0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes) 5 views36 pagesChapter 7.3
CSE Anthropology optional paper-2
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Utevetupias
Cheptis
Concept of Etynicity
Word etnyicity has Come rm
original word eranic wlich means race .
Bur etanic gpeowp does net jush li
saciol identity. ty Groader C
Qe {fs See Conseiousness op People,
united ar closely —etated to-€acl Hur by
Shaved experience _ Such gas dangueye rou,
seligions bLetieys, Commen Meritage or conbi—
Nasiony A> alt
SS yehos ,REgrES | Japanese -kkc all term
disting ethnic eee»
The other Mraming of Mthuic Come prom
word eyes
meaning. vost , bub
nob means politcal Gmmunity wu
Gmmon descour ox tiashtp (ethnic ayeof)
§ndiutdued Souol tdentH
© Calta! and Seco! uni}ornity.
© Individ peeling op belengingness te gra.
© Birth detennines mumbership .
® These groups are Separated by quia
Pemitervies ox boundaries .Utevetupias
= Erhnicity deni on 4 Process oF ASceming onés
i Tdentity .
= wecording to Maxweber Cehen (i974) ethnicity
is “Process of Intera tien between cutturral gmups
Cfesattng ulthin Comms Sotial Gutexb”
Though ir fs Considered iM mere § ethnic
elation » how fr become move inter
Eelation cus to head fer |ectoblr
identity. ~\y
Pe
= Feedkk Rath gave Conwet Ethisic Boundaries,
fe Study Rtinfatty. Accorcliing io Wim people in
Soop are loound boy Pxtyrierdiol bonds.
We Considerect feces On interface and ivitera-
CHon anon qrospé her gave rise te tdent-
Hes. these gmups Fe Cuiure Bounded entities.
4 Concapt ermicity 7 clesely inked ustth nation
awe unietanic patton avd Some arvemuli-
NaHONSH(Atndta) . Evnnicity Is we and they
Ly Recowding W@ Sumner | People have thelr
as Coutee of thelr lives And Yate
Orhers sroup with wekerence te Hnety own .
This tendency ted 4° eHanowntrism and ft
1s a generalized prejudice .Utevetupias
Ly Pence Sotfal categorisotfon based on etanic
identity led yo Cteatfon a tn Group’ and
Sout Group’
the menkey 2 Ln Comp Ts expected to
Wold Such attitude os paviicweay ident:
and,
Nomous Kivid Of peessuve ave brought q
whe fall to Cantorm to fr.
Lb Ethnic atvibutes are Staltc pr
ms by
Srhntaty wolAch
isa aynamie S ,wwhureby
SUP ay people wequup ftselh as an adaptive
Srrateqy in ‘wesponse to specif, Lemand oy
STiuattor) «
4 tn retour me Oblettue Ceitevia Arlee religion
Can be abandoned fn favour op cther citesiq
ke region ox language:
malades Separared tom pakistan on
oF Pamala CuUtare Tertspeciive oy
iqfous idenrty .
2d aS fdeology fo damand quecter
do share iy power Struaure.
According te Max Weber t-
CQ) dr is based on veal and assumed commen
descent amd blood Hes-Utevetupias
ci peaples belies tn Gommen deta makes
Vt Tevelevant whethor Tr [S weal oy false.
GW jhe commonality ef the Chic People
may be anyone op the “GATE xia - PhysTco)
Oppeawana te Common historic expertence
GY) The commen belie: Produces act bond
between the pesple-
Ofer Chara trenisics +
Q) Etinidiy jg ~welated te Iden Ke catte
Seligfon , language , keqion, 8c
ah) Gngie bekseen foo Minto Sproups acces
Lohan inequality nS ‘Ey teem of power Shaving.
GD Betng leper our tryyelemelopmental process or
even being vichn bi Uneven cevelopment,
ethnicity Causesm@etnic movements .
MIdty “altar mani petred fr Tndian politic
Hy due to grass wot discontent bur
Ceestion op vested intercit of political
dr can att as too} porte
ee Politics.
factors Yar Led fo Increase Im Tnrewelt te
Study Stanidty tH ecent Himes t—
Q) migsation | @) Emengena a, Biyatics
@ coturol cowtac CS Gnpia@ dey wesources.
