Supreme Court Daily Cause List 17-09-2024
Supreme Court Daily Cause List 17-09-2024
1 T.P.(C) No. 832/2024 REDDY (GUNNAPALLI) HEMA @ DELLI KEDAR NATH TRIPATHY
XII-A
Versus
REDDY LOKESH
[SERVICE/COMPLIANCE]-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
4 SLP(C) No. THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. ROOH-E-HINA DUA [P-1],
3007-3008/2012 [P-2]
IV-B
Versus
M/S. ANAPURNA IMPEX PVT. LTD. HARISH PANDEY
5 C.A. No. 7091/2014 DR. SHEFALI JAIN AND ORS. AMIT ANAND TIWARI
III
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . AND ORS. AADITYA ANIRUDDHA
PANDE [R-1], GHAROTE
ANURAG A [R-5]
6 C.A. No. 7237/2012 BHALCHANDRA PANDURANG THALE AND ORS. ABHA R. SHARMA
IX
Versus
DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 17-09-2024
Registrar Court
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . AND ORS. SHISHIR DESHPANDE ,
NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO
KATNESHWARKAR , MEERA
MATHUR , KUSH
CHATURVEDI , AADITYA
ANIRUDDHA PANDE [R-1], V.
D. KHANNA
8 C.A. No. THE [Link] [Link] NALANDA GRAMIN MITTER & MITTER CO.
8355-8356/2014 BANK
XVI
Versus
RITA PRASAD AND ORS.
9 SLP(C) No. 2238/2015 SISH RAM(DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS. GHAN SHYAM VASISHT
IV-B [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5], [P-6],
[P-7], [P-8], [P-9], [P-10],
[P-11], [P-12], [P-13], [P-14],
[P-15]
Versus
RAGHBIR AND ORS. PREETI SINGH [R-4], [R-7], V.
K. VERMA [R-9]
11 SLP(C) No. ALL THE MEMBERS OF BALMIKI SAMAJ AND ANR. BHUWAN RAJ [P-1]
13372-13373/2017 AND ANR.
IV-B
Versus
ALL THE MEMBERS OF DHANAK SAMAJ AND ORS. DEVENDRA SINGH [R-4],
AND ORS. SUSHIL BALWADA [R-1],
[R-3], [R-5]
13 C.A. No. 399/2024 THE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. AKSHAY AMRITANSHU [P-1]
IV
Versus
DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 17-09-2024
Registrar Court
RAJ PAL RANBIR SINGH YADAV
[CAVEAT]
Only C.A. No. 401-403 of 2024 is listed under this
item
IA No. 127561/2017 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
O.T.
13.1 Connected THE STATE OF HARYANA SPECIAL SECRETARY TO AKSHAY AMRITANSHU [P-1]
C.A. No. 401-403/2024 GOVT. OF HARYANA URBAN ESTATE DEPARTMENT
IV AND ORS.
Versus
BALA AND ORS. RAHUL PRATAP [R-19]
18 C.A. No. THE KOLHAPUR ARYA SAMAJ SHIKSHAN SANSTHA ABHA R. SHARMA
8147-8150/2024 AND ORS.
III
Versus
RAVINDRA GANPATRAO JADHAV AND ORS. VATSALYA VIGYA [R-1],
AADITYA ANIRUDDHA
PANDE [R-2], [R-3]
IA No. 102844/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT
IA No. 102845/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
O.T.
IA No. 171402/2023 - PERMISSION TO FILE
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES
IA No. 102848/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILE
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES
19 SLP(C) No. 30694/2018 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 8 RAJ BAHADUR YADAV [P-1]
IX
Versus
M/S HEATSHRINK TECHNOLOGIES LTD
IA No. 139903/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT
23 Diary No. 18856-2019 LATE SH. MOHANLAL THROUGH LRS AND ANR. DIVYESH PRATAP SINGH
IV-C
Versus
DINESH DIED THROUGH LRS AND ORS. PRATIBHA JAIN [R-1.1], [R-2],
[R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6]
30 SLP(Crl) No. 5233/2020 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. AADITYA ANIRUDDHA
II-A PANDE [P-1]
Versus
BALAJI AND ORS. DILIP ANNASAHEB TAUR
[R-2], SUDHANSHU S.
