0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views2 pages

Economics II: IS-LM Model Problem Set

Uploaded by

Minh Anh Phạm
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views2 pages

Economics II: IS-LM Model Problem Set

Uploaded by

Minh Anh Phạm
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Principles of Economics II

Problem set 3
Dr. Hoang Khieu

Question 1
P lease explain if each of the following statements is true, false, or uncertain.

a. The main determinants of investment are the level of sales and the interest rate.

b. If all the exogenous variables in the IS relation are constant, then a higher level of
output can be achieved only by lowering the interest rate.

c. The IS curve is downward sloping because goods market equilibrium implies that an
increase in taxes leads to a lower level of output.

d. If government spending and taxes increase by the same amount, the IS curve does not
shift. IS curve shift to the right

e. The LM curve is upward sloping because a higher level of the money supply is needed
to increase output.
I
An increase investment
f. An increase in government spending leads to a decrease in investment. E Interest rate T
g. Government policy can increase output without changing the interest rate only if both
monetary and fiscal policy variables change

Question 2
a. Provide an example in which both the IS curve and LM curve shift. Please explain
how the two curves shift.

b. Consider an economy facing inflation (discussed later) and unemployment (also dis-
cussed later). To deal with inflation, a higher interest rate is needed; to deal with
unemployment, investment should be encouraged. Is there any policy (mix) that can
solve these problems?

Question 3
Consider the following IS–LM model:

C = 200 + .25YD

I = 150 + .25Y 1000i

1
G = 250
T = 200
(M/P )d = 2Y 8000i
M/P = 1600

a. Derive the IS relation.(Hint: You want an equation with Y on the left side and every-
thing else on the right.)

b. Derive the LM relation.(Hint: It will be convenient for later use to rewrite this equation
with i on the left side and everything else on the right.)

c. Solve for equilibrium real output.(Hint: Substitute the expression for the interest rate
given by the LM equation into the IS equation and solve for output.)

d. Solve for the equilibrium interest rate. (Hint: Substitute the value you obtained for
Y in part (c) into either the IS or LM equations and solve for i. If your algebra is
correct, you should get the same answer from both equations.)

e. Solve for the equilibrium values of C and I, and verify the value you obtained for Y
by adding C, I, and G.

f. Now suppose that the money supply increases to M/P = 1,840. Solve for Y, i, c, and
T, and describe in words the e↵ects of an expansionary monetary policy.

g. Set M/P equal to its initial value of 1,600. Now suppose that government spending
increases to G = 400. Summarize the e↵ects of an expansionary fiscal policy on Y, i,
and C.

a. C + I + G = Y c. IS = LM
Plug all numbers in place 0.55 - Y/2000 = Y/4000 - 0.2
200 + .25YD + 150 + .25Y - 1000i + 250 =Y 0.75= 3Y/4000
600 + .25YD + .25Y - 1000i = Y Y = 1000
1000i = 600 + 0.5Y - 0.25(200) - Y = 550 - 0.5Y
i = 0.55 - Y/2000 d. i = 0.55 - Y/2000
= 0.55 - 1000/2000
= 0.55 - 0.5 = 0.05 = 5%
b. (M/P )^d = M/P
Plug all numbers in place, we have i as a function of Y e. C = 200 + .25 (Y - T) = 200 + .25(1000 - 200) = 400
2Y - 8000i = 1600 I = 150 + .25Y - 1000i = 150 + 0.25(1000) - 1000(0.05) = 150 + 250 - 50 = 350
C + I + G = 400 + 350 + 250 = 1000
8000i = 2Y - 1600
i= Y/4000 - 0.2

Common questions

Powered by AI

A policy mix to address both inflation and unemployment could involve the use of contractionary monetary policy to curb inflation by increasing interest rates, coupled with targeted expansionary fiscal policy aimed at specific sectors or investments to boost job creation and offset potential unemployment due to reduced consumption. Such a mix requires careful calibration to prevent conflicting outcomes, such as stagflation .

This statement is generally false in the context of the IS-LM model. An increase in government spending typically shifts the IS curve to the right, leading to higher output and potentially higher interest rates. While higher interest rates might crowd out some private investment by increasing borrowing costs, the initial increase in government spending boosts aggregate demand and overall investment unless the economic context exhibits extreme crowding out effects .

When all exogenous variables in the IS relation are constant, a higher output level can only be achieved by lowering the interest rate because the IS curve remains unchanged. The downward slope of the IS curve reflects this inverse relationship: lower interest rates reduce the cost of investment, increasing aggregate demand and resulting in higher output. Without changes in fiscal policy or other external influences, this remains a primary method of influencing output .

An increase in the money supply shifts the LM curve to the right, leading to a lower equilibrium interest rate and a higher output level. This is because more money in the economy reduces the cost of borrowing, encouraging investment and spending, thus increasing aggregate demand and output .

An increase in the money supply shifts the LM curve to the right, as the excess supply of money leads to lower interest rates, thereby making borrowing more attractive. This encourages investment and consumption, resulting in an increase in aggregate demand and real output. The effect on output depends on the elasticity of the IS curve; greater responsiveness leads to more substantial output changes .

In the IS-LM model, increased government spending shifts the IS curve to the right, raising output and potentially interest rates. This can lead to a partial crowding out of private investment as borrowing costs rise, although the overall investment may still increase due to the amplified demand and economic activity. The net effect on investment depends on the sensitivity of private sector investments to interest rate changes .

When government spending and taxes increase by an identical amount, theoretically, the IS curve remains unchanged if there is no change in net aggregate demand. This balanced budget change means any increase in government spending is exactly offset by a reduction in consumer spending due to higher taxes, assuming there are no multiplier effects or other economic adjustments. This scenario assumes Ricardian equivalence, where consumers fully anticipate future taxes and adjust their spending accordingly .

Expansionary monetary policy decreases interest rates by increasing the money supply, shifting the LM curve to the right and increasing output without initial changes in fiscal positions. In contrast, expansionary fiscal policy, such as higher government spending, shifts the IS curve to the right, increasing both output and potentially interest rates due to increased demand for money. The key contrast lies in the primary mechanism: monetary policy affects liquidity and borrowing costs, while fiscal policy directly impacts aggregate demand and government spending .

An increase in taxes reduces disposable income, leading to a decrease in consumption. This shifts the IS curve to the left, as aggregate demand in the economy declines, resulting in a lower equilibrium output. As a result, the economy contracts unless offset by other measures such as monetary policy interventions .

Both the IS and LM curves can shift simultaneously due to policy changes or external economic shocks. For instance, an expansionary fiscal policy, such as increased government spending, shifts the IS curve to the right due to higher aggregate demand. Simultaneously, expansionary monetary policy, such as an increase in the money supply, shifts the LM curve to the right by reducing interest rates and increasing liquidity. The interaction between these shifts depends on their relative magnitudes. If both shifts are of equal magnitude, output increases significantly with lesser changes in interest rates .

You might also like