Understanding Quality in Daily Life
Understanding Quality in Daily Life
QUALITY
Quality has been an age-old concern. The discerning customer in shops and market places has applied
―quality techniques,‖ prodding and turning fruits and vegetables testing for firmness, freshness and fitness
for the purpose of consumption. If the products were not adequate, the purchase would not take place.
In the hustle and bustle of cattle markets farmers argued and bartered over the fitness of animals for breeding,
dairy farming or consumption, providing evidence for their case by inspection against criteria learned from
their forefathers. Those shoppers and farmers passed on their knowledge to their children and similarly it was
passed on to their children‘s children.
I too learned the principles of inspection and learning from my mother as she scrutinized clothes and
footwear, fruits and vegetables in our town market. Eager market traders would get short shrift from her if
clothes had weak stitching, zips got stuck when zipping, fruits were marked and bruised or vegetables
appeared old and unpalatable.
The issue of quality of goods and services is not new. Throughout history, society has demanded that
providers of goods and services should meet their obligations. As long ago as 1700 BC King Hammurabi of
Babylon introduced the concept of product quality and liability into the building industry of the time by
declaring:
If a building falls into pieces and the owner is killed then the builder shall be put to death. If the owner‘s
children are killed then the builders‘ children shall be put to death.
A BROADER VIEW OF “WHAT IS QUALITY”
Ask people this question and we get a diverse range of answers. A good answer given in a seminar on quality
was ―Quality‖ is a perception. Quality could be all things to all people. Quality like beauty lies in the eyes of
the beholder. Quality like any other concept begins in the mind. Quality is found in great abundance in our
daily life. We live in a quality age, in a quality home, fully of quality furniture. We buy quality goods and
drive a quality car and demand quality service from others.
In our industry, this is the most commonly used word in day-to-day work. Infact we see a lot of posters
espousing the cause of quality but posters by themselves cannot help unless everyone is educated about the
meaning of quality. Without a clear understanding of the term quality, it is difficult to achieve it. Lack of
understanding gives rise to the ambiguous use of the word ―quality‖ and leads to variation in priorities,
decisions, actions and attitude.
BAMR
The oxford dictionary defines quality as ―degree of excellence, relative nature or kind or character. General
Excellence.
A good product
Sturdy
Durable
Made of best materials
Easy to operate
Nice in appearance and touch
Produced with care
Brand
Sales talk/Sales brochure
Picture and sound quality
Size/dimensions
Appearances
Weight
Terms of payment
Maintenance cost
Terms of delivery
Installation
BAMR
Servicing/skills
Courtesy of staff
Layout of table/comfort
Lighting/Ambience/Atmosphere
Correct order taking
Services of the waiters
Neatness/Clean linen
Reasonably Quick service
Tasty food
Courteous serving
Quality Assurance
QA contains all those planned and systematic actions necessary to supply adequate confidence that a product
or service will satisfy/fulfill given requirements for Quality.
QA includes QC, but it emphasizes quality in the design of products and processes.
BAMR
Quality Control
QC is the process through which we measure the actual quality performance and compare it with the set
standards.
The typically quality control program is based on the periodic inspection, followed by feedback of the results
and change or adjustment whenever required.
Quality System
A Quality System is the company-wide and plant-wide operating work structure, responsibilities, procedures,
and processes for guiding the coordinated actions of the workforce, the machines, and the information of the
organization in the best and most practical ways to assure customer satisfaction. Quality
Assurance and Quality Control both are part of the quality system.
It basically aims to involve every person from every function or department of an organization working
together to eliminate defects/errors and prevent 3M Waste from the manufacturing process.
BAMR
What is Cost of Quality (COQ)
Cost of Quality is a methodology used to define and measure where and what amount of an organization’s
resources are being used for prevention activities and maintaining product quality as opposed to the costs
resulting from internal and external failures. The Cost of Quality can be represented by the sum of two
factors. The Cost of Good Quality and the Cost of Poor Quality equals the Cost of Quality, as represented in
the basic equation below:
CoQ = CoGQ + CoPQ
The Cost of Quality equation looks simple but in reality it is more complex. The Cost of Quality includes all
costs associated with the quality of a product from preventive costs intended to reduce or eliminate failures,
cost of process controls to maintain quality levels and the costs related to failures both internal and external.
BAMR
BAMR
The Cost of Good Quality (CoGQ)
1. Prevention Costs – costs incurred from activities intended to keep failures to a minimum. These can
include, but are not limited to, the following:
o Establishing Product Specifications
o Quality Planning
o New Product Development and Testing
o Development of a Quality Management System (QMS)
o Proper Employee Training
2. Appraisal Costs – costs incurred to maintain acceptable product quality levels. Appraisal costs can
include, but are not limited to, the following:
o Incoming Material Inspections
o Process Controls
o Check Fixtures
o Quality Audits
o Supplier Assessments
BAMR
o Shipping Damage due to Inadequate Packaging
Late 1950’s Japanese who developed new concepts in response to the Americans
It is beyond the scope of this site to go into great detail on each of the gurus, their philosophies, teachings and tools;
however, a brief overview of their contribution to the quality journey is given, supported by several references.
Early 1950’s Americans who took the messages of quality to Japan Late 1950’s Japanese who developed new concepts
in response to the Americans 1970’s-1980’s Western gurus who followed the Japanese industrial success It is beyond
the scope of this site to go into great detail on each of the gurus, their philosophies, teachings and tools; however, a
brief overview of their contribution to the quality journey is given, supported by several references.
The Americans who went to Japan:
Dr. W. Edwards Deming: Probably the most known quality guru—for a reason. Developed a complete description
and guide to quality management (14 points and 7 deadly diseases). The American management consultant convinced
the world about the power of simple tools like the Plan-Do-Check-Act-circle (PDCA) and Statistical Process Control
(SPC).
