Rolls Royce Import Tax Calculation
Rolls Royce Import Tax Calculation
Particulars Pg No.
Chapter 2 - Types of Duty 1
Answers 8
Chapter 3 - Classification of Imported & Exported Goods 19
Answers 23
Chapter 5 - Importation & Exportation of Goods 27
Answers 40
Chapter 6 - Warehousing 60
Answers 62
Chapter 7 - Refund 65
Answers 69
Chapter 8 - Foreign Trade Policy 75
Answers 77
CA Final May/Nov 24
Theory
5. With reference to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, discuss the validity of
the imposition of customs duties in the following cases:- (MTP JULY
2021)
(a) Both countervailing duty and anti-dumping duty have been
imposed on an article to compensate for the same situation of
dumping.
(b) Countervailing duty has been levied on an article for the reason
that the same is exempt from duty borne by a like article when
meant for consumption in the country of origin.
(c) Definitive anti-dumping duty has been levied on articles
imported from a member country of World Trade Organization
as a determination has been made in the prescribed manner
that import of such article into India threatens material injury
to the indigenous industry.
Practical Theory
10. During the year 2020, the customs authorities have noticed that there
is an increased quantity of Product XYZ being imported into the
country. Determine whether the Central Government should consider
levying safeguard duty or anti-dumping duty with appropriate
reasons. Also enumerate any exemptions/reliefs available from such
duty. (PAST EXAM NOV 2019)
12. Royal Park Limited has imported Product ‘A’ for sale in India from
Country Alpha, which are liable for anti-dumping duty. You are
provided with the following details.
(i) Country Alpha does not sell Product ‘A’ in its domestic market.
However, it exports the same Product ‘A’ at USD 200 per piece to
another third country.
(ii) The Product ‘A’ is sold in domestic industry @ USD 175 per piece.
(iii) Royal Park Limited has imported Product ‘A’ at USD 100 per
piece.
(iv) Landed value of Product ‘A’ is USD 125 per piece.
13. With reference to the Customs Act, 1962, decide the validity of the
following independent cases with proper legal provisions:
(i) Apex Rubber Limited is a 100% EOU located in a Special
Economic Zone. It imported certain items from China for its
production process. Customs officer proposed to impose anti-
dumping duty on such imports. The importer contends that no
anti-dumping duty can be imposed on imports by a 100% EOU
under any circumstances.
(ii) Customs Department proposed to impose anti-dumping duty
retrospectively in respect of certain items. Importer's
association claimed that anti-dumping duty cannot be levied
14. BCG Ltd. imported goods from Japan and intends to avail the benefit
of an exemption notification issued under section 25(1) of the
Customs Act, 1962 with regard to said goods. However, since it does
not have a manufacturing facility at all, it needs to send the goods so
imported for job work to a job worker. Its accountant advised it that
as per the Customs (Import of Goods at Concessional Rate of Duty)
Rules, 2017, BCG Ltd. is not permitted to send such goods for job
work. You are required to advise BCG Ltd. on the said issue
elaborating the relevant legal provisions under the customs law.
(Nov’22)
15. Determine the total duties payable under Customs Act if Mr. Rao
imported rubber from Malaysia at landed price (exclusive of duties) of
Rs.25 lakh. It has been notified by the Central Government that share
of imports of rubber from the developing country against total
imports to India exceeds 5%. Safeguard duty notified on this product
is 30%, IGST u/s 3(7) is 12% and BCD is 10%.
16. Determine the customs duty payable under the Customs Tariff Act,
1975 including the safeguard duty of 30% under section 8B of the said
Act with the following details available on hand:
Note: Ignore GST compensation cess. (MTP NOV 2020) (MTP NOV 2019)
17. KTU Limited has imported certain goods for sale in India from Country
Z, which are liable for anti- dumping duty. Country Z sell the like
goods in its domestic market in the ordinary course of trade at USD
300 per piece. The imported goods are sold in domestic Indian industry
@ USD 275 per piece. KTU Limited has imported the goods at USD 180
per piece. Landed value of the imported goods is USD 190 per piece.
18. PCB Limited has imported printed circuit boards for sale in India from
Country X, which are liable for anti-dumping duty. You are provided
with the following details. (PAST EXAM NOV 2020)
(i) Country X does not sell these goods in its domestic market.
However, it exports the same printed circuit boards at USD 200
per piece to another third country.
(ii) The printed circuit board is sold in domestic industry @ USD 175
per piece.
(iii) PCB Limited has imported the printed circuit boards at USD 100
per piece.
(iv) Landed value of the printed circuit boards is USD 125 per piece
19. X Transport company imported Rolls Royce car for the purpose of
providing output services by way of transportation of passengers`
Following are the cost & other details-
21. Determine the safeguard duty payable by X Ltd., Y Ltd., Z Ltd. and A
Ltd. under section 8B of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 from the
following:
22. Mr. X an importer imported certain goods CIF value was US $ 20,000
and quantity 1,000 Kgs. Exchange rate was 1 US $ = Rs. 50 on date of
presentation of Bill of Entry. Customs Duty rates are —
(i) Basic Customs Duty 12%
(ii) SWS @ 10%
23. Determine the total duties payable under Customs Act if Mr. Bhairav
imported rubber from Malaysia at landed price (exclusive of duties) of
`25 lakh. It has been notified by the Central Government that share of
imports of rubber from the developing country against total imports
to India exceeds 5%. Safeguard duty notified on this product is 30%,
IGST u/s 3(7) is 12% and BCD is 10%. Ignore agriculture infrastructure
and development cess. (5 Marks Oct 22 & April ‘23)
1. (b)
2. (a)
3. (c)
4. (d)
Theory
5.
(a) Not valid. As per section 9B of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, no article
shall be subjected to both countervailing and anti-dumping duties to
compensate for the same situation of dumping or export
subsidization
(b) Not valid. As per section 9B of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975,
countervailing or anti-dumping duties shall not be levied by reasons
of exemption of such articles from duties or taxes borne by the like
articles when meant for consumption in the country of origin or
exportation or by reasons of refund of such duties or taxes.
(c) Valid. As per section 9B of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, no definitive
countervailing duty or anti- dumping duty shall be levied on the
import into India of any article from a member country of the World
Trade Organisation or from a country with whom Government of India
has a most favored nation agreement, unless a determination has
been made in the prescribed manner that import of such article into
India causes or threatens material injury to any established industry
in India or materially retards the establishment of any industry in
India.