CHOUDHARI [R-37]
DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 17-09-2024
Registrar Court
31 SLP(Crl) No. 6834/2020 [Link] H. CHANDRA SEKHAR [P-1]
II-C
Versus
POORNIMA
32 R.P.(C) No. 433/2024 in UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. RAJ BAHADUR YADAV [P-1]
C.A. No. 3793/2019
XIV-A
Versus
SANJAY KUMAR PATHAK AND ORS.
MADHURIMA TATIA [IMPL]
IN C.A. No. - 3793/2019,
33 SLP(C) No. 5310/2021 RAM RATAN (SINCE DEAD) THROUGH HIS LEGAL VIPIN KUMAR [P-1], [P-1.4],
IV-C HEIRS [P-1.7], [P-1.3], [P-1.6],
[P-1.2], [P-1.5], [P-1.1]
Versus
RAMHIN BAI AND ORS. SAMEER SHRIVASTAVA
[R-2], D. K. DEVESH [R-14],
ANKITA SHARMA [R-14]
36 SLP(C) No. 3868/2022 ZENLAB INDIA (NOW KNOWN AS ZENLAB ETHICA VMZ CHAMBERS [P-1]
IX LTD.) AND ANR.
Versus
LATROS PHARMACEUTICALS PRIVATE LTD. MRINAL GOPAL ELKER
[CAVEAT]
45 SLP(C) No. 20514/2022 NAVYUVAK SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL ATUL BABASAHEB DAKH
IX CHAPOLL
Versus
DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 17-09-2024
Registrar Court
SHIVAJI HARISHCHANDRA CHATE AND ORS. MOHAMMAD ASLAM
[CAVEAT], M. V. KINI &
ASSOCIATES [R-3],
SUDHANSHU S.
CHOUDHARI [R-4]
SHIRISH K. DESHPANDE
[IMPL]
IA No. 171618/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT
IA No. 171619/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
O.T.
IA No. 46753/2023 -
INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT
IA No. 171620/2022 - PERMISSION TO FILE
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES
46 SLP(C) No. 4817/2023 HAL EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY PANKAJ BHAGAT
XII-A LIMITED
Versus
CALVARY TEMPLE AND ORS.
49 SLP(C) No. 9693/2023 SHEELA SRIVASTAVA SINCE DECEASED BY LRS TARUNA ARDHENDUMAULI
XI RAVINDRA NATH SRIVASTAVA AND ORS. PRASAD
Versus
HOUSING COMMISSIONER AND ORS. SHASHANK SINGH [R-1],
AVIRAL SAXENA [R-3]
52 SLP(C) No. JHAGRU (DEAD) THR. LRS AND ORS. ROHIT AMIT STHALEKAR
3093-3094/2023
XI
Versus
DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 17-09-2024
Registrar Court
CHHOTELAL (DEAD) THR. LRS AND ORS. GOURAVE KUMAR AGARWAL
[CAVEAT] [CAVEAT]
IA No. 29488/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
O.T.
53 SLP(C) No. 5837/2023 M/S PUNCHIP ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD. AND ORS. DIVAKAR KUMAR
XIV
Versus
BIBI ALAPE KAUR (DECEASED) AND ORS. PANKAJ KUMAR MISHRA
[R-2], [R-3], KRISHNANAND
PANDEYA [R-4]
54 SLP(C) No. 14549/2023 THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 RAJ BAHADUR YADAV
XI-A BHUBANESWAR
Versus
M/S. POSCO INDIA PVT. LTD.
FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.63328/2023-
CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA
No.63329/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C
OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT
56 SLP(C) No. 14545/2023 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 RAJ BAHADUR YADAV
XI-A
Versus
M/S POSCO INDIA PVT LTD.
