0% found this document useful (0 votes)
219 views8 pages

State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Manual

Psychopathology

Uploaded by

Mir Bushra
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
219 views8 pages

State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Manual

Psychopathology

Uploaded by

Mir Bushra
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Manual

For
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory

Constructed and Standardized By


Dr. Roma Pal and [Link] Tiwari

Published By :
Agra Psychological Research Cell
Tiwari Kothi, Belanganj, Agra-282 004
(2 )
Manual
for

State-Trait Anxiety Inventory


The difficulties of adjustment of the stross and strain of
contemporary living, have been bemoaned and deplored by every

generation since long before christian era", said psychiatrist Karl


Menninger. The price for lamentation, however goes to the present
articlate age of anxiety. Its problems are proclaimed daily, in the
living colourand in a best-selling literature of turmoil, alienation
and despair. Sometimes the stress of modern life seem too much to
bear. As a consequence, the modern youth groors bindly around
myrid of superstition and so called social prograrns seeking an
answer that would satisfy his moral aesthetic, spiritual and
economic well being. But unfortunately the modern youth is in
perpetual state of anxiety, unhappiness and be wilderment
because he is not able to achieve a well-balanced placement in his
present circumstances and situations. The newspapers are evidènt
enough that racial discrimination and prejudices have been
harming both home and community.
Psychologically, anxiety is a important phenomena.
very
Froud was the first to define anxiety within the context of

psychological theory. According to him, "Anxiety is as something


felt, an unpleasant effect of state or condition." This state is
characterised by all that is covered by the word nervous
apprehension or anxious expect-station and efferent discharge
phenomena.

Spielberger (1960) defined anxiety as a State of arousel


caused by threat to well-being. Here "State' refers to the condition
involving the entire organism and 'Arouusal' refers to a condition
of tension, unrest or uneasiness or a readiness to act in response
whereby Threat' refers to anticipation of pain or danger or serious
interference with gnal seeking activities.

No doubt, anxiety oceupies a very important place in the


Study of human personality and a multitute of activities of mind.

It has been found that cireumstances in which failure is


experienced or in which an individuals intelligence is evaluated,
4 )
was given to fire psychologists and five psychiatrists to examine ano

the accuracy theitems and as well add atlest two items for each.
of Tes

Afer getting the experts response and the [Link] items, it was Tra
tested on more than 600 college students and only those items 68
were included in the present test having highest frequeney and 7
accuracy. The present test consists of 30 items each in State as
well Trait form.
ca
Administration :
e
It is a self administering test which can be given either
individually or in a group. There is no time limit to complete the
test but usually its completion takes 15-20 minutes. The testee
should have a clear cut understanding of the 'State'instructions a

which needs his responses as to how he feels at this moment and a


the Trait' instruction which needs his responses as to how he t
generally [Link] the standard instructions are printed on
the first page but before starting this test, the tester should
enquire whether the testee has followed the instructions or not. It
is aswell advised that the State Test may be first given to the
testeeand then the Trait Test.
Instructions :For State Anxiety :
"A number of statements are given on the next page. Read
each statement carefully and tick ()
mark to the response which
suits you very much to indicate how you feel right now i.e. at this
[Link] of the responses are right or wrong. Try to respond
toall the statements at the earliest."
Por Trait Anxiety :
"A number of statements aré given on the next page. Read
each statement carefully and tick ()
mark to the response which
suits you very much to indicate how you generally feel. None of the
responses are right or wrong. Try to respond to all the statements
at the earliest."

Reliability :

For getting the reliability of the text, the present test was
administered to a group of 400 students (200 males and 200
Temale) who were studing in High School. Intermediate, Graduate
(3 )

are particularly threatening to the individual resulting in high


Trait Anxiety (Spielberger and Smity; 1966) Generally it is
asumed that individuals who are high in Trait anxiety will exhibit
state elevationsmore frequently than those with [Link] anxiety
since they react to a wider range of situations as dangerous or
threatening. Actually the state anxiety is a transitory emotional
state or condition characterized by subjective, consciously
perceived feeling of tension and apprehension and heightened
autonomic nervous system activity. State anxiety may varry in
intensity and fluctuate over time. Where by Trait anxiety refers to
relatively stable individual between people in the
differences
tendency to respond to the situations that are perceived as
threatening with elevations. It refers to the 'acquired behavioral
dispositions" of Campbell (1963) and invlives residues of past
experience that predispose an individual both to view the world in
a articular way. and to manifest response
'Object-consistent'

tendencies. Trait anxiety indicates differences in the strength of a


latent disposition to mainifest a certain type of reaction whereby
State anxiety an empirical process or reaction taking place at a
is

particular moment in time and at a given level of intensity.