(III) After the purpose for which a sample was taken is over, such
sample shall, if practicable, be restored to the owner, but if the owner
fails to take delivery of the sample within 3 months of the date on
which the sample was taken, it may be disposed of in such manner as
the Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs
may direct.
7. As per section 9A(1A) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, following are
the ways that would constitute circumvention (avoiding levy of duty
Practical Theory
9. Section 9A(3) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 provides that the anti-
dumping duty can be imposed with retrospective effect provided the
Government is of the opinion that:-
a. there is a history of dumping which caused injury or that the
importer was, or should have been, aware that the exporter
practices dumping and that such dumping would cause injury,
and
b. the injury is caused by massive dumping of an article imported
in a relatively short time, which in the light of timing and
volume of the imported article dumped and other circumstances
is likely to seriously undermine the remedial effect of the anti-
dumping duty liable to be levied.
9
CA Final May/Nov 24
Types of Duty (Answers)
10. In the given case, since Product XYZ is being imported into the
country in increased quantity, Central Government should consider
levying safeguard Duty and not anti-dumping duty.
Anti-dumping duty is imposed when any article is exported from any
country to India at less than its normal value, which is not the case
here.
Exemptions/reliefs:
11. Section 9A(3) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 provides that the anti-dumping
duty can be imposed with retrospective effect provided the Government is of
the opinion that: -
(a) there is a history of dumping which caused injury or that the importer
was, or should have been, aware that the exporter practices dumping and
that such dumping would cause injury , and
10
CA Final May/Nov 24
Types of Duty (Answers)
Margin of dumping is the difference between export price and normal value
of the imported article and injury margin is the difference between the fair
selling price [non-injurious price (NIP)] due to the domestic industry and the
landed value of the dumped imports.
(ii) Injury margin is USD 50 [USD 1753 – USD 1254] whichever is lower i.e. USD
50
Anti-dumping duty for 1,000 pieces (in rupees) = USD 50 × 1,000 pieces × ₹ 75
= ₹ 37,50,000.
1 When there are no sales of the like article in the domestic market of the
exporting country, normal value is taken as the comparable representative
price of the like article when exported from the exporting country to an
appropriate third country.
2 Export price is price of the article exported from the exporting country.
4 Landed value
13.
I. The contention of the importer is partially correct.
11
CA Final May/Nov 24
Types of Duty (Answers)
(ii) where such article imported is either cleared as such into the DTA
or used in the manufacture of any goods that are cleared into the DTA,
and in such cases anti- dumping duty shall be levied on that portion of
the article so cleared or so used as was leviable when it was imported
into India.
(iii) after completion of the job work, send the processed goods
to the importer or to another job worker as directed by the importer
12
CA Final May/Nov 24
Types of Duty (Answers)
for carrying out the remaining processes, if any, under the cover of an
invoice or an e-way bill.
25,000)
Particular Amount(Rs.)
13
CA Final May/Nov 24
Types of Duty (Answers)
Total 42,30,000
Note: It has been clarified by DGFT vide Guidance note that value
for calculation of integrated tax shall also include safeguard duty
amount.
whichever is lower.
14
CA Final May/Nov 24
Types of Duty (Answers)
per piece, thus Fair selling price in the present case is USD 275 per
piece.
Landed Value is taken as the assessable value under the Customs Act
and the applicable basic customs duties except CVD, SAD and special
duties. Landed value in the given case is USD 190 per piece.
(ii) Injury margin is USD 85 [USD 275 – USD 190] whichever is lower i.e.
USD 85
Anti-dumping duty for 800 pieces (in rupees) = USD 85 x 800 pieces x ₹
72 = ₹ 48,96,000.
Anti-dumping duty for 1,000 pieces (in rupees) = USD 50 × 1,000 pieces
x ₹ 75 = ₹ 37,50,000
*When there are no sales of the like article in the domestic market of
the exporting country, normal value is taken as the comparable
representative price of the like article when exported from the
exporting country to an propriate third country.
15
CA Final May/Nov 24
Types of Duty (Answers)
****Landed value
19.
Particulars Calculation Amount
(INR)
Cost of Vehicle-(A) 300,00,000
Custom duty-(B) 10% 30,00,000
SWS-(C) 10% on (B) 300,000
Total custom duty payable- (D) (B+C) 33,00,000
Total Cost after Custom duty-(E) (A+D) 3,33,00,0000
IGST-(F) 28% on (E) 93,24,000
Compensation cess-(G) 20% on (E) 66,60,000
Total cost-(H) (E+F+G) 4,92,84,000
20. Since, import from a developing country does not exceeds 3% (i.e. 2%
only) of total import of that article in to India, Safeguard duty is Nil.
In the given case safeguard duty will be payable by X Ltd.
21.
Importer Country of import ₹ in crores % of
imports
X Ltd. Developing country 70 2.8%
Y Ltd. Developing country 72 2.88%
Z Ltd. Developing country 52 2.08%
A Ltd. Developing country 50 2%
Others Developed country 2,256
Total 2,500 9.76%
Safeguard duty is as follows:
XLtd 21 70 x 30%
YLtd 21.60 72 x 30%
ZLtd 15.60 52 x 30%
A Ltd 15 50 x 30%
16
CA Final May/Nov 24
Types of Duty (Answers)
22.
Part I ₹
Part II
Part III
S. Particulars (₹)
No.
1 Landed price 25,00,000
2 Add: Basic customs duty @ 10% 2,50,000
3 Add: Safeguard duty @ 30% on ₹ 25,00,000 7,50,000
4 Add: Social welfare surcharge (SWS) @ 10 % on 25,000
₹ 2,50,000 [While calculating SWS, safeguard
5 Add: Integrated tax 4,23,000
12% of ₹ 35,25,000 (₹ 25,00,000 + ₹ 2,50,000 + ₹
7,50,000 + ₹
25,000)
[Integrated tax is levied on the sum total of the
assessable value of the imported goods, customs
duties and applicable SWS]
17
CA Final May/Nov 24
Types of Duty (Answers)
18
CA Final May/Nov 24
Theory
Practical Theory
19
CA Final May/Nov 24
Rate: 18%
20
CA Final May/Nov 24
The fruit and vegetable juices of this heading are generally obtained
by pressing fresh, healthy and ripe fruit or vegetables. This may be
done (as in the case of citrus fruits) by means of “mechanical
extractors" operating on the same principle as the household
lemon-squeezer, or by pressing which may or may not be preceded
either by crushing or grinding (for apples in particular) or by
treatment with cold or hot water or with steam (e.g., tomatoes,
black currants and certain vegetables such as carrots and celery).
