying temperature operating
conditions. Parabolic dish collectors that are part of dish/engine systems, and central receiver
systems are usually in this category.

If operated at a constant temperature, and that temperature is significantly higher than ambient
temperature, the rate of heat loss term in Equation (5.9) is a constant, and the useful energy out is
optical energy collected minus this constant. The result is a thermal output linearly proportional to
solar irradiance once a minimum ‘threshold’ solar irradiance level has been reached. This simple

21 of 30 8/21/2010 5:02 PM
Chapter5 [Link]

behavior is pictured in Figure 4.8 d).

(5.25)

The only variable unaccounted for here, is the variation in the overall heat loss coefficient, UL
caused by variations in wind velocity and direction. For parabolic dishes using cavity receivers, UL
will also change with the tilt angle of the cavity relative to the earth. This angle changes as the
dish tracks the sun across the sky. Data on both of these effects can be found in Stine &
McDonald (1989).

Usually for these combined concentrator/engine systems, the combined collector/engine system
performance is modeled. The output curve is similar to Figure (4.8d) but with the offset including
both collector thermal losses, and engine losses. These will be discussed in Chapter 11.

5.4.4 Photovoltaic Collectors

The performance of a photovoltaic panel or concentrating photovoltaic collector is defined in terms

of its efficiency as a function of load resistance and cell temperature. Equations defining the
appropriate efficiency are given as Equation (5.17) for flat-plate photovoltaic panels and (5.20) for
concentrating photovoltaic collectors. Normally, the efficiency of a photovoltaic panel or collector is
determined based on experimental data.

A curve of efficiency as a function of voltage across the panel at different levels of irradiance is
shown in Figure 5.9. This curve is derived from the basic I-V data shown in Figure 5.4 and is for a
cell temperature of 25oC, air mass = 1.5.

Figure 5.9 Photovoltaic panel efficiency at different levels of solar irradiance. Data shown are for a cell temperature of
25 oC and an air mass of 1.5.

22 of 30 8/21/2010 5:02 PM
Chapter5 [Link]

The peak power points described in Section 5.2.4 above are obvious in this plot, however we are
now looking at efficiency variation rather than power variation as in Figure 5.5. It is important to
note that the panel efficiency remains almost the same at all levels of insolation Although Figure
5.5 shows a marked decrease in power as solar irradiance decreases, the efficiency decreases
only slightly with irradiance level.

The effect of elevated cell temperatures on panel efficiency is shown in Figure 5.10. Here we see a
significant reduction in panel efficiency as cell temperature increases. The typical temperature
coefficient of efficiency is between value here is -0.5 to -0.6%/ oC

Figure 5.10 Photovoltaic panel efficiency at 1,000 W/m2 for different cell temperatures. Data shown are for an air mass
of 1.5.

Model - All of the factors discussed above must be included in a photovoltaic panel or collector
performance model. The performance of a photovoltaic panel is a function of the solar irradiation
level, the temperature of the cell and the air mass which affects the spectral distribution of the
incident irradiance as discussed in Chapter 2, section 2.2.2 and demonstrated on Figure 2.5. One
such model for photovoltaic collector efficiency is

(5.26)

where: - efficiency of panel at standard irradiance, cell temperature and air

mass.

- ratio of efficiency of panel at specified irradiance level to efficiency

at standard irradiance.

- efficiency of panel at specified cell temperature to its efficiency at

23 of 30 8/21/2010 5:02 PM
Chapter5 [Link]

the specified irradiance level.

- efficiency of panel at a specified air mass to its efficiency at

the specified irradiance level.

5.5 Measuring Collector Performance

To use a collector performance model data with some degree of confidence, it is important to
understand the way in which such data are obtained and what limitations this might impose on
how the data can be used. Below we describe the three most common methods of measuring
collector performance. There are collector test standards available that specify both the
experimental setup and the testing procedure. The most commonly accepted standards are listed
in the References and Bibliography at the end of this chapter.

Testing is performed only on clear days when the solar irradiance level is high and constant. Prior
to taking measurements, hot heat-transfer fluid is circulated through the absorber or receiver to
bring it up to the test temperature. For a flat-plate collector, the test flow rate is generally specified
by the test procedure in use. In the case of parabolic trough testing, turbulent flow is maintained
within the receiver tube to ensure good heat transfer between the fluid and the wall of the receiver
tube. A measurement is made only when the collector is at steady state, which is indicated by a
constant rise in heat transfer fluid as it flows through the receiver.

