CHAPTER TWO

LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Preamble

This chapter has covered the review of existing literature, comprising three main sections. Firstly, it
provides a conceptual review of all the variables and indicators utilized in this study. Secondly, it delves
into the theoretical review of the theories that form the basis of this research. Lastly, it includes empirical
reviews to substantiate the connections between the determinants of foreign direct investment and
economic growth in Nigeria.

2.2 Conceptual Review

2.2.1 Overview of Foreign Direct Investment

Inflows And Economic Growth

Foreign direct investments consist of external resources, including technology, managerial and marketing
expertise and capital. All these generate a considerable impact on host nation’s production
[Link](2007), described FDI in several ways, first and most likely it may involve parent
enterprises injecting equity capital by purchasing shares in foreign affiliates. According to World Trade
Organization New (WTON, 2001) foreign direct investment occurs when an investor based in one
country, home country, acquires an asset in another country, the host country with the intent to manage the
asset. Foreign direct investment is described as investment made to acquire a lasting interest (usually at
voting stock) and acquiring at least 10% of equity share in an enterprise operating in a country other than
the home country of investors (Mwilima 2003). According to (Ayanwale 2007), that ownership of at least
10% of the ordinary shares or voting stock is the criterion for the existence of a direct investment
relationship. The United Nations defined FDI as investment in enterprises located in one country but
effectively controlled by residents of another country. This definition not only considers foreign direct
investment from an investment point of view, but also defines the status of corporate [Link]
direct investment (FDI) is therefore defined “as an increase in the book value of the networth of
investment in one country held by investors of another country where the investments are under the
managerial control of the investor”(Graham, 1995). To buttress the definition above,Todaro and Smith
(2003) noted that most FDI are in fact subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations (MNCs) such that the
investors are the parent organizations of firms. Thus, foreign direct investment flows represent the
expansion of the international activities of Multinational Corporations.

[Link] Foreign Direct Investment Inflows in Developing Countries

Foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows play a significant role in the economic development of
developing [Link] importance of foreign direct investment (FDI) started to increase on a global
scale in the second half of the twentieth century. Since then, it has become one of major areas of research
for both academics and policy makers interested in international investments flows. Research has shown
that FDI inflows positively impact GDP growth and export performance, particularly in industries such as
manufacturing and services (Borensztein et al., 1998).FDI contributes to growth in a substantial manner
because it is more stable than other forms of capital flows (Ajayi, 2006). Hence, it occupies and as well
takes the prime position in the portfolio of development financing mix of most developing economies. In
2004, FDI accounted for one half of total resource flows to developing countries, while remittances,
Oversea Development Aids (ODA) and portfolio equity split, albeit not equi proportionally, the remaining
half (World Bank (2011). This apart, FDI benefits the host countries in many different ways. These
benefits include: technology spillovers and human capital accumulation, increasing efficiency through
competition and improved resource allocation, strengthening of the domestic financial markets and
reducing local capital [Link] fact, over the past few decades the growth rate of world FDIs has exceeded
the growth rates of both world trade and GDP (UNCTAD,2001).In the light of the foregoing therefore, the
need to attract FDI is imperative particularly given its importance and role in the growth process of
developing economies. These consequently advance why so much effort has tirelessly been geared mostly
by developing nations towards its attraction. Inspite of these efforts, appreciable amounts of FDI are
unable to be attracted amid various measures (like reduced tax rates, tax holidays and subsidies,
exemption from import duties, accelerated depreciation allowances, grants and modified environmental
standards, signing of investment treaties and promotion activities) that has so far been adopted.

[Link] Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Inflows in Developing Countries

It is commonly asserted that the factors that create a conducive environment for domestic investment are
often the same factors that tend to drive Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) as [Link] firms make
decisions to invest in foreign markets, they are impacted by a broad array of economic, political,
geographical, social, and cultural [Link]'s essential to emphasize that, although the list of factors is
extensive, not every determinant holds the same level of significance for every investor, in every location,
and at all points in [Link] pinpointing the precise quantity and caliber of FDI determinants required
for a location to attract a specific level of inflows can be challenging, it remains evident that there must be
a fundamental minimum of these determinants in place before FDI inflows commence(Ngowi,2001).It is
logical to anticipate that investors would make location choices based on the expected profitability of that
location. Nevertheless, the profitability of an investment is likely to be influenced by various factors,
including the characteristics of the country in question and the specific investment objectives.

