0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views10 pages

Tachyon Partition Function in dS2

Uploaded by

Guillermo Silva
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views10 pages

Tachyon Partition Function in dS2

Uploaded by

Guillermo Silva
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Contents

1 Tachyons by Facu 2
1.1 Path integral . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.2 Character of SO(1, 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

1
Chapter 1

Tachyons by Facu

1.1 Path integral


We will be interested in calculating the partition function in EdS2
Z
Z = Dϕ e−SE [ϕ] (1.1.1)


Z
SE [ϕ] = d2 x gϕ[−2 + m2 ]ϕ (1.1.2)

We decompose ϕ in terms of harmonical spherics


∞ X
X m=l ∞ Y
Y l
ϕ= clm Ylm (Ω) =⇒ Dϕ = dclm (1.1.3)
l=0 m=−l l=0 m=−l

Which have the following properties



Z
2Ylm = −l(l + 1)Ylm , d2 x g Ylm Yl′ m′ = δll′ δmm′ (1.1.4)
S2

Puttign this in the Euclidean action we get


√ XX
Z
1
SE = d2 x g clm Ylm [l′ (l′ + 1) + m2 ]cl′ m′ Yl′ m′ (1.1.5)
2 lm l′ m′

Z
1 X X
= d2 x g Ylm Yl′ m′ clm cl′ m′ [l′ (l′ + 1) + m2 ] (1.1.6)
2 lm l′ m′
1 XX
= δll′ δmm′ clm cl′ m′ [l′ (l′ + 1) + m2 ] (1.1.7)
2 lm l′ m′
1
= c2lm [l(l + 1) + m2 ] (1.1.8)
2
Z Y
2 2
=⇒ Z = clm e−clm [l(l+1)+m ] (1.1.9)
lm

2
In [1] a tachyonic scalar field is defined by the following mass

m2 = −n(n + D − 1), n = 0, 1, 2, 3, ... (1.1.10)

Where D denotes the dimension of de Sitter space-time dSD . For now we will be interested
in two dimensions so
m2 = −n(n + 1), n = 0, 1, 2, 3, ... (1.1.11)
Reeplacing this mass in the partition function we get
Z Y Z Y
−c2lm [l(l+1)−n(n+1)] 2
Z= clm e = clm eclm [n(n+1)−l(l+1)] (1.1.12)
lm lm

From this we can deduce the following

l > n =⇒ Well defined Z. These are physical states. (1.1.13)

l < n =⇒ Ill defined Z. (1.1.14)


In this case we have a non-decaying exponential. Nevertheless, the contributions of these
states can be computing by Polchinski regularization (citar).
Z Y
l = n =⇒ Z = = V ol(G) (1.1.15)
lm

We may call these gauge states (donde le dicen ası́ en la literatura?). With this in mind we
propose to calculate the character (explicar bien que es esto). For the character only the
physical states will contribute. For example, take l = 0. We need to take n = 1 and so
on. A state with n = 0 will be ”gauge”. Take l = 1. A ”non physical polcho” state comes
from n = 0. A gauge state from n = 1. Take l = 2. Gauge state at n = 2, polcho states at
n = 0, n = 1.

1.2 Character of SO(1, 2)


(A)dS2 is defined as the hyperboloid

(X + )2 + (X − )2 − (X 1 )2 = R2

It is preserved under transformations Λ ∈ SO(2, 1). The equation that defines these trans-
formations is:
Λµ ρ ηµν Λν σ = ηρσ , η = diag(−1, −1, 1) (1.2.1) definin lam

Below, we will find the generators of the algebra so(2, 1). We define the elements of the
group near the identity as Λ = eϵJ . To find the generators, we expand infinitesimally close
to the identity.
Λµ ρ ≈ δ µ ρ + ϵJ µ ρ

3
We substitute this transformation into (1.2.1). Working with O(ϵ) we have

(δ µ ρ + ϵJ µ ρ )ηµν (δ ν σ + ϵJ ν σ ) = ηρσ

 + ϵJ µ ρ ηµσ
ηρσ + ϵJ ν σ ηρν ϵ2 J µ ρ ηµν J ν σ = 
ηρσ

| {z }
O(ϵ2 )≈0

J µ ρ ηµσ + J ν σ ηρν = 0
or in matrix notation
ηJ = −J T η (1.2.2) def J
reeplacing
 
