0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views3 pages

Oral Reflection Assessment Peer Feedback Guide

Uploaded by

heheking87
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views3 pages

Oral Reflection Assessment Peer Feedback Guide

Uploaded by

heheking87
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

CAES920x Oral Reflection Assessment Peer

Feedback Form and Practice Questions


Instructions
Take turns with the practice questions on the back of this handout. After each question put a tick () in the
peer feedback form below for each of the four criteria below (content, coherence, delivery, pronunciation)
and add some brief suggestions for improvement – if any are needed.
 Do not show the question to your partner. Only read it aloud. If your partner does not understand
the question, they can ask you to repeat it. In the assessment you can ask for the question to be
repeated.
 Each answer should be around 2.5 minutes long. Do NOT show your partner the timer. In the
assessment, you will not be marked down if you speak for longer than 2.5 minutes. This is not a
presentation. Timing is not assessed. The examiner will ask you to stop after you have spoken for
2.5 minutes.
Content - shows thorough reflection with specific details, convincing evidence, interesting insights and
evidence of learning and development etc.
Highly Quite Some Does not Notes and suggestions
reflective reflective evidence of seem to have
and very and reflection done any
thorough thorough reflection
First question
Second question
Third question

Coherence - ideas and points are easy to follow and sequenced logically; always relevant to the question;
effective use of transitions and signposting etc.
Very easy Mostly Can be Hard to follow Notes and suggestions
to follow easy to followed in
follow places but
not others
First question
Second question
Third question

Delivery - effective use of pausing and pacing, not too many fillers, not too monotone etc.
Very Mostly Quite Hard to listen Notes and suggestions
smooth smooth smooth in to and
delivery delivery some places understand
First question
Second question
Third question

Pronunciation - consistent, accurate, key terms and names etc. seem well practiced
Excellent Good Okay Needs work Notes and suggestions
First question
Second question
Third question
Practice Questions for the Oral Reflection Assessment
First question: content learning from bibliographic essay research
1. Why did you choose this source for your bibliographic essay [indicate which one(s)], and why does this source
qualify as “core” reading on your topic?
2. Which of your sources for the bibliographic essay was most useful or interesting, and why?
3. How has your bibliographic essay topic changed during the process of reading for, and then writing your
essay? Why?
4. Have you learned anything new about your bibliographic essay topic during the process of your research?
Have any of your views on issues within this topic changed? Explain.
5. Let’s say you were going to develop an argumentative or thesis driven essay from the reading you’ve done for
your bibliographic essay. What would your argument be, and how would you support it from the reading you’ve
done?
6. What was a central argument or critical idea discussed among two or more of the sources that you read for
your bibliographic essay? What is your stance on this and how did you reach that stance?
7. What content in your research for your bibliographic essay did you find most surprising, insightful or
unexpected? Why?
8. What were the most notable responses you had to one of the critical ideas, issues or arguments you examined
in your bibliographic essay?

Second question: development of academic English skills


1. What major changes have you made to either your argumentative essay or your bibliographic essay? Why and
how did you make these changes?
2. What specific problems with your academic English have you tried to eliminate from your writing? How?
3. What was the most difficult part of researching and then writing your argumentative and/or bibliographic
essay? Why? How did you handle these difficulties?
4. What was the most challenging source you read for either your argumentative or bibliographic essay? Why
was it so challenging? How did you address this challenge?
5. Which part of your argumentative or bibliographic essay did you find most difficult? What was your approach
to overcoming this?
6. Based on your experience of written assessments of this course and feedback you have received, what do you
think you need to do to further improve your academic reading and writing skills?
7. Tell me about the effectiveness of one or more resources and/or strategies that you used to improve your
academic English skills this semester.
8. To what extent have you used Generative AI tools to develop your academic reading and writing skills this
semester. How effective have you found such tools?

Third question: transfer of skills


1. What were the most useful skills or strategies that you learned on this course and explain how they have
helped or could help you in your other HKU courses or assignments?
2. In the process of writing your argumentative and bibliographic essays, what academic English reading or
writing skills did you learn about? How have learning about these helped or could help you with your reading
and/or writing in other Arts Faculty courses?
3. How does the reading and writing you’ve done for this essay compare to your experience of reading and
writing in other courses? What similarities and differences did you notice?
4. To what extent are any of the skills you’ve practiced in the argumentative essay and/or the bibliographic essay
transferrable to other assignments you are doing or will do at university? Why?
5. Can you give an example of where you have transferred (or could transfer) a skill or strategy from this course
to another HKU course? How successful would you say the transfer was (or could be) and why?
6. What challenges have you faced or might you face when transferring skills and strategies from this course to
other HKU courses? How did you or could you address those challenges?
7. What strategies or academic English skills learned on this course would you recommend to another student
who is taking the same disciplinary major courses as you? Why?
8. What skills using Generative AI tools have you learned on this course that you found could be applied in your
other HKU courses? What are the strengths and weaknesses of such tools? How easy or difficult was it to transfer
these skills?
Please be aware that the wording of the questions in the actual Oral Reflection Assessment may differ but their
substance will be essentially the same. The reason for having multiple and varied questions is so that you do NOT
script answers in advance, but instead answer questions as if in an actual interview / tutorial situation for which
you have adequately prepared.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Improving academic English skills involves addressing specific problems in the writing process, as identified through feedback and self-reflection. Challenges such as eliminating certain language errors can be tackled by actively seeking resources like grammar guides or peer review sessions . Additionally, improving these skills entails reflecting on the effectiveness of strategies and tools used, and incorporating changes that address the most difficult parts of the essay writing process, such as adapting to complex sources. The process ultimately requires an iterative approach, focusing on feedback to methodically refine skills .

