0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views2 pages

Bioequivalence of Perfalgan Injection

Uploaded by

hg832511
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views2 pages

Bioequivalence of Perfalgan Injection

Uploaded by

hg832511
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Bioequivalence study comparing a new paracetamol solution for injection and propacetamol after

single intravenous infusion in healthy subjects.

Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Jan; 42(1):[Link]

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

A new, ready-to-use solution for injection of paracetamol (Perfalgan 10 mg/ml) without previous
reconstitution has been developed. The aim of the study was to determine the serum concentration
profiles of paracetamol after 15 min infusion of Perfalgan 0.5 g and 1 g doses and to demonstrate the
bioequivalence between Perfalgan 1 g dose and a marketed reference formulation for injection,
propacetamol 2 g (Pro-Dafalgan 2 g) equivalent to 1 g of paracetamol. The secondary objective was
to evaluate local tolerance, and clinical and biological safety.

METHODS

The study was performed in 24 healthy, male volunteers, according to an open-label, randomized,
single-dose, 3-period crossover design, with a 1-week washout period between the doses. Blood
samples were taken prior to each administration and at 18 time points within the 24-hour period
following the beginning of each infusion. Serum concentrations of paracetamol were determined by
validated high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection. From serum concentration-
time data, a non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed to calculate Cmax, tmax,
AUC(inf), t(1/2), MRT, Cl(T) and Vd. Log-transformed AUC(inf) and Cmax were tested for
bioequivalence. The local pain intensity at infusion site was assessed using a 4-point categorical scale
from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The clinical and biological safety was evaluated by physical examination
with measurements of vital signs and ECG and laboratory tests including hematology and
biochemistry.

RESULTS

After infusion of 0.5 g and I g of the new paracetamol solution, C(max) and AUC(inf) increased
proportionally with dosage. After dose correction to 1 g of paracetamol, the mean (+/- SD) Cmax
ratio was 0.98 +/- 0.24 and 0.94 +/- 0.08 for AUC ratio. Identical t(max) was observed for the 2
paracetamol dosages and 90% confidence intervals for t(1/2), MRT, Cl(T) and V(d) were within the
acceptable interval 0.8-1.25. The calculated 90% confidence intervals of the new solution (Perfalgan
1 g) to marketed solution (propacetamol 2 g) ratios were 1.11-1.31 (point estimate 1.20) for C(max)
and 1.10-1.16 (point estimate 1.13) for AUC(inf). These values were within the acceptable
bioequivalence intervals of 0.75 to 1.33 for Cmax and 0.80-1.25 for AUC(inf). Application site
disorders were the most frequently observed adverse events but local pain at infusion site was less
reported by subjects after Perfalgan (2%) compared to propacetamol (20%). The clinical and
biological safety was good and equivalent for the 3 treatments.

CONCLUSION

After administration of paracetamol solution for injection 0.5 g and 1 g, the pharmacokinetics of
paracetamol is linear. All results indicate that 1 g of paracetamol administered as Perfalgan 10 mg/ml
is bioequivalent to propacetamol 2 g with a better local safety.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Flouvat B
Leneveu A

Fitoussi S

Delhotal-Landes B

Gendron A

MeSH

AcetaminophenAdultAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticArea Under CurveBiological AvailabilityChemistry,


PharmaceuticalChromatography, High Pressure LiquidCross-Over StudiesDrug Administration
ScheduleFranceHalf-LifeHumansInfusions, IntravenousInjectionsMaleNeedlesPainPharmaceutical
SolutionsSpectrophotometry, UltravioletTherapeutic EquivalencyTime FactorsWounds, Penetrating

Pub Type(s)

Clinical Trial

Comparative Study

Journal Article

Randomized Controlled Trial

Language

eng

PubMed ID

14756388

You might also like