W Edwards Deming placed great importance and responsibility on management, at both the individual and company
level, believing management to be responsible for 94% of quality problems.
His fourteen point plan is a complete philosophy of management, that can be applied to small or large organisations in
the public, private or service sectors:
• Create constancy of purpose towards improvement of product and service
• Adopt the new philosophy. We can no longer live with commonly accepted levels of delay, mistakes and defective
workmanship
BAMR
• Cease dependence on mass inspection. Instead, require statistical evidence that quality is built in
• End the practice of awarding business on the basis of price
• Find problems. It is management’s job to work continually on the system
• Institute modern methods of training on the job
• Institute modern methods of supervision of production workers, The responsibility of foremen must be changed from
numbers to quality
• Drive out fear, so that everyone may work effectively for the company • Break down barriers between departments
• Eliminate numerical goals, posters and slogans for the workforce asking for new levels of productivity without
providing methods
• Eliminate work standards that prescribe numerical quotas
• Remove barriers that stand between the hourly worker and their right to pride of workmanship • Institute a vigorous
programme of education and retraining
• Create a structure in top management that will push on the above points every day
He believed that adoption of, and action on, the fourteen points was a signal that management intended to stay in
business. Deming also encouraged a systematic approach to problem solving and promoted the widely known Plan, Do,
Check, Act (PDCA) cycle. The PDCA cycle is also known as the Deming cycle, although it was developed by a
colleague of Deming, Dr Shewhart. It is a universal improvement methodology, the idea being to constantly improve,
and thereby reduce the difference between the requirements of the customers and the performance of the process. The
cycle is about learning and ongoing improvement, learning what works and what does not in a systematic way; and the
cycle repeats; after one cycle is complete, another is started
Dr Joseph M Juran developed the quality trilogy – quality planning, quality control and quality improvement. Good
quality management requires quality actions to be planned out, improved and controlled. The process achieves control
at one level of quality performance, then plans are made to improve the performance on a project by project basis,
using tools and techniques such as Pareto analysis. This activity eventually achieves breakthrough to an improved level,
which is again controlled, to prevent any deterioration
BAMR
Juran believed quality is associated with customer satisfaction and dissatisfaction with the product, and emphasised the
necessity for ongoing quality improvement through a succession of small improvement projects carried out throughout
the organisation. His ten steps to quality improvement are:
• Provide training
• Report progress
• Give recognition
• Communicate results
• Maintain momentum
He concentrated not just on the end customer, but on other external and internal customers. Each person along the
chain, from product designer to final user, is a supplier and a customer. In addition, the person will be a process,
carrying out some transformation or activity.
Dr Kaoru Ishikawa made many contributions to quality, the most noteworthy being his total quality viewpoint,
company wide quality control, his emphasis on the human side of quality, the Ishikawa diagram and the assembly and
use of the “ seven basic tools of quality”:
He believed these seven tools should be known widely, if not by everyone, in an organisation and used to analyse
problems and develop improvements. Used together they form a powerful kit.
BAMR
One of the most widely known of these is the Ishikawa (or fishbone or cause and effect) diagram.
or EFFECT
Like other tools, it assists groups in quality improvements. The diagram systematically represents and analyses the real
causes behind a problem or effect. It organises the major and minor contributing causes leading to one effect (or
problem), defines the problem, identifies possible and probable causes by narrowing down the possible ones. It also
helps groups to be systematic in the generation of ideas and to check that it has stated the direction of causation
correctly. The diagrammatic format helps when presenting results to others.
BAMR
Level of
quality Quality control procedure
and stage of evolution
“Taguchi methodology” is fundamentally a prototyping method that enables the designer to identify the
optimal settings to produce a robust product that can survive manufacturing time after time, piece after piece,
and provide what the customer wants. Today, companies see a close link between Taguchi methods, which
can be viewed along a continuum, and quality function deployment (QFD).
BAMR
Philip B Crosby is known for the concepts of “ Quality is Free ” and “Zero Defects”, and his quality
improvement process is based on his four absolutes of quality:
• Form a management level quality improvement team (QIT) with responsibility for quality
improvement process planning and administration
• Evaluate the cost of quality and explain its use as a management tool to measure waste
• Raise quality awareness and personal concern for quality amongst all employees
• Take corrective actions, using established formal systems to remove the root causes of
problems
• Hold a Zero Defects Day to broadcast the change and as a management recommitment and
employee commitment
Invented by Walter A. Shewhart while he was working for Bell Labs in the ’20s, control charts
have been used in a variety of industries as part of a process improvement methodology.
Shewhart understood that, no matter how well a process was designed, there will always be
variation within that process—and the effect can become negative if the variation keeps you from
meeting deadlines or quotas.
BAMR
Statistical process control (SPC) :
Common causes :Purely random , unidentifiable sources of variation that are unavoidable
with the existing process and the process in control.
Assignable causes ; Any variation causing factors that can be identified and eliminated.
1. Cost reduction: In this method, only a fragmentary output is inspected to ensure the
quality of product, therefore probe cost would be reduced greatly.
2. Huge efficiency: Inspection of a fractional portion requires lesser time and tedium in
comparison to holistic investigation leading to huge escalation in efficiency and
production.
3. Easier to use: Pitching SQC not only reduces process variability but also makes the
process of production-in-control. Even, it is much to apply by an individual without
having such extensive specialized guidance.
4. Authentic anticipation: SQC is the most preeminent approach that can accurately predict
future production. To ensure the degree of perfection and product performance, SQC
provides a great predictability.