Effective use of resources such as peer-reviewed journal articles, writing workshops, and digital tools like Generative AI has shown to significantly improve academic English skills. Students gain insights by comparing the effectiveness of these resources and identifying which best suits their learning styles . Applying these insights involves adapting strategies, such as continuous drafting and receiving iterative feedback, to future coursework, which would require disciplined application of learned techniques and seeking cross-course synergies .

A successful transfer could involve using a critical analysis skill from an argumentative essay to enhance a history assignment, where the student effectively employed evidence-based argumentation to support a thesis. Factors contributing to this success include the similarity of methodological approaches between the courses and proactive application of feedback learned from peer reviews . The ability to anticipate instructor expectations and an understanding of academic integrity across different contexts also played a role in applying this skill effectively, highlighting the importance of reflective skill application .

Challenges include adapting communication style to different academic contexts and aligning learned skills with varied assignment formats . These can be effectively managed by understanding the specific requirements of each course, seeking feedback, and practicing adaptability through active learning. Engaging in cross-disciplinary discussions to gain insights into different expectations and being open to re-contextualizing skills are key strategies for overcoming these challenges. Developing a reflective practice to evaluate the effectiveness of transferred skills continually is also crucial for ensuring seamless transitions .

Reflection is critical in enhancing presentation delivery as it fosters self-awareness regarding strengths and weaknesses in areas such as coherence, pronunciation, and pacing . Integrating reflection into academic growth involves routinely evaluating presentations for clarity and engagement, seeking peer feedback to identify improvement areas, and adopting iterative practice routines. This reflective cycle encourages continuous learning and fine-tuning of communication skills for diverse academic settings, ultimately contributing to overall student confidence and presentation effectiveness .

Strategies learned using Generative AI tools include automating research processes, enhancing language accuracy, and generating diverse content ideas. The effectiveness of transferring these skills lies in understanding AI limitations and leveraging its strengths like efficiency in initial drafting and brainstorming . Their application requires recognizing contexts where AI tools can supplement human cognition without undermining originality. For example, using AI for language refinement could be highly beneficial in coursework demanding polished presentation, illustrating the tools' strategic utility across academia .

An unexpected insight might be the identification of an underappreciated perspective that challenges mainstream views in the topic, such as discovering a minority viewpoint that adds depth to the understanding of subject matter dynamics. This insight is significant as it not only broadens the analysis but also encourages a more integrative approach to research, fostering a comprehensive understanding that respects diverse scholarly opinions . Such discoveries underline the importance of extensive research encompassing various sources .

The skills developed in writing argumentative and bibliographic essays, such as critical thinking, structuring arguments, and effective research techniques, are highly transferable to other academic assignments. Successful transfer depends on the similarity of tasks, awareness of how to apply these skills in different contexts, and the ability to adapt strategies to new content areas . For instance, skills like sourcing evidence and making cogent arguments can greatly assist with projects in other courses that require thorough research and analysis. Recognizing transferable skills can also enhance students' adaptability and learning efficacy across disciplines .

The reading and writing processes in this course emphasize critical engagement, reflection, and synthesis, which contrast with other courses that may prioritize rote learning or descriptive writing . These comparisons reveal that immersive, reflective approaches can foster deeper cognitive processing and analytical skills. Implications for student learning include a greater ability to apply critical thinking across disciplines, enhancing overall academic performance. Furthermore, aligning course expectations with such high-engagement models may better prepare students for interdisciplinary challenges .

The stance on a central argument evolved through the iterative process of engaging with multiple sources that evaluated and critiqued each other's positions. This evolution is influenced by cumulative evidence and differing perspectives, encouraging reflection on personal biases and assumptions . For instance, engaging with a source that challenges initial beliefs with robust data prompts re-evaluation of the stance to align with the most convincing argument based on substantial evidence, demonstrating learning growth and critical engagement .

You might also like