0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views6 pages

Internet Impact on Adolescent Self-Esteem

Uploaded by

jayaruban3010
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views6 pages

Internet Impact on Adolescent Self-Esteem

Uploaded by

jayaruban3010
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Tool description

Research topic: Effects of internet on self-esteem among


adolescents.
Tools incorporated: Internet addiction test by Kimberly young,
Rosenberg self-esteem scale

INTERNET ADDICTION TEST


INTRODUCTION:
The Internet Addiction Test is a reliable and valid measure of addictive use of
Internet and was developed by Dr Kimberly Young. It consists of 20 items that
measure mild, moderate, and severe level of Internet addiction. The scale was
created by adapting DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling to pertain to
Internet use and is a modification of the earlier 8-item scale, Young’s Internet
Addiction Diagnostic Questionnaire (IADQ). The IAT views Internet addiction as
an impulse-control disorder and the term Internet refers to all types of online
activity. The IAT is the most widely used Internet addiction scale in the world, and
has been translated into several languages including English, Chinese, French,
Italian, Turkish, and Korean.

RELIABILITY
The Internet Addiction Test (IAT) is a reliable tool for assessing internet addiction,
with studies showing good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha often ranging
from 0.83 to 0.91) and acceptable test-retest reliability,
VALIDITY
The validity of Kimberly Young's Internet Addiction Test (IAT) is well-supported
through psychometric evaluations. It demonstrates strong internal
consistency (Cronbach's alpha values typically range from 0.85 to 0.93),
indicating that it reliably measures the construct of internet addiction. It also
exhibits construct validity, aligning closely with behavioral addiction symptoms
such as loss of control and negative consequences. Additionally, the test has been
successfully adapted and validated across various cultural contexts, further
confirming its robustness as an assessment tool.

SCORING
The IAT total score is the sum of the ratings given by the examinee for the 20
item responses. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 5. The
scoring ranges from 1 (rarely) to 5 (always), depending on how often the
respondent experiences the behavior described in the statement. The maximum
score is 100 points. The higher the score is, the higher is the severity of your
problem.

INTERPRETATION
1. 20–49: Normal Internet Use
o The individual has a healthy relationship with the internet.
2. 50–79: Moderate Internet Addiction
o Internet use is causing occasional or frequent problems in daily life,
but it remains manageable.
3. 80–100: Severe Internet Addiction
o Internet use is significantly interfering with daily activities,
relationships, and responsibilities.

QUESTIONNAIRE
ROSENBERG SELF ESTEEM SCALE
INTRODUCTION
The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), developed by Morris Rosenberg in
1965, is one of the most widely used tools for measuring self-esteem. It is a self-
report questionnaire designed to assess an individual's overall evaluation of their
self-worth or self-acceptance. The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale remains a
cornerstone in psychological research and practice, offering valuable insights into
self-perception and its implications for emotional well-being and behavior.

RELIABILITY: The RSE demonstrates a Guttman scale coefficient of


reproducibility of .92, indicating excellent internal consistency. Test-retest
reliability over a period of 2 weeks reveals correlations of .85 and .88, indicating
excellent stability.

VALIDITY: Demonstrates concurrent, predictive and construct validity using


known groups. The RSE correlates significantly with other measures of self-
esteem, including the Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory. In addition, the RSE
correlates in the predicted direction with measures of depression and anxiety.

SCORING:
The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) scores are interpreted based on the
total score obtained after adding responses to the 10 items, with certain items
reverse-scored. As the RSE is a Guttman scale, scoring can be a little complicated.
Scoring involves a method of combined ratings. Low self-esteem responses are
“disagree” or “strongly disagree” on items 1, 3, 4, 7, 10, and “strongly agree” or
“agree” on items 2, 5, 6, 8, 9. Two or three out of three correct responses to items
3, 7, and 9 are scored as one item. One or two out of two correct responses for
items 4 and 5 are considered as a single item; items 1,8, and 10 are scored as
individual items; and combined correct responses (one or two out of two) to items
2 and 6 are considered to be a single item.

INTERPRETATION:
• Positive items: Scored directly (e.g., "Strongly Agree" = 3, "Strongly Disagree"
= 0).
• Negative items: Reverse-scored (e.g., "Strongly Agree" = 0, "Strongly
Disagree" = 3).
• Total Score Range: 0 to 30.
• Scores ranging from(0-14) – low self esteem
• Scorese ranging from(15-25) – normal or moderate self esteem
• Scores ranging from(26-30) – high self esteem

QUESTIONNAIRE
1. On the whole, I am satisfied with myself.
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
2. At times I think I am no good at all.
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
3. I feel that I have a number of good qualities.
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
4. I am able to do things as well as most other people.
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
5. I feel I do not have much to be proud of.
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
6. I certainly feel useless at times.
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
7. I feel that I'm a person of worth, at least on an equal plane with others.
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
8. I wish I could have more respect for myself.
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
9. All in all, I am inclined to feel that I am a failure.
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
10. I take a positive attitude toward myself.
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree

Common questions

Powered by AI

The RSES, through its simple scale using a combination of positive and negative items, provides a versatile measurement applicable across various contexts. It achieves reliable results owing to its structured scoring system and consistent methodology, allowing broad interpretation across demographic and psychological spectrums .

The IAT's translation into multiple languages (English, Chinese, French, Italian, Turkish, Korean) enhances its cultural adaptability, allowing it to measure internet addiction reliably across diverse populations. This adaptability confirms the robustness of the IAT as a global assessment tool .

The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale has excellent reliability, shown by a Guttman scale coefficient of .92 and test-retest reliability correlations of .85 to .88. It demonstrates validity through its correlations with other self-esteem measures and predictive alignment with measures of depression and anxiety .

The RSES provides insights into self-perception, correlating with measures of depression and anxiety. It serves as an indicator of emotional well-being, helping researchers and clinicians assess the impact of self-esteem on individual behavior and psychological health .

The IAT is considered a reliable tool with internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.83-0.91) and acceptable test-retest reliability. It demonstrates strong validity through psychometric evaluations, aligning closely with behavioral addiction symptoms. This suggests it effectively measures internet addiction and has been validated in various cultural contexts .

The IAT categorizes internet addiction into three severity levels: Normal Internet Use (scores 20–49), where the individual has a healthy relationship with the internet; Moderate Internet Addiction (scores 50–79), where internet use causes occasional or frequent problems but remains manageable; and Severe Internet Addiction (scores 80–100), where internet use significantly interferes with daily activities, relationships, and responsibilities .

By assigning direct scores to positive items and reverse-scoring negative items, the RSES ensures comprehensive evaluation of self-worth. The total score indicates levels of self-esteem (low, normal, high), allowing precise differentiation in self-perception among individuals .

The IAT is a widely used tool due to its comprehensive assessment of internet addiction, addressing various online activities. Its detailed scoring enables clinicians to identify and categorize addiction severity, crucial in targeting interventions for adolescents' specific needs .

The IAT adapts DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling to internet use, thus classifying it as an impulse-control disorder. This alignment indicates a loss of control and negative consequences associated with internet addiction, similar to traditional addiction symptoms .

The RSES consists of 10 items, some requiring reverse scoring. Positive items are scored directly, while negative ones are reverse-scored. Scores range from 0 to 30, classifying self-esteem as low (0-14), normal/moderate (15-25), and high (26-30). This method evaluates overall self-worth and self-acceptance .

You might also like