5. Prior fault detection: Any deviation from standard control limits depicts signs of danger
in the underlying production process that invites necessary corrective measurement to be
taken earlier. SQC is helpful in early detection of faults.
BAMR
A control chart is an important aid or statistical device used for the study and control of the
repetitive processes. It was developed by A. Shewhart and it is based upon the fact that variability
does exist in all the repetitive process.
A control chart is a graphical representation of the collected information. The information may
pertain to measured quality characteristics of samples.
A control chart having a chance pattern of variation will have the following three characteristics:
(i) Most of the points will lie near the central line.
(iii) None of the points (except 3 in a thousand) fall outside the control limits.
(iii) Shifts
BAMR
Extreme variation is recognised by the points falling outside the upper and lower control limits.
Thus, when the sample points outside these limits on X chart, p chart or both it means some
assignable causes of error are present and corrective action is necessary to produce the products
within the specified limits.
(b) Samples chosen at a peak position of temperature, pressure and such other factors.
BAMR
Figure: Control Chart for Extreme Variation
If the consecutive points on X or R chart tend to move steadily either towards LCL or UCL, it can
be assumed that process is indicating a Trend, that is change is taking place slowly and through
all the points are lying with in control limits, after some time it is likely that the process may go
out of control if proper case or corrective action is not taken.
Causes of Trend
(iii) Shift
When a series of consecutive points fall above or below the central line on either X or R
BAMR
chart, it can be assumed that shift in the process has taken place indicating presence of some
assignable cause.
BAMR
It is generally assumed that when seven consecutive points lie above or below the central line, the
shift has occurred.
Causes of Shift
Erratic fluctuation is characterised by ups and downs as shown in Figure is given below. This
may be due to single causes or a group of causes affecting the process level and spread. The
causes of erratic fluctuations are rather difficult to identify. It may be due to different causes
acting at different times on the process.
Causes of Fluctuations
BAMR
Brief History of Statistical Quality Control
1924: W. A. Shewhart introduces the control chart concept in a Bell Laboratories Technical
Memorandum.
1946: The American Society for Quality Control (ASQC) is formed as a merger of varies quality
societies.
1957: Turan and Gragna: Published first time Quality Control Handbook.
1959: Technometrics (a journal of statistical for the physical, chemical engineering sureness) is
established J. Stuart Hunder is the founding editor.
1969: Industrial Quality Control replaced by Quality Progress (Journal of Quality Technology).
1989: The journal Quality Engineering appears. 1989: Motorola‟s six sigma initiative begins.
A typical control chart is graphical display of a quality characteristic that has been measured or
computed from a sample statistic versus the sample number or time. The chart contains center
line that represents the average value of the quality characteristic corresponding to the in-control
state. Two other horizontal lines called Upper Control Limit (UCL) and Lower Control Limit
(LCL). These control limits are chosen so that if the process is in control, nearly all of the sample
points will fall between them. As long as the points plot within the control limits, the process is
assumed to be in control and no action necessary. If a point that plots outside of the control limits
is interpreted as the process is out of control.
Even if all the points plot inside the control limits, if they behave in a systematic or non-random
manner, then this could be an indication that the process is out of control. If the process is in
control, all the plotted points should have an essentially random pattern. Usually, there is a
reason why a particular non-random pattern appears on a control chart and if it can be found and
eliminated process performance can be improved.
Figure: A typical control chart
The most important use of a control chart is to improve the process. We have found that,
generally,
2. Consequently, the routine and attentive use of control charts will identify assignable
causes. If these caused can be eliminated from the process, variability will be reduced
and the process will be improved.
3. The control chart will only detect assignable causes. Managements, operator and
engineering action will usually be necessary to eliminate the assignable causes.
Some analysts suggest using two sets of limits control charts. The outer limits say, at three sigma
are the usual action limits, that is, when a point plots outside of this limit, a search for an
assignable cause is made and corrective action is taken if necessary. The inner limits, usually at
two sigma are called warning limits.
If one or more points fall between the warning limits and the control limits or very close to the
warning limit, we should be suspicious that the process may not be operating properly.
The use of warning limits can increase the sensitivity of the control chart. One of their
disadvantage is that they may be confusing to operating personnel.
Due to these causes or the presence of assignable causes, the process is considered as out of
control.
Suppose all the points fall within the control limits but do not form a trend or any sequence of
points then it is called constant cause system and the process is in control.
Preparation :
Data collection:
TQM FRAMEWORK
The figure shows the framework of TQM system. It begins with the knowledge provided by
gurus of quality: Shewhart, Deming, Juran, Figenbaum, Ishikawa, Crosby, and Taguchi. As the
figure shows, they contributed to the development of principles and practices and/or the tools
and techniques. Some of these tools and techniques are used in the product and/or service
realization activity. Feedback from internal/external customers or interested parties information
to continually improve the organization‟s system, product and/or service
TQM FRAMEWORK
THE EIGHT PRINCIPLES OF TQM
1. Customer focus: Every action comes from a drive to deliver more value to the customer.
2. Total employee involvement: Include all staff, not just managers, in ideation and
decision-making. After all, executives don’t have a monopoly on good ideas.
5. Strategic and systematic approach: The primary tenet of TQM is to make strategic
choices to improve your company as a whole rather than only specific issues. For example, don’t
just replace underperforming employees, explore why they underperformed in the first place to
better understand if there is room for improvement in hiring, onboarding, or training practices
instead.
6. Continual improvement: Rather than going for a single big project, focus on
implementing small changes. Improving customer satisfaction or core processes is a long-term
game.
8. Clear communication: Everyone in your company should be on the same page. You need
to standardize your vision, processes, and plans. To make things easier, use a reliable platform
for all communication.
