Foundations in Building Construction
Foundations in Building Construction
Chapter 4
Foundations
4.1 Introductions
A foundation is that part of a structure which is in direct contact with the ground to which the loads are
transmitted. It is the lowest part of a structure which transmits the weight of the structure, together with
the effect of live loads and pressure, to the material on which the structure rests in such a manner that
the underlying material is not stressed beyond its safe bearing capacity. Generally, the foundations are
placed below the ground level, to increase the stability of a structure or building. Foundations are
normally placed below the ground surface. The part of the building below the surface of the ground is called
the sub-structure and that above the ground is called the super-structure. The soil or rock on which a
building rests may also be called the foundation, and its surface the foundation bed.
4. Lateral stability:
It anchors the super-structure to the ground, thus imparting lateral stability to the super-structure.
The stability of the building, against sliding and overturning due to horizontal forces is increased due
to foundations.
5. Safety against undermining:
It provides structural safety against undermining or scouring due to burrow animals and floodwater.
6. Protection against soil movements:
Special foundation measures prevent or minimize the distress (or cracks) in the super- structure, due
to expansion or contraction of the sub-soil because of moisture movement in some problematic soil.
liable to damage and the most difficult to get at after the completion of the building, the need for it to be
satisfactorily designed and constructed, right from the beginning, should be strongly emphasized.
Foundations have to be strong enough to resist deformations. If, however, extensive and unequal settlement
occurred, serious damage may result in the form of cracked walls, distorted door and window openings.
A foundation should therefore be sufficiently strong to prevent marked and unequal settlement, which may
be caused by:
i. weak sub soils such as made-up ground,
ii. shrinkage of subsoil’s (e.g. soft clay),
iii. movement of ground water,
iv. excessive vibration due to machinery, such as in pile driving,
v. slipping of strata on sloping sites, and
vi. Subsequent building operations involving deep excavations on an adjacent site.
The selection of foundation type depends on a number of factors, which include:
nature of soil,
size and weight of the structure,
climate (seasonal) variation of ground water level,
building laws and relationship of the floor to the grade line i.e. slope.
4.3.1 Sub-soil conditions
Certain sub-soils, for instance made ground from industrial waste products and ground water may contain
chemicals, such as sulfates of calcium and sodium, and acids and may cause serious damage to foundations
and foundation walls of normal Portland cement concrete. Chemical analysis of such soils and under-ground
water is therefore necessary. Lean concrete especially is liable to chemical attack and dense concrete mixes
are less vulnerable.
The foundation concrete should therefore be composed of special cement, such as sulfate resisting Portland
cement if the concentration of sulfate is very high. Cement mixes of Portland blast furnace cement (GGBS
cement) and high alumina cement concretes are more resistant to chemical attack than normal Portland
cement concrete. In some cases it may be necessary to protect the concrete with asphalt or asphalt coat.
4.3.2 Foundation Material
All materials for foundation shall be water resistant, sufficiently strong, soil-acid resistant and immune from
termite. As a result there are no many kinds of materials, which satisfy these requirements. The use of some
typical materials for foundation purposes is summarized below.
a) Basalt: it is the best foundation material used for all types of foundation in different form.
b) Trachyte: they are of variable strength and durability. In general, they are good foundation
materials.
c) Granite: it is good foundation material, but never used because of its high cost.
d) Sandstone: Generally of two kinds, strong and soft. The strong sandstone is good foundation
material.
e) Limestone: It is of variable strength. The strong limestone is a good foundation material.
f) Shale: Generally weak and thus not used as a foundation material.
g) Concrete: It is a foundation material most commonly employed for small as well as large buildings.
It has great strength but it ought to be protected against large scale attacks by water below the
ground if not specially mixed. Sub-soil water sometimes contains aggressive carbonic acid. The
carbonic acid in the coarse of time will attack, and destroy the concrete.
h) Wood: Wood is not recommendable for anything but relatively small buildings. In such cases, it
must be a shard kind of wood that resists decay and attack by termites, e.g. Tid; olive (Weira). Zigba
is never to be used underground and only red colored eucalyptus can be used.
i) Iron: Iron shall not be used uncovered as it rusts very rapidly when in contact with the soil. For this
reason it is primarily used as reinforcement bars in concrete.