58 SLP(C) No. 25004/2023 JAI NARAIN VYAS UNIVERSITY JODHPUR AND ANR. VIKALP MUDGAL
XV
Versus
BHANWAR SINGH GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH
BHATI [CAVEAT]
Only SLP (C) Nos. 25004/2023, 1643/2024,
1870/2024, 13820/2024, 8453/2024 & 8487 /2024
is listed
58.1 Connected JAI NARAIN VYAS UNIVERSITY JODHPUR AND ANR. VIKALP MUDGAL
SLP(C) No. 1643/2024
XV
Versus
MOHAMMAD HUSSAIN
IA No.14876/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C
OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA
No.14877/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 17-09-2024
Registrar Court
58.2 Connected JAI NARAIN VYAS UNIVERSITY, JODHPUR AND ORS. VIKALP MUDGAL
SLP(C) No. 1870/2024
XV
Versus
RAKESH SHARMA K. PAARI VENDHAN [R-1]
IA No.16772/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C
OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA
No.16773/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
58.3 Connected JAI NARAIN VYAS UNIVERSITY, JODHPUR AND ANR. VIKALP MUDGAL
SLP(C) No. 8453/2024
XV
Versus
DEVENDRA RUSHEET SALUJA [R-1]
IA No.78647/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN
FILING and IA No.78648/2024-EXEMPTION
FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT and IA
No.78649/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
58.4 Connected JAI NARAIN VYAS UNIVERSITY, JODHPUR AND ANR. VIKALP MUDGAL
SLP(C) No. 8487/2024
XV
Versus
SATISH BADGUJAR RUSHEET SALUJA [R-1]
FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.80056/2024-
CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA
No.80054/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C
OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and
IA No.80055/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING
O.T.
62 SLP(C) No. 25588/2023 SHRI CHHATRAPATI SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA
IX LTD.
Versus
SHRI. MAHALAKSHMI TRADING COMPANY AND SHASHIBHUSHAN P.
ANR. ADGAONKAR [CAVEAT]
66 SLP(C) No. 28370/2023 THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE BAR AKSHAY AMRITANSHU
XII-A COUNCIL OF INDIA
Versus
A MADHAVA RAO AND ORS.
70 SLP(C) No. 28485/2023 HAMEED SULEMAN @ HAMID SULAIMAN AND ANR. PRANJAL KISHORE
IV-A
Versus
IRSHAD KHALIQ AND ANR. M. A. CHINNASAMY
[ONLY SLP NO. 2109/24 IS LISTED UNDER THIS
ITEM]
73 SLP(C) No. 16285/2024 MUMBAI HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT CHIRAG M. SHROFF
IX BOARD, (MHADA) AND ORS.
Versus
JAYANTIBHAI BABUBHAI PATEL AND ANR. KUNAL CHEEMA [CAVEAT],
ARTI SINGH [R-2]
IA No. 38294/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT
IA No. 51368/2024 - PERMISSION TO FILE
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES
80 SLP(C) No. 10866/2024 THE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. AKSHAY AMRITANSHU
IV-B
Versus
SANDEEP KUMAR R. C. KAUSHIK [R-1]
84 T.P.(C) No. 447/2024 SWAGATA DAS DEB RESHMI REA SINHA [P-1]
XIV
Versus
KAUSHIK DEB
95 SLP(C) No. 8080/2024 PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR. BHARTI TYAGI
IX
Versus
VRINDA SHARAD BAL AND ORS. PRASHANT SHRIKANT
KENJALE [R-1], [R-2]
IA No. 64911/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
O.T.
102 SLP(Crl) No. 6650/2024 TAPASH MAHANTA AND ANR. SOUMYA DUTTA
II-B
Versus
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL
103 T.P.(Crl.) No. 403/2024 PRANAY SUMBLY AND ORS. SHWETA SHARMA
II-A
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR. PASHUPATHI NATH RAZDAN
[R-1], SUDHANSU PALO [R-2]
107 SLP(C) No. 14763/2024 CONFERENCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS (INDIA) (REGD.) PETITIONER-IN-PERSON
XIV
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. NISHIT AGRAWAL [R-3]
109 SLP(C) No. 9476/2024 THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. SAMIR ALI KHAN
XVI
Versus
NEXUS MOTORS PRIVATE LIMITED
DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 17-09-2024
Registrar Court
IA No. 90119/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT
111 T.P.(Crl.) No. 255/2024 MITHLA SAHU AND ORS. UTKARSH SRIVASTAVA
II-B
Versus
SURUCHI KAPOOR AND ANR.