A B C
J = D E F 
G H I
we get

−1 0 0 −1 0 0
     
A B C A D G
 0 −1 0   D E F  = −  B E H   0 −1 0 
0 0 1 G H I C F I 0 0 1

−A −B −C A D −G
   
 −D −E −F  =  B E −H 
G H I C F −I
=⇒ A = 0, E = 0, I = 0, y H = F, C = G, D = −B.
Then, a general matrix J ∈ so(2, 1) can be written as
 
0 B C
J =  −B 0 F 
C F 0
     
0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
=B  −1 0 0  +C  0 0 0 +F  0 0 1 
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
= aµ Jµ (1.2.3)

Thus, a possible basis for so(2, 1) consists of the following generators


     
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
J0 =  −1 0 0  , J1 =  0 0 1  , J2 =  0 0 0 
0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0

Where we find the algebra

[J0 , J1 ] = J2 , [J0 , J2 ] = −J1 , [J1 , J2 ] = −J0 (1.2.4) lie alg

4
By exponentiating the generators, we obtain the following group elements.

cos(θ) − sin(θ) 0
 

eθJ0 =  sin(θ) cos(θ) 0 


0 0 1
 
1 0 0
eα1 J1 =  0 cosh(α1 ) − sinh(α1 ) 
0 − sinh(α1 ) cosh(α1 )
cosh(α2 ) 0 − sinh(α2 )
 

eα2 J2 = 0 1 0 
− sinh(α2 ) 0 cosh(α2 )
From g(θ) = eθJ0 it is clear that g(0) = g(2π) = I. Then, θ ∈ [0, 2π]. The compact nature
of the generator J0 : is then recognized: starting from the group element g(0) I arrive at the
same element with g(2π). The case of the generators J1 , J2 is different; the group element
does not recur, so we see that α1,2 ∈ R. We conclude that the topology of the group SO(2, 1)
is R2 × S 1 . The casimir is
C = J02 − J12 − J22 (1.2.5)
importante: el casimir que toma vasilio es menos el anterior. Tomemos

C = −J02 + J12 + J22 (1.2.6)

We can indeed check that [C, Ji ] = 0.


Ladders: We define
J ± = J2 ± iJ1 (1.2.7)
=⇒ [J0 , J ± ] = ±iJ ± , (J + )∗ = −J − , [J + , J − ] = −2iJ0 (1.2.8)
1
C = −J02 + (J + J − + J − J + ) (1.2.9)
2
i 1
J1 = − (J + − J − ), J2 = (J + + J − ) (1.2.10) J1J2
2 2
Since [C, Jµ ] = 0 we will work with simultaneous eigenvectors of C y J0 . It will be useful
in what follows to rewrite the eigenvalue of the Casimir as

λ = ∆(∆ − 1)

then
C |∆, m⟩ = ∆(∆ − 1) |∆, m⟩ , J0 |∆, m⟩ = im |∆, m⟩ . (1.2.11)
En cuanto a m, deberá toma valores enteros para el grupo es SO(2, 1) o semi enteros para
SL(2, R). Los operadores J ± aumentan/bajan el autovalor de J0 en una unidad al actuar

5
sobre autofuncioines de J0

J0 (J ± |∆, m⟩) =(J ± J0 ± iJ ± ) |∆, m⟩


=J ± (J0 ± i) |∆, m⟩
=J ± (im ± i) |∆, m⟩
=i(m ± 1)(J ± |∆, m⟩).

Esta última ecuación nos dice que (J ± |∆, m⟩) es autovector de J0 con autovalor i(m ± 1).
Escribiremos
J ± |∆, m⟩ = cm |∆, m ± 1⟩
donde los kets |∆, m⟩ se asumen normalizados.
Teniendo en cuenta que
J − J + = J0 (J0 + i) + C (1.2.12)
J + J − = J0 (J0 − i) + C (1.2.13)
se concluye que
2
J + |∆, m⟩ = − ⟨∆, m| J − J + |∆, m⟩ (1.2.14)
= − ⟨∆, m| J02 + iJ0 + C |∆, m⟩ (1.2.15)
=m(m + 1) − ∆(∆ − 1) (1.2.16)

We conclude that
p
J + |∆, m⟩ = m(m + 1) − ∆(∆ − 1) |∆, m + 1⟩ (1.2.17)

