APPENDIX E
Executive Summary
Statement of the Problem Statistical Treatment Findings Conclusions Recommendations
Used
This study aims to Determine The statistical treatment of Based on the The
the Relationship Between Percentage, Mean, the gathered data indicated findings, recommendations
Smartphone Usage and and Standard revealed the following the following are based on the
Academic Performance of Deviation findings: conclusion were findings of
Selected ABM Students at drawn: Relationship
Sta. Catalina Integrated Percentage is 1. Demographic Profile of The result of the Between
National High School. This calculated by the Respondents: correlation between Smartphone Usage
research intends to answer the frequency in the The research indicates smartphone usage and Academic
following questions: category divided by that majority of and academic Performance:
1. What is the profile of the the total number of respondents were 17 performance of the
senior high school students in participants and years old, and there was a ABM students 1. For Students:
terms of: multiplying by 100%. higher representation of rejected the null Attend time
1. Age; female, with 24 hypothesis and management
2. Sex; Weighted mean was participants compared to thus implied that workshops
2. What is the smartphone utilized to turn the males. there is a positive emphasizing a
usage profile of the responses into scores 2. Smartphone Usage: correlation between balance between
respondents in terms of: as the foundation for Academic and Non- smartphone usage academic and non-
1. Number of hour(s) figuring out the verbal Academic: and academic academic
spent on smartphone interpretations as -Academic Usage: 83.3% success among smartphone use.
for academic purposes scaled into five use smartphone for ABM students. Learn to create
daily and; potential answer. academic (1-3 hours However, the personalized
2. Number of hour(s) spent on Standard Deviation daily), primarily as presence of a schedules.
smartphone for non-academic was applied in order to supplementary tools. subgroup with 2. For Parents:
purposes daily. better understand how -Non-Academic Usage: potentially Establish clear digital
3. What is the extent of the data entries 43.3% spend 4-7 hours problematic non- guideline at home,
academic performance of the deviate from the daily, 26.7% use them 8+ academic phone setting time limits
respondents? mean. The more hours, indicating potential use highlights the and prioritizing
spread of the data, the need for further academics. Engage
4. Is there a significant higher the deviation issues impacting time investigation to in conversation with
relationship between was calculated the management. determine the children about
smartphone usage and square of variance 3. Academic Performance: specific impact of responsible
academic performance of Strong correlation found excessive phone smartphone use.
ABM students at Sta. Catalina between smartphone use on academic [Link] Teachers:
Integrated National High usage and high academic performance. Integrate technology
School? achievement among ABM strategically in
students. Many surpassed learning activities.
expectations, attaining Designate “no phone
proficiency or excellence. zones” for focused
4. Relationship Between learning without
Smartphone Usage and distractions.
Academic Performance: 4. For Future
Positive correlation noted Researchers:
between responsible Conduct longitudinal
smartphone use and studies tracking
academic success among academic
ABM students. Further performance and
investigations needed to well-being,
understand the impact of correlating
excessive non-academic smartphone usage
phone use on academic patterns for valuable
performance, suggesting a insights over time.
complex relationship.