Oblique Incidence Wave Reflection Analysis
Oblique Incidence Wave Reflection Analysis
, Electromagnetic
Fields and Waves, Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, IL, 1992, ISBN: 1-57766-115-X.
Edminister, J., Electromagnetics (Schaum’s Outline), McGraw-Hill, New York, NY,
1993, ISBN: 0-07-018993-5. Hecht, E., Optics (Schaum’s Outlines), McGraw-Hill, New
York, NY, ISBN: 0-07-027730-3. Serway, R., & Faughn, J., College Physics, ISBN: 0-
03-022952-9.
Chapter 6
Oblique Incidence Plane Wave Reflection and Transmission
Plane waves are not normally incident, so now we must consider the general problem of a
plane wave propagating along a specified axis that is arbitrarily relative to a rectangular
coordinate system. The most convenient way is in terms of the direction cosines of the
uniform plane wave, the equiphase surfaces are planes perpendicular to the direction of
propagation.
Definitions:
uniform planes – a free space plane wave at an infinite distance from the
generator, having constant amplitude electric and magnetic field vectors over the
equiphase surfaces.
equiphase surface – any surface in a wave over which the field vectors of a
particular instant have either 0° or 180° phase difference.
(6.1)
Equation (6.1) states that each z equal to a constant plane will represent an equiphase
surface with no spatial variation in the electric or magnetic fields. In other words,
for a uniform plane wave
It will be necessary to replace z for a plane wave traveling in an arbitrary direction with
an expression when put equal to a constant (βz = constant), that will result in equiphase
surfaces.
The equation of an equiphase plane is given by
The radial vector (r) from the origin to any point on the plane, and β is the vector normal
to the plane is shown in Figure (6.1).
n
z r
O y
y
x x W
As you can see from figure 6.1, the plane perpendicular to the vector β is seen from its
side appearing as a line P-W. The dot product nβ · r is the projection of the radial vector
r along the normal to the plane and will have the constant value OM for all points on the
plane. The equation β · r = constant is the characteristic property of a plane
perpendicular to the direction of propagation β.
= constant
r=
θx, θy, θz, are the angles the β vector makes with x, y, and z axes, respectively.
(6.2)
The unit vector nβ along β and η is the wave impedance in the propagation medium. See
Figure 6.2 for the illustration of orthogonal relations between and the direction
of propagation.
Plane of constant E
phase
Z p=PxH
H power density flow
nβ
r
Point on the
plane
X
Y
EXAMPLE 6.1
The vector amplitude of an electric field associated with a plane wave that propagates in
the negative z direction in free space is given by
Solution:
The direction of propagation nβ is –az. The vector amplitude of the magnetic field is then
given by
EXAMPLE 6.2
1. .
2. Vector magnetic field, assuming .
3. Frequency and wavelength of this wave.
4. Equation of surface of constant phase.
Solution:
nβ · =0
so that
The general expression of this equation in terms of the direction cosines is given
by
Comparison between equation 6.4 and the general expression shows that the plane
given in equation 6.4 has no z dependence and, hence defines a plane parallel to
the z axis. In other words, equation 6.4 can be obtained by substituting θx = π/2 in
the general expression of the equiphase plane.
By decomposing the general problem into two special cases we can simplify our analysis.
1. E field is polarized in the plane formed by the normal to the reflecting surface in the
direction βi of the incident wave.
2. E field is perpendicular to the plane of incidence.
The plane formed by the normal to the reflecting surface and the direction of propagation
β is known as the plane of incidence. The general case can be considered as a
superposition of two cases –
θi θr
X
Perfect
Conductor
Z
The figure shows an incident wave polarized with the E field in the plane of incidence
and the power flow in the direction of at angle with respect to the normal to the
surface of the perfect conductor.
The direction of propagation is given by the Poynting vector and the , E, and H fields
need to be arranged so that is in the same direction as at any time. The
magnetic field is out of the plane of the paper, for the direction of the electric
field shown. There is no transmitted field within the perfect conductor; however there
will be a reflected field with power flow at the angle with respect to the normal to the
interface. To maintain the power density flow will be in the same direction as.
