0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views8 pages

Understanding Sense and Reference

Uploaded by

ai4238973
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views8 pages

Understanding Sense and Reference

Uploaded by

ai4238973
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Chapter 3

Reference and Sense

Entry Test

(1) S, U. “John sang wonderfully last night” is both a sentence (S) and an utterance (U).

Sentence: A grammatically complete unit of words expressing a complete thought. Utterance: A spoken or written instance of a
sentence, considering context.

(2) Yes. Sentences can be true or false, depending on their correspondence to reality.

(3) Yes. Utterances are tied to a particular time and place, considering context.

(4) No. Sentences, in general, are not tied to specific times or places without context.

(5) No. Propositions (the meaning or idea expressed by a sentence) are language-independent.

(6) Yes. Utterances can be true or false, considering the context.

Key Concepts: Sentence: grammatical structure. Utterance: spoken/written instance of a [Link]: meaning/idea
expressed by a sentence. Context: influences utterance meaning

1) Introduction

This unit introduces key concepts in semantics, focusing on the distinction between sense and reference.

Key Terms:

1. Sense: Relationships within language (word meanings).

2. Reference: Relationships between language and the world (identifying specific things).

Main Points:

1. Reference connects language to the world, identifying specific objects, people, or concepts.

2. The same expression can have different referents depending on context.

3. Reference is a relationship between language and the world.

Examples:

1. “My son is in the beech tree” – “my son” refers to a specific person.

2. “this page” – refers to a specific sheet of paper (physical object).

3. “your left ear” – refers to the ear touched in response to the instruction.

2) Practice Questions:

1. Last three words: “touch your left ear”.

2. The thing touched is part of the world (physical ear).

3. Yes, “your left ear” is part of the language.

4. No, “your left ear” refers to the mother’s ear in the given context.

Takeaways:

1. Language expressions can have variable reference.

2. Context determines the specific referent.

3. Reference highlights the connection between language and reality.

3) Let’s dive into the practice questions.


(1) Referent of “the present President of the United States”

(a) In 2007: The referent would be George W. Bush.

(b) In 1996: The referent would be Bill Clinton.

(2) Nature of the phrase “the present President of the United States”

The phrase has variable reference, meaning its referent changes depending on the time and context in which it’s used.

(3) Referent of “the President of the United States”

(a) In a conversation about United States politics in 2007: The referent would be George W. Bush.

(b) In a conversation about United States politics in 1996: The referent would be Bill Clinton.

4) Factors influencing reference : The correct answer is (c) both (a) and (b). The reference of an expression varies according to both
the circumstances (time, place, etc.) in which the expression is used and the topic of the conversation.

It’s interesting to note that some expressions have constant reference, meaning their referent remains the same in most everyday
situations. However, phrases like “the present President of the United States” are examples of expressions with variable reference,
where the referent changes depending on the context. ¹

4) Let’s explore the practice questions.

(1) Does “the moon” have constant reference?*

Yes. In most everyday conversations, “the moon” refers to Earth’s natural satellite.

(2) Does “The People’s Republic of China” have constant reference?*

Yes. This phrase typically refers to the country with that official name.

(3) Does “Angola” have constant reference?*

Yes. This geographical term usually refers to the African country.

(4) Does “Halley’s Comet” have constant reference?*

Yes. This phrase consistently refers to the specific comet named after Edmond Halley.

These examples illustrate constant reference, where expressions reliably point to the same entity.

Key Takeaways:

Constant reference occurs when expressions consistently refer to the same object or concept.

Context plays a crucial role in determining reference in language.

Different expressions can share the same referent (e.g., “Morning Star” and “Evening Star” both refer to Venus).

Additional Examples of Constant Reference:

Historical events (e.g., “World War II”)

Scientific concepts (e.g., “gravity”)

Geographical locations (e.g., “Mount Everest”)

However, as the comment suggests, most language expressions rely on context for reference, leading to variable reference in many
cases.

5) Let’s dive into the practice questions.

(1) Can “the President” and “the Leader of the Republican Party” have the same referent in a 2007 conversation about the
United States?

Yes. In 2007, George W. Bush was both the President and the Leader of the Republican Party.
(2) Can “John” and “the person in the corner” have the same referent?

Yes. If John is the only person in the corner, the phrases refer to the same individual.

6) Next, let’s explore sense and semantic relationships.

(1) “fell over” / “fell down”

S (Same meaning)

(2) “It is that Raymond will be here tomorrow” / “Raymond will be here tomorrow”

S (Same meaning)

(3) “Your gatepost doesn’t seem to be quite” / “Your gatepost seems uneven”

S (Same meaning)

(4) “He painted the fireplace” / “He painted the wall”

D (Different meaning)

(5) “I’ll see you on” / “I’ll see you at”

D (Different meaning)

Key Takeaways:

Sense refers to an expression’s semantic relationships within the language.