21
CA Final May/Nov 24
8. "The laptop supplied along with software loaded on hard disk drive
has to be classified as laptop and valuation has to be made as one
unit. The classification also has to be determined accordingly."
Examine this statement with reference to classification and
valuation of laptop under Customs Act, 1962 read with relevant
rules and relevant judicial pronouncement, if any. (5 Marks May
‘22)
22
CA Final May/Nov 24
Theory
1. The Customs Tariff has a set of six General Rules for Interpretation
of the First Schedule and three General Explanatory Notes. The six
General Rules of Interpretation and three General Explanatory
Notes are integral part of the Tariff Schedule. The purpose of their
inclusion in Customs Tariff is to standardize the manner in which
the nomenclature in the schedule is to be interpreted so as to
reduce classification disputes.
3. The Customs Tariff has a set of six General Rules for Interpretation
of the First Schedule and three General Explanatory Notes. The six
General Rules of Interpretation and three General Explanatory
Notes are integral part of the Tariff Schedule. The purpose of their
inclusion in Customs Tariff is to standardize the manner in which
the nomenclature in the schedule is to be interpreted so as to
reduce classification disputes.
Rule 4 of the Rules of Interpretation is called as akin rule. This rule
lays down that goods which cannot be classified in accordance
with rules 1, 2 and 3 of the Rules of Interpretation shall be
classified under the heading appropriate to the goods to which
they are most akin. In other words, akin rule’ is a residual rule
5. The application of this rule arises when the goods consists of more
than one material or substance.
When by application of rule 2(b) or for any other reason, goods are,
prima facie, classifiable under two or more headings, classification
shall be effected as follows:
Rule 3(a) – Specific over general
(i) The heading which provides the most specific description shall
be preferred to headings providing a more general description.
(ii) However, when two or more headings each refer to part only
of the materials or substances contained in mixed or
composite goods or to part only of the items in a set up for
24
CA Final May/Nov 24
Classification (Answers)
Practical Theory
25
CA Final May/Nov 24
Classification (Answers)
26
CA Final May/Nov 24
Theory
5. What is the relevant date for determining the rate of duty and
tariff valuation in respect of goods imported/exported by post?
16. What is the permissible time limit with respect to the following- :
(i) for filing a bill of entry
(ii) for paying the assessed duty
(iii) for delivery of arrival manifest or import manifest/report and
departure manifest or export manifest/report
17. State in brief the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 relating to
filing of “Arrival manifest or import manifest/ Report”.
19. State and summarise the provisions and procedure in the Customs
Act, 1962 governing preparation and filing of a bill of entry.
20. Under what situations the amount of duty and interest refundable
under section 18 of the Customs Act, 1962 shall be paid to the
importer/exporter instead of being credited to the Consumer
Welfare Fund?
22. Briefly explain the following with reference to the provisions of the
Customs Act, 1962:
(i) Bill of export
(ii) Import report
(iii) Imported goods
(iv) Entry (v) Prohibited goods
(v) Customs port
(vi) Goods
(vii) Stores
(viii) Conveyance
(ix) Dutiable goods
(x) Customs area
(xi) Adjudicating Authority
24. Explain with reference to the Customs Act, 1962, the conditions to
be fulfilled for filing application to Settlement Commission
25. State the salient features of "Deferred duty payment facility" with
reference to Customs Act, 1962 and rules thereunder. (PAST EXAM
MAY 2018)
Practical Theory
26. M/s Pipli Imports Ltd. imported certain goods, which were unloaded
in the customs area on 01.10.2020. When order for clearance was
passed by proper officer on 05.10.2020, it was found that there was
some pilferage of such goods. As the imported goods were in the
custody of Port Trust, the Department demanded duty from the
custodian under section 45(3) of the Customs Act, 1962, on such
pilferage. The Port Trust denied such demand contending that it
was not an approved custodian falling under section 45 and
possession of goods by it was by virtue of powers conferred under
the Major Port Trust Act, 1963. Hence, it is not liable for customs
duty on pilfered goods. M/s Pipli Imports Ltd. has also asked the
Port Trust to make good the loss of goods. Examine, whether the
demands made by the Department and M/s Pipli Imports Ltd. are
justified in law, referring to decided case law
27. Mr. Anil and his wife (non-tourist Indian passengers) are returning
from Dubai to India after staying there for a period of two years.
They wish to bring gold jewellery purchased from Dubai. Please
enumerate provisions of customs laws for jewellery allowance in
their case.
29. Laxmi Company imported goods valued at Rs. 10,00,000 vide a Bill
of Entry presented before the proper officer on 15thDecember,
2019, on which date the rate of customs duty was 20%. The proper
officer decided that the goods should be subject to chemical or
other test and therefore, the same were provisionally assessed at a
value of Rs. 10,00,000 and Laxmi company paid provisional duty of
Rs. 2,00,000 on the same date. Laxmi Company wants to
voluntarily pay duty of Rs. 1,50,000 on 20th January, 2020.
(1) Can Laxmi Company provisionally pay the duty and what are
the conditions which are to be complied before such payment
is made?
30. After visiting USA for a month, Mrs. and Mr. Iyer (Indian residents
aged 35 and 40 years respectively) brought to India a laptop
computer valued at Rs. 70,000, used personal effects valued Rs.
1,40,000 and a personal computer for Rs. 58,000.
Calculate the custom duty payable by Mrs. & Mr. Iyer, if any.
32. Mr. Anil and his wife (non-tourist Indian passengers) are returning
from Dubai to India after staying there for a period of two years.
They wish to bring gold jewellery purchased from Dubai. Please
enumerate provisions of customs laws for jewellery allowance in
their case.
33. Gregory Peg of foreign origin has come on travel visa, to tour in
India. He carries with him, as part of baggage, the following:
Particulars Value in ₹
Travel Souvenir 85,000
Other articles carried on in person 1,50,000
120 sticks of cigarettes of ₹100 each 12,000
Fire arm with 100 cartridges (value includes the value of 1,00,000
cartridges at @ ₹ 500 per cartridge).
Determine customs duty payable, if the effective rate of customs
duty is 38.50% inclusive of social welfare surcharge, with short
explanations where required. Ignore Agriculture infrastructure and
development cess.
(1) Can Laxmi Company provisionally pay the duty and what are
the conditions which are to be complied before such payment is
made?