The conception of Trait and State anxiety are considered in
greater detail by Spielberger (1966). Althrough a number of

studies have been conducted in this area to study both the aspects
of anxiety in the past in West but none in India. The anxiety test
in India, measure only one of the aspects or even none. The

present test is an attempt in this direction.

Construction and Standardization of the Test :


For the construction of the present test, the items were
collected from the STAS constructed by spielberger, Gorsuch
and
Lushene (1970), rewritten in a manner that would permit each
State and Trait anxiety.
item to be used as a measure of both i.e.,
that items with a
While selecting the items, it was assumed
of anxiety would be
demonstrated relationship to other measures
embodying content of
most useful here. Hence a number of items
most widely used anxiety scales were
proven relationship to the as a
permit each item to be used
written in a manner that would
In the preliminary form of the
measure of State or Trait anxiety. which
each for State and Trait anxiety
test there were 15 items
(6 )

a valid tool Table:1


The above table clearly shows that present test is8

for the measurement of state-trait anxiety.

For the concurrent of the present inventory, the


validity

present Hindi version, Sinha and Sinha's comprehensive Item


Anxiety Scale and Srivastava and Tiwari's Anxiety scale were
administered to 100 College students (50 males and 50 1.

females). 2.
3
The correlation coefficients are given in following 4
Table : 5.
6.
College Males College Females
Anxiety Scales 7.
(N= 50) (STA) (N= 50) (STA)
8
1. Sinha and Sinha's 73 -70 9
Comprehensive 10.
Anxiety Scale. 11.
2. Srivastava and 78 75
12.
Tiwari's Anxiety
Scale. 13.
14.

For getting the construct validity of the present inventory, the 15


present scale was to 200 college students 16
administered

Males and Females in equal number thicaly : (both

1
1. First--The state Anxiety inventory was administered to
1
the students with the standard instruction (Normal Condition).
2
2. SecondThe StateAnxiety inventory was administered to
the students after providing 15 minute period of relaxation. (Relax
Condition).

3. ThirdThe state Anxiety inventory was again


administered to same sample asking them to respond according to
how they believed they would feel Jst prior to the final
examination in an important course' ([Link]).

The means scores state anxiety and for individual items were
caleulated under Normal Relax and Exam. Conditions which are

given in Table.
(5 )
a time lapse of one
week and
and Post Graduate classes within
as well
caleulated seperately for state
Test retest reliability was
for state was found to be,
Trait anxiety. The test retest
reliability

for Trait scale was 76 with


68 whereby the test retest reliability

-73 for the total scale.

consistency of the scale was checked by


The interrnal
between total scores on
calculating the coefficient of correlations
to be 63 for state items and
each of the sub-Scales and was found
-76 for Trait items and72 for total scale.
by
was measured for its split half reliability
The scale
male
of 200 college students including
administering upon a group
and it was found to be71 for
state
and female aged 19-22 years
for Trait. test and 76 for the total
test.
test,78

Validity:
present test were
As pointed out earlier the items of the
tests available in this area and
collected from the standerdised
Furthermore only those items
gain checked by the experts rating.
and accuracy (through
were selected who have highest frequency
college students). This shows
che administration of the test on 600
content validity.
that the present test passess high