The main building blocks of TQM are culture, analytics, a systemic approach, and long-term
investment. You can’t implement any of the TQM principles without mastering these business
areas:
• Culture: The idea that every employee is responsible for driving change in the company
requires an organizational culture that supports it at all levels. Without all staff on board, any
quality improvement will be temporary.
• Measurement and analytics: If you don’t have the data, you can never know if you
improved or not. That’s why you must adopt a mindset of tracking everything efficiently and
consistently.
• Systemic outlook: Don’t treat just the symptoms, seek out the root of issues and address
those.
QFD TEAM:
BENEFITS OF QFD:
1. Improves Customer satisfaction
Prioritizes resources
Based on consensus
Creates communication
Identifies actions
3. Provides Documentation
HOUSE OF QUALITY
The primary planning tool used in QFD is the house of quality. The house of quality translates
the voice of the customer into design requirements that meet specific target values and matches
those against how an organization will meet those requirements. Many managers and engineers
consider the house of quality to be the primary chart in quality planning
The structure of QFD can be thought of as a framework of a house, as shown in figure. The parts
of the house of quality are described as follows:
The exterior walls of the house are the customer requirements. On the left side is a listing of the
voice of the customer or what the customer expects in the product. On the right side are the
prioritized customer requirements or planning matrix. Listed items include customer
benchmarking, customer importance rating, target value, scale-up factor and sales point. The
ceiling, or second floor, of the house contains the technical descriptors. Consistency of the
product is provided through engineering characteristics, design constrains and parameters. The
interior walls of the house are the relationships between customer requirements and technical
descriptors. Customer expectations (customer requirements) are translated into engineering
characteristics (technical descriptors). The roof of the house is the interrelationship between
technical descriptors. Trade offs between similar and/or conflicting technical descriptors are
identified. The foundation of the house is the prioritized technical descriptors. Items such as the
technical benchmarking, degree of technical difficulty and target value are listed. This is the
basic structure for the house of quality. Once this format is understood, any other QFD matrices
are fairly straightforward and easy to understand The structure of QFD can be thought of as a
framework of a house, as shown in figure 23.3. The parts of the house of quality are described as
follows:
The exterior walls of the house are the customer requirements. On the left side is a listing of the
voice of the customer or what the customer expects in the product. On the right side are the
prioritized customer requirements or planning matrix. Listed items include customer
benchmarking, customer importance rating, target value, scale-up factor and sales point. The
ceiling, or second floor, of the house contains the technical descriptors. Consistency of the
product is provided through engineering characteristics, design constrains and parameters. The
interior walls of the house are the relationships between customer requirements and technical
descriptors. Customer expectations customer requirements) are translated into engineering
characteristics (technical descriptors).
The roof of the house is the interrelationship between technical descriptors. Trade offs between
similar and/or conflicting technical descriptors are identified. The foundation of the house is the
prioritized technical descriptors. Items such as the technical benchmarking, degree of technical
difficulty and target value are listed. This is the basic structure for the house of quality. Once this
format is understood, any other QFD matrices are fairly straightforward and easy to understand
The general purpose of QFD model includes the components addressed in below Figure
Customers requirements (CR) - Also known as "Voice of Customer" or VoC, they are the
"whats" the customers want from the product to be developed. They contain customers‟ wishes,
expectations and requirements for the product. Customer importance ratings - Once these
"whats" are in place, the customer needs to provide numerical ratings to these "whats" items in
terms of their importance to the customer. A numerical rating of 1 to 5 is often used, in which
the number 5 represents the most important and1 the least. Customer market competitive
evaluations - In this block, a comparison is made between a company's product/service and
similar competitive products/services on the market by the customer. The comparison results will
help the developer position the product on the market as well as find out how the customer is
satisfied now. For each product, the customer gives 1 to 5 ratings against each CR, 5 being best
satisfied and 1 the worst. Technical specifications – They are the technical specifications that are
to be built into a product with the intention to satisfy the CR. They are sometimes referred as
"hows" because they are the answers to CR: how can the requirements be addressed or satisfied.
They are the engineers' understanding in technical terms what customers really want. The
technical specifications must be quantifiable or measurable so that they can be used for design.
Relationship matrix - Relationship matrix is used to maintain the relationship between CR and
design requirements. In other words, the matrix corresponds to the "whats" vs. "hows". It is the
center part of HoQ and must be completed by technical team. A weight of 1-3-9 or 1-3-5 is often
used for internal representation of relationship, 1 being the weak and the biggest number being
the strong relationship. Correlation matrix - It is the triangular part in the HoQ (the "roof"). The
correlation matrix is used to identify which "hows" items support one another and which are in
conflict. Positive correlation help identify "hows" items that are closely related and avoid
duplication of efforts. Negative correlation represents conditions that will probably require trade-
offs. The positive and negative ratings are usually quantified using 2, 1, -1, and -2 ratings, with 2
being the two "hows" items are strongly supportive to each other and -2 being the conflicting.
Sometimes only 1 and -1 are used. Target goals - Completed by technical team, these are the
"how muchs" of the technical "hows" items. They provide designers with specific technical
guidance for what have to be achieved as well as objectively measuring the progress. The goals
have to be quantified in order to be specific and measurable. Technical difficulty assessment -
Technical team conducts the assessment. It helps to establish the feasibility and realizability of
each "hows" item. A 1 to 5 ratings are used to quantify technical difficulty with 5 being the most
difficult and 1 being the easiest. Technical competitive evaluation - It is used for comparing the
new product with competitor's products to find out if these technical requirements are better or
worse than competitors. Again, 1 to 5 ratings are used with 5 being the fully realized each
particular "hows" item and 1 being the worst realized. Overall importance ratings - This is the
final step of finishing HoQ for phase 1. For each column, sum all the row numbers each of which
is equal to the production of relationship rating and customer's important rating. The results help
identify critical product requirements and assist in the trade-off decision making process.