Spread footings are also classified into three further groups based on the type of construction. They are
simple footings, stepped footings and grillage foundation footings. Simple footings project only a few cm
beyond the edges of the walls or other structures supported by them. They are used when only light loads
come on to the wall. Stepped footings are necessary when a wider distribution of the load is to be ensured
and also a uniform spreading from the top of the footing to the bottom is desired. Grillage foundation
footings consist of steel or wooden joists arranged in a stepped manner.
For light loads, simple footings are constructed having projections beyond the width of the wall, on either
side. These projections are generally not greater than 15cm on either side. As a thumb rule for small
footings the base width of concrete bedding should be twice the width of the wall. The depth of the concrete
bedding should be at least twice the projections. The base may be of concrete slab or completely built up
of bricks or stones. In case no concrete base is provided, the wall is built up in steps to transmit the
load safely. Rich mortar is used to join the bricks. This type of foundation is rarely used these days as
it is not economical.
When the width of foundation is considerably more than the wall width, it is economical to make the
brick footing stepped over a level concrete bed as shown in Fig 2. The footing should be designed
properly otherwise the upward reaction from soil will have a tendency to break or crack the concrete
bed. The concrete used in footings consists of ordinary Portland.
(1) Depth of Footing. The minimum depth of footing is given by Rankine's formula as,
2
P 1 sin
D
w 1 sin
The minimum depth of footing for the load bearing wall is limited to 90 cm for the stability. In case of
clayey soils or black, cotton soils, the footing is taken down to a depth below where there is no danger of
shrinkage cracks.
2. Width of Footing. It is obtained by dividing the total load including dead load, live load and wind load by
the allowable bearing capacity of the soil.
T
B
P
3. Depth of Concrete Bed. The depth of concrete bed of the footing depends upon the projection of the
concrete block beyond the footing over it, the upward soil pressure and the quality of the concrete. The
concrete block may fail in bending, crushing, or shearing. It is a general practice to design the depth of
concrete bed by the consideration of maximum bending moment. The following formula may be used to
determine the depth of the concrete bed :
d 0.775m
Problem
Design the foundation of a three storeyed residential building whose foundation will rest on sandy soil with
angle of response of 300 and safe bearing capacity of 15 tonnes per sq. m. The soil weighs of 1600 kg. per
cubic metre. The walls are 30 cm. thick and 13.0 metre high above the ground level including parapet. The
roof consists of 15cm. thick R. C. C. slab and 10 cm. thick average lime-terracing. The floors are made up of
10 cm. thick R.C.C. slab covered with 25 mm. of Indian Patent Stone (l.P.S.) flooring, the maximum span of
the R.C.C. slab for the roof or floors between two main walls is 5 metres. The weight of R.C.C. may be
assumed as 2200 kg 1m3 and that of lime concrete as 1800 kglm3.
These footings are sometimes known as column footings and are used to support the individual columns,
piers or other concentrated load. Most column footings are slab footings with two-way reinforcements and
constant depth. They could either be stepped types or can have projections in the base concrete as shown
typically in Fig. 3. Isolated footing is provided under column to transfer the load safely to the soil bed. An
offset of at least 150 mm is provided in the concrete bed on all sides. When brick masonry columns are
used, they are stepped down on all the four sides in regular layers with 50 mm offsets.
The use of concrete footings become essential when concrete columns are used. The footing may be a slab,
stepped, or sloped ones. Steel reinforcement is provided in both directions with proper cover. Fig 2 illustrate
various types of the isolated R.C.C. columns.
If such a column was centered on an isolated footing, the footing might project over property line. If it were
placed near the edge of such a footing, the foundation pressure would not be symmetrically distributed and
the footing would tend to settle unevenly. This condition can be overcome by combining the wall or column
footing and the nearest interior footings i.e a single footing.
