1

RESEARCH SAMPLE
CHIDIEBERE SAMUEL AGBOEZE
PHD AFRICAN AMERICAN STUDIES

Assessment of Youth Involvement in Self-Help Community Development Projects in

Nsukka Local Government Area, Enugu State, Nigeria

A RESEARCH PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE

REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF BACHELOR OF EDUCATION ([Link])
DEGREE IN ADULT EDUCATION /GOVERNMENT UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA
NSUKKA.
 2

Abstract

The paper tends to look into the dynamics of youths' participation in community development
initiatives across a few different regions in Nigeria. Afterwards, the importance of youth
involvement and empowerment is discussed in relation to factors that affect community
development programs. The research attempts to find problems and contributions of the youth
towards sustainable community growth using both primary and secondary data. Key
recommendations include those on youth involvement in the continuance and scaling up of
community projects, which point to capacity-building and strategic support. Such
recommendations are presented with regard to educational programs, the formation of alliances,
and legislation to enable active involvement by young people in community development.
 3

CHAPTER ONE

Introduction

The youth consists of a transitional generation between childhood dependence and adult
independence, wherein energy and vitality are most active, innovative, and creative, where one
can contribute most to the well-being of society. Youths are always considered the backbone in
any community in general for present and future development. They are the reservoir of intellect,
skill, and optimism, which are valuable ingredients in social development. Illiteracy among the
youths is a grave menace to such a development process; therefore, educational and
developmental opportunities must be continuously provided for them.

Background of the Study

The United Nations refers to the youth as those people between 15 and 24 years of age, while the
government of Nigeria refers to those within the ages of 16 and 20 years as youths. However,
basing this research on the volatility and vibrancy of these Nigerians, the category of 18-35 years
will be explored. Young people have special talents and capacities that when usefully mobilized
lead to development without stagnation. Community development is a source of living
improvement, collectively undertaken, and relies highly on the involvement of the youth. For
years, communities have been involved in self-help projects that address local needs and
stimulate development in areas such as provision of infrastructure and educational initiatives.

Statement of the Problem

Despite their potentials, some challenges that face the youths, which hinder their involvement,
include unemployment, bad leadership, corruption, political instability, insecurity, and poverty.
These challenges tend to alienate them, and this, in turn, has minimized effective involvement.
The study examines youth involvement in self-help community development projects in Nsukka
Local Government Area, Enugu State, Nigeria, and identifies strategies for improving their
participation.

Purpose of the Study

The general purpose of this study was to assess the involvement of youths in self-help
community development projects in Nsukka Local Government Area of Enugu State.
Specifically, the study sought to:
 4

1. Examine the extent of youth involvement in self-help community development projects

in Nsukka Local Government Area.
2. Find out the types of self-help projects youth embark on toward's community
development in Nsukka Local Government Area.
3. Ascertain the hindrances to youth involvement in self-help community development
projects in Nsukka Local Government Area.
4. Examine factors that promotes youth involvement in self-help community development
projects in Nsukka Local Government Area.
5. Ascertain the roles of youth organization in self-help community development in Nsukka
Local Government Area.

Significance of the Study

This study is theoretically and practically important. Theoretically, it was anchored on

Astin's Theory of Involvement, 1984, where active involvement in community projects rings
aloud. Practically, the study points to the engagement of youths into community development by
members of the community, local government officials, educators, and policy makers.
Appreciation of the involvement may be better organized for an improved living standard.
Members will benefit through the realization of their roles in community development and
understanding the need for massive involvement instead of waiting for external assistance. Youth
potential may be recognized by local government officials in improving living standards. Such
findings will also be significant to students, teachers, curriculum planners, the Ministry of
Education, supervisors, and parents.

Research Questions

The following research questions guided the study:

1. To what extent are youth involved in self-help community development projects in
Nsukka Local Government Area?
2. What are the types of self-help community developments projects embarked by
youths in Nsukka Local Government Area?
3. What are the hindrances to youth involvement in self-help community development
projects in Nsukka Local Government Area?
4. What are the factors that promotes youth involvement in self-help community
development projects in Nsukka Local Government Area?
5. What are the roles of youth organization in self-help community development in Nsukka
local government area?
 5

Scope of the Study

The present study has examined the activities of youths in self-help community
development projects within Nsukka Local Government Area. Variables such as gender, age,
time, and location have been examined in this study to give a wider insight into the involvement
of youths in local development projects.