validity of the present test, the English


For concurrent
Trait Inventory, Cattell and Scieries
version of State Anxiety and
Taylor (1953) Manifest Anxiety
(1963) IPAT Anxiety Scale and
(100
toa sample of 200 College Students
Scale were administered
are given in
Males and 100 Females) the correlation-Coefficients
following table :
the Stait-Trait Anxiety
Table : Correlations Between
(ST), IPAT and TMAS.
Males College Females
College
(N= 100) (STA)
Anxiety Scales (N= 100) (STA)
-73
.75
IPAT -83
-81
TAMS
(7
tool Table :The Construct Validity of the State Anxiety Scale :
Males (N= 100) Females (N 100)=
the
(Means) (Means)
ive
Item Norm Relax Exam. Norm Relax Exam.
ere
50 1 1·80 1·50 2-90 2-00 1-30 3-10
2 2-00 1-80 310 1-90 1·50 2-60
3 1·60 1-50 2-660 1-60 1·40 2-00
g 4 1·40 1-50 1-90 1-04 1-02 2-00
5 1-90 1·40 2-10 1-80 1·50 2-60
6. 1-30 1-20 3-00 2-00 1-70 3-30
7. 2-10 2-70 2-30 2-20 1-80 3-40
2-60 1-80 2-70 2-10 2 3-50
9 2-10 1-60 2-80 1-80 1-60 2-90
10. 2-20 1·90 3-00 2-20 1-90 3-10
11. 2-00 1-80 2-60 2-40 1-70 2-80
12. 1-70 1-60 2-70 1-70 1-50 3-00
13. 1·50 1-30 1-90 1·40 1-20 2-00
14. 1-70 1·50 2-70 1-50 1-40 2-80
15. 1·40 1-20 1-50 1·30 1·10 1-90
16. 2-20 2-00 3-00 1-90 1-80 2-70
2-50 2-10 3-20 2-10 1-90 3-10
17.
1-70 1-80 1·70 1·60 1·40 2-20
18.
2-00 170 2-90 2-00 1-60 3-00
19.
1-30 1-10 2-00 1-20 1-20 2-10
20.
2-20 3-60 2-60 2-00 3-20
21. 2-80
2-00 3-10 2-20 1-90 3-00
22. 2-40
1·60 1·10 1-00 2-80
23. 1-20 1-20
2-30 3-40 2-70 2-20 3-00
24. 2-90
2-40 2-00 2-90
25. 2-50 2-10 2-80
2-60 1-80 1-90 2-50
26. 1-90 1·90
3-00 2-00 1-90 310
27 2-10 2-00
2-30 2-40 3-00
28. 1-90 2-90
2-40
1-90 1-80 2-00
29 1-70 1-90
1-80 2-50
2-20 2-50 2-10
30. 2-40 2-10
35-50 30-40 41-00
35-00 50-00
Scale 40- 00
males and females have
The Table clearly shows that both the in
anxiety in normal condition
losser magnitude of state both
exan. In the relax condition
comparison to the conditions of to
anxiety in comparison
males and females have lowest trait
'normal' as well as 'exam'conditions.
scores for state Anxiety
Scoring: The possible range of the
30(minimum) to 90 (maximum).
and Trait Anxiety varies from
of the both scales by ratings
The subjects respond to each item instructions (printed on the
themselvesaccording to the standard 2.
a three point scales : 1. Always,
front page of the scale) on
state and Trait scales equal
Some-times,3. Never for the blancing
ratings indicate high
numbers of items have been taken. Highanxiety for the positive
indicate low
anxiety whereas low rating
scores of responses will be
items of the each scale, the weightage items will be
marked 3,2 and 1 respectively whereas reversed
and negatives items of the state
marked, 1, 2 and 3. The positive
below :
Anxiety and Trait Anxiety are given
1. State Anxiety
KPositiveItems :1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 15, 16, 19, 20, 22, 24,

25,26, 27, 28, 29, 30 (Scoring should be


3, 2, 1).
13, 14, 17, 18, 21, 23 (Scoring
eNegative Items :3,8, 9, 12,
should be 1, 2, 3).

2. Trait Anxiety :
Positive Items : 1, 2,3, B 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14,be15,
27,28,29, 30 (Scoring should
23,
3, 2,
26,

1).

Negative Items :
4, 5,9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,22,
(Scoring 2, 3).
should be 1,
24, 25,

Common questions

Powered by AI

Having both state and trait measures in the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory allows for a comprehensive assessment of anxiety by capturing transient, situational anxiety (state) and enduring predispositions (trait). State anxiety measures how an individual feels at a specific moment, while trait anxiety assesses the individual's usual level of anxiety across different situations . This dual approach provides a deeper understanding of an individual's anxiety profile, distinguishing between temporary stress responses and chronic anxiety tendencies. It helps in identifying those who may require more intensive interventions for anxiety management due to stable anxiety traits .

Reliability tests such as test-retest and internal consistency are crucial for ensuring the credibility of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory by confirming the consistency and stability of the test results over time and across items. The test-retest reliability measures the stability of the anxiety results when the same individuals take the test under the same conditions after a period, with the State anxiety showing a reliability of 0.68 and Trait anxiety 0.76 . Internal consistency, indicated by the coefficient of correlations, ensures that the items within each anxiety category (state or trait) consistently measure the same construct, with internal consistency scores such as 0.63 for state items and 0.76 for trait items reinforcing this consistency . High reliability scores enhance confidence in the test's ability to produce accurate, repeatable results.

