Theories of Intellectual Property Explained
Theories of Intellectual Property Explained
ESONI
P
I
. Nat
ural
theor
y
I
I. Kar
lMar
x’st
heor
yofconf
li
ctandv
alueaddedt
heor
y
I
II
. Commonst
heor
y
I
V. Labourt
heor
y
V. Per
sonal
i
tyt
heor
y
VI
. Ut
il
it
ari
ant
heor
y
VI
I. Soci
alpl
anni
ngt
heor
y
I
. Nat
ural
theor
ybyl
i
sanderspoon
I
tismor
ephy
sical
.Ev
ery
thi
ngi
sal
readyt
her
eint
henat
ure,
wwej
ustneedt
o
usei
ttocr
eat
esomet
[Link];
riv
er’
shy
dropoweri
sconv
ert
edi
ntohy
dro-
el
ect
ri
cit
ybyt
heuseoft
urbi
nes
I
I. Val
ueaddedt
heor
y
Whensomei
nvent
ionorcr
eat
ioni
spr
otect
edunderI
PRandamonet
ary
benef
itf
oll
owsbecauseofsuchpr
otect
iont
hen,
itgi
vesani
ncent
ivet
othe
cr
eat
orandot
her
sal
sot
opr
oduce/
creat
esomet
hing.
Al
so,
themonet
arybenef
itgotoutofsuchI
Pcanbeusedt
ocr
eat
enew
t
hingsandt
het
echnol
ogygr
owsi
nthi
smanner
.
I
II
. Common’
stheor
y
Ev
ery
thi
ngi
sav
ail
abl
eint
hepubl
i
cdomai
n[eg;
for
est
s,r
iver
s,et
c.,
.
]andt
he
samei
susedbecauseoft
henecessi
tyashasbei
ngt
hecasewi
thev
ery
i
nvent
ion/
creat
ionoft
heci
vi
li
zat
ion.
I
V. Labourt
heor
y
Thi
swaspr
opoundedbyJohnLocke.I
tst
atest
hat“
Imy
sel
fam pr
oper
ty,
so
ut
il
iseonesel
ftocr
eat
esomet
hing”
V. Per
sonal
i
tyt
heor
y
Hegel
propoundedt
hist
heor
y.I
thol
dst
hatI
Pisamani
fest
ati
onofone’
ssel
f
andhenceneedst
obepr
otect
ed.
Li
mit
ati
on-
[Link]
eet
houghthast
obet
her
e.I
e;peaceofmi
nd,
pri
vacy
,sel
frel
i
ance,
secur
it
yandl
eisur
e,r
esponsi
bil
i
ty,
ident
it
y,ci
ti
zenshi
pet
c.
[Link]
phanwor
k-anony
mouswr
it
erandnoci
ti
zenshi
ptowr
it
er[cant
r
egi
sterany
wher
e]
[Link]
tai
nfact
orsdi
ff
eraccor
dingt
odi
ff
erentcul
tur
esl
i
keconsumer
happi
ness,
weal
thofi
nfo,
richar
ti
sti
ctr
adi
ti
on,par
ti
cipat
ive
democr
acy
,respect
.
VI
. Ut
il
it
ari
ant
heor
y
Theobj
ect
ivei
smaxi
misat
ionofnetsoci
alwel
far
e.
VI
I. Soci
alpl
anni
ngt
heor
y
Gi
vesmor
eimpor
tancet
othesoci
ety
.
Di
ff
erencebt
wut
il
it
ari
anandsoci
alpl
anni
ngt
heor
y
Ut
il
it
ari
an-goodoft
hewhol
ewor
ld
Soci
alpl
anni
ng-goodf
orpar
ti
cul
arsoci
ety
.
HEGELI
ANJUSTI
FICATI
ON
I
deasbel
ongt
onoonebutwhent
hati
deai
susedbyaper
son,
that
whi
chi
scr
eat
edi
samani
fest
ati
onofhi
ssel
f/per
sonal
i
ty.
Hepr
opagat
est
hef
ir
stpossessi
ont
heor
y.I
e;onl
ythatwhi
chi
svi
rgi
n
[Link]
sist
hemoder
nconceptofnov
elt
y
i
nIP.
Thought
alenti
sint
ernal
,whenexpr
essedi
tbecomesext
ernal
.Ev
en
whenhemakesi
tknownt
othewor
ld,
hest
il
lhol
dst
heowner
shi
pov
er
t
hatI
P.