(2) Determine the amount of interest payable, if any, under section
18 of the Customs Act, 1962 assuming that the payment of ₹
1,50,000 as stated above is made on 20th January, 2023 and
that the final duty is assessed on 31st January, 2023 at ₹
4,00,000 and the balance duty is paid on the same day.
36. After visiting USA for a month, Mrs. and Mr. Iyer (Indian residents
aged 35 and 40 years respectively) brought to India a laptop
computer valued at ₹ 70,000, used personal effects valued ₹
1,40,000 and a personal computer for ₹ 58,000.
Calculate the custom duty payable by Mrs. & Mr. Iyer, if any. Ignore
Agriculture infrastructure and development cess.
37. Mrs. X, an Indian resident (36 years old) who was on a visit to
China, returned after 6 months. She was carrying with her the
following items:
(i) Personal effects ₹ 75,000
(ii) Laptop computer ₹ 60,000
(iii) Jewellery - 25 grams (purchased in China) ₹ 75,000
(iv) Music system ₹ 50,000
38. After visiting USA for a month, Mrs. and Mr. Iyer (Indian residents
aged 35 and 40 years respectively) brought to India a laptop
computer valued at ` 70,000, used personal effects valued `
1,40,000 and a personal computer for ` 58,000. Calculate the
custom duty payable by Mrs. & Mr. Iyer, if any. (5 Marks Oct 21,
Oct ’18, Mar’18, Mar’22)
41. After visiting USA for a month, Mrs. and Mr. X (Indian
residents aged 40 and 45 years respectively) brought to
India a laptop computer valued at ` 80,000, used personal
effects valued at ` 90,000 and as personal computer for `
52,000. What is the customs duty payable? Ignore
Agriculture infrastructure and development cess. (5
Marks Oct 22)
42. Joginder & Co. imported goods valued at ₹ 12,00,000 vide a bill of
entry presented before the proper officer on 15th December 2021,
on which date the rate of customs duty was 20%. The proper
officer decided that the goods should be subject to chemical test
and therefore, the same were provisionally assessed at a value of ₹
12,00,000 and Joginder & Co. paid provisional duty of ₹ 2,40,000 on
43. Mr. Cliff Paul, a resident and citizen of USA, visits India on a
business tour. He made declaration to the proper officer about his
baggage under section 77 of the Customs Act, 1962 for the purpose
of clearance. During the scrutiny of the declaration, proper officer
found that some of the articles declared in baggage brought with
him were prohibited to be entered in India and were detained by
the officer.
Although Mr. Paul did not insist to clear those articles, value of
those articles was very high and it was a difficult situation for him.
You are required to advise any procedure prescribed under customs
law to overcome the situation. Give your advice on the basis of
relevant statutory provisions.(3 Marks May ‘22)
Particulars Amount
46. Mr. X has imported some items from abroad. Since he was unable
to make a self-assessment, he has sought for provisional
assessment pending technical testing on 29.04.2021. The technical
report was received on 05.05.2021. Discuss about the time limit
available to the officer for finalizing the provisional assessment as
per law and guide Mr. X as to when his provisional assessment will
be finalized. (PAST EXAM NOV 2020)
47. Gregory Peg of foreign origin has come on travel visa, to tour in
India. He carries with him, as part of baggage, the following:
48. Queen Marry’, is a vessel containing the goods imported by XML Ltd.
The events relating to its entry into India and the discharge and
onward movement and storage of the goods are as follows.
24.05.2020 Vessel entered the Indian territorial waters.
25.05.2020 Import manifest was delivered to the customs authorities
27.05.2020 XML Ltd filed bill of entry for the goods
29.05.2020 Entry inwards granted to the vessel
The rate of customs duty on the goods was increased from 8% to 10%
on 28.05.2020.
At what rate should XML Ltd. pay the customs duty on the goods
imported by it?
49. Mr. Krishna Bhansali, has imported some garments from Paris. He
is unable to make self-assessment under section 17(1) of the
Customs Act, 1962because of differential rates for different kinds
of material and hence has made a request in writing to the proper
officer for provisional assessment pending technical testing. Is he
eligible to apply for provisional assessment? Discuss.
50. Moris Lal has imported goods from Germany and is finally re-
assessed u/s 18(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 for two such
consignments. Particulars are as follows:
With reference to Baggage Rules, 2016, determine whether Mr. and Mrs.
Sujoy will be required to pay any customs duty? (MTP MAY 2020) (MTP
MAY 2019)
52. Mahesh imported certain goods in May 2018 and ‘ínto bond’ bill of
entry was presented on 14th May 2018 and goods were cleared from
the port for warehousing. Assessable value on that date was US $
1,00,000. The order permitting the deposit of goods in warehouse
for 4 months was issued on 21st May 2018. Mahesh deposited the
goods in warehouse on the same day but did not clear the imported
goods even after the warehousing period got over on 21st
September 2018. A notice was issued under section 72 of the
Custom Act, 1962, demanding duty and interest. Mahesh cleared
the goods on 14th October 2018. Customs duty paid on removal of
the goods is Rs. 7,17,000. You are required to compute interest
payable on such removal, explaining the provisions of the Customs
Act, 1962.
53. A vessel Bhishma, sailing from U.S.A to Australia via,, India carries
various types of products namely ‘A, B, C & D’.
54. Padmavati, an Indian resident (36 years old) who was on a visit to
China, returned after 6 months. She was carrying with her the
personal effects and jewellery 25 grams (purchased in China) worth
₹ 75,000 each. Further, she was carrying a laptop computer worth
₹ 60,000 and a music system worth ₹ 50,000 with her. Compute the
customs duty payable by Padmavati with reference to the Baggage
Rules, 2016. Ignore Agriculture infrastructure and development
cess. (5 Marks March ‘23)
Particulars Value in ₹
Used personal effects 50,000
Travel souvenirs 50,000
Laptop 1,20,000
200 gms tobacco 1,000
[Valued @ ₹ 5
per gram]
50 cigars [Valued @ ₹ 100 each] 5,000
Fire-arms 80,000
With reference to the Baggage Rules, 2016, determine
customs duty payable. Ignore agriculture infrastructure and
development cess. (5 Marks April ’23)
57. Kiara of Indian origin, came to India on tour with her baby of 1 year.
She brought following goods:
Theory
1. Interest is payable from the first day of the month in which the
provisional assessment began. Refer section 18.