Combined footings are so proportioned that the centroid of the area which bears on the soil lies on the line
of action of the resultant of the column loads, in order to avoid any tendency to rotate. The result is usually a
trapezoidal footing. It is ordinarily assumed that arrangement also produces uniform pressure distribution
under the footing.
Combined footings can also have rectangular shape if the load on the interior columns is heavier than the
outer columns and the inward projection of the footing can be adjusted. Combined footings are usually built
of reinforced concrete. However, steel grillage combined footings are also used. Typical reinforced concrete
combined footing layouts are shown in Fig 4.
As described above the shape of the combined footing is proportioned in such a way that the centre of
gravity of the resultant area is in the same vertical line in the centre of gravity of the loads. Generally, the
shape of the footing is rectangular or trapezoidal.
Problem 2. Two columns 50 cm x 50 cm and 60 cm x 60 cm carry 80 tonnes and 120 tonnes of loads
respectively. The centre to centre distance between the columns is 5.20 metres. The allowable bearing
capacity of the soil is 20 tlm2. Determine the dimensions of the combined footing if the footing is not to
project more than 25 cm beyond the outside of the smaller column.
The analytical solution for cantilever footing requires two simplified assumptions that uniform soil
pressures are obtained beneath each footing pad, and the strap or beam connecting the two footings is
perfectly rigid. Under this assumption, the resultant of the column loads would coincide with the center of
gravity of the two footing areas. Cantilever footings can be built of steel as well. Typical strap or cantilever
footings are shown in Fig. 5.
There are a number of different types of strips which include masonry strips; concrete strips – plain and
reinforced; trench fill – concrete and stone; reinforced beam strips –rectangular and inverted T, and these
are described in the following sections.
Strip footings are commonly used for the foundations to load-bearing walls. They are also used when the
pad foundations for a number of columns in line are so closely spaced that the distance between the pads is
approximately equal to the length of the side of the pads. (It is usually more economic and faster to excavate
and cast concrete in one long strip, than as a series of closely spaced isolated pads.). They are also used on
weak ground to increase the foundation bearing area, and thus reduce the bearing pressure – the weaker the
ground then the wider the strip. When it is necessary to stiffen the strip to resist differential settlement, then
tee or inverted tee strip footings can be adopted. Typical examples are shown in Fig.6.
which the low bearing capacity of soil necessitates such large isolated footings that it is reasonable to
joint them altogether. If the sum of the base areas of the footings required to support a structure
exceeds about half the total building area then it is preferable to combine the footings into a single raft.
Thus, raft can be assumed as a large footing.
In general raft foundations consist of reinforced concrete slabs covering the entire foundation area and
constitute a form of foundation where the loads from load-bearing walls or columns are distributed over the
whole area of the building or beyond it. They have a loading distribution similar to inverted floors, the
upward pressure of the soil being fairly uniform under the whole raft. The concrete slab, being subjected to
bending stresses, must be reinforced with layers of closely spaced reinforcing bars running at right angles to
each other in both directions and may or may not need to incorporate beams, according to the structural
arrangement, spans between load bearing walls or columns.
Types of rafts: Flat plate type, flat plate with pedestal and two way beam and slab type. See figure 8.
1. When the load of the structure is very heavy but the bearing capacity of soil is so low that small
individual footings cover more than half of the area under the structure, then use of raft foundation will
be economical. This will develop the minimum contact pressure and in most cases the maximum safety
factor against soil failure.
2. In highly compressible soils the settlements under individual footings are quite high. Provision of a raft
foundation is the only solution in such circumstances. Sometimes the depth at which the raft is placed is so
great that the unit load from the building becomes equal to the unit weight of the soil that has been
excavated. Such type of raft is known as floating foundation. . .
3. Localised weak spots and loose pockets in soil mass can be bridged safely by a raft foundation but the
size of the weak spot must be known so that it can be designed properly. Ordinarily a soft area smaller than
one-third the column spacing does not pose any serious problem in bridgiag, Large weak area requires
special treatment.