Sameness of meaning is a fundamental semantic relationship.

Sense applies to words, phrases, and sentences.

Additional Examples: Synonyms (e.g., “happy” and “joyful”). Hyponymy (e.g., “dog” and “animal”). Antonymy (e.g., “hot” and “cold”)

7) Understanding sense and reference helps clarify language meaning and interpretation.

Let’s explore the practice questions.

(1) “Rupert took off his jacket” / “Rupert took his jacket off”

Yes, they mean nearly the same thing.

(2) “Harriet wrote the answer down” / “Harriet wrote down the answer”

Yes, they mean nearly the same thing.

(3) “Bachelors prefer redheads” / “Girls with red hair are preferred by unmarried men”

Yes, they mean nearly the same thing.

Key Takeaways: Sense explores semantic relationships within language. Word order can affect meaning, but sometimes doesn’t.
Context influences interpretation.

Additional Examples: Synonyms (e.g., “big” and “large”) Idiomatic expressions (e.g., “kick the bucket” meaning “to die”) Figurative
language (e.g., metaphors, similes)

8) Understanding sense and semantic relationships helps uncover nuances of language meaning.

Excellent practice exercises.

(1) Does “bank” have the same meaning in:

“I have an account at the Bank of Scotland” / “We steered the raft to the other bank of the river”. No

(2) Does “bank” have the same meaning in:

“The DC-10 banked sharply to avoid a crash” / “I banked the furnace up with coke last night”. No
Analysis:

The word “bank” exhibits polysemy, having multiple distinct senses:

1. Financial institution (Bank of Scotland)

2. Riverbank (river’s edge)

3. Aeronautical term (banking, or tilting, an aircraft)

4. To cover or heap (banking up a furnace)

Key Takeaways:

Polysemy: words with multiple related or unrelated senses.

Homonymy: words with identical spelling but different meanings.

Context disambiguates word senses.

Additional Examples: “bow” (front of a ship, ribbon tied around a package) “spring” (season, coiled metal object). “cloud” (weather
phenomenon, data storage)

9). Excellent clarification on the term “word” and its usage in semantics.

Word-form vs. Lexical Item

Word-form: sequence of letters and phonemes (e.g., “bank”)

Lexical Item: distinct meaning or sense (e.g., “bank” as financial institution, riverbank, etc.)

Practice Exercises

(1) Two sentences illustrating different meanings of “The chicken is ready to eat”:

“The roasted chicken is ready to eat.” (chicken is food)

“The chicken is ready to eat its breakfast.” (chicken is an animal)

(2) Two sentences illustrating different senses of “He greeted the girl with a smile”:

“Smiling warmly, he greeted the girl.” (he was smiling)

“He greeted the girl, who was smiling at him.” (girl was smiling)

(3) Two sentences illustrating different senses of “He turned over the field”:

“The pilot banked the plane and turned over the field.” (changed direction)

“The farmer turned over the field, preparing it for planting.” (tilled the soil)

Key Takeaways : Sentences can have multiple senses (ambiguity).Context disambiguates word [Link] items can have
multiple related or unrelated senses (polysemy, homonymy).

10) Excellent discussion on sense and reference.

Key Takeaways:

1. Sense and reference differ:

Reference: relation between expression and thing/person in the world.

Sense: abstraction representing meaning, independent of reference.

2. Every expression with meaning has sense, but not every expression has reference.

3. Sense is an abstraction, grasped by language users when understanding expressions.

Practice Exercises
(1) Dictionary lookup:

You find an expression with the same sense.

(2) Dictionary contents:

A dictionary is full of words.

(3) Learning meanings through reference:

Yes, a foreigner can learn initial word meanings through reference (pointing).

(4) Learning meanings through dictionary:

No, a foreigner cannot learn initial word meanings solely through an English dictionary (requires prior understanding).

Insights : Dictionaries provide sense explanations, not [Link] learning requires understanding sense, not just
reference. Sense is a fundamental aspect of linguistic meaning.

11). Let’s analyze the practice exercise:

(1) “almost”

No (does not refer to a thing in the world)

(2) “probable”

No (does not refer to a specific thing)

(3) “and”

No (logical operator, not a thing)

(4) “if”

No (conditional operator, not a thing)

(5) “above”

No (relational term, not a specific thing)

These words are examples of:- Modals (almost, probable) - Conjunctions (and). - Conditionals (if) - Prepositions (above)

They contribute to sentence meaning (sense) but do not directly refer to objects or entities in the world.