Similarly
2
J − |∆, m⟩ = − ⟨∆, m| J + J − |∆, m⟩ (1.2.18)
= − ⟨∆, m| J02 − iJ0 + C |∆, m⟩ (1.2.19)
=m(m − 1) − ∆(∆ − 1) (1.2.20)

We conclude that
p
J − |∆, m⟩ = m(m − 1) − ∆(∆ − 1) |∆, m − 1⟩ (1.2.21)

Now we can write the non-compact generators in term of the ladders operators using 1.2.10
i
J1 |∆, m⟩ = − (J + − J − ) |∆, m⟩ (1.2.22)
2
i hp p i
J1 |∆, m⟩ = − m(m + 1) − ∆(∆ − 1) |∆, m + 1⟩ − m(m − 1) − ∆(∆ − 1) |∆, m − 1⟩
2
(1.2.23) J1

6
We aim to compute the character for a non-compact (hyperbolic/spacelike) direction

χ∆ (x) = tr eJ2 x (1.2.24)

To compute this character we start with

fm′ ,m (x) = ⟨m′ | exJ2 |m⟩ (1.2.25)

The idea is to compute this function by finding a differential equation for it. The trick is to
insert J0 inside the bracket and manipulate. The next equation holds

e−xJ2 J0 exJ2 = cosh x J0 − sinh x J1 (1.2.26) trick

We do the following trick

⟨m′ | J0 exJ2 |m⟩ = − im′ ⟨m′ | exJ2 |m⟩ (1.2.27)


′ xJ2
= ⟨m | e (cosh x J0 − sinh x J1 ) |m⟩ (1.2.28)
′ xJ2 ′ xJ2
=im cosh x ⟨m | e |m⟩ − sinh x ⟨m | e J1 |m⟩ (1.2.29)

From the first and third line we arrive at the following equation
(m′ + m cosh x)
i ⟨m′ | exJ2 |m⟩ = ⟨m′ | exJ2 J1 |m⟩ (1.2.30)
sinh x
Now we act with 1.2.23 on the rhs of the equation. We arrive at
m cosh x + m′ 1 p p 
fm′ ,m (x) = m(m − 1) − ∆(∆ − 1)fm′ ,m−1 (x) − m(m + 1) − ∆(∆ − 1)fm′ ,m+1 (x)
sinh x 2
(1.2.31) rec
Now taking a derivative
d d
fm′ ,m (x) = ⟨m′ | exJ2 |m⟩ = ⟨m′ | exJ2 J2 |m⟩ (1.2.32)
dx dx
Now using 1.2.10
d 1
fm′ ,m (x) = ⟨m′ | exJ2 (J + + J − ) |m⟩ (1.2.33)
dx 2
1 p p 
= m(m + 1) − ∆(∆ − 1)fm′ ,m+1 (x) + m(m − 1) − ∆(∆ − 1)fm′ ,m−1 (x)
2
(1.2.34)

We can use this equation to reeplace the term fm′ ,m−1 (x) in 1.2.31. We get the following
d (m cosh x + m′ ) p
fm′ ,m (x) = fm′ ,m (x) + m(m + 1) − ∆(∆ − 1)fm′ ,m+1 (x) (1.2.35)
dx sinh x
Or we can reeplace the term fm′ ,m+1 (x) in 1.2.31 . We get
d (m cosh x + m′ ) p
fm′ ,m (x) = − fm′ ,m (x) + m(m − 1) − ∆(∆ − 1)fm′ ,m−1 (x) (1.2.36)
dx sinh x
7
Now we define the following differential operator

(m cosh x + m′ )
 
± d p
L fm′ ,m (x) = ∓ fm′ ,m (x) = m(m ± 1) − ∆(∆ − 1)fm′ ,m±1 (x)
dx sinh x
(1.2.37)
p
L+ L− fm′ ,m (x) = m(m − 1) − ∆(∆ − 1)L+ fm′ ,m−1 (x) (1.2.38)
p p
= m(m − 1) − ∆(∆ − 1) m(m − 1) − ∆(∆ − 1)fm′ ,m (x) (1.2.39)
=(m(m − 1) − ∆(∆ − 1))fm′ ,m (x) (1.2.40)

p
L− L+ fm′ ,m (x) = m(m + 1) − ∆(∆ − 1)L− fm′ ,m+1 (x) (1.2.41)
p p
= m(m + 1) − ∆(∆ − 1) m(m + 1) − ∆(∆ − 1)fm′ ,m (x) (1.2.42)
=(m(m + 1) − ∆(∆ − 1))fm′ ,m (x) (1.2.43)