PHASES OF QFD
PRODUCT PLANNING
Translating what customer wants or needs into set of prioritized design requirements.
PART PLANNING
For example, if requirement is that product should be portable, then characteristics could
be light-weight, small size, compact, etc.
PROCESS PLANNING
PRODUCTION PLANNING
In this step too, ability to deliver six sigma quality should be improved
BENEFITS OF QFD
QUALITY CIRCLES
Quality circle may be defined as a small group of workers (5 to 10) who do the same work
voluntarily meeting together regularly during their normal working time usually under the
leadership of their own supervisor to identify, analyze and solve work related problems.
This group presents the solution to the management and wherever possible implement the
solution themselves. The QC concept was first originated in Japan in 1960. The basic cycle of a
quality circle starts from identification of problem.
Philosophical basis of QC
1. A belief that people will take pride and interest in their work if they get autonomy and take
part in decision making.
3. A belief that each employee desires to participate in making the organization a better place.
4. It is a mean/method for the development of human resources through the process of training,
work experience and participation in problem solving
5.A willingness to allow people to volunteer their time and effort for improvement of
performance of organization.
1. Non member
2. Members
3. Leader
4. Facilitator
a) Link between leader and steering committee
e) Evaluate QC Program.
[Link]
Even though there is no special department for QC an committee is formed among the
employees to:-
6. Steering committee
[Link] Management
CEO, MD, GM, Chairman are in this level without their support QC cannot be successful.
Kaizen (Ky ‘ zen) is a Japanese term that means continuous improvement, taken from words
'Kai', which means continuous and 'zen' which means improvement. Some translate 'Kai' to mean
change and 'zen' to mean good, or for the better
Kaizen is one of the most commonly used words in Japan. It is used, not only in the workplace,
but in popular culture as well. Kaizen is a foundation on which companies are built. Kaizen is
such a natural way for people in Japan to think that managers and workers often do not make a
conscious effort to think “Kaizen.” They just think the way they think – and that way happens to
be Kaizen.
activities on an organization
KAIZEN ADVANTAGES
Kaizen's focus on gradual improvement can create a gentler approach to change in contrast to big
efforts that may be abandoned due to their tendency to provoke change resistance and pushback.
Kaizen encourages scrutiny of processes so that mistakes and waste are reduced.
With fewer errors, oversight and inspection needs are minimized.
Employee morale improves because Kaizen encourages a sense of value and purpose.
Teamwork increases as employees think beyond the specific issues of their department.
Client focus expands as employees become more aware of customer requirements.
Systems are in place to ensure improvements are encouraged both in the short and long
terms.
KAIZEN DISADVANTAGES
Companies with cultures of territorialism and closed communication may first need to
focus on cultural changes to create a receptive environment.
Short-term Kaizen events may create a burst of excitement that is shallow and short-lived
and, therefore, is not sustained.
EXAMPLES OF KAIZEN
Toyota is arguably the most famous for its use of Kaizen, but other companies have successfully
used the approach. Here are the examples:
Lockheed Martin. The aerospace company is a well-known proponent of Kaizen. It has used the
method to successfully reduce manufacturing costs, inventory and delivery time.
Ford Motor Company. When lean devotee Alan Mulally became CEO of Ford in 2006, the
automaker was on the brink of bankruptcy. Mulally used Kaizen to execute one of the most
famous corporate turnarounds in history.
POKA-YOKE
Poka-yoke is a Japanese term that means "mistake-proofing" or "inadvertent error prevention".
A poka-yoke is any mechanism in a process that helps an equipment operator avoid mistakes and
Status:
Stop
Check
Alarm
WHEN TO USE MISTAKE PROOFING
When a process step has been identified where human error can cause mistakes or defects to
occur, especially in processes that rely on the worker’s attention, skill, or experience In a service
process, where the customer can make an error which affects the output At a hand-off step in a
process, when output (or for service processes, the customer) is transferred to another worker
When a minor error early in the process causes major problems later in the process When the
consequences of an error are expensive or dangerous
HOW TO IMPLEMENT? (STEPS)
While the obvious reason for applying Poka Yoke principle is the quality of what is produced,
there are other benefits.
Workers will need less training, because the process they are now following will
automatically correct any deviation from what is required.
Increased safety where work is done with hazardous materials or in risky conditions, such
as working with electricity or petrochemicals.
quality checks by sampling and inspection can be reduced, because the elimination of
mistakes is built into the process, either b prediction or by detection
the work will be less repetitive and boring because of the removal of some of the
inspection that was needed before
Quality-based work and continuous improvement become a way of life.
No defective items, or very few, are produced, thus reducing waste and costs
Confidence levels in the product(s) are improved, because stakeholders know that the
production process eliminates or radically reduces defects being produced
QUALITY SYSTEMS
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (QMS) : (QMS) is a system that documents the policies,
business processes, and procedures necessary for an organization to create and deliver its
products or services to its customers, and therefore increase customer satisfaction through high
product quality. In short, a QMS helps a company meet its regulatory requirements and customer
requirements, and make continuous improvements to its operations.