The expression for the total electric field in free space is
(6.5)
(6.6)
(6.7)
Equation 6.8 shows the relationship between the incident and reflected amplitudes for a
perfect conductor the total tangential E field at the surface must be zero which satisfies
the boundary condition. To be zero at all values of x along the surface of the conducting
plane, the phase terms must be equal to each other –
(6.9)
Definition:
Snell’s Law is a rule of Physics that applies to visible light passing from air (or
vacuum) to some medium with an index of refraction different from air.
(6.10)
(6.11)
Observe the variation of the total field with the x variable indicating there is a traveling
wave in the x direction with a phase constant
Use the relation for each of the incident and reflected fields to employ the
The solution of the determinant, the only nonzero component of is the ay component
given by
Glancing Incident:
Average power flow perpendicular to the conducting surface is zero, because the average
Poynting Vector is zero in that direction
The location of zeros (nodes) of the field can be found by letting sin = 0. At
a distance z from the conducting plane given by
Or
z=n
The zeros will occur at distances larger than integer multiples of . So, for normal
incidence, cos , and the positions of the zeros will are the same as those
discussed in chapter 5. For the oblique incidence, the locations of the standing-wave
nodes are apart along the direction of propagation. The wavelength measured along
the z-axis is greater than the wavelength of the incident waves along the direction of
propagation. As shown in Figure 6.4 the relation between these wavelengths is
.
z
cos i
θi
Figure 6.4
The plane of the zero field occur at multiples of along the direction of propagation,
and they are located at integer multiples of along the z-axis which appear separated
by larger distances. Also note that the standing-wave pattern associated with the
component may appear as if there is no zero value of the electric field at
z = 0, but the component is normal to the reflecting surface, therefore the boundary
condition is not in violation.
The entire electric field is (out of the paper) in the y direction and the magnetic field will
have both x and z components. See Figure 6.5.
Perfect
Conductor
az
Figure 6.5
at z = 0
Therefore,
And
And
Negative sign indicates the opposite direction of the reflected electric field (i.e. into the
paper)
And the substitution of has been made. The direction vectors of the incident and
reflective wave are
And
The concept can be illustrated by considering the average density flow associated with
the wave.
, ,
EXAMPLES:
Find the peak value of an induced surface current when a plane wave is incident at am
angle on a large plane, perfectly conducting sheet. The surface of the sheet is located at z
= 0 and
Solution
From the equation of the incident electric field, the propagation vector is given by
, that is,
Because the electric field is along the y direction – that is, perpendicular to the plane of
incidence, the equations given in the section above will be used.
where the normal n to the surface for the geometry of Figure 6.5 is n = -az. The magnetic
field in this case has two components:
EXAMPLE:
The electric field associated with a plane wave propagating in an arbitrary direction is
given by
If this incident on a perfectly conducting plane oriented perpendicular to the z axis, find
the following:
Solution
Comparing this with the equation of the electric field in the parallel polarization case,
where the incident electric field is given by
βi
Figure 6.6
Observe that:
That is,
Based on the analysis of section 6.2.1, we have , and the amplitude of the
reflected electric field . Hence
Parts 2 and 3 can easily be obtained by the following the analysis of section 6.2.
For example, the magnetic field associated with the electric field in the parallel
polarization case is given by
For the perpendicular polarization case, the magnetic field has two components,
Figure 6.7 shows two media with electrical properties and in medium 1, and and
in medium 2. Here a plane wave incident angle on a boundary between the two
media will be partially transmitted into and partially reflected at the dielectric surface.
The transmitted wave is reflected into the second medium, so its direction of propagation
is different from the incidence wave. The figure also shows two rays for each the
incident, reflected, and transmitted waves. A ray is a line drawn normal to the equiphase
surfaces, and the line is along the direction of propagation.
Incident
2 rays Reflected
rays
1
1 r 2
i C E
1 , 1
2 , 2 A B
t
Reflected
rays
Figure 6.7
The incident ray 2 travels the distance CB, while on the contrary the reflected ray 1
travels the distance AE. For both AC and BE to be the incident and reflected wave fronts
or planes of equiphase, the incident wave should take the same time to cover the distance
AE. The reason being that the incident and reflected wave rays are located in the same
medium, therefore their velocities will be equal,
It takes the incident ray the equal amount of time to cover distance CB as it takes the
refracted ray to cover distance AD –
And in medium 2:
Also,
Therefore,
Therefore, (6.12)
i|| r
i| | i |r|
Region 1 i r
Region 2 Y X
(Out of
paper)
t ||t
||t
t
Figure 6.9
Z
The unknown amplitudes of the reflected and transmitted electric fields can be
determined by simply applying the boundary conditions at the dielectric interface. The
electric fields will now be used in the analysis to emphasize the case of parallel
polarization, instead of using the electric fields .