40
CA Final May/Nov 24
Import & Export (Answers)
16. (i) Refer section 46: 30 days prior to arrival, & not later than the
end of the day of arrival.
(ii) Refer section 47: day of filing bill of entry (self-assessment) or
within a day of receiving re-assessed bill of entry.
(iii) Refer section 30: import manifest: before arrival; import report:
within 12 hours of arrival of conveyance at customs station;
section 41: departure or export manifest / report: before departure
of conveyance.
23. (i) ‘Clear first-Pay later’ i.e., deferred duty payment is a mechanism
for delinking duty payment and customs clearance. The aim is to
have a seamless wharf to warehouse transit in order to facilitate
just-in-time manufacturing.
41
CA Final May/Nov 24
Import & Export (Answers)
24. According to section 127B of the Customs Act 1962, the following
conditions are to be fulfilled for filing an application for settlement
of cases:
(i) the applicant has led a bill of entry, or a shipping bill, or a
bill of export, or made a baggage declaration, or a label or
declaration accompanying the goods imported or exported through
post or courier, as the case may be, and in relation to such
document or documents, a show cause notice has been issued to
him by the proper of cer.
(v) the application does not relate to goods to which section 123
applies or to goods in relation to which any offence under the
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 has been
committed.
25. The salient features of “Deferred duty payment facility” are as under:
- Under section 47 of the Customs Act, 1962, the Central
Government has permitted importers certi ed under Authorized
Economic Operator programme as Authorized Economic Operator –
AEO (Tier-Two) and AEO (Tier-Three) to make deferred payment of
import duty. AEO means Authorized Economic Operator certi ed by
the Directorate General of Performance Management under CBEC.
42
CA Final May/Nov 24
Import & Export (Answers)
The eligible importer shall pay the duty electronically except where
Assistant/Deputy Commissioner of Customs allow payment by any other
mode for reasons to be recorded in writing.
Practical Theory
26. The facts of the case are similar to the case of Board of Trustees v.
UOI (2009) 241 ELT 513 (Bom HC DB), wherein the High Court held
that considering the language of section 45(3), the liability to pay
duty is of the person, in whose custody the goods remain as an
approved person under section 45 of the Act. Therefore, section 45(3)
applies only to the private custodians who are required to be
approved by Principal Commissioner/ Commissioner of Customs
under section 45(1). Accordingly, the major ports and airports
covered under Major Port Trust Act, 1963 who do not require any
approval under section 45(1), are not covered by section 45(3). Thus,
the Department cannot demand duty from Port Trust on the
pilferage under section 45(3) of the Customs Act, 1962.
Section 45(3) of the Customs Act, 1962 holds the custodian
responsible only in respect of the customs duty in respect of
pilfered goods. It does not extend to the value of goods lost.
However, the Port Trust, as bailee of the goods, is liable for value of
the goods to the importer.
43
CA Final May/Nov 24
Import & Export (Answers)
27. As per rule 5 of the Baggage Rules, 2016, a passenger who has been
residing abroad for more than one year and returns to India shall be
allowed duty free clearance of jewelry in bona fide baggage as under:
• Jewelry upto a weight of 20 grams with a value cap of Rs.
50,000 for a gentlemen passenger
Thus, in the given case, Mr. Anil would be allowed duty free jewelry
upto a weight of 20 grams with a value cap of Rs. 50,000 and his
wife would be allowed duty free jewelry upto a weight of 40 grams
with a value cap of Rs.1,00,000.
Further, in addition to the jewelry allowance, Mr. Anil and his wife
would also be allowed duty free clearance of jewelry worth
Rs.1,00,000 (Rs.50,000 per person) as part of free baggage
allowance.
28. Yes, charges are payable for late filing of bill of entry if an importer
fails to present the bill of entry before the end of the next day
following the day (excluding holidays) on which the
aircraft/vessel/vehicle carrying the goods arrives at a customs
station at which such goods are to be cleared for home consumption
or warehousing, and the proper officer is satisfied that there was no
sufficient cause for such delay [Section 46(3) of the Customs Act,
1962].
Yes, a bill of entry can be led in advance. It can be presented
within 30 days of the expected arrival of the aircraft/vessel/vehicle
by which the goods have been shipped for importation into India
vide proviso to section 46(3) of the Customs Act, 1962.
In the given case also, the time period as described above will be
available - with reference to the date of arrival of vessel/aircraft -
for ling the bill of entry.
44
CA Final May/Nov 24
Import & Export (Answers)
= Rs. 4,418
30. (1) As per the Baggage Rules, 2016, an Indian resident arriving from
a country other than Nepal, Bhutan, or Myanmar,is allowed duty free
clearance of-
(i) Used personal effects and travel souvenirs without any value
limit.
45
CA Final May/Nov 24
Import & Export (Answers)
31. Rate of duty will be 10%, because the bill of entry is deemed to
have been filed on the date of entry inward though it was actually
filed before the rate of duty increased.
32. As per rule 5 of the Baggage Rules, 2016, a passenger who has been
residing abroad for more than one year and returns to India shall
be allowed duty free clearance of jewellery in bona fide baggage as
under: • Jewellery upto a weight of 20 grams with a value cap of ₹
50,000 for a gentlemen passenger • Jewellery upto a weight of 40
grams with a value cap of ₹ 1,00,000 for a lady passenger Thus, in
the given case, Mr. Anil would be allowed duty free jewellery upto
a weight of 20 grams with a value cap of ₹ 50,000 and his wife
would be allowed duty free jewellery upto a weight of 40 grams
with a value cap of ₹1,00,000. Further, in addition to the jewellery
allowance, Mr. Anil and his wife would also be allowed duty free
clearance of jewellery worth ₹ 1,00,000 (₹ 50,000 per person) as
part of free baggage allowance.
46
CA Final May/Nov 24
Import & Export (Answers)
34. Yes, charges are payable for late filing of bill of entry if an
importer fails to present the bill of entry before the end of the day
(including holidays) preceding the day on which the
aircraft/vessel/vehicle carrying the goods arrives at a customs
station at which such goods are to be cleared for home
consumption or warehousing, and the proper officer is satisfied
that there was no sufficient cause for such delay [Section 46(3) of
the Customs Act, 1962]. However, the Board may, in such cases as
it may deem fit, prescribe different time limits for presentation of
the bill of entry, which shall not be later than the end of the day of
such arrival. Yes, a bill of entry can be filed in advance. It can be
presented within 30 days of the expected arrival of the
aircraft/vessel/vehicle by which the goods have been shipped for
importation into India vide proviso to section 46(3) of the Customs
Act, 1962.