CHAPTER TWO

LITERATURE REVIEW

This research investigates some of the fundamental concepts lying at the core of youth
involvement in self-help community development projects, organized under a number of
themes.

Conceptual Framework:

Assessment can be regarded as a structured process wherein there is an evaluation and

collection of feed-back to address certain issues that would help in the project planning and
decision-making aspects. In the words of Maxwell (2013), an assessment would include initial,
formative, and summative assessments that will help in tracking progress as well as outcomes.

Youths may be considered a vibrant age group falling between the age brackets of 13-35 years,
which may differ in some parts of the world. They are highly instrumental in the development
processes of society because of their energy, intelligence, and creativity.

Participation involves youth in the decision-making process and implementation of various

community projects that would help foster good relationships within the society and deliver
efficiency in the implemented projects. It entails creating an enabling environment for the
young people to participate.

Self-help refers to the efforts of the people themselves in meeting community needs by
mobilizing local resources. It represents the spirit of belonging, sustainable community support,
based on the logic that the best form of help one can have is teaching him or her how to help
themselves.
 6

Community development is a collective action with the intention of improving living standards
and solving local problems (Frank, 2012). Community development requires the participation of
each and every community member, especially the youths, who are considered key drivers for
development processes. They involve themselves in various self-help projects, including
infrastructural development, education, and environmental conservation. Causes such as
unemployment, corruption, and lack of direction retard the involvement of the youths. World
Bank Report, 2010.

Factors that Enhance Youth Participation: For effective participation, youth require
supportive leadership, focus, and planning with involvement. At the same time, community
leaders have an especially vital role in organizing young people and involving them in
development processes.

Youth Organization Roles: The organization acts as a catalyst in the development of the
community by organizing or guiding efforts to be channeled into useful projects, skill-building,
and social responsibility.

Summary

Literature impresses that youths can actually play a very vital role in community development. It
highlights active involvement by youth, enabling environments, and prudent leadership to assure
their potential for progress is tapped for societal advancement. This framework will guide the
study in assessing the way youths are involved in Nsukka's self-help community development
projects.
 7

CHAPTER THREE

METHODOLOGY

Methodology of the Study on Youth Involvement in Self-Help Community Development

Projects in Nsukka Local Government Area, Enugu State, Nigeria.

Research Design

I have adopted a Descriptive Survey research design to collect and interpret data from a sample
of the population with a view to analyzing the involvement of youth in community development
initiatives in Nsukka.

Scope of the Study

The study was done in Nsukka Local Government Area, Enugu State, which has 12 towns. I
narrowed my study to this area because of the prevalent abandoned self-help projects in the area,
and I assumed increased youth involvement could have surmounted this problem.

Population of the Study

The population comprised 4,012 respondents 4,004 members of community-based youth

organizations and eight community leaders from eight of the 12 towns.

Sample and Sampling Techniques

It had 200 respondents who were selected through a simple random sampling method from eight
communities representing their registered youth organizations.

Data Gathering Instrument

The data collection instrument was a standardized questionnaire that had two parts: one for the
demographic information and another for a four-point scale's selected questions that measured
youth involvement in community development.

Validation of the Instrument

A total of three experts from the University of Nigeria Nsukka validated the questionnaire on
language, relevance, and adequacy, following which necessary modifications were affected.

Reliability of the Instrument

The reliability of the instrument was ascertained using Cronbach Alpha reliability method on a
trial group from Udi Local Government Area. The overall reliability index obtained was 0.77.
 8

Procedures for Data Collection

Two field assistants distributed the questionnaires during the monthly meetings of the
community-based youth organizations. Data collection lasted for two months.

