Methods of Summons Service Explained
Uploaded by
nurumboya2Methods of Summons Service Explained
Uploaded by
nurumboya2Common questions
Powered by AISubstituted service can be applied if the defendant or their agent refuses to sign the acknowledgement, or if the serving officer is unable to locate the defendant after due diligence and there appears to be no chance of finding them. In such cases, the service of summons can be done by fixing a copy of the summons on the outer door or a conspicuous part of the defendant's residence or business location. Additionally, if the court is satisfied that the defendant is avoiding service, the summons can be affixed in a conspicuous place at the courthouse or at places where the defendant has conducted business or resided .
The court limits the use of substituted service by stating that it should not be used as a regular mode of service and should only be employed as a last resort. The court requires clear evidence that the defendant is actively avoiding service or that personal service is impossible after due diligence before allowing substituted service .
When multiple defendants are involved in the same case, the summons must be served individually to each defendant. This ensures that each party is equally informed and accountable under the law .
If the defendant is absent during the attempted personal service, a summons may be delivered to any adult or female family member residing in the defendant's household. However, servants do not qualify as family members, thereby limiting who can receive the service on the defendant's behalf .
If the defendant resides within the court's jurisdiction, the summons is served through the court officer or an approved courier service. However, if the defendant is outside the court's jurisdiction, the summons is served through an officer of the court within the jurisdiction where the defendant resides .
The case of Basant Singh vs Roman Catholic Mission (2002) underscores that substituted service should not be the default approach and should only be considered as a final option. This precedent emphasizes careful judicial consideration before opting for substituted service, reinforcing its use solely in scenarios where normal service methods have been exhausted or deemed impractical .
After delivering a summons, the serving officer must make an endorsement on the original summons regarding the delivery, which serves as official proof and documentation of the service performed .
Improper reliance on substituted service as a primary method can undermine the fairness of the legal process, potentially violating defendants' rights by not ensuring their awareness of the proceedings. It can lead to default judgments that may later be overturned, prolonging legal resolutions and increasing court burdens, and challenge the legitimacy of court decisions if procedural fairness standards are not maintained .
The court may allow a plaintiff to serve a summons in addition to the service by the court to ensure timely and effective communication, reflecting the flexibility of service arrangements. This allows for alternative methods when standard procedures may not be effective or practical, demonstrating judicial adaptability to specific case circumstances .
If a defendant refuses acceptance of a summons offered by post, the court can declare that the summons has been properly served as long as the court receives an acknowledgment signed by the defendant or their agent. Alternatively, if the defendant refuses outright, the court may proceed with substituted service as necessary .