5.5.1 Thermal Performance Measurements

In a typical test to determine solar collector efficiency, the collector aperture is aligned as close as
possible to normal to the incident direct (beam) solar irradiance. This is done to eliminate any
uncertainties due to off-normal incidence angle effects. Figure 5.11 is a photograph of a turntable
at Sandia National Laboratory, Albuquerque used to align the aperture of a parabolic trough
collector normal to the incident direct (beam) solar irradiance. Once data are obtained with the
aperture normal to the sun, testing is repeated, usually only at one temperature, to determine the
effect of varying angles of incidence on collector performance.

24 of 30 8/21/2010 5:02 PM
Chapter5 [Link]

Figure 5.11 Collector module test facility at Sandia National laboratories. Courtesy of Sandia National Laboratories.

Three procedures for measuring the performance of thermal collectors are used, depending on
the type of collector system being tested and the experimental apparatus available. We shall
briefly describe each method; collector balance, system balance and heat loss measurement
methods below. Figure 5.12 depicts the test setup used in these tests graphically.

Figure 5.12 Three experimental methods for measuring collector efficiency.

Collector Balance - The most common test method used for flat-plate and parabolic trough
collectors is that depicted in Figure 5.12 a). This flow loop must incorporate accurate
measurement capabilities for the fluid inlet and outlet temperatures, and the mass flow rate of the
heat transfer fluid. It must also include a temperature controller connected to auxiliary heating and
cooling devices so that a constant fluid inlet temperature can be maintained. The rate of energy
being transferred to the heat transfer fluid under steady state conditions is given in Equation (5.2)

25 of 30 8/21/2010 5:02 PM
Chapter5 [Link]

Single collector modules are typically used in these tests, the temperature increase across a
single module, especially a parabolic trough module, can sometimes be small (e.g., 1 to 5ºC in a
parabolic trough) since these modules are designed to be connected in series in applications.
Therefore, extreme care must be taken in making accurate temperature rise measurements.
Dudley et al. (1982) describe, in general, the test procedures developed at Sandia National
Laboratories for testing parabolic trough collectors.

Flow System Balance - In some cases, it is not easy to accurately measure the fluid inlet or outlet
temperatures or the mass flow rate. Instead of performing the energy balance on the collector
module itself, an insulated flow loop and tank can be used as illustrated in Figure 5.12 b). The
energy balance for the system using this apparatus would be:

(5.27)

where:

m - mass of fluid in entire system (kg)

- the rate of increase of fluid in the tank (K/s)

- rate of pump work entering the insulated system (W)

For this method to work, the amount of fluid must be large enough so that the bulk temperature of
the fluid (and therefore the collector fluid inlet temperature) does not increase too rapidly in order
to obtain an approximate steady state temperature condition.

Heat Loss Measurement - A third method is often used on concentrating collector systems and
involves two tests to obtain a single performance data point. This procedure is illustrated
schematically in Figure 5.12 c). First the rate of optical energy collected defined in Equation (5.4)
is measured. Operating the collector with heat transfer fluid close to ambient temperature does
this. Since heat loss from the collector, as shown in Equation (5.9), is proportional to the
difference between fluid and ambient temperature, there should be no heat loss when they are the
same temperatures.

The second test is to operate the collector at normal operating temperatures (a heater is required)
without solar input. Usually defocusing the concentrator attains this test condition. Under these
conditions, heat will be lost from the receiver because of the temperature difference between it
and ambient. If this test is performed at different temperatures, the non-linear relationship between
heat loss and temperature difference can be determined. The rate of useful energy out of the
collector at any given temperature then is:

(5.28)

As with any test method, there are a number of inaccuracies that can affect the results obtained
with this test procedure. Probably the most important discrepancy is from the fact that, due to the
temperature difference needed to conduct heat through the absorber wall and transfer it into the
working fluid, the absorber surface will be hotter than the heat transfer fluid, under normal
operating conditions. However, when heat is being lost from a defocused or shaded collector
during the second test above, the absorber surface will be cooler than the heat transfer fluid. This
will result in the test measurement indicating heat losses that are lower than actually occur during
normal operation.

26 of 30 8/21/2010 5:02 PM
Chapter5 [Link]

Incident Angle Modifier - Most solar collector testing is performed using a two-axis tracking device
that places the collector aperture normal to the sun such as shown in Figure 5.11. In actual
installations, flat-plate collectors are usually mounted in a fixed position with the sun making
different incident angles to the collector aperture over the day as described in Section 4.1.1.

Parabolic troughs likewise usually track about a single axis and have incident angles as described
in Section 4.1.2. A non-zero angle of incidence not only changes the amount of irradiation incident
on the collector aperture (already accounted for in the definitions of aperture solar irradiance), but
also changes collector performance due to, among other things, variation of surface properties
with incident angle and internal shading.