The organization's abbreviated name—ISO—is not an acronym; it derives from the ancient
Greek word ísos, meaning equal or equivalent. Because the organization would have different
acronyms in different languages, the founders of the organization decided to call it by the short
form ISO
The International Organization for Standardization was founded in 1947 and is headquartered in
Geneva, Switzerland. The organization began in the 1920s as the International Federation of the
National Standardizing Associations (ISA). After being suspended during World War II, the
United Nations Standards Coordinating Committee (UNSCC) proposed a new global standards
body and the International Organization for Standardization was formed. The ISO works in 165
countries. Members of the organization are the foremost standards organizations in their
countries; there is only one member per country. While individuals and companies cannot
become members of ISO, there are various ways that industry experts can collaborate with the
ISO.
Members of ISO meet annually at a General Assembly to discuss the strategic objectives of the
organization. In addition, there is a 20-person council with rotating membership that provides
guidance and governance for the organization. ISO develops and publishes standards for a vast
range of products, materials, and processes. The organization's standards catalog is divided into
approximately 97 fields, which include healthcare technology, railway engineering, jewelry,
clothing, metallurgy, weapons, paint, civil engineering, agriculture, and aircraft. In addition to
producing standards, ISO also publishes technical reports, technical specifications, publicly
available specifications, technical corrigenda, and guides.
The ISO plays an important role in facilitating world trade by providing common standards
among different countries. These standards are intended to ensure that products and services are
safe, reliable, and of good quality. For the end-user and consumer, these standards ensure that
certified products conform to the minimum standards set internationally. The ISO has been
credited with setting more than twenty thousand standards, ranging from manufactured products
and technology to food safety, agriculture, and healthcare standards.
In some cases, "ISO" is used to describe the product that conforms to an ISO standard as a result
of the ubiquity of these standards. For example, the speed of film, or the sensitivity of a
photographic film to light, is referred to by its ISO number (ISO 6, ISO 2240, and ISO 5800).
SOME STATISTICS
Members
n Staff
Technical secretariats
37 member bodies provide the administrative and technical services for the secretariats of
technical committees (TC) and subcommittees (SC) These services equal a full-time staff
of 500 persons
Central Secretariat
Geneva
The International Organization for Standardization has a six-stage process for developing
standards. The stages include the following:
Proposal stage. The first step in developing a new standard starts when industry
associations or consumer groups make a request. The relevant ISO committee determines
whether a new standard is indeed required.
Preparatory stage. A working group is set up to prepare a working draft of the new
standard. The working group is composed of subject matter experts and industry
stakeholders; when the draft is deemed satisfactory, the working group's parent
committee decides which stage occurs next.
Committee stage. This is an optional stage during which members of the parent
committee review and comment on the draft standard. When the committee reaches
consensus on the technical content of the draft, it can move to the next stage.
Enquiry stage. The draft standard at this stage is called a Draft International Standard
(DIS). It is distributed to ISO members for comments and, ultimately, a vote. If the DIS is
approved at this stage without any technical changes, ISO publishes it as a standard. If
not, it moves to the approval stage.
Approval stage. The draft standard is submitted as a Final Draft International Standard
(FDIS) to ISO members. They vote to approve the new standard.
Publication stage. If ISO members approve the new standard, the FDIS is published as
an official international standard.
ISO participating members vote on standards approvals. A standard must receive affirmative
votes from at least two-thirds of participating members and negative votes from no more than
one fourth of participating members.
As it relates to ISO standards, certification is a certifying body's assurance that a service, product
or system meets the requirements of the standard. While ISO develops the standards, third-party
certification bodies certify conformity with those standards.
According to the ISO, the phrase "ISO certification" should never be used to indicate that a
product or system has been certified by a certification body as conforming to an ISO standard.
Instead, ISO suggests referring to certified products or systems using the full identification of the
ISO standard.
For example, instead of "ISO certified", ISO recommends using the phrase "ISO 9001:2015
certified." This fully identifies the standard being certified, including the version -- in this case,
the version of ISO 9001 released in 2015.
While ISO does not do certifications, its Committee on Conformity Assessment works on
standards related to the certification process.
The process of getting certified for an ISO standard can be expensive, time-consuming and
potentially disruptive to the business. Before taking any steps to get certified, determining the
need for certification can be the most important step.
The first step in becoming certified is determining whether certification is worth the costs. Some
reasons that organizations pursue certifications include the following:
Regulatory requirements. Some businesses and products require certification that they
meet common standards.
ISO 9000: 2005 - Quality Management Systems (QMS) – Fundamentals and Vocabulary
discusses the fundamental concepts related to QMS and provides the terminology used in the
other two standards
ISO 9001 : 2008 – Quality Management Systems (QMS) – Requirements is the standards
used registration by demonstrating conformity of the QMS to customers, regulatory and
organization‟s own requirements.
ISO 9004 : 2000- Quality Management Systems (QMS) – GUIDELINES FOR
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT provides guidelines that an organization can use to
establish a QMS focused on improving performance.
ISO 9001
Design, Development, Production, Installation & Servicing
ISO 9002
Production, Installation & Servicing
ISO 9003
Inspection & Testing
ISO 9004
Provides guidelines on the technical, administrative and human factors affecting the product or
services.
WHAT ISO DOES?
ISO does not carry out ISO 9001 or ISO 14001 certification.
ISO does not issue certificates.
ISO does not accredit, approve or control the certification bodies.
ISO develops standards and guides to encourage good practice in accreditation and
certification.
ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 are among ISO's most well known standards ever.
They are implemented by more than a million organizations in some 175 countries.
ISO 9001 helps organizations to implement quality management.
ISO 14001 helps organizations to implement environmental management.
Both ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 concern the way an organization goes about its work.
They are not product standards.
They are not service standards.
They are process standards.
They can be used by product manufacturers and service providers.
