MRP Workshop Overview and Insights
MRP Workshop Overview and Insights
MRP I
• Material Requirement Planning ERP
MRP II MRP II
ERP
• Enterprise Resource Planning
Introduction
MRP I MRP II ERP
Stand for Material Requirement Stand for Manufacturing Resource Stand for Enterprise Resource
Planning. Planning. Planning.
Marketing
Nature of Demand and Supply
The Nature of Demand
Independent demand :
• The Independent Demand occurs(Forecasted) by the request of
customers for products.
• usually used for production planning/MPS and is not used for
MRP.
dependent demand :
• The dependent Demand is calculated according to the independent
demand.
Demand
is the number of units of a specific product that its consumers are
willing to purchase at each price
Nature of Demand and Supply
Push Pull
Push vs Pull Strategy
• Products are from production up • In a pull-based supply chain, procurement,
to the retailers. production, and distribution are demand-
Logic • This means that production
driven rather than based on predictions
happens based on demand • Goods are produced in the
forecast. amount and time needed.
• A push production creates How it • No dependency on Demand nor • Dependent on Demand and
products without having a work limits on WIP. limitations to WIP.
specific customer request (make- • The Pull System is a lean manufacturing
• A company using the push system will forecast
to-stock). demand and employ the Material method that uses the Just-in-Time strategy of
MRP Link Requirements Planning (MRP) process to not producing goods until an order is
produce goods and services ahead of time. This received. Instead of forecasting demand, the
is related to the Just-in-Case concept. pull system produces ‘as needed’.
• The push system is particularly useful for • This is particularly useful for companies
When to products with low demand uncertainty that deal with high demand uncertainty,
• A pull production supposedly use or with high importance of economies of low product mix, and low importance of
produces only if there is a request scale in reducing costs. economies of scale.
for a product by the end
customer (make-to-order).
Types of Work
The types of work and the relationships
Material Planning
Inventory Control
(MRP)
Introduction
MRP Definitions
1. What is Needed ?
3. When is Needed ?
Product
The Planning
Data MRP Structure (BOM)
The Inventory
Record
Inputs of MRP
1. The Master Production Scheduling
• The master schedule outlines the anticipated production activities of the plant.
• Developed using both internal forecasts and external orders.
• it states the quantity of each product that will be manufactured and the time frame in which they will be needed.
• The master schedule separates the planning horizon into time "buckets," which are usually calendar weeks.
• The schedule must cover a time frame long enough to produce the final product.
• It is important to note that master schedules are often generated according to demand and without regard to capacity.
• An MRP system cannot tell in advance if a schedule is not feasible, so managers may have to run several possibilities
through the system before they find one that works.
Inputs of MRP
2. The Bill of Materials (BOM)
• A listing of all Qnty of the raw materials, parts, subassemblies, and assemblies needed to produce one unit of a product.
• Bill of Materials used to in conjunction with the Master Production Schedule (MPS) to determine the items for which
purchase requisitions and the Production orders must be released.
C is a parent of D
D is a child of C
Single BOM
Inputs of MRP
B. Multi Level Bill Of Materials (BOM)
• Takes more work to create but offers greater details and specificity on the parent and child parts in the product.
• The total material required is shown. Additionally, the product structure is indented to show the relationship
between the parent and child product, as well as assemblies and subassemblies
Represent BOM
Modular Planning
Single Level BOM Multi Level BOM
BOM
Summarized
Indented BOM
BOM
Summarized BOM
Inputs of MRP
What Is a Subassembly?
• Several components put together to make a unit, which can then be used as a part for a larger assembly, or a
finished product.
• A subassembly can also function as a finished product too, which can be sold separately to customers or used to
finish the construction of another product.
• Subassembly is, as this is a key part of developing your multi level BOM.
• It’s important to know what a This means you’ll need intimate knowledge of your materials, components, and
subassemblies to carefully develop your indented bill of materials.