If total energy recovery from a collector field over a period of time is to be estimated from collector
performance data, definition of the collector’s performance at other than zero incident angles is
necessary. The ratio of collector efficiency at any angle of incidence, to that at normal incidence is
called the ‘incident angle modifier’, Ki.

It is measured experimentally by varying the angle of incidence under noontime solar irradiance
conditions with ambient temperature heat transfer fluid passing through the collector. Changes in
this optical efficiency measurement give the incident angle modifier. Usually it is expressed as a
polynomial curve fit as:

(5.29)

where a and b are coefficients from a polynomial curve fit.

To predict the performance of a solar collector in a system, the collector normal incidence
efficiency predicted by either the linear or the non-linear ‘delta-T-over-I’ experimental data
correlation model described below, is multiplied by the incident angle modifier to obtain collector
efficiency:

(5.30)

Optical Efficiency - Optical efficiency, as defined in Equation (5.14) is generally determined by one
of two methods. The first method, easily performed on tracking collectors, involves operating the
collector at constant inlet temperature, first with the concentrator focused ‘on-sun’ and then with it
‘defocused’. The efficiency of the collector ‘on-sun’ is added to the rate of heat loss divided by the
same irradiance and aperture area with the result being the optical efficiency.

This same type of test can be performed on a flat-plate collector by covering and uncovering the
absorber with a sheet of opaque material.

5.5.2 Photovoltaic Performance Measurements

Due to the rapid response rate of the photovoltaic cell, testing of photovoltaic panels and
concentrating photovoltaic collectors does not have many of the difficulties addressed above for
thermal collectors. A detailed outline of performance testing procedures for photovoltaic panels is
contained in ASTM 1036.

Generally all that is required is a variable load resistance and measurements of current through
the load and voltage across the panel. A thermocouple should be placed adjacent to the
photovoltaic cells to ascertain their temperature. An alternative to using a variable resistance is to

27 of 30 8/21/2010 5:02 PM
Chapter5 [Link]

connect the photovoltaic panel across a large capacitor. Taking simultaneous transient data of
both voltage and current will provide the data necessary to plot an I-V curve.

Significantly more equipment is involved to determine the output at different cell temperatures and
air mass.

Summary

Table 5.1 Summary of Collector Performance Models

Flat-plate Thermal Collectors:

Aperture Irradiance:

Receiver Temperature Approximation:

Performance Model:

Parabolic Troughs

Aperture Solar irradiance:

Receiver Temperature Approximation:

Performance Model:

Parabolic Dish and Central Receiver

Aperture Solar irradiance:

Receiver Temperature Approximation:

Tr = best approximation

28 of 30 8/21/2010 5:02 PM
Chapter5 [Link]

Performance Model:

Flat-Plate Photovoltaic Panels

Aperture Irradiance:

Performance Model

Concentrating Photovoltaic Collectors

Aperture Irradiance:

Performance Model

References and Bibliography

Paitoonsurikarn, S, T. Taumoefolau and K. Lovegrove (2003) "Investigation of Natural Convection

Heat Loss from a Solar Concentrator Cavity Receiver at Varying Angle of Inclination" to be
presented at the 2003 ASME International Solar Energy Conference.

Stine, W. B. and C. G. McDonald (1989) "Cavity Receiver Convective Heat Loss" proceedings of
the International Solar Energy Society Solar World Congress 1989 Kobe, Japan, September 4-8,
1989.

ANSI/ASHRAE Std. 93-1986 (RA 91) (1986) Methods of Testing to Determine the Thermal
Performance of Solar Collectors, American Society of Heating and Refrigeration Engineers,
Atlanta, GA ([Link]).

ANSI/ASHRAE Std. 95-1981 (1981) Methods of Testing to Determine the Thermal Performance of
Solar Domestic Water Heating Systems, American Society of Heating and Refrigeration Engineers,

29 of 30 8/21/2010 5:02 PM
Chapter5 [Link]

Atlanta, GA ([Link]).

ANSI/ASHRAE Std. 96-1980 (RA 89) (1980) Methods of Testing to Determine the Thermal
Performance of Unglazed Flat-Plate Liquid-Type Solar Collectors American Society of Heating and
Refrigeration Engineers, Atlanta, GA ([Link]).

ANSI/ASHRAE Std. 109-1986 (RA 96) (1986) Methods of Testing to Determine the Thermal
Performance of Flat-Plate Liquid-Type Solar Collectors Containing Boiling Liquid, American Society
of Heating and Refrigeration Engineers, Atlanta, GA ([Link]).

ASTM E1036M-96e2 Standard Test Methods for Electrical Performance of Nonconcentrator

Terrestrial Photovoltaic Modules and Arrays Using Reference Cells, American Society for Testing
of Materials ([Link])

30 of 30 8/21/2010 5:02 PM