(2) Section 18 of the Customs Act, 1962 further stipulates that the
importer is liable to pay interest, on any amount payable
consequent to the final assessment order @ 15% p.a. from the first
day of the month in which the duty is provisionally assessed till
the date of payment thereof. Accordingly, amount of interest
payable will be = [₹ 1,50,000 x 15% x 51/365] + [₹ 50,000 x 15% x
62/365] = ₹ 3,144 + ₹ 1,274 = ₹ 4,418
36. (1) As per the Baggage Rules, 2016, an Indian resident arriving from
a country other than Nepal, Bhutan, or Myanmar,is allowed duty
free clearance of-
(i) Used personal effects and travel souvenirs without any value
limit.
47
CA Final May/Nov 24
Import & Export (Answers)
Particulars ₹
Personal effects [Duty free clearance is allowed] Nil
Laptop computer [One laptop computer is exempt Nil
when imported into India by a passenger ≥ 18 years of
age]
Jewellery [Duty free jewellery allowance is not 75,000
available to Mrs. X since she did not reside abroad for
more than 1 year]
Music system 50,000
Total value 1,25,000
Less: General duty free baggage allowance of ₹ 50,000 50,000
Value of baggage liable to customs duty 75,000
Rate of Duty 38.50%
Customs duty @ 38.50% (including social welfare 28,875
surcharge)
38.
48
CA Final May/Nov 24
Import & Export (Answers)
39. Yes, charges are payable for late filing of bill of entry if an
importer fails to present the bill of entry before the end of the day
(including holidays) preceding the day on which the
aircraft/vessel/vehicle carrying the goods arrives at a customs
station at which such goods are to be cleared for home
consumption or warehousing, and the proper officer is satisfied
that there was no sufficient cause for such delay [Section 46(3) of
the Customs Act, 1962]. However, the Board may, in such cases as
it may deem fit, prescribe different time limits for presentation of
the bill of entry, which shall not be later than the end of the day of
such arrival.
49
CA Final May/Nov 24
Import & Export (Answers)
In the given case also, the time period as described above will be
available - with reference to the date of arrival of vessel/aircraft -
for ling the bill of entry.
50
CA Final May/Nov 24
Import & Export (Answers)
51
CA Final May/Nov 24
Import & Export (Answers)
In the given case, proper of cer has detained the prohibited article
declared and brought by Mr. Cliff Paul. Such articles shall be
returned to him on his leaving India.
Particulars Rs.
Jewellery 75,000
52
CA Final May/Nov 24
Import & Export (Answers)
45.
Computation of customs duty payable
Travel souvenir Nil
Articles carried on in person 1,50,00
Cigarettes (Since the number of cigarettes does not 08,000
exceed 100,the same will be covered within the scope of
rule 3 of Baggage Rules, 2016 and thus, be eligible for
general free allowance (GFA) or concessional rate of duty
applicable to baggage vide Notification No. 26/2016 Cus.
Fire arms cartridge [Since the number of fire arms 1
cartridge doesnot exceed 50,the same will be covered 5,000
within the scope of rule 3 of Baggage Rules, 2016 and thus,
be eligible for GFA or concessional rate of duty applicable to
baggage vide Notification No.26/ 2016 Cus. dated 31.03.201
6,as the case may be.]
One litre of wine [Since the quantity of wine does not 1
exceed 2 litres, the san1e will be covered within the scope 5,000
of rule 3 of Baggage Rules,2016 and thus, be eligible for GFA
or concessional rate of duty applicable to baggage vide
Notification No. 26/ 2016 Cus. dated 31.03.2016,as the case
may be.]
Baggage within the scope of rule 3 of Baggage Rules,2016 1,
88,000
Less:GFA 1
5,000
Baggage on which duty is payable 1,73,00
Customs duty payable @ 38.5% 066,60
5
46. The proper officer can finalize the provisional assessment within 2
months of receipt of a chemical or other test report, where the
provisional assessment is ordered for that reason. The Commissioner
of Customs may allow a further time period of 3 months in case the
proper officer is not able to finalize the provisional assessment
within the period of 2 months.
53
CA Final May/Nov 24
Import & Export (Answers)
48. Rate of duty will be 10%, because the bill of entry is deemed to
have been filed on the date of entry inward though it was actually
filed before the rate of duty increased.
49. Yes, Mr. Krishna Bhansali can apply for provisional assessment
under section 18 of the Customs Act, [Link] 18(1) provides
that provisional assessment can be resorted to, inter alia, where
the importer or exporter is unable to make self-assessment under
54
CA Final May/Nov 24
Import & Export (Answers)
50. As per section 18(3) of the Customs Act, 1962, an importer is liable
to pay interest at the rate of 15% p.a. (Notification No. 33/2016-
Cus. (NT) dated 01.03.2016), on any amount payable consequent to
the re-assessment order from the first day of the month in which
the duty is provisionally assessed till the date of payment.
Since in the given case, refund has been made (28.04.2020) within
3 months from the date of re- assessment of duty (02.02.2020),
interest is not payable to Moris Lal on duty refunded in respect of
2nd consignment.
51. As per rule 3 of the Baggage Rules, 2016, an Indian resident arriving
from any country other than Nepal, Bhutan or Myanmar, shall be
allowed clearance free of duty articles in his bona fide baggage,
that is to say, used personal effects and travel souvenirs; and
articles [other than certain specified articles], upto the value of
Rs.50,000 if these are carried on the person or in the accompanied
baggage of the passenger.
55
CA Final May/Nov 24
Import & Export (Answers)
52. As per section 61(2) of the Customs Act, 1962, if goods (not meant
for being used in an 100% EOU, STP unit, EHTP unit) remain in a
warehouse beyond a period of 90 days from the date on which the
order permitting deposit in a warehouse is made, interest is
payable @ 15% p.a., on the amount of duty payable at the time of
clearance of the goods, for the period from the expiry of the said
90 days till the date of payment of duty on the warehoused goods.
56
CA Final May/Nov 24
Import & Export (Answers)
Products C & D are transit goods since these goods remains in the
same vessel Bhishma chartered to Australia.
Particulars ₹
Personal effects Nil
[Duty free clearance is allowed]
Laptop computer Nil
[One laptop computer is exempt when imported into India by
a passenger ≥ 18
years of age]
Jewellery 75,000
[Duty free jewellery allowance is not available to
Padmavati since she did not reside abroad for more
Music system 50,000
Total value 1,25,000
57
CA Final May/Nov 24
Import & Export (Answers)
57.