4. Raft is very useful for resisting large hydraulic uplift. Firstly, the weight of the raft and columns etc. resist
the uplift. Secondly, it is easier to make structurally continuous foundation watertight than individual
footing with separate floor slabs.
5. Sometimes people use pile foundation in place of raft foundation thinking that pile foundation is always
good. Actually, sometimes pile foundation may be harmful whereas raft foundation will be economical.
Following example will illustrate the point. There is a thick layer of fairly firm clay over a deep layer of soft
clay. Soil investigations may show that the firm clay is having enough bearing capacity as a distributing raft
over the soft clay; If instead of raft, the pile is used then piles may destroy this advantage of spreading the
load and thereby decreasing the unit pressure on the soft clay which will increase the settlement .
The advantage of raft over strip foundation is that the building becomes monolithic and any weak patches in
bearing soil do not cause local subsidence. The foundation, if adequately reinforced, stands or sinks in one
unit. Rafts are therefore especially suitable for soils of variable or unreliable bearing capacity, such as soft
clay or other weak sub-soils.
The minimum foundation depth below ground level of 1.00 – 1.20m or more for strip foundations on clay
soils is not applicable to raft foundations, which can be as shallow as consistent with complete coverage and
floor level. The raft can have the dual function of foundation and site concrete.
If for some reasons beams have to be incorporated, a raft foundation can be given the form inverted T-
beams of reinforced concrete with the slab covering the entire foundation. The beams run in both directions
and intersect under the columns. These are poured at same time as the slab forming a monolithic structure,
which will act as a unit. Before basement floor is placed, the space between these beams may be filled with
cinders or other materials.
If the slab is placed at the top of the beams and monolithic with the raft, the raft may serve the basement
floor and save excavation and filling. This construction is suitable for a soil that will stand without casing so
that the space occupied by the beams can be excavated and whole mat poured without the use of forms.
Common types of mat or raft foundations sections are shown in Fig. 8.
When raft foundation is constructed it is preferable to pour the entire slab in one operation in order to avoid
construction joints. To safeguard bearing soil under external walls from drying shrinkage, rafts should
preferably extend 0.50m or more; beyond outside walls, alternatively the perimeter bearing soil may be
protected by a concrete apron around the building, forming a path. Centers of gravity of structure and raft
should approximately coincide; this is likely to occur in most cases, unless there is some heavy load, such as
large chimney stock, near to perimeter of the building, in which case the raft projection may need to be
increased near this edge to avoid eccentric loading on the raft.
Raft foundations are not suitable for steeply sloping sites, where excavation at upper end of the building
would be excessive, nor are raft foundations generally suited to framed buildings with heavy concentrated
(column) loads, where raft thickness and reinforcement would need to be excessive.
Determination of Bearing capacity of Raft foundation
For granular soils
N 3
Safe Bearing Capacity, q (in tones / sq. ft)
5
N value is obtained from standard penetration test.
The raft foundations are normally large and the bearing capacity of sand increases with the width of the
foundation. Hence bearing capacity failue of raft foundation on sand deposits may be ruled out. For the
same soil pressure the differential settlement is less for the raft foundation as compared to the individual
footings. Hence the allowable soil bearing pressure in case of raft foundation can be increased.
For Clay soil
b
UltimateBearing Capacity, Qult 2.85 * Qu 1 0.3 *
L
Where, Qu= Unconfined compressive strength of clay
L=Length
b=width
This is an element of construction placed and driven into the ground either vertically or slightly inclined to
increase the load carrying capacity of the soil and transfer the load of the superstructure to the selected strata
safely. They are used to transfer the weight of the building on to the soil at a depth greater than would be
economically feasible with spread foundations. In spread foundations, the loads are transmitted directly to
the soil by the foundation. In pile foundations, the loads are transmitted first into the pile, which in-turn
transmit then to the soil or rock.
Foundation structures rarely consists of a single pile. Generally, there will be a minimum of two or three
piles under a foundation element or footing. Building codes may stipulate the minimum number and
arrangement of piles under a building element.