Method of Data Analysis

Frequency and percentages were used to analyze the demographic data, while responses to the
questions of the study were analyzed using real limits of numbers for extent ratings with a
criterion mean of 2.5 for acceptance or rejection of items. The formula used in computing the
mean score is \\( X = \\frac{\\sum x}{\\sum f} \\).

Table 1: Population Distribution Table

S/N Communities Registered based community youth Number of

organization members
1. Nsukka Nguru youths association 480
2. Ochima Amigbo umu-ejekwu youth association 400
3. Ikolo Amori youths association 527
4. Ohodo Ochiudo youths development union 382
5. Diogbe Diogbe youths association 321
6. Ukehe Obi Nwanne youth association 694
7. Onyohor – –
8. Udueme – –
9. Aku Age grade youths development union 588
10. Ozalla – –
12. Ekwegbe Amaeze youth development association 612
Total 4004

Sample and Sampling Techniques

The sample size of this study is 200 respondents. The sample size is the subset of the
population or the entire population. Therefore, to compose this sample, the researcher adopted
simple random sampling techniques. Purposely, the researcher selected eight communities
because only eight communities has registered youth organizations. Then using a simple random
sampling technique, the researcher will select 200 respondents, both youths and youth
community leaders, male and female inclusive.
 9

Table 2: Sample Distribution Table

S/N Communities Registered based on community Number of Random sample of

youth organization members registered members
1. Nsukka Nguru youth association 480 25
2. Ochima Amigbo unu-ejekwu youth 400 25
association
3. Ikolo Amori youths association 527 25
4. Ohodo Ochiudo youth development union 382 20
5. Diogbe Diogbe youth association 321 25
6. Ukehe Obi nwanne youth association 694 30
7. Aku Age grade union 588 25
8. Ekwegbe Amaeze youth development 612 25
4004 200

Instrument for Data Collection

A standardized questionnaire titled: "youth involvement in self-help community

development projects in Nsukka local government area". was used to collect data. There are two
sections to the questionnaire. The first component tries to identify the marital status, age,
educational qualifications, sex and employment of the respondents. The second component
consists of constructed questions that arose from the study topic and were designed to assess
youth involvement in Nsukka's self-help community development. For study questions 1-5, the
second portion was also structured along a four-point scale of Very High Extent (VHE), High
Extent (HE), Low Extent (LE), and Very Low Extent (VLE), with numerical values of 1, 2, and
3. For research questions, there are four options: Strongly Agree (SA), Agree (A), Disagree (D),
and Strongly Disagree (SD).

Validation of the Instrument

To ensure the validity of the instrument, the initial draft of the Questionnaire will be
given to three experts for validation, two from department of Adult Education and one from the
department of Measurement and Evaluation, in the University of Nigeria Nsukka. These experts
were requested to study the items on the questionnaire to assess the suitability of the
questionnaire in terms of language, adequacy and relevance in addressing the research questions,
in cognizance of the purpose of the study. These experts made corrections on the wrong use of
grammar by the researcher, erroneous use of tenses, some of the items in the clusters not
addressing the specific purposes of the study and the research questions. Their corrections and
 10

comments were used to modify the instrument.

Reliability of the Instrument

The reliability of the instrument was ascertained through trial testing. Thirty (30) copies
of the research instrument were administered on 30 members of other youth organizations from
Udi Local Government Area of Enugu State which was not used in the study. Cronbach Alpha
was used to test the internal consistency of the questionnaire items. Cronbach Alpha was chosen
because the instrument was non-dichotomously scored. This means that, it does not create
chance for “ Yes” or “ No” answer. The internal consistency reliability coefficient obtained for
each of the clusters A, B, C, and D were 0.71, 0.73, 0.81, 0.68 and 0.89 respectively. The
reliability index for the overall cluster is 0.77 which is an indication that the instrument was very
reliable.
Procedures for Data Collection
Two field assistants assisted the researcher in distributing the instrument to the
respondents. The research assistants were given instructions on how to administer the instrument
to the participants. Every month, the registered community-based youth organizations hold their
monthly meetings. The participants were assured that the study was academic in nature and not
intended to evaluate their activities. The questionnaire was provided in 200 copies, which were
filled and returned on the spot and this took a period of two months.
Method of Data Analysis