Now acting on the lhs

m cosh x + m′
 
+ − + d
L L fm′ ,m (x) =L + fm′ ,m (x) (1.2.44)
dx sinh x
(m − 1) cosh x + m′ m cosh x + m′
  
d d
= − + fm′ ,m (x) (1.2.45)
dx sinh x dx sinh x

We also do
m cosh x + m′
 
− + − d
L L fm′ ,m (x) =L − fm′ ,m (x) (1.2.46)
dx sinh x
(m + 1) cosh x + m′ m cosh x + m′
  
d d
= + − fm′ ,m (x) (1.2.47)
dx sinh x dx sinh x

And we add the two expressions.


 
′ ′′ ′ 2
−2 − coth(x)f (x) − f (x) + f (x) (m csch(x) + m coth(x)) = 2(m2 − ∆(∆ − 1))f
(1.2.48)

We put m = m and we get
  x 
coth(x)f ′ (x) + f ′′ (x) − f (x) −∆2 + ∆ + m2 coth2 + m2 =0 (1.2.49)
2
 x 
f ′′ (x) + coth x f ′ (x) + ∆(∆ − 1) − m2 (1 + coth2 ( ) f (x) = 0 (1.2.50)
2
We use
cosh x + 1 cosh x − 1
cosh2 (x/2) = , sinh2 (x/2) = (1.2.51)
2 2
1 + cosh x 2 cosh x
=⇒ coth2 (x/2) = =⇒ 1 + coth2 (x/2) = (1.2.52)
cosh x − 1 cosh x − 1

8
 
′′ ′ 2 cosh x
f (x) + coth x f (x) + ∆(∆ − 1) − 2m f (x) = 0 (1.2.53)
cosh x − 1
Same expression guille notes, different than vasilio’s notes

f (x) = fm,m (x) = ⟨m| exJ2 |m⟩ (1.2.54)

We need to solve this differential equation, and once we do that, we obtain the character as
the sum of all posible m’s.

9
Bibliography

epstein [1] H. Epstein and U. Moschella, de Sitter tachyons and related topics, Commun. Math.
Phys. 336 (2015) 381 [1403.3319].

dio [2] D. Anninos, T. Anous, B. Pethybridge and G. S¸eng¨or, The discreet charm of the
discrete series in dS2, J. Phys. A 57 (2024) 025401 [2307.15832].

rosen [3] J. Bonifacio, K. Hinterbichler, A. Joyce and R.A. Rosen, Shift Symmetries in (Anti) de
Sitter Space, JHEP 02 (2019) 178 [1812.08167].

10

Common questions

Powered by AI

Ladder operators J± play a crucial role in computing eigenvectors for the SO(2,1) algebra by modifying the eigenvalue m of J0 by ±1. Acting on a state |Δ, m⟩, the ladder operators yield new states |Δ, m ± 1⟩, adjusting the eigenvalue of J0 correspondingly. This algebraic manipulation is fundamental to transitioning between states within a representation. The process is mathematically described by equations involving J0, J±, and the Casimir operator, ensuring consistency in eigenvalue jumps, which adhere to m(m ± 1) - Δ(Δ−1). These steps elaborate on how ladder operators control eigenvalue transitions essential for understanding the representation structure of the group .

In the calculation of the character for the SO(2,1) group, gauge states (l = n) and polcho states (l < n) have significant implications. Gauge states occur at l = n and contribute to the character as they have a well-defined structure in terms of the volume of the group. Meanwhile, polcho states, when present at l < n, theoretically should not contribute to the partition function due to their ill-defined nature. However, these states can be regularized, potentially using methods like Polchinski regularization, to yield meaningful contributions. Thus, only physical states, where l > n, are excluded, contributing exclusively to the character, highlighting the importance of selecting valid states for accurate character computation .

Computing the character for a non-compact direction in SO(2,1) involves integrating differential operators to handle elements like e^{xJ2}. The character, χΔ(x) = tr e^{J2x}, is expressed in terms of fm',m(x) = ⟨m'| e^{xJ2} |m⟩. Calculations use differential equations derived from inserting operators like J0 and involve hyperbolic functions (cosh x, sinh x) that characterize transformations in non-compact paths. This computation is critical as it details how group elements transform states, connecting algebraic expressions to geometric interpretations, reflecting important properties of SO(2,1)'s representations and symmetries .