112 T.P.(Crl.) No. 295/2024 HARMINDER SINGH WALIA AND ANR. AMIT KUMAR SINGH
II-A
Versus
SATPAL BABBAR
114 SLP(C) No. 8692/2024 THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER SRAVAN KUMAR KARANAM
XII-A
Versus
M. RAVINDER REDDY AND ANR. HIMINDER LAL [CAVEAT]
117 Diary No. 12844-2024 UT OF J AND K AND ORS. PASHUPATHI NATH RAZDAN
XII-A
Versus
FAIZAN AHMAD WANI AND ORS. SANJANA SADDY [R-1], [R-2],
[R-3], [R-5]
118 SLP(C) No. 10782/2024 CHANDRA KALA SINGH AND ORS. AMIT PAWAN
XVI
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. NAMITA CHOUDHARY [R-8],
[R-9], [R-10], [R-11]
DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 17-09-2024
Registrar Court
IA No. 99630/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT
IA No. 99634/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING
O.T.
121 T.P.(C) No. 1280/2024 CHANDANA @ SINGAMSETTI LAXMI DURGA D. ABHINAV RAO
XII-A
Versus
CHANDANA SRINIVAS RAO
122 T.P.(C) No. 1161/2024 M/S KOHINOOR SEED FIELDS INDIA PVT. LTD DHEERAJ P DEO
XII-A
Versus
M/S VEDA SEED SCIENCES PVT. LTD AND ANR. SINDOORA VNL [R-1], M.
YOGESH KANNA [R-2]
123 SLP(Crl) No. 9536/2024 RAGHU YANE KABEERA DEVASA & CO.
II-C
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.
124 T.P.(C) No. 1325/2024 SAFA ARIF @ SAFA ARJUN GUPTA VIKRANT NARAYAN
IV-B VASUDEVA
Versus
ARJUN VED GUPTA
IA No. 112869/2024 - STAY APPLICATION
127 SLP(C) No. 13082/2024 BABAN GANU MALI AND ANR. PURTI GUPTA
IX
Versus
DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 17-09-2024
Registrar Court
BABAN DINKAR THORAT AND ORS.
IA No. 187111/2024 - CONDONATION OF DELAY
IN FILING THE SPARE COPIES
131 SLP(C) No. 13906/2024 VASUDEV YESSO NAIK AND ANR. NARENDER KUMAR VERMA
IX
Versus
SHRIPAD YESSO NAIK AND ORS. LEGAL OPTIONS [R-2], [R-3],
[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7]
132 SLP(C) No. 13993/2024 SHIVNAGAR VIDYA PRASARAK MANDAL AND ANR. ARVIND S. AVHAD
IX
Versus
VIKRANT BHAUSA PAWAR AND ANR. SAKSHAM MAHESHWARI
[CAVEAT]
135 T.P.(C) No. 1745/2024 NIMISHA ROHIT BAJPAI @ NIMISHA AKHILESH ANWESHA SAHA
IX MISHRA
Versus
DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 17-09-2024
Registrar Court
ROHIT BAJPAI RASHMI SINGHANIA [R-1]
IA No. 146749/2024 - STAY APPLICATION
136 SLP(C) No. 15824/2024 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. MANJEET CHAWLA
IX
Versus
SANDEEP VINAYKUMAR SINGH AND ANR.
NEW DELHI
12-09-2024 17:37:06
ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR
The document shows that interim orders, such as stay orders and exemptions from filings, are frequently employed to maintain the status quo or relieve parties from specific procedural requirements during litigation. For example, in T.P.(C) No. 3205/2023, an ex-parte stay and exemption from filing O.T. is sought via IA No. 250138/2023 and IA No. 250139/2023, allowing the court to temporarily pause actions or procedural requirements while awaiting a final decision . Such orders can prevent prejudice to parties pending a full hearing, illustrating their critical role in managing ongoing litigation effectively.