The data collected from the study was analyzed as follows: Demographic characteristics
of the respondents were analyzed using frequency and simple percentages. The formula is shown
below as:
F 100- X - = %N

Where F = Frequency

N = Number of respondents
% = Percentage

On the other hand, in order to determine the extent of agreement or disagreement to an

item by respondents and establish decision rule, real limits of numbers were used as follows:
Very High Extent 3.5-4.00, High Extent 2.50-3.49, Low Extent 1.50-2.49 and Very Low Extent
1.00-1.49 for research questions one, two and three while criterion mean of 2.5 and above was
used for research question five. Thus, any item whose mean score is 2.5 and above will be
accepted while those below 2.5 will be rejected. The instrument was based on four-point rating
scale of:
 11

Very High Extent (VHE) = 4 points

High Extent (HE) = 3 points
Low Extent (LE) = 2 points
Very Low Extent (VLE) = 1 points and
Strongly Agree (SA) = 4 points
Agree (A). = 3 points
Disagree (D) = 2 points
Strongly Disagree (SD) = 1 point
Mathematically arrived at by summation of the points which are

4  3  2 1
 2.50
4

The formula is shown as follows:

X = ∑x

---
∑f

X = Mean score

∑x =Total score

∑f = Frequency

CHAPTER FOUR
PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS OF DATA
This chapter presents the results of the study in line with the specific purposes, research
questions that guided the study. This was done by presenting the data in tabular form.
Section A-- personal information of Respondents

This section is designed to ascertain the personal information of the respondents. The personal
information of the respondents is analyzed in the tables below

Table 3: Gender of the Respondent

S/N Sex Frequency Percentage (%)

 12

1 Male 80 40
2 Female 120 60
Total 200 100
Table 3. above shows that female respondent is greater in number with 60% percent of the
population while the male population comprises of the remaining 40%.

Table 4: Designation of the Respondent

S/N Sex Frequency Percentage (%)

1 Youths 192 96
2 Youth leaders 8 4
Total 200 100

Table 4 : For the respondents, 96% were youth while 4% were youth leaders.

Table 5: Marital status

S/N Marital status Frequency Percentage (%)

1 Single 120 60
2 Married 50 25
3 Divorce 5 2.5
4 Widows 25 12.5
Total 200 100

The table 5 above shows that 120 of the respondents representing 60% are single while fifty of
the respondents representing 25% are married. The table equally reveals that 5 of the
respondents representing 2.5% are divorced while 25 of the respondents representing 12.5% are
widowed. The analysis of the result shows that majority of the respondents are single at the time
of this study.

Table 6: Distribution of the Respondents by Age

S/N Age Frequency Percentage (%)

1 18 – 23 70 35
2 24 – 29 72 36
3 30 – 35 38 19
4 36 and above 20 10
Total 200 100
 13

The table 6 above reveals that 70 of the respondents representing 35% are within the age range
of 18-23 while 72 of them representing 36% are within the age range of 24-29 years. In addition,
38 of the respondents representing 19% are within the age range of 30-35 while 20 of them
representing 10% are within the age range of 36 and above. Therefore, the table revealed that
majority of the respondents are within the age range of 24-29 years.

Table 7: Distribution of Respondents by Occupational Qualification

S/N Occupation Frequency Percentage (%)

1 Students 50 25
2 Civil servant 44 22
3 Traders 64 32
4 Farmers 42 21
Total 200 100

On the occupation of the respondents, students were 50 representing 25% while civil servant
were 44 representing 22%. Traders were 64 representing 32% while farmers were 42
representing 21% in number. This shows that most of the respondents were traders and students.