Particulars ₹
Personal effects Nil
Used personal effects of infant Nil
New camera 45,000
Mobile phone 12,500
Cigarette sticks 70 1,000
Wine -2 litres 18,000
Travel souvenirs Nil
Laptop Nil
58
CA Final May/Nov 24
Import & Export (Answers)
Total 76,500
Less: General Free Allowance 50,000
Baggage on which duty is payable 26,500
Duty payable on baggage @ 38.50% 10,203
(including 10% Social welfare surcharge)
59
CA Final May/Nov 24
Chapter 6 – Warehousing
Multiple Choice Questions
Theory
2. Elaborate the provisions relating to the owner’s right to deal
with warehoused goods under section 64 of the Customs Act,
1962. (5 Marks Sep 22)
Practical Theory
7. Vipul imported certain goods in May. An ‘into bond’ bill of entry was
presented on 14th May and goods were cleared from the port for
warehousing. Assessable value on that date was US $ 1,00,000. The
order permitting the deposit of goods in warehouse for 4 months was
issued on 21st May. Vipul deposited the goods in warehouse on the
same day but did not clear the imported goods even after the
warehousing period got over on 21st September.
A notice was issued under section 72 of the Customs Act, 1962,
demanding duty and interest. Vipul cleared the goods on 14th October.
Compute the amount of duty and interest payable by Vipul while
removing the goods on the basis of the following information:
Integrated Tax leviable under section 3(7) of the Customs Tariff Act is
exempt.
Ignore agriculture and infrastructure development cess.
1. (b)
Theory
have not been cleared for home consumption or export are not duly
accounted for to the satisfaction of the proper officer.
Practical Theory
6. Yes, the company will succeed. The facts of the given situation are
similar to the case of CCus vs. Biecco Lawrie Ltd. 2008 (223) ELT 3 (SC)
wherein the Supreme Court has held that where duty on the
warehoused goods is paid and out of charge order for home
consumption is made by the proper of cer in compliance of the
provisions of section 68, the goods allowed to be retained for storage
in the warehouse as permitted under section 49 of the Customs Act
are not treated as warehoused goods and importer would not be
required to pay anything more.
Section 49 of the Customs Act, 1962 inter alia also provides that
imported goods entered for home consumption if stored in a public
warehouse, or in a private warehouse on the application of the
importer and if the same cannot be cleared within a reasonable time,
shall not be deemed to be warehoused goods for the purposes of this
Act, and accordingly the provisions of Chapter IX shall not apply to
such goods.
Notes:
1. As per third proviso to section 14(1) of the Customs Act, 1962,
assessable value has to be calculated with reference to the rate of
exchange prevalent on the date on which the into bond bill of entry is
presented for warehousing under section 46 of the Customs Act, 1962.
2. Goods which are not removed within the permissible period are
deemed to be improperly removed in terms of section 72 of the
Customs Act, 1962 on the day they should have been removed
[Kesoram Rayon v. CC 1996 (86) ELT 464 (SC)]. The applicable rate of
63
CA Final May/Nov 24
Warehouse (Answers)
duty in such a case is the rate of duty prevalent on the last date on
which the goods should have been removed.
64
CA Final May/Nov 24
Chapter 7 – Refunds
Theory
(3 Marks Jan 21 )
4. Section 26A of Customs Act, 1962 provides for refund of import duty
paid if goods are found defective or not as per speci cations. Discuss
the conditions governing such refund in brief.
Practical Theory
10. M/s. HIL imports copper concentrate from different suppliers. At the
time of import, the seller issues a provisional invoice and the goods
are provisionally assessed under section 18 of the Customs Act, 1962
based on the invoice. When the nal invoice is raised, based on the
price prevalent in the London Metal Exchange on a predetermined
date as agreed in the contract between the buyer and seller, the
assessments are nalized on the basis of the price in such invoices.
M/s HIL has led a refund claim arising out of the nalization of the
bill of entry by the authorities. The Department, however, has rejected
the refund claim on the grounds of unjust enrichment. Discuss
whether the action of the department is correct in law?
11. XYZ Ltd imported capital goods and used them in its factory to
produce goods for sale. Upon discovery of an error by which excess
import duty had been paid on the said capital goods, it led a claim
for refund. As regards unjust enrichment, it contended -• that the
capital goods were not sold and hence the principle of unjust
enrichment will not apply to the refund of import duty paid on capital
goods; and • that in any case the price of the nished goods
manufactured in the factory remained the same before and after the
import and installation of the capital goods, which is suf cient proof
to establish that duty burden has not been passed on. Examine the
merits of these contentions, with the support of case law, if any.
13. Mr. N has, over three consignments of 200, 400 and 400 units,
imported a total of 1000 units of an article "ZEP", which has been
valued at ` 1,150 per unit. The customs duty on this article has been
assessed ` 250 per unit. He adds his pro t margin ` 350 per unit and
sells the article for ` 1,750 per unit. After one month of selling the
entire consignment of article "ZEP", Mr. N found that there had been
an error in payment of amount of duty, in which duty for the
consignment of 200 units was paid as if it was 400 units, resulting in
excess payment of duty. Mr. N les an application for refund for `
50,000 (200 X 250). Is the bar of unjust enrichment attracted?
Chapter 7 - Refunds
Theory
(ii) The High Court, in Parimal Ray v. CCus. 2015 (318) ELT 379 (Cal.),
has ruled that the law of limitation under Customs Act is applicable
to duty or interest paid under that Act.
However, any sum paid to the exchequer by mistake is not the duty or
excess duty but is simply money paid to the account of Government.
(a) If the refund claim is lodged by the importer, the time limit
should be calculated from the date of payment of duty.
(b) If the refund claim is lodged by the buyer of imported goods, the
time limit should be calculated from the date of purchase of
goods.
(c) In case of goods which are exempt from payment of duty by an
ad-hoc exemption, the limitation of one year should be
computed from the date of issue of such exemption order.
(d) Where any duty is paid provisionally, the time limit should be
computed from the date of adjustment of duty after the nal
assessment thereof or in case of re-assessment, from the date
of such re-assessment.
(e) Where the refund arises as a result of any judgement/ decree/
order/ direction of the Appellate Authority/ Appellate
Tribunal/Court, the time limit should be calculated from the
date of such judgement/decree/order/direction.