Inputs of MRP
Importance and Purpose of Multi Level BOM
The purpose of having your multi level BOM is
• Overview of Assemblies: To have greater details and specificity on the parent and sub-assemblies in the product, and
their exact relationship between the sub assemblies and the finished product.
• Prevent Errors when Dealing with Sub-Assemblies: If your manufacturing business is scaling, it becomes necessary
to breakdown your products into sub-assemblies, and them into smaller sub-assemblies and components and so
on, which will be essential in preventing errors and help accurately tracking parts.
Inputs of MRP
C. Modular Planning BOM
• A modular bill of materials (modular BOM) is type of bill of materials (BOM) and a critical element in defining the
product structure of an end-item.
• Modular BOMs define the component materials, documents, parts and engineering drawings needed to complete
a sub-assembly.
• It may include historical average of demand expressed as percentage of the total demand for all options within a feature
or for specific end item within a product family.
• An artificial graphing of items or events in BOM format used to facilitate the MPS and Materials Planning.
Bicycle
✓ Each part gets a unique code, if the same part code is on a different bill, it will be the same
• Unique identifier exact part.
• Quantities and units ✓ BOMs list the Qnty of each part used to make one unit and the unit of measure is specified.
• This includes gross requirements, scheduled receipts, and the expected amount on hand. It includes other details
for each item as well, like the supplier, the lead-time, and the lot size.
MRP Environment
MPS-Master
Production Schedule
MRP-Material BOM-Bill of
The Planning Data Requirement Materials/The product
Planning Structure
Exploding Number 1
• Also known as horizontal and vertical dependences.
• Establish end items, subassemblies, components and purchased materials gross number relationships.
Netting Number 2
• Also known gross to net.
• It consider the effect of the current inventories levels.
• Used to calculate the Net Requirements.
Offsetting Number 3
• Also known Lead time offsetting.
• Lead time offsetting is the rime intervals necessary to either manufacturer or purchase the components are referred to
as the lead time.
MRP Environment
External Internal
Lower yields or higher scrap factors than
Changes to customer orders
planned
Material shortages caused by inventory Expedite orders Changes in end-item due date
record inaccuracies
De-expedite orders
B = 2*100 = 200.
We need
C = 1*100 = 100.
for 100 A
D = 10*100 = 1000.
We need
G = 4*2*100 = 800.
for 100 A
Safety stock is the additional inventory that is held by a company to mitigate risk of stockouts, caused by
Safety Stock fluctuations in supply and demand.
• Planned order arrivals of the item (arriving at the beginning of the period).
Planned Order
Receipts • Planned order receipts differ from scheduled receipts in that they have not been released.
The MRP Chart-MRP Logic
2. For the Orders terms
Term Definition
Schedule Order Receipt Planned order to be received in a specific time according to the previous schedule.
Planned order receipt Output of the MRP as a recommendation of when should I receive these order after finishing all process.
Planned Order Release Output of the MRP as a recommendation of when this order should dispatched to the customers.
• it shows the size of one period, and how detailed MRP's plan is depends on how long or what days the
bucket is set.
Time Periods &
(Buckets) • The size of bucket is usually 3 to 7 days, and the period to be planned is mostly 3 to 6 months.
• . If the size of bucket is set to 3 days, the planned period is set to 3 months.
• The bucket quantity is related to the MRP's processing time, and thus it should be set within the
necessary period of time.
The MRP Chart-MRP Logic
3. For the Time Periods & (Buckets)
The MRP Chart-MRP Logic
4. For the Item
As shown in the figure, for example, the low level code of Part b used at Level
1 and Level 2 is 2 in Product Z. The low level code set in this way is registered
to each item, and is used to perform a level-by-level explosion.
The MRP Chart-MRP Logic
• The Lead time
Lead time refers to the time taken – or allowed for – between the start and
completion of an operation or project
• Cycle time is the time it takes from the start to the end for an internal process.