There is no need to carry the ay vector, because the magnetic fields only have one
component in the y direction. Recall that this relation is valid at z = 0,
(6.13)
& are the magnitudes of in regions 1 & 2, respectively. In order for this to be
valid at any value of x at any point on the interface, and knowing :
Or
* This is the same relation that was determined earlier from Snell’s Law. Substitute
into equation 6.13 to obtain
At z = 0 (6.14)
(6.15)
At z = 0
(6.16)
*Making use of the fact that . Define the reflection coefficient and the
transmission :
And
(6.18)
And
Where and .
Definition:
Brewster Angle – (from Brewster’s Law), the polarizing angle of which (when
light is incident) the reflected and refracted index is equal to the tangent of the polarizing
angle. In other words, the angle of incidence of which there is no reflection.
From the reflection coefficient expression-
It can be seen that there is an angle of incidence at . This angle can be obtained
when
(6.19)
This condition is important, because it is usually satisfied by the materials often used in
optical applications.
(6.20)
Square both sides of equation 6.20 and use Snell’s Law for the special case of
for the following result:
(6.21)
(6.22)
Or
(6.23)
i
r
r
i
i r
1, 1
i r
2 , 2 X
t
t βt
(6.24)
At z = 0 (6.25)
*Note: The exponential factors were canceled after substituting z = 0 and using Snell’s
Laws in the above two equations.
at z = 0,
The significant differences between the two will be illustrated in the following example:
EXAMPLE
SOLUTION
= 6.34°
Therefore,
= 83.7°
Hence,
= 6.34°
To relate the Brewster angles in both cases, let us calculate the angle of
refraction.
Therefore, in case a,
Therefore,
Or , which is the same as the Brewster angle for case b. Also, the angle of
refraction in case b is given by Snell’s Law as:
In the previous section it was shown that for common dielectrics, the phenomenon of
total transmission exists only where the electric field is parallel to the plane of incidence
known as parallel polarization.
There is a second phenomenon existing for both polarizations:
Total reflection occurring at the interface between two dielectric media
A wave passing from a medium with a larger dielectric constant to a medium with
smaller value of ε
or (6.26)
Definition:
, (critical angle of incidence) is the value of that makes = π/2, see Figure
6.13.
, or
1
2 t 2
t
1 2
Figure 6.13 illustrates the fact that . The critical angle is defined as the
value of at which = π/2.
Envision a beam of light impinging on an interface between two transparent media where
. At normal incidence ( = 0) most of the incoming light is transmitted into the less
dense medium. As increases, more and more light is reflected back into the dense
medium, while increases. When = 90°, is defined to be and the transmittance
becomes zero. For > all of the light is totally internally reflected, remaining in the
incident medium.
EXAMPLES:
Use Snell’s Law to derive an expression for θc. Compute the value of θc for a
water-air interface ( =1.33).
Imagine yourself lying on the floor of a pool filled with water, looking straight
upwards. How larger a plane angle doe the field of view beyond the pool
apparently subtend?
Rays striking the air-water interface from above at glancing incidence will
enter the water at a transmission angle equal to . The plane angle subtended at the
observer is therefore 2 . Here,
Determine the critical angle for a water ( =1.33) –glass ( =1.50) interface.
We have
Or = = 0.887 = 62.5°
1 mm 1μm 1nm
U
l
t
V r
i a
s γ rays
v
Radio Microwave Infrared b X rays
i
l o
e l
e
t
Frequency
The figure above shows the spectrum of electromagnetic radiation extending from the
long- wavelength radio waves to X rays and gamma rays the shortest wavelength.