The time limit of one year is not applicable if duty is paid under
protest. Finally, it is worth mentioning that above provisions
regarding time limit are mandatory and customs authorities cannot
grant a refund which is led beyond the maximum permissible period.
Act makes provision for refund of import duty paid if goods are found
defective or not as per speci cations.
The refund is admissible if goods are re-exported or relinquished and
abandoned to the customs authorities or destroyed. Thus, refund is
possible even if goods are destroyed or relinquished in India without re-
exporting the same.
The section stipulates the following conditions for the refund:
(i) the goods are found to be defective or otherwise not in
conformity with the speci cation agreed upon between the
importer and the supplier of goods;
(ii) the goods have not been worked, repaired or used after
importation except where such use was indispensable to discover
the defects or non-conformity with the speci cations;
(iii) the goods are identi ed to the satisfaction of Assistant/Deputy
Commissioner of Customs as the goods which were imported;
(iv) the importer does not claim drawback under any other provision
of this Act; and
(v) the goods are exported or the importer relinquishes his title to
the goods and abandons them to customs or such goods are
destroyed/rendered commercially valueless in the presence of
proper of cer in prescribed manner within 30 days from the date
on which the order of clearance of imported goods for home
consumption is made by the proper of cer. This period of 30 days
can be extended up to 3 months.
(vi) An application for refund of duty shall be made before the expiry
of 6 months from the relevant date in prescribed form and
manner.
(vii) Imported goods should not be such regarding which an offence
appears to have been committed under this Act or any other law.
(viii) Imported goods should not be perishable goods and goods which
have exceeded their shelf life or their recommended storage
before use period.
5. As per third proviso to section 27(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, the
minimum monetary limit below which refund cannot be granted is `
100.
6. Customs duty is a levy under Indirect taxation, which implies that the
incidence of the customs duty paid is generally passed on to the buyer
of the goods. When an importer imports goods, he has to pay the
customs duty on such goods. Similarly, an exporter in case of export
goods, if the same are subject to export duty, the exporter pays the
export duty. This duty is recovered from the buyer when the goods are
sold by the importer or exporter, as the case may be. In other words,
the incidence or burden of duty is passed on to the buyer, from whom
the importer or exporter collects the customs duty paid. Subsequently,
if the importer or exporter makes a claim for refund of duty paid (due
to excess payment) and receives the refund from the Government, he
would be called to have enriched himself as he collected the duty from
his customer also and also as refund from the Government. Such
enrichment is referred to as ‘unjust enrichment’. Accordingly, the
doctrine of ‘unjust enrichment’ implies that no person should enrich
himself at the cost of others. Therefore, wherever there is excess
payment of duty, the refund is to be given only to the person who has
borne the burden of such duty along with interest, if any. When the
person who applies for refund is not the person who has borne the
burden of duty, the refund is paid into a fund called 'Consumer Welfare
Fund'. Section 28D provides that every person who has paid duty under
the Customs Act, unless the contrary is proved by him, shall be deemed
to have passed the full incidence of such duty to the buyer; hence the
applicant for refund has to refute the presumption of passing on the
incidence of duty.
8. Refund is not allowed in case of perishable goods and goods which have
exceeded their shelf life or their recommended storage-before-use
period in terms of section 26A(3) of the Customs Act, 1962. However,
the Board may, by noti cation in the Of cial Gazette, specify any other
Practical Theory
11. The incidence of duty can be passed directly or indirectly. Where the
capital goods are used for manufacture, the duty paid on their import
will go into the costing of the goods manufactured and sold, and can
thus be passed on to the buyers. The Large Bench of the Tribunal in
the case of SRF Ltd. v. CCus. Chennai 2006 (193) ELT 186 (Tri. - LB) has
held that the doctrine of unjust enrichment would be applicable in
case of imported capital goods used captively for manufacture of
excisable goods. As regards the relevance of the fact that price
remained the same before and after the capital goods were imported,
the Larger Bench also clari ed that uniformity in price before and
after assessment does not lead to inevitable conclusion that duty
burden has not been passed, as such uniformity may be due to various
reasons. In view of this, the contentions of XYZ Ltd are liable to be
rejected.
13. Mr. N’s invoices show that he collected duty of ` 250 per unit on 1,000
items. However, he paid duty on 200 items more. This payment, in the
normal course, was made before the order permitting the clearance of
the goods. It would be evident from the bill of entry that the amount
paid was more than the amount of duty assessed. Thus Mr. N’s case
falls within the exception to unjust enrichment listed at clause (g) of
the rst proviso to section 27(2). He will be able to refute the charge
of unjust enrichment. Furthermore, clause (a) of the same sub-section
provides that the doctrine of unjust enrichment will not apply to the
refund of duty and interest, if any, paid on such duty if such amount
is relatable to the duty and interest paid by the importer/exporter, if
he had not passed on the incidence of such duty and interest to any
other person. Mr. N’s invoices will show how much duty he collected
from his customers, hence he may be covered by this clause also to
escape the bar of unjust enrichment.
Practical Theory
4. Mr. Ayush Bhandari wants to import samples from US. State in brief
policy for import of samples.
6. Mr. X is desirous to know the bene ts of deemed exports under FTP. You
are required to discuss the same with reference to FTP.
7. Two exporters namely, Red Sky Pvt. Ltd. and Black Night Pvt. Ltd. have
achieved the status of Status Holders (One Star Export House) in the
current nancial year. Both the exporters have been regularly exporting
goods (other than Gems and Jewellery) every year. What would have
been the minimum export performance of the two exporters to achieve
such status? Both the exporters want to establish export warehouses
in accordance with the applicable guidelines. What should be their
export turnover to enable them to establish export warehouses?
9. XYZ Ltd. has imported inputs without payment of duty under Advance
Authorization. The CIF value of such inputs is ` 10,00,000. The inputs are
processed and the nal product is exported. The exports made by XYZ
10. ‘A’ has used some duty paid inputs in its export products. However, for
the rest of the inputs, he wants to apply for the Advance Authorization.
Can he do so? Explain with reference to the provisions of Foreign Trade
Policy
Practical Theory
10. Yes, ‘A’ can do so. In case of part duty free and part duty paid imports,
both Advance Authorization and drawback will be available. Drawback
can be obtained for any duty paid material, whether imported or
indigenous, used in goods exported, as per drawback rate xed by DoR,
Ministry of Finance (Directorate of Drawback). Advance Authorization
can be used for importing duty free material. Details about duty paid
material must be mentioned in the application for Advance
Authorization