Dr
awbacks
Var
yingdegr
eesofper
sonal
i
ty
Whi
l
epoet
rymayhav
emor
eper
sonal
i
tyi
nitt
hant
radesecr
ets
orcomput
erpr
ogr
ams,
Hegel
arguest
hatbot
hdeser
ve
pr
otect
ionf
ort
her
easont
hatt
heyar
eamani
fest
ati
onofsel
f,
ev
eni
fatasmal
ldegr
ee.
o Oneoft
hecr
it
ici
sm t
othi
stheor
yist
hatsomet
imes
per
sonal
i
tyhasnot
hingt
odowi
tht
heI
[Link];
Edi
sonused
t
hef
il
amentt
omakel
i
ghtbul
bnotbecausei
trepr
esent
ed
hi
m butbecausei
twast
hebestwayt
odoi
t.
o Hegel
arguest
hatt
hisi
sov
ersi
mpl
i
ficat
[Link]
emaybe
10way
stowr
it
eacomput
erpr
ogr
am,
butt
hemet
hod
chosenbyt
heaut
horshowshi
sper
sonal
i
tyi
nasmal
l
way
.Al
soEdi
son-
li
ghtbul
b,Gr
aham Bel
l
-tel
ephone—t
his
cr
eat
or-
obj
ectr
elat
ionshi
pmakest
heper
sonal
i
tyv
isi
ble.
Al
i
enat
ionofI
P
I
fIPi
samani
fest
ati
onofsel
f,t
heni
tsal
i
enat
ioni
sli
ke
al
i
enat
ionofsel
faswel
l
.Al
so,
ift
heobj
ect
-cr
eat
orr
elat
ionshi
p
i
slost
,theobj
ectl
osesi
tsv
alue.
Hegel
arguedbysay
ingt
hatal
i
enat
ioni
sjust
if
iedonl
ywhen-
o Cr
eat
ormustr
ecei
ver
ecogni
ti
onofwor
k
o Wor
kmustr
ecei
vepr
otect
ionagai
nstchange.
Per
sonal
i
tyj
ust
if
icat
ioni
nUSl
aw
Rai
sest
hequest
ionwhet
herwor
kswhi
char
ewor
thyal
one
shoul
dbepr
otect
ed?
Negat
edt
hisst
andbyst
atngacaseBl
i i
enst
einvDonal
dson
Li
thogr
aphi
ngCo.I
nthi
scase,
copy
rightwaspr
ovi
dedt
othe
l
i
thogr
aphofaci
rcusev
ent
houghi
twasnotagr
eatar
tast
he
wor
thi
nessofsomet
hingi
ssubj
ect
ive.
Tr
ademar
kal
socomesunderper
sonal
i
tyt
heor
yast
heuni
que
namesusedar
edependedont
hest
ory
,hi
stor
yandcr
eat
ivi
ty
behi
ndi
t.
Ci
vi
lri
ght
ssuppor
tforper
sonal
i
tyj
ust
if
icat
ion
Pr
ivacyr
ightar
gument
Ther
ear
e2scenar
ios-i
fint
endedf
orpr
ivat
euse-cantmakei
t
publ
i
c
I
fint
endedf
orpubl
i
cuse,
,t
hencannotbe
askedt
orev
eal
mor
[Link];
ifat
it
le,
char
act
er
i
skeptamy
ster
y,t
heni
tist
heaut
hor
’sr
ight
t
okeepi
[Link]
eveal
mor
ethan
hedesi
resj
ustont
hebasi
sthati
tisi
nthe
publ
i
cdomai
n.
Fr
eedom ofexpr
essi
onar
gument
Thi
sfr
eedom i
smeani
ngl
essunl
esst
her
eisassur
ancet
hatt
hat
t
hewor
kwi
l
lremai
nunadul
ter
ated.I
e;I
Pisanexpr
essi
onofsel
f
andhencecannotbet
amper
edwi
th.
nGi
I l
li
am vABCI
nc.20mi
nsofa90mi
nshowwasr
emov
ed
bef
orebr
oadcast
ingi
[Link]
swashel
dtobev
iol
ati
veoft
hewor
k.
I
fexpr
essi
oni
snotpr
otect
ed,
theywi
l
lnotsur
viv
[Link]
wini
ant
heor
y
say
sthati
fsomet
hingi
snotofv
alue,
itshal
lnotsur
viv
e.
ButHegel
opposedt
hisbysay
ingt
hatani
deamaynotf
ind
r
ecogni
ti
oni
naner
abutmayf
indaccept
ancei
nal
aterer
[Link]
t
i
simpor
tantf
ort
hesoci
etyt
opr
otecti
deasnomat
terhowr
adi
cal
.
Concl
usi
on-
+v
e–l
abour
-commonofi
deasi
nexhaust
ibl
e
Per
sonal
i
ty-ev
ent
hemostt
echni
cal
processi
sanout
comeof
per
son’
sment
alf
acul
ti
es.
-
ve–l
abour
-doesn’
tconsi
derwho’
[Link]
fest
edi
t.
Per
sonal
i
ty-noti
ncl
udet
hosewhi
chdon’
thav
eper
sonal
expr
essi
on.