Table 8: Distribution of Respondents by Educational Qualification

S/N Educational Frequency Percentage (%)

qualification
1 First school leaving 45 22.5
certificate
2 WAEC 72 36
3 OND 13 6.5
4 HND 27 13.5
st
5 1 Degree 43 21.5
Total 200 100

The table 8 above shows the educational qualifications of the respondents, First School Leaven
Certificate (FSLC) holders were 45 representing 22.5%; WAEC holders were 72 representing
36% ; OND holders were 13 representing 6.5 ; HND were 27 representing 13.5% and 1st degrees
holders were 43 representing 21.5%. This shows that majority of the respondents were WAEC
and first school leaven holders.
 14

Table 9: Distribution based on number of children

S/N Number of children Frequency Percentage (%)

1 None 135 67.5
2 1– 3 30 15
3 4– 6 24 12
4 7– 9 11 5.5
Total 200 100

The table above illustrates 135 respondents representing 67.5% have no children; 30 respondents
representing 15% have 1-3 children; 24 respondents representing 12% have 4-6 children; 11
respondents representing 5.5% have children between 7-9. This indicates that majority of the
youths have no children and the remaining 50 married respondents have children although most
of them have children between 1-3.

Research Question One: To what extents are youth involved in self-help community
development projects in Nsukka local government Area?

Table 10: Mean Responses of the Respondents Showing extent of youth's involvement in self-
help community development projects in Nsukka local government Area

S/N Items statements VHE4 HE3 LE2 VLE1 No of Ex Mean Decision

respondent x remark
1 Level of youths 15 37 63 85 200 382 1.91 Rejected
involvement in the
planning of the
community
development project
2 Involvement in 13 20 92 75 200 373 1.86 Rejected
determining the type
of facilities and
equipment needed for
the project
3 Involvement in 45 37 82 36 200 491 2.45 Rejected
determining relevant
project
4 Involvement in Budget 40 25 38 97 200 409 2.04 Rejected
planning
5 Involvement in 35 50 62 53 200 467 2.33 Rejected
 15

deciding the standard

quality of the project
6 Involvement in setting 35 13 82 70 200 413 2.06 Rejected
the time frame and
specific period for the
development project
7 Take part in allocation 47 15 40 98 200 411 2.05 Rejected
of responsibilities for
carrying out the
project

Table 10: above reveals that the youths involvement in self-help community development
projects at a low extent (LE) in all the items as none of their mean responses is up to 2.5 which is
the criterion mean for acceptance. This means that the extent of youth involvement in self-help
community development projects is low. For youths: involvement in determining relevant project
has the highest score with a mean score of 2.45, followed by involvement in deciding the
standard quality of the project with a mean score of 2.33.

Others include, involvement in setting the time frame with a mean score of 2.06, followed by
take part in allocations responsibilities for carrying out the project with a mean score of 2.05,
involvement in budget planning 2.04, level of youth's involvement in the planning 1.91 and
involvement in determining the facilities and equipment needed for the project with the mean
score of 1.86.

Research Question Two: what are the types of community development projects embarked by
youths in Nsukka Local Government Area?

Table 11: mean response showing the types of self-help community development projects
embarked by youths.

S/N Items statements SA4 A3 D2 SD1 No of Ex Mean Decision

respondent x rule
8 Water bore-hole 95 50 47 8 200 632 3.16 Accepted
project
9 Construction of 150 40 7 3 200 737 3.68 Accepted
community market
10 Construction of 36 89 25 50 200 551 2.55 Accepted
drainage facilities
11 School construction 98 47 55 – 200 643 3.21 Accepted
 16

projects
12 Community 82 45 37 36 200 573 2.86 Accepted
recreational facilities
13 Community health 46 121 8 25 200 588 2.94 Accepted
centre project
14 Community road 62 53 52 33 200 544 2.72 Accepted
construction project

Table 11: above shows the various views of youths on the self-help community development
projects involved in by communities. From the analysis, construction of community market has
the highest score with a mean score of 3.68, followed by school construction project with a mean
score of 3.21. The next is water bore-hole project with mean score of 3.16. Others include:
community health centre project 2.94, community recreational facilities 2.86, community road
construction projects 2.72 and construction of drainage facilities 2.55.

Research question Three: what are the hindrances to youth involvement in self-help community
development projects in Nsukka local government area?

Table 12: Mean Responses Showing hindrances to Youths involvement in Community

Development Projects.

