0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views4 pages

Reliability and Normality Analysis Results

Uploaded by

Hanock Jacob
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views4 pages

Reliability and Normality Analysis Results

Uploaded by

Hanock Jacob
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Reliability

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's N of Items
a
Alpha

-.003 7

a. The value is negative due to


a negative average covariance
among items. This violates
reliability model assumptions.
You may want to check item
codings.

Normality

Tests of Normalityb

gedner of the respondent Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk

Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.

respondent monthly income male .464 11 .000 .449 11 .000


*
male .154 11 .200 .955 11 .711
respondent working experience
*
female .151 14 .200 .921 14 .231

*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.


a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
b. respondent monthly income is constant when gedner of the respondent = female. It has been omitted.

Man whutney test

Gender

Test Statisticsa

respondent respondent
monthly income working
experience

Mann-Whitney U 63.000 67.500


Wilcoxon W 168.000 133.500
Z -1.628 -.529
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .103 .597
b
Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed Sig.)] .467 .609b
Ranks

gedner of the respondent N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks

male 11 14.27 157.00

respondent monthly income female 14 12.00 168.00

Total 25
male 11 12.14 133.50
respondent working
female 14 13.68 191.50
experience
Total 25

Maritial status

Ranks

maritial status of the N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks


resondent

single 7 11.50 80.50

respondent monthly income married 17 12.91 219.50

Total 24
single 7 17.57 123.00
respondent working
married 17 10.41 177.00
experience
Total 24

Test Statisticsa

respondent respondent
monthly income working
experience

Mann-Whitney U 52.500 24.000


Wilcoxon W 80.500 177.000
Z -.927 -2.299
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .354 .022
b
Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed Sig.)] .664 .024b

a. Grouping Variable: maritial status of the resondent


b. Not corrected for ties.
Typs of family

Ranks

respondent family types N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks

nuclear 16 12.00 192.00

respondent monthly income joint 9 14.78 133.00

Total 25
nuclear 16 12.91 206.50
respondent working
joint 9 13.17 118.50
experience
Total 25

Test Statisticsa

respondent respondent
monthly income working
experience

Mann-Whitney U 56.000 70.500


Wilcoxon W 192.000 206.500
Z -1.925 -.086
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .054 .931
b
Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed Sig.)] .388 .934b

a. Grouping Variable: respondent family types


b. Not corrected for ties.

Respondent religion

Ranks

respondent religoin N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks

hindu 17 12.76 217.00

respondent monthly income others 8 13.50 108.00

Total 25
hindu 17 15.09 256.50
respondent working
others 8 8.56 68.50
experience
Total 25
Test Statisticsa

respondent respondent
monthly income working
experience

Mann-Whitney U 64.000 32.500


Wilcoxon W 217.000 68.500
Z -.495 -2.105
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .621 .035
Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed Sig.)] .842b .037b

a. Grouping Variable: respondent religoin


b. Not corrected for ties.

You might also like