Key Takeaways: Not all meaningful expressions have reference. Logical operators, modals, and relational terms have sense but no
[Link] and reference are distinct aspects of linguistic meaning.

12) Let’s review the answers:

(1) When looking up a word in a dictionary, you find: An expression with the same sense.

Dictionaries provide definitions, which explain the sense (meaning) of words.

(2) A dictionary is: Full of words. Dictionaries contain linguistic information, not physical objects.
(3) Can a foreigner learn initial word meanings through reference (pointing)? Yes.

Pointing out referents can help learners associate words with concepts.

(4) Can a foreigner learn initial word meanings solely through an English dictionary? No.

Dictionaries require prior understanding of some words; pointing or context is necessary for initial learning.

Key Takeaways: Dictionaries provide sense [Link] learning requires understanding sense and reference. Initial
language learning benefits from contextual or gestural cues.

13). Excellent discussion on propositions, sense, and translation.


Propositions : A proposition is a unit of meaning that expresses a complete, independent thought.

Practice Answers:

(1) “Johnny has got a new teacher” – Yes (proposition)

(2) “A new teacher” – No (phrase, not a complete thought)

(3) “Johnny” – No (proper noun, not a complete thought)

(4) “This is the house that Jack built” – Yes (proposition)

14). Translation and Sense

Similar senses can be expressed across languages.

Practice Answers:

(1) Do “M. Berger s’est rasé ce matin” and “M. Berger shaved himself this morning” express the same proposition?

Yes (same overall meaning)

(2) Do the two sentences have the same sense?

Yes (same meaning, with reservations about nuances)

(3) Do “ce matin” and “this morning” have the same sense?

Yes (equivalent meanings)

(4) Do “s’est rasé” and “shaved himself” have the same sense?

Perhaps (similar, but with nuances)

(5) Does “ein unverheirateter Mann” have the same sense as “an unmarried man”?

Yes (equivalent meanings)

Key Takeaways: Propositions represent complete, independent [Link] can be preserved across languages, despite
nuances. Translation may involve approximations, not exact equivalences.

15) Excellent discussion on sense, dialects, and reference.

_Dialects and Sense_

(1) Do “pavement” (British) and “sidewalk” (American) have the same sense? Yes
(2) Do “pal” and “chum” have the same sense? Yes
(3) Can expressions with different social connotations have the same sense? Yes

Key Takeaways: Sense can be preserved across [Link] words can convey the same meaning. Social connotations don’t
necessarily affect sense.

16) _Reference and Utterance_

(1) Is it one utterance or two when two people say “John is putting on weight”? Two
(2) Would the referred “John” be the same or different? Almost certainly, two different Johns

Key Takeaways: Utterances are specific acts by speakers on particular [Link] depends on context, including speaker
and occasion. Same sentence, different utterances, can refer to different entities.

17) Excellent discussion on reference, sense, and meaning.

Practice Exercises:

(1) “Helen meant that rock-hard object” – R (reference)

(2) “Albert means me” – R (reference)


(3) “What does unique mean?” – S (sense)

(4) “Purchase has the same meaning as buy” – S (sense)

(5) “Look up the meaning of apoplexy” – S (sense)

(6) “You’ll see who I mean” – R (reference)

Key Takeaways: “Mean” and “meaning” can indicate both reference and sense. Context disambiguates intended meaning.
Idealization helps simplify complex meaning issues.

Key Concepts:

1. Sense: abstract concept representing meaning, independent of reference.

2. Reference: relation between expression and thing/person in the world.

Takeaways:

1. Sense and reference are fundamental to meaning studies.

2. Reference is relatively straightforward.

3. Sense is more elusive, but its usefulness becomes clearer with study.

4. Semanticists continue to refine understanding of sense.

Influential Figure: Gottlob Frege (German philosopher) demonstrated the importance of the sense/reference distinction.

Exercise

Here are the answers to the questions:

1. Key terms and concepts: - Sense: abstract concept representing meaning - Context: situation influencing interpretation -
Reference: relation between expression and thing/person - Dialect: regional/language variation - Referent: thing/person
represented by expression - Proposition: unit of meaning expressing complete thought

2. Different expressions with same referent:

Example: “The CEO” and “John Smith” (same person)

3. Same expression with different referents:

Example: “Bank” (financial institution or riverbank)

4. Invariable referent: “The Sun”.

No referent: “Maybe” (modal word)

5. Explanation: Every meaningful expression has a sense (meaning), but not every expression directly refers to a specific thing/person
in the world.