• lead time is the duration it takes from the start to the end to fulfill a customer’s request
The MRP Chart-MRP Logic
• Related terms Involving times
The MRP Chart-MRP Logic
Lot Sizing The lot Size decision should not be made lightly.
Lot Size decision affect Factor affecting the Lot Size decision Methods to determine the best Lot Size
Period
Lot for Lot
Order
Method to (L4L).
Quantity
determine
the best
Lot Size
Part
Least Unit
Period
Cost
Balancing
The MRP Chart-MRP Logic
Lot Sizing 2. Lot for Lot (L4L)
Assuming the L4L logic
• Orders can be for any Qnty.
• Orders exists in exact quantity that is actually needed, this result in no On-Hand
Ordering inventory.
and
Carrying • In practice no on hand inventory doesn’t always occur because orders arrivers late or
Cost. early, orders are cancelled or Qnty are deliver are under or over those ordered.
Period
Lot for Lot
Order
Method to (L4L).
Quantity
determine
the best
Lot Size
• This method is usually used for perishable food items or for items for which the market fluctuates widely.
• This Method is consistent with the Just in time philosophy of eliminating all unrequired inventory.
The MRP Chart-MRP Logic
Lot Sizing 3. Least Unit Cost
• This method produces the demands for the present period, then on a trail basis,
evaluate future periods.
Ordering
and
Carrying
Cost.
Period
Lot for Lot
Order
Method to (L4L).
Quantity
determine
the best
Lot Size • The Lot Size Computations of the LUC Method
Least Total
Cost
The MRP Chart-MRP Logic
Lot Sizing 5. Part Period Balancing
• Part Period Balancing is a variation of the LTC Least Total Cost approach. It converts
the ordering cost to its equivalence in part periods.
Where
𝑠 EPP >>>is the economic part period.
𝐸𝑃𝐸 = S >>>is the ordering cost.
𝑘
Ordering K >>>>is the carrying cost of one unit for one period.
and
Carrying
Cost.
Period
Lot for Lot
Order
(L4L).
Quantity
Method to
determine
the best
Lot Size
Application of Part
Part Period Least Unit
Balancing Cost Period Balancing.
Least Total
Cost
• Since 116 is the closet value to 115, the requirements for period 2 through 5 should be
included in the order due in Period 1.
The MRP Chart-MRP Logic
Lot Sizing 6. The Period Order Quantity (POQ)
• This method uses the standard EOQ, Calculating a fixed number of period
Ordering
and Carrying
requirements to include in each other.
Cost.
• The POQ avoids remnants (the quantities carried in inventory until the
Period
Order
Lot for Lot next requirements.
(L4L).
Quantity
Method to
• Using EOQ for discrete demand frequency results in
determine
the best
remnants.
Lot Size
Steps to Calculate the POQ
Part Period Least Unit
Balancing Cost 1. Calculate the EOQ in the standard Manner.
Least Total
2. Use EOQ to calculate N (Number of orders per year).
Cost
3. Calculate the POQ
According to the Following
Where
[Link] the ratio 𝐸𝑂𝑄/𝑅
R is the annual requirements.
𝐸𝑂𝑄 = 2𝑅𝑆/𝐾𝐶
𝑅
S is the Ordering Cost.
K is Holding cost. OR 2. POQ= 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜 ∗ 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑑𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟
𝑁= C is Carrying Cost (Interest rate).
𝐸𝑂𝑄 N is the numbers of orders per year.
Ordering
and Carrying
Cost.
Period
Lot for Lot
Order
(L4L).
Quantity
Method to
determine
the best Lot
Size
Least Total
Cost
• This approach does not minimize ordering and carrying costs, but it frequently is less costly than ordering each period or
arbitrarily selecting a fixed order period.