1. Scope
2. Normative Reference
4.2 Documentation
5. Management Responsibility
5.4 Planning
6. Resource Management
6.1 Provision of Resources
6.3 Infrastructure
7. Product Realization
7.4 Purchasing
8.1 General
8.5 Improvement
STRUCTURE OF ISO 9000
BENEFITS
For businesses
suppliers can base the development of their products and services on specifications that
have wide acceptance in their sectors
free to compete on many more markets around the world
For customers
For governments
For consumers
For everyone
International Standards on air, water and soil quality, and on emissions of gases and
radiation
ISO 14000
ISO 14001:2004 is standards is the heart of all the environmental standards. This standard
provides organizations with the elements of for an environmental systems, which can be
integrated into other management systems to help achieve environmental and economic goals.
This standard provide guidelines for registration and/or self-declaration of the organization’s
environmental management systems. This standard is written in a manner that it can be
applicable to all types and sizes of organizations. This standard is also capable to accommodate
diverse geographical, cultural, and social conditions. The demonstration of successful
implementation of the system can be used to assure other parties that an appropriate EMS is in
place.
ISO14000 is generic in nature. It does not intend to specify the level of environmental
performance of an organization. If that had been the case, ISO would have written it according to
the specific activity of each business.
However, ISO has developed many other environmental standards that deal with specific
environmental standards. These standards are beyond the scope of ISO14001:2004 standards at
the moment.
ISO14001:2004 provide a framework to the organizations so that they could communicate
about EMS matters with the other stakeholders including customers, environmental regulators,
the public and so forth.
It also provides framework to the organizations-irrespective of their current level of
environmental maturity-to remain committed for environmental management and its continual
improvement as well.
ISO 14000, the Environmental Management Systems (EMS).
The overall aim of the Environmental Management systems is to provide protection to the
environment and to prevent pollution.
The success of ISO 9000 along with increased emphasis on Environmental issues were
instrumental in ISO‟s decision to develop Environmental Management Standards.
In 1991, ISO formed the Strategic Advisory Group on the Environment (SAGE) which led to
the formation of Technical Committee (TC) 207 in 1992. Mission of TC207 is to develop
standards for an Environmental Management System (EMS) which was identified as ISO 14000.
GLOBAL BENEFITS
ISO 21001 is a quality management system that aims to standardise education management to
ensure it meets learners’ needs. It’s intended to help schools, colleges, training providers and
other educational organisations implement best practice. It is based on the widely followed ISO
9001 quality management systems.
Around the world, education quality varies significantly. This means that in some cases, learners
are not receiving the best level of education available. As an Educational Organisation
Management System (EOMS), ISO 21001 attempts to address this problem. To do so, it
emphasizes several concepts related to education management best practice:
The standard aims to help educational establishments improve quality by incorporating these
concepts and objectives into their teaching and training methods. ISO 21001 also recognises that
technology is revolutionising every facet of the education system, from streamlining homework
assignments and marking to giving special needs students more personalised support.
ISO 21001 certification is intended to ensure that education providers are offering the highest
quality instruction available to learners. In the coming years, ISO 21001 will be increasingly
recognised as an independent measure of an education provider’s quality. Therefore, any
organisation that offers teaching and training will benefit from having their education
ISO 21001 certification empowers you to deliver more effective and efficient educational
services, offering a customised experience to every learner, while supporting people with
special educational needs.
ISO 21001 helps educational organisations to ensure that learners receive the desired
quality of education, while improving the learner’s productivity, safety and wellbeing.
Six Sigma is a quality management methodology used to help businesses improve current
processes, products or services by discovering and eliminating defects. The goal is to streamline
quality control in manufacturing or business processes so there is little to no variance throughout
The need for process improvements and a continuous improvement methodology like Six Sigma
came into existence only due to
Six Sigma was trademarked by Motorola in 1993, but it references the Greek letter sigma, which
is a statistical symbol that represents a standard deviation. Motorola used the term because a Six
Sigma process is expected to be defect-free 99.99966 percent of the time — allowing for 3.4
defective features for every million opportunities. Motorola initially set this goal for its own
manufacturing operations, but it quickly became a buzzword and widely adopted standard.
Six Sigma is specifically designed to help large organizations with quality management. In 1998,
Jack Welch, CEO of GE, helped thrust Six Sigma into the limelight by donating upwards of $1
million as a thank you to the company, recognizing how Six Sigma positively impacted GE’s
operations and promoting the process for large organizations. After that, Fortune 500 companies
followed suit and Six Sigma has been popular with large organizations ever since.
To reduce variation
To reduce defects /rework
To improve yield /productivity
To enhance customer satisfaction
To improve the bottom-line
To improve top-line
Shortening cycle-time
The more number of standard deviations between process average and acceptable process limits
fits, the less likely that the process performs beyond the acceptable process limits, and it causes a
defect. This is the reason why a 6σ (Six Sigma) process performs better than 1σ, 2σ, 3σ, 4σ, 5σ
processes.
Obviously 7 or more σ processes are even better than a 6σ (Six Sigma) process, and yet
throughout the evaluation and history of Six Sigma process, the practitioners gained the belief
that a 6σ process is good enough to be reliable in almost all major situations except some
systems whose defects can cause unrepairable consequences.
LSL and USL stand for “Lower Specification Limit” and “Upper Specification Limit”
respectively. Specification Limits are derived from the customer requirements, and they specify
the minimum and maximum acceptable limits of a process.
For instance in a car manufacturing system the desired average length (Mean length) of car door
can be 1.37185 meter. In order to smoothly assemble the door into the car, LSL can be 1.37179
meter, and USL can be 1.37191 meter. To reach a 6σ quality level in such a process, the standard
deviation of car door length must be at most 0.00001 meter around the mean length.
Sigma is also the capability of the process to produce defect free work. Higher the capability,
lower the defects.