S/N Items statements SA4 A3 D2 SD1 No of Ex Mean Decision

respondent x rule
15 Poor educational 180 45 13 12 200 693 3.4 Accepted
background of the
majority of the youths
16 Incompetent 99 67 14 20 200 645 3.22 Accepted
community youth
organization
17 Youth unemployment 150 38 4 8 200 730 3.65 Accepted
and poverty
18 Adult action are not 50 135 15 – 200 635 3.17 Accepted
always in the best
interests of youths
19 Youths interest are 120 29 21 30 200 639 3.19 Accepted
frequently overlooked
20 Non-challant attitude 167 18 – 15 200 737 3.68 Accepted
of youths towards
 17

community
development projects
community
development

The table 12 above shows the various views of the respondents on the hindrances to youth’ s
involvement in community development projects. From the analysis, for youths; nonchallant
attitude of youths towards community development projects has the highest mean score of 3.68,
followed by youth unemployment and poverty with mean score of 3.65, others include, poor
educational background of majority of the youths 3.46, incompetent community youth
organizations 3.22, youths interests are frequently overlooked 3.19 and Adult action are not
always in the best interests of the youths 3.17.

The analysis in this table shows that both youths and youth leaders agreed that all the items are
some of the hindrances to youth’ s involvement in community development projects as all the
items were above 2.5 which is the criterion mean for acceptance.

Research question Four: what are the factors that promotes youth’ s involvement in self-help
community development projects in Nsukka local Government area?

Table 13: Mean Responses Showing Factors that promotes youth’ s involvement in self-help
community development projects.

S/N Items statements SA4 A3 D2 SD1 No of Ex Mean Decision

respondent x rule
21 Provision of youth 100 62 32 6 200 640 3.28 Accepted
economic empowerment
22 Provision of physiological 88 85 12 15 200 646 3.23 Accepted
needs eg food
23 Provision of social needs 111 78 5 6 200 694 3.47 Accepted
eg. Security
24 Love and belongingness 70 45 57 28 200 557 278 Accepted
25 Self esteem 78 97 25 – 200 653 3.26 Accepted
26 Youth should be given an 90 77 10 23 200 634 3.17 Accepted
opportunity for self-
actualization
 18

Table 13: above shows the perceptions of the respondents on the factors that promotes youths
involvement in self-help community development projects. For youths: social needs have the
highest score with a mean score of 3.47, followed by youth economic empowerment with a mean
score of 3.28. Others include: Self-esteem 3.26, physiological needs 3.23, self-actualization 3.17
and love and belongingness with a mean score of 2.78.

Therefore, the table reveals that the respondents accepted the factors that promotes youth
involvement in community development projects.

Research question five: what are the roles of youth organizations in self-help community
development in Nsukka local government area?

Table 14: Mean Responses Showing the roles of the youth organizations in Self-help community
development projects.

S/N Items statements VHE4 HE3 LE2 VLE1 No of Ex Mean Decision

respondent x remark
1 Brings about feelings 85 99 13 3 200 640 3.2 Accepted
of belongingness and
engage the youths in
change efforts
2 Enables youth 92 75 20 13 200 646 3.23 Accepted
leadership to emerge
3 Creation of voluntarily 70 28 62 40 200 528 2.64 Accepted
efforts towards
community
development projects
4 Creation of job 86 75 30 9 200 896 4.48 Accepted
opportunities

Table 14 above presents the various views of the respondents on the roles of youth organizations
in community development projects. From the analysis, for youths organizations; creation of job
opportunities has the highest mean score of 4.48, followed by Enables youth leadership to
emerge with mean score of 3.23, others include, Brings about feeling of belongingness and
engage youths in change efforts 3.2 and creation of voluntary efforts towards community
development 2.64.
 19

The analysis in this table shows that both youths and Youth leaders agreed that all the items are
some of the roles of youth organization in self-help community development projects as all the
items were above 2.5 which is the criterion mean for acceptance.

CHAPTER FIVE

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, DISCUSSIONS, CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS,

LIMITATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER STUDY

Overview of Findings

Engagement of Youth in Planning : Youths are not appropriately engaged in the planning of
community development projects.