Piles are structural numbers of timber, concrete, and/or steel that are used to transmit surface loads to lower
levels in the soil mass. This transfer may be by vertical distribution of the load a long the pile shaft or direct
application of load to a lower stratum through the pile point.
Piles are long and slender members which transfer the load to deeper soil or rock of high bearing capacity
avoiding shallow soil of low bearing capacity. The main components of the foundation are the pile cap and
the piles.
These piles transfer their load on to a firm stratum located at a considerable depth below the base of the
structure and they derive most of their carrying capacity from the penetration resistance of the soil at the toe
of the pile . It is used to transfer the superimposed load to a hard strata at a considerable depth. The pile
behaves as an ordinary column and should be designed as such. Even in weak soil a pile will not fail by
buckling and this effect need only be considered if part of the pile is unsupported, i.e. if it is in either air or
water. Load is transmitted to the soil through friction or cohesion. But sometimes, the soil surrounding the
pile may adhere to the surface of the pile and causes "Negative Skin Friction" on the pile. This, sometimes
have considerable effect on the capacity of the pile. Negative skin friction is caused by the drainage of the
ground water and consolidation of the soil. See Fig 9,11 and 12.
Friction pile
It transfers the superimposed load to the soft soil by frictional forces existing between the ground and the
periphery of the pile. That is to mean its carrying capacity is derived mainly from the adhesion or friction of
the soil in contact with the shaft of the pile. See Fig 10, 11 and 12.
Battered Pile: It is an inclined pile constructed to resist inclined forces. See Fig 12.
Sheet Pile: It is thin member of steel sheet or timber used as pile. See Fig 12.
Under–ream pile – It is a pile with one or more bulbs in its vertical shaft. These bulbs are known as under-
reams and it increases the bearing capacity of the soil considerably.
2 0
A.M Wellington, editor of Engineering News proposed this formula based on his experience. Safe Bearing
capacity of pile is given by:
W .R
Q
F (S C )
3. There is uncertainty about the relationship between the dynamic and static resistance of soil.
4. Dynamic formulae are ill-suited for clay because skin friction developed in clay during driving is
very much less than which occurs after a period of time. In clayey soil, the point resistance is more
during driving because of development of pore pressure but later on the point resistance decreases after
the dissipation of pore pressure. Hence it cannot be used for saturated clays.
5. In Engineering News' formula the weight of the pile and its inertia effect is not taken into account.
6. Dynamic formulae do not give any idea about probable settlement in future.
Seeing the above limitations of dynamic formulae, a number of static formulae are also used for the
determination of bearing capacity. The static bearing capacity formulae of piles are based on the
assumption that the total resistance offered to a pile by system at a critical load is equal to the sum of
the total ultimate skin friction Rf and the total end bearing resistance at the top of the pile, Rp.
Q Ap X p AsY f
Where,
As= Surface area of pile up on which the skin friction acts which will be equal to the length of the pile
multiplied by perimeter of pile.
Vierendeel's Formula. Vierendeel's Pile static bearing capacity formula is based on the earth pressure
theory. The formula assumes that at any depth there is a passive resistance on the pile and the total
resistance is obtained by integrating the unit resistance over the total mantle surface area along the
entire length o fthe pile.
Where,
f = Co-efficient of friction whose values for cast in situ piles and other rough surfaces like concrete or
timber piles = 0.33 and for smooth piles or piles in wet and plastic soils = 0.25.
D = Diameter of pile
The purpose of a pile load test may be either to determine the ultimate bearing capacity of a pile or to
check whether a pile can safely carry its design load as obtained by any of the pile formulae. In the
conventional pile load test the load is applied over the pile cap in equal increments of 1/4th of design
load. Each load is maintained for 24 hours after which the next increment is given and the corresponding
settlement is noted. The full design load should be maintained for a week. Loading is subsequently
increased in steps and finally 1.5 times the design load is again maintained for a week. The load is then
removed and the net settlement is noted. A load settlement curve drawn and the ultimate load is taken to be
the value corresponding to a total settlement of 12 mm, It is also essential that net settlement should not
exceed 6 mm. Fig. 13 shows the load settlement curve for a pile in sandy and clayey soil. The ultimate load
can be determined in sandy soil when the curve begins (Point A) flattening. In clay the curve is practically
straight up to failure. In Fig. 13 point B is the failure point. In some cases the point of failure is evident
whereas in other cases the curve changes slope so gradually that picking the failure point is difficult and
hence any of the following rules may be used for this purpose. See Fig 14 for pile load test.