The Casimir operator C in the SO(2,1) algebra, defined as C = -J0² + J1² + J2², is a central element that commutes with all generators of the algebra, i.e., [C, Ji] = 0. This makes it a vital tool for classifying representations and determining invariant properties of the system. The eigenvalues of the Casimir operator, expressed as λ = Δ(Δ−1), define important characteristics of the states |Δ, m⟩, which are simultaneous eigenvectors of both C and J0. Calculations involving ladder operators J±, which modify the eigenvalue of J0, demonstrate how these states can be derived and confirmed using the Casimir operator’s eigenvalues, reinforcing the fundamental representation theory in the context of the group structure .

The topology and geometric interpretation of SO(2,1) can be inferred from the nature of its Casimir operator and the associated eigenstate structure. The Casimir C = -J0² + J1² + J2², revealing certain symmetries, reflects the group's fundamental invariances and topology. The configuration R2 × S1, suggested by the generator decomposition and their effects, highlights a topology blending non-compact (infinite) parts (R2) with compact cyclic parts (S1). Eigenstate structure contributes by classifying states through Δ(Δ−1), representing constraints meaningfully across geometric and topological features, allowing visualization and comprehensive understanding of SO(2,1)'s manifest properties and spatial-temporal transformations .

The path integral is used to calculate the partition function in two-dimensional de Sitter space for tachyonic scalar fields, where the action SE[ϕ] involves integrating over spherical harmonics expansions. The partition function Z = ∫ Dϕ e^{-SE[ϕ]} allows us to identify physical states, which are defined when l > n, as they result in a well-defined partition function. Conversely, ill-defined states occur when l < n, and these do not contribute physically due to non-decaying exponentials. When l = n, the states are gauge states with the partition function equivalent to the volume of the group. This demonstrates the differentiation between physical and gauge states in terms of the partition function .

Inserting the operator J0 into expressions for the character tr e^{J2x} facilitates solving differential equations by helping relate various eigenvalue problems. Specifically, manipulating the expression ⟨m'| e^{xJ2} |m⟩ using J0 allows derivation of differential equations for functions like fm',m(x). By introducing J0 through trigonometric and hyperbolic rotations related to x, one manages terms in differential equations, expressible through derivatives df/dx involving cosh x and sinh x. This systematic insertion and manipulation enable simplification and resolution of complex differential equations central to the computation of characters for non-compact generators, as shown in detailed expressions and derivations for functions of the form ⟨m| e^{xJ2} |m⟩ .

The algebra so(2,1) is associated with transformations preserving the hyperboloid defined by (A)dS2, described by the equation (X+)² + (X−)² − (X1)² = R². These transformations belong to the group SO(2,1) where the generators are found by expanding around the identity and solving ηJ = -J^Tη. This gives the generators J0, J1, and J2, which correspond to matrices governing these transformations. They form a basis for so(2,1) characterized by specific commutation relations: [J0, J1] = J2, [J0, J2] = -J1, and [J1, J2] = -J0 .

Simultaneous eigenvectors of the Casimir operator C and J0 are key to understanding representations of SO(2,1) by allowing the classification of states within irreducible representations based on their eigenvalues. The eigenvector |Δ, m⟩ has eigenvalues Δ(Δ−1) from C and im from J0, which succinctly defines its representation space. These eigenvectors enable construction and analysis of the representation's structure through ladder operators, which alter m while preserving Δ. Hence, simultaneous eigenvectors are crucial for detailing the irreducible unitary representations of this non-compact group, providing insights into both abstract algebraic properties and physical interpretations in contexts like quantum field theory .

The representation of group elements in SO(2,1) through the exponentiation of its generators J0, J1, and J2 reveals the underlying structure and topology of the group. Exponentiating J0 produces a rotation, whereas exponentiating J1 and J2 results in hyperbolic rotations, as seen in matrices e^{θJ0}, e^{α1J1}, and e^{α2J2}. The periodic nature of exponentiating J0, leading to g(0) = g(2π), indicates the compact nature akin to a circle S1. In contrast, the lack of periodicity in J1 and J2 points to their representation of non-compact directions, suggesting the SO(2,1) group's topology is best described as R2 × S1 .

You might also like