6. Dictionary definition:

- Typical definition: explanation of sense (meaning)

- Native speaker knowledge: includes nuances, context, and associations

- Complete entry: impossible due to complexity and variability of language

7. “The Evening Star” / “The Morning Star”:

Same referent (planet Venus), different senses (astronomical contexts)

8. “The President of the United States” / “The Commander-in-Chief” / “The Leader of the Republican Party”:

Same referent (person holding office), different senses (roles/responsibilities)


9. “Visiting relatives can be boring”:

Context influences interpretation (relatives, visiting, boredom)

10. “The planet Mars”:

Fixed referent (specific planet)

11. “Smoking grass can be dangerous”:

Context and sense disambiguate meaning (smoking grass vs. Lawn care)

These answers demonstrate understanding of Unit 3 concepts, applying them to various examples.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Words like 'bank' demonstrate polysemy as they possess multiple, context-dependent meanings—namely a financial institution, a riverbank, or an aircraft maneuver . Speakers navigate this complexity by relying on context and collocational cues to interpret the intended sense. For instance, in the sentence 'We deposited money in the bank,' the shared knowledge that money relates to finance helps identify 'bank' as a financial institution. Similarly, discussing 'fishing near a bank' usually clarifies the meaning as the edge of a river . Context and shared understanding within discourse communities enable successful communication despite polysemy's inherent complexity .

Constant references occur when expressions consistently denote the same object or concept, such as 'the moon' referring to Earth's natural satellite . Variable references change depending on the context; for example, 'the present President of the United States' refers to different individuals depending on the current political context . Constant references provide stability in communication, while variable references demonstrate language's adaptability and reliance on context for meaning .

The reference of expressions like 'the present President of the United States' changes based on the time and context in which they are used. For instance, in 2007, this expression would refer to George W. Bush, whereas in 1996, it would refer to Bill Clinton . This reveals that context plays a crucial role in determining reference, showing that language is dynamic and fluid, adapting to circumstances and the specific situation at hand .

Dialectal variations illustrate the fluidity of sense across language varieties because different dialects may use different words for the same concept without altering the underlying meaning. For instance, 'pavement' in British English has the same sense as 'sidewalk' in American English . This stability in sense, despite lexical differences, demonstrates that sense transcends specific word choices and allows for effective communication across dialectal variations, highlighting language's adaptability and shared understanding across communities .

Constant references simplify language comprehension by providing stable points of reference that consistently denote the same objects, reducing ambiguity. For example, 'the moon' always refers to Earth's natural satellite, making it easy for listeners and speakers to understand and agree on the subject matter . This stability aids in clear communication by ensuring that these expressions reliably carry the same meaning across various contexts, streamlining the interpretative process .

The same word can have multiple meanings, a phenomenon known as polysemy. For example, 'bank' can refer to a financial institution or the side of a river . Context resolves these ambiguities by providing additional information that clarifies which sense of the word is intended. For instance, mentioning a bank in the context of a withdrawal implies a financial institution, while talking about paddling a boat suggests a river bank .

Propositions enhance comprehension by encapsulating complete thoughts or statements that have clear and independent meanings, unlike phrases or improper nouns that lack such completeness. For example, 'Johnny has got a new teacher' is a proposition because it conveys a complete thought, whereas 'a new teacher' only expresses part of a thought . This distinction is essential as it highlights how propositions function as the building blocks of meaning in complete ideas, making comprehension and communication more precise .

Understanding sense and reference is crucial for language translation because it ensures the preservation of meaning across languages. While the sense should ideally be maintained, nuances and cultural contexts can affect the exact translation. Some degrees of approximation are inevitable due to differences in linguistic structures and interpretations. For example, 'M. Berger s’est rasé ce matin' translates to 'M. Berger shaved himself this morning,' capturing the essence but potentially missing subtle nuances . This underscores the importance of contextual understanding in translation efforts .

Sense refers to the relationships within language, representing an expression's meaning, while reference is about the relationship between language and the real-world objects or concepts it denotes . These concepts are critical in semantic studies because they help distinguish between language's abstract representation of meaning (sense) and its practical linkage to the real world (reference). Understanding this distinction allows for deeper semantic analysis and the exploration of meaning and interpretation .

Context plays a pivotal role in distinguishing between syntactically similar expressions that might otherwise be seen as synonymous by providing background that influences interpretation. For example, the expressions 'Rupert took off his jacket' and 'Rupert took his jacket off' mean nearly the same thing, but slight contextual differences might prioritize action focus or style . Context ensures that nuances and specific intentions behind utterances are understood, thereby preserving the integrity and intended message of communication .

You might also like