(a) The test load should be twice the contemplated design load and should be maintained for at least 24
hours and until settlement does not exceed 5.6 mm in 24 hours. The design load shall not exceed one-half
the maximum applied load provided the load settlement curve shows no signs of failure and provided the
permanent settlement of the top of the pile, after removal of all load at completion of the test does not
exceed 6.4 mm.
(b) Observe the load carried without exceeding a total permanent settlement of 6 mm in 48 hours and divide
by a factor of safety of 2.
(c) Observe the point at which no settlement having occurred for 24 hours, the total settlement including
elastic deformation of the pile is not more than 0.25 mm per tone to test load and apply a factor of safety
of2.
(d) One-half or one third of the final load which causes settlement equal to 10% of pile diameter.
(e) Two-third of the final load which causes a total settlement of 12mm.
(j) Mark the point at which the plastic curve breaks sharply and divide by a factor of safety of 2.
(g) Draw tangent lines to the general slope of the upper and lower portion of the curve. Observe the load at
their intersection and divide by a factor of safety of 1.5 or 2. See Fig 13.
Limitation of this method is that pile load tests are generally done on one or two test piles after most of the
piles are already driven. It generally provides an oversafe and costly design except in rare cases while the
pile is unsafe. There are many other limitations also. Such as, it is not possible to arrive at the ultimate
bearing capacity of the pile and separation of skin friction and point resistance is not possible. The latter is
necessary while estimating the bearing capacity of piles used for formulations subjected to scour or
vibration. The set up for the load test on pile has been shown in Fig. 14.
Piles heads should be fitted with metal rings to prevent splitting. After driving timber piles, damaged heads
of piles should be cut back to sound timber and ends treated with preservative. When capped with concrete,
timber pile heads should be embedded in concrete, which surrounds the timberhead by at least 15cm.
Whenever it is necessary to use a longer pile than available in usual length, it is customary to splice the piles
together with their ends abutting each other. Additional strength can be obtained by the use of steel plates
bolted to the sides of the piles. In rare cases, small pieces of timber are bolted around the sides of the pile to
increase the hold of the piles with the ground. this increase the surface area in contract with the soil.
Timber piles deteriorate due to decay or insect attack. Decay in timber piles is caused by the presence of a
certain plant life called fungi, while insect attack is mainly due to termite or marine borers, which live on
the cellulose present in the timber. Therefore adequate treatment of timber before driving is essential.
Timber fully below water throughout the year does not decay. It is desirable to ensure that the variations in
the water level around the timber piles are least. Timber piles may be made mostly resistant to decay by
preservative treatments. Some of the techniques include:
- Chemical preservation: e.g. treating timber with creosote oil under pressure is usually carried out.
The amount to be applied depends up on the type of timber used and the degree of protection
needed. Zinc chloride, copper sulphate, suphur chloride, etc. and used for the same purpose which
are poisonous to the animal life but liable to be washed away by the water table fluctuation.
Chemically treated piles should be handled very carefully so as to avoid the breaking of outer fibers,
which act as protective coverings.
- Mechanical protection: Mechanical protection is afforded by various types of coverings like thin
sheets of metal or a layer of felt soaked in various chemicals.
Reinforcement for precast concrete piles consists of longitudinal bars with hops or spirals. The top end point
of the pile should be provided with additional lateral reinforcement to withstand the driving stresses. Typical
details of precast concrete piles are shown in Fig. 15.
concrete is poured to one meter into this pipe, the pipe is withdrawn; and continue pouring until the
whole pile length
Typical sequence of concrete pouring in cast-in-situ concrete piles is shown in Fig. 16.