Role of Youth: The youths are core players in community development in terms of commerce,
trade and agriculture.

Challenges : The primary issues to be addressed are poor education, poverty, unemployment
among young people, and disempowerment of young women.

Drivers for Participation: Empowerment of youths, physiological needs, social needs, love and
belongingness, esteem and self-actualisation.

Youth Organizations: Play major roles in self-help community development.

Discussion of the Findings

 20

Low Involvement in Planning: Youth involvement in planning is low, contrary to other research
showing that involvement in planning was higher in developing countries.

Types of Projects: Communities in Nsukka engage in a number of self-help projects such as

water bore-holes, community markets, and construction of schools.

Hindrances to Involvement : Hindrances to involvement include poor educational background,

unemployment among youth, and non-challant attitudes towards community projects.

Motivational Factors: Some of the motivational factors in youth participation are empowerment,
social needs, and self-esteem.

Youth Organizations' Roles: Youths organizations play a very important role in community
development and creation of job opportunities.

Conclusion

Recognition vs. Action: There is recognition of involvement of youth, but as far as

implementation is concerned, it is moving very slow. Unless meaningful participation takes
place, one can't expect to reap full benefits from youth during national reconstruction.

Integrated Approach : The participation has to be integrated into policies and decision-making
components if it is to contribute to broader development objectives.

Implications of the Study

Community Development : The participation of youth is highly essential for any successful self-
help community development project.

Stakeholder Engagement : It will be very essential on the part of stakeholders to engage young
people in the various processes of planning and implementation in a community development
initiative.

Educational and Financial Support : For an active participation of youth, it is important that their
educational deficiencies be addressed along with financial support.

Recommendations

Education and Enlightenment: Educating youth organizations about their roles within community
development.
 21

Comprehensive Programs: Community must establish youth intervention programs in

coordination with other agencies.

Social Workers: It should hire social workers to help carry out community projects.

Government Initiatives: The government should implement some educational programs to raise
awareness regarding the significance of community development.

Financial Support: Societies should financially help carry out the project.

Discipline and Enlightenment: Allow the youth to understand the importance and dangers
associated with the neglect of self-help activities.

Limitations of the Study

1. Lack of Initial Understanding of the Topic Made It Hard for Me to Write to the Point .
2. Honesty or Otherwise of the Respondents Were to Determine Validity in the Survey
Results .
3. Bad Roads and Insecurity in the Nsukka Community Made Access Difficult for Data
Collection.

Suggestions for Further Studies

Youth Organizations and Their Role in Community Development in Nsukka.

Stakeholders' Perception: This involves studying stakeholders' perceptions of youth participation

in community projects.

Self-Help Projects: In order to investigate self-help community development projects as a

panacea to youth restiveness in Enugu State.
 22

REFERENCES

Adefemi, O. (1998). Dimensions and Issues in Community Development Projects: Ibadan

Gabesther Education Publishers.

Afuye, H.O. (2005). Community Development in West Africa: Ibadan Publishing Press, Nigeria.

Akintoye, L.C. (2002). The Developing Capacity of Youths in West African sub-Region: Ibadan
Publishing Press.

Akinboade, C. Y. (2017). The effect of youth empowerment on participation in communitybased

development projects in Ondo and Kogi States of Nigeria, 1986 – 1994.

Akintoye, L.C. (2010). The Developing Capacity of Youths in West African sub-Region: Ibadan
Publishing Press.

Anderson, T.K. (2016). A Study carried out to ascertain the Level of Youths Participation in
Community Development Projects in Lima, Peru. Peruvian Journal of Community
Development 9, 95-110.

Anyanwu, C. N. (2010). Community Development: The Nigerian Perspective. Ibadan: Gabesther

Educational Publishers.

Anyanwu, C. N. (2010). Handbook of Education for Nigeria. Lagos: Amfitop Books.

Anyanwu, C. N. (2010). Introduction to Community Development. Ibadan: Gabesther

Educational Publishers

Anderson, T.K. (2005). A Study carried out to ascertain the Level of Youths Participation in
Community Development Projects in Lima, Peru. Peruvian Journal of Community
Development 9, 95-110.