(® Develspment of Tedynalegy Gmeng @Hinte gous
|Utevetupias
Sridy fnvolwes Varies medelé | theory 2—
© Calterel Assiimiladien twesry + Cmeting pot thee)
Ly consensus appmath like American Society
Where many etanfc gwrp identities asstwila—
ted Cmeryed) ante ict communities and all
are Qeveralty become American . Howe
thesry 18 net bidtely accepted a5
Pants in America are maintaini
i wtity
Separare fem commen Amer ian Ghinee,
\
@® Assimilation and Mteqralion” : Ayst one ts
assimilakon © matting pet) amd Fnterachve
jmregration FS ite diguse pension and to protect
the dow {na «ted group vik ts Suggetted to main—
tain
Co-openmation — usfth Marginalrzed quoups -
clic] oppwach Cten iiicr_theery) s bh power
le based on -etonfc jdentites each
Ty qe wrest oreatbenr Concessions .
ka Lurmita phadnis study]
Ot
@ eeda Haaowy + LHynic Intewatkion
Atcordin te him eennic POPS
aimtatned due to absence ay
Mobility and cevtacc our ft -entails the Secial
Precess of xclusion and inwxpevation . The
Soual croups Diving ty fanticnay a7req Lctain
tneiy fdentities be cause they maintain mini-
mol Seda} Contact -Uftevetupias
© Meeording to Geewe etyniciy {S natugsl
bond between people , Immutable or primordial
Thus politica Identity fermaton can be Seon
as Stevarning, HEM this Primordial legauty ,
® Aceording is ipankar Gupta
» In Indian politics
though variery of Identities tn ound ty
one Seuieby , only Centain ern re,
Polttically “autyated and 4nat te Uvely
or certain petnt sy time
language —At Wattonal,
ple UH nai mt
ps ea ee —Thter state
ner Rae P™ Batkward ness_aatiin
Stabe,
Rente , erhnict
Re
HWS an &xcetlent tol for
Ident featron of the SPivahions of Community
i's) looundary and jor Pexserving
+ C cultural Boundaries]
Conwpr ob Ethnic boundaries given
wth. According 4 litm pesgle living
With Varfouy etintc identy
wetein tho idenvittes | pe opined Haar thee
Ventties ame retain, because pepple maimtein
limited Social nrenciton « Pesple prauice socal
exclusion amd &imited Interauion te mainatn
identities. these ‘boundaries axe Sette} pou hd-
AMES Which dees vot aUnoys Corresponds tothe
|Utevetupias
tenitevial boundaries. ay Noga people ane,
fresent fy mere than one stare in Newheost.
People ontsrde boundary mot expected to have
Common Chava Geatstics and people of ourtide
Smup are not Sxpected te Conform to customs
and nexmt ap parr cular etanic gue
D precording to Basth and Benedir
‘3
& a
boundary f$ fmpevient fn i
Rae “pea emerge
4 These boundaries axe administered boy Sotial
InSHtetens and Seuiel bedjes 2g. \chap panchayph
Vribal Cound), Cosnes Cound ..--ebe-
Gnceq UeN@s oy Shnidny
W pe Yer Oh identity, Gable oF Q pani-
To gmep 1 muth ethnic naken .
AD PSeseay and Promotion, of language ,
Knowledge 4 Comm unity .
GD Tr Com be atbas Soul capital ger Social
Srebary moiureining | Sotfal hawmeny.
OO TWTs cam be ack as fool fer Community
to damand rwalts, JUG Thy muUcultur)
Sedeties: Cay grey fs minowity)-Utevetupias
|
|
Negakives t— |
Oo Ernidiy iS Tnrevacton barweon pops. tp
Cteat ¢ Inger” and “oubgwup? beditng Hen
Wis led te Crh cantata and vazfour
Prejudias peeling .
@ Teo much hatted bebseen group Sep
te Gmmunal violence
® Etnicity can led te Separate ferme -
Hen Sy Shavehand | fd hea - Telen gana .
© Fetbat movements, Tile Unrear
- ‘
© seciay Tension turpathed the octal copita) and
Overall development ny region Supyers
© Ht am be think) Hethaional inbegutty
S&S. Noga Mopement Khalistan mevemad -
Bharat Shsestha
Bharat .
games .
summers and falee Wess .
S Politica} neensus _ Give Autonomy ~ Sth and
6 Schedule
Lb Twbal Panchsheal , Poster notiened te
ay
treugh education -
S menaia commiirer Cmumbed mocel),
Comunity palicring: Ckerala nodal) ,Utevetupias
Grandia as we know has cutturd, economic
amd Social hetesogenetty + Compl ty ethnic
Plurotity Sh our Nation [5 Enown youth EH
Tndta Plural ty oridentity tsa tealtiy and
Wwe are chivide by these etunte iclentt
which rece hi byured doyatties .
5 Geoqmphicatiy , anata pedilitare
35 Numerous groups belongs ~ & race,
language , Cutie thc.
bindia 1s united Byit—
* Common lnistory niafth Greated Psychelogi -
Cop ui ty,
bnlty in aspects of politcal ecomemic,
Socal: spheyg Se Pawtiament one tax system
Caste System manson » Citizen slap °
induism wetef ned pan-Tudtan Telenitty,
Ter ployed impovrant ole Sante
Sho, Hindi .
mm Stugale movemenh united dudia,
Quity 3 -
ys Fier Hime under pshoka , tndfa Come under
One Uwbrella under Cortralised ule
4 during medieval period mughal eupire Heated
Pan india sevdimed with skang Certiralised
Monayale .