When adapting a Western anxiety assessment tool for use in a different cultural context like India, adjustments must include ensuring content validity through cultural relevance and clarity in language, which was done by rewriting items in a manner suitable for the Indian population using input from experts . Validation processes should involve extensive testing for both reliability and validity with local populations, possibly including modifications to account for cultural differences in anxiety expression and understanding . For the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory in India, this involved specific testing scenarios like "Normal," "Relax," and "Exam" conditions to ensure construct validity and reliable measurement across different situational contexts .

Concurrent validity ensures that the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory accurately measures anxiety by comparing its results with other established measures like Sinha and Sinha's Comprehensive Anxiety Scale and the Srivastava and Tiwari's Anxiety Scale. High correlation coefficients, like 0.73 for college males and 0.70 for females with the Comprehensive Anxiety Scale, indicate that the Inventory aligns well with existing validated measures of anxiety . This alignment suggests that the test accurately reflects the construct of anxiety, providing confidence in its applicability and reliability in assessing anxiety levels. Moreover, these concurrent correlations confirm that the Inventory can be trusted to provide results comparable to those of other standardized measures, reinforcing its validity .

Using a three-point scale for evaluating responses in the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory simplifies response options, encouraging clear distinctions between levels of agreement or frequency (always, sometimes, never). This simplicity aids in reducing participant confusion and improves clarity in response interpretation . However, the limited range could potentially lead to forced or inaccurate responses, as individuals might find it difficult to accurately represent their feelings within constrained options. This could reduce the sensitivity of the test, as subtle variations in anxiety might not be captured. A broader scale might better encompass the complexity of emotional states like anxiety, offering more nuanced data, yet it may increase cognitive load on participants. Balancing simplicity and sensitivity is thus a critical consideration in psychometric test design .

The split-half reliability test is used to evaluate the internal consistency of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory by correlating scores from two halves of the test. This method assesses whether the test items reliably measure the same construct within the same testing instance. It provides insight into the extent to which all parts of the test contribute equally to measuring anxiety, ensuring that variability in scores is due to differences in anxiety levels, not inconsistency in the test itself. For the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, the split-half reliability was found to be 0.71 for state and 0.78 for trait anxiety, indicating a high level of consistency within the halves of the test . This consistency confirms that the test is well-designed to measure its intended constructs reliably.

Differentiated anxiety responses in 'normal,' 'relax,' and 'exam' conditions reveal the variable nature of state anxiety across different situational contexts, reinforcing the understanding that state anxiety is a transient emotional state. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory results showed lower anxiety levels during 'relax' conditions compared to elevated anxiety levels in 'exam' conditions, for both males and females . These results illustrate the responsiveness of the tool to environmental factors and underscore the need to consider situational influences when interpreting results. Understanding these variations helps in tailoring interventions, highlighting the importance of temporal and context-based factors in anxiety management strategies. It also helps in distinguishing between individuals with situational anxiety and those with more stable anxiety traits .

Administering the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory as a self-administered test, without a time limit, enhances its efficacy by allowing respondents to complete it at their own pace. This method reduces anxiety induced by time pressure, which could otherwise skew results and jeopardize the accuracy of anxiety assessment . Whether administered individually or in groups, the self-paced nature ensures that individuals have the opportunity to contemplate each question, thus providing accurate and reflective responses. Furthermore, this approach helps alleviate any potential discomfort associated with timed tests, particularly for those with higher levels of trait anxiety, thus enhancing the reliability and authenticity of the collected data .

Freud defined anxiety as an unpleasant emotional state characterized by nervous apprehension or anxious expectation, emphasizing the subjective experience of tension and the physiological discharge phenomena associated with it . Spielberger, however, approached anxiety as a state of arousal caused by threats to well-being, wherein "state" refers to an encompassing condition of the organism and "arousal" refers to a readiness to act due to tension or unease . Freud's definition focuses on the psychological and experiential aspects of anxiety, while Spielberger highlights the functional response to perceived threats, linking it to behavioral and physiological readiness.

The inclusion of both positive and negative items in the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory enhances its robustness by promoting response variability and reducing response biases such as acquiescence or disacquiescence (tendency to agree or disagree with statements regardless of content). Positive items elicit agreement when the respondent experiences anxiety, while negative items require disagreement for the same experience. This design helps ensure that respondents are thoughtfully engaging with each question rather than consistently choosing similar ratings across the entire test. In terms of scoring, the positive and negative item format ensures a balanced representation of anxiety symptoms, thus improving the discriminant validity of the assessment tool .

You might also like