Astin, (1984). Theory of Involvement: Retrieved from: [Link] on 15/6/2014.

Banda, K. (2005). Community Activeness Among Youths: The Tanzanian Experience. Katongo
Yukwua Publishing Press. Tanzania.
 23

Barbazette, J. (2006). What is Needs Assessment? Retrieved from

[Link]

Blair, C.K. (2007). Community Development Challenges in Asia: Problems and Prospects. Ne
Yarhuda Printing Press, India.

Bobson, R. (2001). The Community in Rural America. New York, Greenwood Press.

Boothroyd, P. (1991). Community Development: The Missing Link in Welfare Policy. Canadian
Perspectives: Kirwin, Bill, (Ed), Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press Incorporation.

Brown, P.W. (2010). After-School Programmes. Attracting and Sustaining youth participation.
International Journal of Learning 179:177-181.

Camino, L.A. (2000). Youth – Adult Partnerships: Entering New Territory in Community Work
and Research. Journal of Applied Developmental Science, 4,11-21.

Carrol, C.D. (2002). Evaluation of the activities of emergency youth forum in Indonesia.
Indonesian Journal of Extension and Public Relations. 3(5), 40-52.

Charlton, P. (2000). Youth Mainstreaming: Problems and Prospects. John Hopkins Press.

Cohill, A.M. (1997). "Success factors of the Blacksburg Electronic Village", In A.M.
Cohill & A.L. Kavanaugh (Eds.), Community networks: Lessons from Blacksburg,
Virginia (pp. 297-318). Norwood, MA: Artech House.

Clark, I..E. (2010). Community Association: Theory and Practice. Mark Gregor Printing Press.
Arizona. USA.

Coyle, M.C. (2000). Tracking the Work: Building a Co-ordinated Community Response: A
Guide for Community. Oxford University Press.

Desarion, F.G. & Langton, P. (1997). Planning Analysis: Theory of Citizen Participation.
Retrieved From [Link]

Estes, R.J. (1984). The Social Progress of Nations. New York: Praegor Publishers.

European Union (1999). An Appraisal of Community Development Projects in Eastern Europe.

12th November, in Oslo, Norway.
 24

Ezeh, C.A. (1999). Theory and Practice of Community Development. Deepspring Printing Press.

Ezema M. C.(2014) Assessment of youths involvement in self-help community development

projects in Nsukka Local Government Area of Enugu state Unpublished M. Ed. Thesis.
Department of Adult Education and Extra-Mural Studies, University of Nigeria, Nsukka.

Ezenyem, N.S. (2002). Families Involvement in Self-help Community Projects for Sustainable
Development: A Case Study of Amadunu Community in Nnobi Idemili South Local
Government Area of Anambra State. Unpublished [Link] Project Report. Department of
Adult Education and Extra-mural Studies. University of Nigeria, Nsukka.

Gordon, R.V. (2007). History of Community Development Projects. Oxford University Press.

Harper, W. (1997). Needs Assessment in Community Development Projects: A Necessity.

Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Press.

Harrel, V.C. (1998). Problems and Prospects of Assessing Community Development

Programmes. Cambridge University Press.

Herberts, G. (2000). Principles of System Theory. McHills Publishing Company Inc. Toronto,
Canada.

Hummels, C. (1999). Community Involvement Programmes: A Panacea to Underdevelopment in

Vietnam. Paranet Computers and Printing Press.

Johnson, K. (2008). Community Development Principles and Concepts. New York Fep
Publishers.

Kamara, B.N. (2005). Dimensions of Community Development Projects in Guinea. Africana –

Fep

Weaver, I. (2013). Women Participation in Community Development: A Panacea to

Underdevelopment in Africa. Geralds Publishing Press, Accra, Ghana.

William, F.G. (2011). Health Consequences of Obesity in Youth: Childhood Predictors of Adult
Disease, Pediatrics, 101(2), 518-525.

World Bank (2016) International Summit on the persistent Rise in Adolescent population of
Developing Countries. 5th May, in Colombo, Sri Lanka.
25