To be continued next Session
Next Session- Inventory Management
Thank you
A multi-level BOM is significant because it provides a detailed map of the component relationships in a product, resembling a family tree. It specifies parent-child relationships between components, crucial for complex assemblies, making it easier to identify and isolate issues in subassemblies. This detailed structure is preferable in complex manufacturing processes, where tracking, modifications, and error prevention are critical. Unlike a single-level BOM, multi-level BOMs prevent errors by offering precise levels of detail needed for intricate product production .
Determining optimal lot sizes involves considering inventory levels, setup and ordering costs, capacity requirements, and delivery constraints. Factors such as the number of BOM levels, setup or purchasing costs, carrying costs, and the low-level code of items also play a crucial role. Methods like Lot-for-Lot, Least Unit Cost, Least Total Cost, and Part Period Balancing are used to balance ordering and carrying costs, ensuring cost efficiency while meeting production schedules .
Low-level coding enhances MRP efficiency by ensuring that all requirements for a component are aggregated at the lowest level of demand in a BOM structure, allowing for a clearer overview and precise planning. This coding method helps in performing level-by-level explosions, crucial in complex product structures, to avoid duplications and ensure accurate net requirements. By using low-level codes, a more organized and systematic approach to gathering and processing material requirements is achieved, thus facilitating effective inventory management and production scheduling .
A well-defined BOM aids in accurate tracking of required materials, ensuring that inventory levels are kept optimal, thereby preventing overproduction and underutilization. It facilitates the planning and scheduling of purchases, contributing to robust supply chains and reducing waste. By detailing all parts and assemblies required for production, a BOM supports cost management by offering transparency in cost estimation and helping identify potential savings in material and production processes .
The 'Lot for Lot' (L4L) strategy involves ordering only the exact amount needed for production, aligning closely with Just-in-Time principles by eliminating excess inventory. It is particularly effective for items with volatile demand or perishability, as it reduces holding costs and minimizes waste. However, it requires precise demand forecasting and reliable suppliers to avoid stockouts or delays. L4L is beneficial in scenarios where storage costs are high or when products have a short life cycle .
Part Period Balancing (PPB) is used by converting ordering costs to their equivalence in part periods, thus balancing between demand and supply over several periods. This approach helps equalize handling and setup costs across periods, minimizing total inventory costs compared to one-time large orders. Advantages over other lot-sizing techniques include better adaptation to demand fluctuations, reduced storage costs, and enhanced alignment with manufacturing cycles. PPB results in more stable and predictable production schedules .
The evolution of a BOM starts with the Initial (Concept) stage, which lists components with their prices, MOQs, lead times, and suppliers. It gives a rough idea of total cost and complexity. In the Design and Development stage, detailed information is confirmed as prototypes are developed, allowing for reliable total cost estimation. During the Initial Manufacturing and Manufacturing stage, the BOM continues to evolve due to Engineering Change Requests and supplier performance evaluations. Each stage adds more precise data and reflects adjustments necessary for production .
Cycle time refers to the duration from the start to the end of an internal process, while lead time encompasses the total time from the initiation of a customer's order to its fulfillment. In production planning, cycle time affects internal efficiency processes, while lead time impacts customer satisfaction and supply chain responsiveness. Both need to be optimized to ensure that production can meet customer demands promptly while maintaining efficient operations .
Modular Planning BOM plays a significant role by outlining the components, documents, parts, and engineering drawings needed for a subassembly. It facilitates Material Requirements Planning (MRP) by defining the product structure for an end-item. The benefits include simplified planning by grouping similar parts or features under a common module, which aligns with various product options. Modular BOMs improve flexibility and efficiency in production, especially for customizable products, reducing errors in assembly and allowing precise demand forecasting .
MRP is designed to answer three key questions: what is needed, how much is needed, and when is it needed. These questions are essential because they help in planning the procurement and production schedules efficiently. Accurately knowing these aspects ensures that materials are available when needed without overstocking, minimizing storage costs, and aligning production schedules to meet customer demands effectively .