In the above figure, the red curve indicates a 2σ level of performance where we observe that its
peak is very low (fewer outputs are around the desired average) and the variation is from extreme
left to extreme right of the figure. If the process improves from 2σ to 3σ (green curve), you will
observe that the process variation reduces and the process has a larger peak (more outputs are
around the desired average, but a different average than red curve). As the process performance
increases from 3σ to 6σ (blue curve), the process becomes centered between the upper and lower
specification limits and does not have much variation. Here with blue curve the majority of
process outputs are around the desired average. This is why it is good and it causes less defects
beyond the lower and upper specification limits.
1 691462 69%
2 308538 31%
3 66807 6.7%
4 6210 0.62%
5 233 0.023%
6 3.4 0.00034%
7 0.019 0.0000019%
In the above table, you will observe that as the Sigma level increase the Defects decrease. For
example, for a 2σ process the Defects are as high as 308,538 in one million opportunities.
Similarly, for a 6σ process the Defects is as low as 3.4 in one million opportunities. The 2σ
performance level will have more defects than a system in 6σ performance level as the standard
deviation for a 2σ process is much larger than the standard deviation for a 6σ process.
DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) is used to correct a process that already
exists.
DMADV (Define, Measure, Analyze, Design, Validate) is used to create a new process.
Control Standardize and document the process and implement the plan.
Monitor the process and feedback the results back to the process
for continuous improvement.
LEVELS OF EXPERTISE IN SIX SIGMA
The belts in martial arts were adapted to recognize the different levels of expertise in six sigma.
The belts in order of expertise are:
WHITE BELT
White belt training introduces to the basic six sigma concepts including quality and
process thinking.
White belt training is knowledge-based training.
An introductory overview of six sigma is given in white belt training.
White belt training motivates interest and understanding in six sigma.
YELLOW BELT
Yellow belts are trained to lead and facilitate improvement sessions using these tools.
GREEN BELT
In addition to process and quality tools, data analysis through statistics is taught.
Green belt participants come into training with the DMAIC project already assigned to
them.
They will apply what they learn to their projects in training sessions.
Green belt participants are trained to lead and carry out DMAIC projects on a part-time
basis
BLACK BELT
They lead and carry out complex projects assigned to them by senior management.
They are given training in advanced quality and statistical tools which are used in six
sigma.
Master black belt receives additional training like advanced statistical analysis, process
simulation, project management, and change management.
They serve as six sigma trainers and coaches to the rest of the organization.
Reducing Waste
Improving Time Management
Increase Customer Loyalty
Boost Employee Motivation
Higher Revenues and Lower Costs
QUALITY AUDIT
Definition
Quality audit is a process of examination and verification of procedures, records, and activities of
a quality system that is carried out by an audit team or an internal or external quality auditor.
Quality audit is considered an integral part of the quality management system and is considered
as a critical component in the ISO quality system standard ISO 9001
Meaning
Quality audit is a standard monitoring process that ensures proper assessment of a system,
adequate implementation of processes, elimination of problem areas, and boosting the efficiency
of the methods.
1. Internal quality system audit – As the name suggests, an internal quality system audit is
a tool to measure quality. It evaluates EQMS or Electronic Quality Management System
in an organization to ensure maximum outcomes and highest efficiency levels. The
software manual in this quality audit type is audited so that all the key employees can
access the document and the work instructions are audited so that quality processes can
meet set targets
2. Production Team Audit – In a production team audit, the quality auditors have to
evaluate past activity for escapes, evidence of training and changes to processes. An
organization carries out a production team audit when it needs re-qualifications related to
skill management. It is also conducted when a Certified Operator program or Operator
Acceptance programs are in place.
3. Supplier Audit – This type of quality audit helps an organisation to join forces with its
suppliers directly in real-time. When you conduct a quality audit in the supply chain, it
becomes easier to establish accountability if there is a chance of poor performance. The
company can control the quality of the suppliers and even the sub-tier suppliers by
implementing supplier audits in its system. There is a higher level of transparency
because of quality audit, and this encourages the identification of the areas that needs
improvement via KPIs or Key Performance Indicators. The supplier audit can easily view
purchase order activities like receipts to take the necessary corrective actions.
4. Safety Audits- Safety policies in an organization are a necessity because it can prevent
accidents from happening. If someone is injured, it can mean loss of life or any other
serious issue that can be damaging to the company. A successful safety policy improves
the overall well-being of an employee. Safety audits are aimed at protecting the safety of
the employees in an organization by viewing the plans and designs. It also examines
organizational procedures and reviews equipment operation to ensure routine safety in
the company.
5. Environmental Audit – The environmental audit helps to create a safe environment by
identifying workplace risks. It also ensures that all the employees are using personal
protective equipment and taking the necessary measures in the workplace
6. Facilities Audit – A facilities audit reviews building systems, technology, and
manufacturing equipment to ensure safety. It also helps to identify the improvements that
can encourage quality outcomes
7. Risk Assessment Audit – As the name suggests risk assessment audit helps to create and
implement an effective strategy for risk mitigation. It prioritizes preventive measures and
makes sure that they are implemented as per the need of the hour
8. Regulatory Audit – This type of audits helps to verify compliance with set standards and
regulations. It reviews the data collection method and quality practices to identify the
areas of non-conformance.
9. Design Control Audit – The design control audit helps to review the design plan, output,
and input for proper acceptance. It ensures the recognition of formalized processes in the
workplace so that it can meet acceptable safety and quality standards and perform risk
analysis.
10. Method Validation Audit – The method validation audit ensures standardization of
analytical test methods that are used during the manufacturing process for accuracy and
consistency in case of products