Structures built on black cotton soils and other expansive soils often crack due to the differential movement
caused by the alternate swelling and shrinkage of the soil. The use of under-reamed pile foundation provides
a satisfactory answer to such kind of problem. Under-reamed piles are bored and cast-in-situ concrete piles
having bulb shaped enlargement near base.
The principle of this type of foundation is to anchor the structure at a depth where ground movements or
volumetric change of soil due to changes in moisture content or consolidation of the poor strata are
negligible. Under-reamed piles having one bulb are known as single-under-reamed piles and are used for
light structures, whereas piles having two bulbs are known as double-under-reamed piles and are used for
heavy structures. Typical single and double under-reamed piles are shown in Fig.17. Under-reamed piles
may be provided for foundations of structures in poor soils overlying firm soil strata. In such soils for
double under-reamed piles, however, both the under-reams rest shall within the firm soil strata. They have
been found useful for machine foundations, factory building, transmission line towers, and other tall
structures also.
Under-reamed piles can be constructed at a batter also for transferred heavy lateral loads. Hence,
they are also suitable for tower footings, retaining walls and abutments. In sandy soils with high
water-table, it is very difficult to build conventional footings suitable to resist large up thrusts but it is
possible to provide these piles under such circumstances. This makes them more useful for
transmission line and other tall structures where in addition to direct load, anchorage is also needed.
Single under-reamed piles have been used successfully for one and two storey buildings. With one
additional bulb the bearing capacity is increased by about 50%. Hence, by increasing the number of
bulbs, very high capacity piles can be constructed for supporting multi-storeyed buildings and heavy
structures.
Under-reamed piles are quite simple to construct. A vertical bore hole is prepared with an auger to
the required depth. An under-reaming tool is used for enlarging the base. The tool consists of two
sets of collapsible blades and a bucket at the bottom for collecting the soil. It is fixed to the extension
rods and lowered down into the bore hole. As the tool is pressed down and rotated, blades try to
widen out and cut the soil from the sides. The rotation is kept very slow with a steady downward
pressure. When the collecting bucket is full, the under-reamer is withdrawn and the soil is removed
by opening the bottom lid. The tool is again lowered and the process is repeated (Fig 17 C).
For single under-reamed piles the bore is taken down to the full depth by the auger and the base is
enlarged by the under-reaming tool. In double and multi under-reamed piles, boring is first
completed to the depth required for the first under-ream only and after completing the under-
reaming, boring is extended further for the second underream and this process is repeated till
completion. The concreting is done in the usual fashion. Under-reamed piles may be installed both in
sandy or clayey soils. The sides may be stabilised if required by the bentonite slurry. The minimum
distance between the centres of bulb in a multi under-reamed pile is 1.5 du, where du is the diameter
of the bulb (Fig. 17 A and B).
The load carrying capacity of a single under-reamed pile is obtained by the equation:
Qu Qp' Q f Ab * qup As * f s
Qp = Base resistance per unit area of the bulb which may be calculated by any one of the
methods explained earlier.
The load carrying capacity of multi under-reamed pile increases with the increase in the number of
bulbs. See Fig. 18. If the spacing between the centers of bulbs is not more than 1.5 du, the ultimate
load carrying capacity of multi under-reamed piles may be determined by the following equation:
Qu Ab * qup As * f s As' * f s
As = Surface area of cylinder of the diameter du and height equal to the spacing between the
centers of the extreme bulbs;
As = Surface area of the embedded portion of pile shaft above the top bulb.
A pile is not used singularly beneath a column or a wall, because it is extermily difficult to drive a pile
absolutely vertical and to place the foundation exactly over its center line. If eccentric loading results, the
connection between the pile and the column may break or the pile may fail structurally because of the
bending stresses. In actual practice, structural loads are supported by several piles acting as a group.
For instance, for columns a minimum of three piles in triangular pattern are used. For walls piles are
installed in staggered arrangement on both sides of its centre line.