Example
Consider an Unpolarized light that is incident at the Brewster angle on a piece of glass
with index of refraction . The polarization with a electric field parallel to the
plane of incidence will be entirely transmitted and the other polarization with a electric
field perpendicular to the plane of incidence will be partially reflected and partially
transmitted. Why is the electric field parallel to the plane of incident totally transmitted?
*Because it is incident at the Brewster angle.
The second interface which is glass to air as illustrated in example 6.7 has an angle of
incidence also known as the Brewster angle for light incident from the glass side to free
space. So, again the polarization with E parallel to the plane of incident will be entirely
transmitted, and E perpendicular will be partially reflected and partially transmitted.
In Figure 6.17:
Reflected wave is entirely polarized, E perpendicular to the plane of incidence
Transmitted wave possess both polarizations
Larger amplitude is the E parallel to plane of incidence – entirely transmitted
throughout the interfaces
More glass elements and the transmitted light could be essentially completely
polarized, E parallel to the plane of incidence
Definition:
Laser (Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission) – A device that produces
coherent radiation in the visible-light range, between 7500 and 3900 angstroms
1. The laser material is in the shape of a long rod that is subjected to radiation from
an extremely intense light source that causes interatomic transition from energy
levels 1 to 3. (Figure 6.18b)
2. If the nonradiative transition between level 3 and level 2 is fast enough, then
electrons in level 3 will transfer to level instead of returning to level 1.
4. If the pumping action is large and fast enough the electron population at level 2
can be made larger than level 1. Radiation of light quanta at frequency f21 occurs
when the electrons can make the transition from level 2 to level 1.
5. By placing mirrors at the end of the laser and forcing the radiation to be reflected
back and forth maintaining the high-photon density, stimulated emission will
increase resulting in a large photon density build up or in other words an
avalanche of photons.
6. An intense light beam will result emerging from the end of the laser rod.
Partially
polarized light;
mostly E
parallel to plane
of incidence
n n n n
Known Factors
The output of many lasers is linearly polarized
The ratio of the light polarized in one direction exceeds the light polarized in the
orthogonal direction by 1000:1
As in most cases, a high degree of linear polarization will be the result of a Brewster
surface within the laser. A Brewster surface is usually used in the construction of a laser.
The light must be transmitted out of the medium of the laser to avoid minimal loss.
Figure 6.19 is a schematic illustrating the use of Brewster windows in a gas discharge
laser. The Brewster angle makes sure that light in one polarization direction is
transmitted out of the medium of the laser to the reflecting mirrors and back into the
medium of the laser with no loss. Where the light is polarized perpendicular to the plane
of incidence a large loss at the Brewster surface will take place due to the reflection out
of the medium of the laser. The preferred polarization case (linear polarization) will lase
(emit coherent light) that will account for the high degree of polarization taking place at
the output.
Figure 6.19 Schematic illustrating the use of Brewster windows in a gas discharge LASER
Output beam
Gas discharge
tube (plasma)
The device in Figure 6.19 exhibits stimulated emission of radiation. For and example
lets say the mixture of gases are helium and neon. These gases are confined to the glass
tube sealed at both ends by mirrors. An oscillator is connected to the tube to that causes
electrons to sweep through the tube, colliding with atoms of gas and raising them to
exited states. Some neon atoms are excited to a higher state during this process that will
also result in a collision with excited helium atoms. Stimulated emission occurs as the
neon atoms make a transition to a lower state and neighboring excited atoms are
stimulated to emit at the same frequency and phase. This will result in a production of
coherent light.
Fiber optics deals with the transmission of light through small filamentary fibers called
dielectric waveguides. This is based on the phenomenon of total internal reflection
occurring at the point where the light is obliquely incident on an interface between two
media with different refractive indexes at an angle greater than the critical angle. Light is
incident at an angle θi as shown in Figure 6.20 and is required to determine the range of
values of the index of refraction n so the internal reflections will occur for any value of
θi .
(6.27)
Refraction from fiber to air sin = 1/n, therefore, from equation 6.27 & 6.28 –
(6.29)
Solve for n,
(6.30)
For equation 6.30 to be true then = π/2, all incident light will be passed by the fiber
requiring
n2 ≥ 2 or n≥
Reflected point
n≥
θt θ2
θi
Figure 6.20 Schematic illustrating the principle of light propagation in optical fibers.