The document shows that the court's discretionary powers, such as granting stay orders and exemptions, significantly impact case outcomes by ensuring temporary reliefs and preventing potential harm before a final decision is made. For instance, in T.P.(C) No. 3205/2023, the listing of an ex-parte stay indicates the court’s role in managing interim impacts . These powers allow the court to maintain fairness and justice while a comprehensive review is conducted, potentially affecting settlement dynamics and strategic decisions of the involved parties during litigation.
The document highlights the Supreme Court's approach to compliance failures, often requiring applications to condone delays or exemptions when filing procedures are not followed. For example, in C.A. No. 399/2024, there is an exemption from filing O.T. cited in IA No. 127561/2017 . Non-compliance can lead to delays in case processing, additional legal costs, and potential prejudice against a party if applications for condonation or exemptions are denied, illustrating the importance of compliance in maintaining procedural integrity.
Interim applications like condonation of delay (e.g., IA No. 68134/2024) and exemptions can slow down legal proceedings by introducing additional layers of judicial review and decision-making, as shown in the document . These applications require courts to dedicate time and resources to procedural rather than substantive issues, which can delay the resolution of the actual matters at hand. However, while they may slow proceedings, they also ensure fairness by enabling parties to rectify procedural lapses that might otherwise bar access to justice.
The document outlines challenges faced by courts in managing connected cases, including maintaining consistency in judgments and aligning procedural timelines. Instances like Diary No. 37948-2017 having multiple connected cases (e.g., Diary No. 30627-2017, 32100-2017, etc.) demonstrate complexity in coordinating hearings and decisions across similar or linked cases . This coordination ensures that related legal principles and facts are uniformly interpreted, preventing contradictory rulings. Efficiency in managing these complexities can impact resource allocation and case resolution speed, complicating judicial workflow.
The document reveals systemic issues such as frequent delays in filings, the need for condonation applications, and repeated requests for exemptions (e.g., IA No. 65372/2018 and IA No. 68219/2018 for condonation of delay in refiling). These systemic delays reflect inefficiencies that burden judicial resources, contribute to backlog, and potentially delay justice for litigants. Addressing these issues could enhance court efficiency, reduce the need for administrative remedies, and foster timelier case resolutions.
The document contains multiple instances of applications for condonation of delay in filing or refiling legal documents. This indicates the court’s acknowledgment of procedural delays and its role in determining their acceptability. For example, in several cases such as Diary No. 20627-2017 and 32100-2017, IA No. 39345/2018 and IA No. 41058/2018 are filed to condone delays in re-filing or curing defects . These applications, if granted, allow cases to proceed despite procedural lapses, but they also highlight the systemic delays that might affect timely justice. The presence of such applications underscores the need for efficiency in legal procedures and the balancing act courts must perform between procedural strictness and substantive justice.
The document suggests procedural flexibility in the Indian Supreme Court system through the accommodation of numerous filing extensions and exemptions, such as IA No. 116028/2024 for condonation of delay in filing. This flexibility allows the court to maintain procedural fairness by adapting to practical challenges faced by litigants while ensuring that procedural gaps do not necessarily result in case dismissals . Such accommodations reflect a judicial inclination towards substantive justice, emphasizing adaptive approaches within procedural constraints.
The frequent presence of condonation applications in the document, such as IA No. 68218/2018 and others, suggests challenges in strict procedural adherence within legal practice. This prevalence indicates potential issues such as complexity in procedural rules, inadequate legal infrastructure, and resource constraints affecting timely filings . It highlights the balance courts must strike between adhering to procedural rules and considering practical difficulties faced by litigants, reflecting broader challenges in maintaining procedural discipline while ensuring fair access to justice.
The document demonstrates the Supreme Court's procedural priorities through its handling of filing and document management. Repeated listings of condonation and exemption applications (e.g., IA No. 62727/2018 for condonation of delay in filing) reflect a focus on ensuring procedural compliance while accommodating practical delays . This approach aims to balance the need for orderly judicial process with flexibility to address genuine procedural hurdles, showing the court’s commitment to both procedural fairness and effectiveness.