Generally a number of piles are used as a foundation under any structure. The behavior of a group of piles is
quite different from the behavior of a single pile. In case of a single pile, a small pressure bulb is formed
which shows the effect of pressure bulb to a limited depth only. Whereas in case of a group of piles the
pressure bulbs of individual piles overlap laterally and the effect of pressure bulbs reaches to a greater
depth. See figure19 below. If the piles are closely spaced, the pressure in the overlapping area will
cause movement of soil and hence the piles will settle down more. Therefore, some thumb rules
adopted in code of practices are used to determine the spacing between piles. The piles may be
arranged in any shape, depending upon the types of structure and nature of soil encountered.
All the piles of a group are driven into the ground to the desired depth and their top is kept at a
uniform level. All the heads of the piles are joined by a concrete pile cap and over this cap the
superstructure is built.
The loads from the superstructure are transferred to the pile group through a reinforced concrete slab
structurally tied to the pile tops such that the piles act as one unit. The slab is known as pile cup. The load
acts on the pile cap which distributes the load to the piles. The load carrying capacity of a pile is not
necessarily equal to the sum of the capacity of individual piles. Estimation of the load carrying capacity is a
complicated problem. When the piles are closely spaced the stresses transmitted by piles to the soil may
overlap and this may reduce the load carrying capacity of piles. For such case the capacity is limited by the
group action. The bearing capacity od a group of piles depends on the spacing. When piles are spaced a
sufficient distance apart, the group capacity may approach the sum of individual capacities.
The efficiency (a) of a group of piles is defined as the ratio of the ultimate load of the group to the sum of
the individual ultimate loads.
Q
g u ( g ) *100
N * Qu
Thus the group efficiency is equal to the ratio of the average load per pile in the group at which the failure
occurs to the ultimate load of a comparable single pile.
Qu ( g )
g N *100
Qu
Where Qu(g)/N= Average load per pile in a group
Qu(g)= ultimate load of the group
Qu=Ultimate load of the individual pile
N= number of piles in a group
The group efficiency depends up on the spacing of the piles. Ideally, the spacing should be such that the
efficiency is 100%. Generally the centre to centre spacing is kept between 2.5* d and 3.5*d where d is
diameter of the pile. The methods for the determination of the ultimate load of the individual piles have
been discussed earlier.
Driven piles
a) End bearing piles
For driven piles bearing on dense, compact sand with spacing equal to or greater than 3d, the group capacity
is generally taken equal to the sum of individual capacity. Thus
Qu ( g ) N * Qu
In this case, the load taken by the group capacity is much greater than (ηg>100%) the sum of individual
capacities and the piles fail as individual piles.
b) Friction piles
The group efficiency of friction piles in sand is obtained from the following expression
QU ( g ) f s ( Pg * D)
g *100 *100
N 8Qu N * f s ( P * D)
NQu
Qu ( g ) g
100
The group efficiency of friction driven piles on sandy soils can also be determined from the Converse-
Labore equation given below.
(n 1)m (m 1)n
g 1 90
mn
Where m= number of rows of piles
N=number of piles in a row
B
tan 1 ( )
S
B= Diameter of pile
S=centre to centre spacing of pile
Bored Piles
The piles are formed by excavating a hole into the ground and then filling it with concrete. For bored piles
in sand at conventional spacing of 3B, the group capacity is taken as 2/3 to ¾ times the sum of individual
capacities for both the end bearing and friction piles. Thus
2 3
Qu ( g ) to * ( NQu )
3 4
In bored piles, there is limited densification of the sand surrounding the pile group. Consequently their
efficiency is lower.
The lower of the two values obtained by the equations (1) and (2) is the actual capacity.
Similarly whenever the top clayey layers offer larger resistance to the driving of a bearing pile, it is
desirable to use piers. Piers can also be driven conveniently under water.
Piers may be hollow or solid in section. They can be made of bricks, concrete, reinforced concrete,
steel, cast iron, etc. The hollow space is plugged with concrete so as to form a solid section.
struts against each other. One strut in the middle of the board or one at top and one at bottom may be used.
For soft soils the wall sheeting are placed close to each other to prevent the flow of soil in to the excavation.
See Figures 22, 23, and 24.
Assignment 4