Market size

Market size is a pivotal determinant that significantly influences the flow of Foreign Direct Investment
(FDI) into developing countries. The potential to access and serve a substantial consumer base is an
enticing factor for multinational corporations considering investments abroad. A significant market size in
a developing country represents a vast consumer base, which is attractive to foreign investors seeking
opportunities for revenue generation and growth (Alfaro et al., 2004).A large market often corresponds
with robust economic growth prospects. Investors are more likely to allocate FDI to countries where they
anticipate rising consumer demand and increased purchasing power (Bloom et al., 2013).A sizable market
allows companies to diversify their customer base, reducing dependence on a single market. This
diversification can help mitigate risks associated with economic fluctuations in one market (UNCTAD,
2019).Exploiting the full potential of a large market can require significant investments in infrastructure,
distribution networks, and local supply chains. This investment can lead to the creation of jobs and
increased economic activity (Nunnenkamp & Spatz, 2002).FDI is often attracted to countries that provide
preferential access to their domestic markets through trade agreements or regional economic
communities. This access can be a valuable incentive for investors (World Bank, 2017).

Infrastructure

Infrastructure is a critical determinant that significantly influences the flow of Foreign Direct Investment
(FDI) into developing countries. Adequate infrastructure is essential for businesses to operate efficiently
and for a country to attract and retain foreign [Link] covers many dimensions, ranging
from roads, ports, railways, and telecommunication systems to institutional development (e.g.,
accounting, legal services) Ajayi (2006).Poor infrastructure can be seen, however, as both an obstacle and
an opportunity for foreign [Link]-developed transportation networks reduce logistical costs and
enhance a country's attractiveness for FDI (Egger et al., 2003).Reliable energy infrastructure reduces
production interruptions and costs, making a country more attractive for FDI (Wang & Huang,
2007).Efficient telecommunications infrastructure promotes information flow and facilitates remote
operations, influencing investment decisions (Wei, 2000).A business-friendly regulatory environment for
infrastructure development encourages private sector participation and is essential for attracting investors
(Asiedu & Lien, 2011).

Labor cost

Labor cost is a significant determinant that profoundly influences the flow of Foreign Direct Investment
(FDI) into developing countries. It is a key factor considered by multinational corporations when
evaluating potential investment destinations. Developing countries often offer a cost advantage in terms
of labor. Lower labor costs can attract foreign investors, particularly in labor-intensive industries such as
manufacturing and textiles, aiming to reduce production expenses (Blomström & Kokko, 2003).Investors
consider wage levels relative to productivity. Low wages, combined with reasonable productivity, make a
location more attractive to labor-intensive industries. However, excessively low wages can raise ethical
concerns (Alfaro et al., 2004).The skill level of the labor force can influence labor costs. Developing
countries with a well-trained and adaptable workforce may justify higher wage rates due to increased
productivity (Javorcik & Spatareanu, 2008).Labor cost considerations differ between industries. Skilled
labor may command higher wages, but industries requiring specialized skills may be willing to pay more
for access to a skilled workforce (Javorcik & Spatareanu, 2008).

Resources

The presence of valuable resources can significantly influence the decision of multinational corporations
to invest in a particular nation. Developing countries endowed with abundant natural resources such as
oil, minerals, and agricultural land are often attractive FDI destinations. Foreign investors seek access to
these resources for extraction, processing, and export (Sachs & Warner, 1995).Availability of energy
resources, particularly oil and gas, is a major driver of FDI, especially for energy-intensive industries
(Asiedu & Lien, 2011).Countries rich in minerals like copper and gold attract FDI in mining and
extractive industries, as investors aim to exploit significant mineral reserves (Asiedu, 2002).Sustainable
resource management practices and transparent regulatory frameworks are essential to maintain investor
confidence and ensure responsible resource extraction (World Bank, 2016).Investment in infrastructure,
particularly in transportation and logistics, is necessary to facilitate the extraction and transportation of
resources, providing assurance to investors (Egger et al., 2011).

Openness

A liberalized trade and investment environment can attract foreign investors seeking access to new
markets and business opportunities. Developing countries that embrace trade liberalization policies by
reducing trade barriers attract FDI due to improved access to their domestic markets (Wacziarg & Welch,
2008).Investor-friendly policies that protect property rights and guarantee against expropriation are
essential for attracting FDI. A favorable investment climate encourages foreign investors (Asiedu,
2006).Political stability and a commitment to open economic policies create an environment conducive to
FDI. Stable governments that uphold the rule of law attract foreign investors (Busse & Hefeker,
2007).Participating in regional economic integration efforts creates larger and more attractive markets,
making developing countries more appealing to FDI (UNCTAD, 2019).

Privatization

Privatization, the transfer of state-owned assets to private ownership, significantly influences FDI inflow
in developing [Link] opens new market opportunities, attracting foreign investors
interested in sectors like telecommunications and infrastructure (Megginson & Netter, 2001).Privatization
introduces competition, making markets more attractive to FDI as foreign firms seek to participate
(Claessens et al., 2000).Privatization enhances efficiency and productivity in formerly state-run entities,
appealing to foreign investors seeking higher returns (Boardman & Vining, 1989).Privatization of natural
resource industries allows foreign firms to engage in resource extraction, making these countries more
appealing for FDI (Boubakri et al., 2013).Privatization leads to increased investment in infrastructure
sectors, attracting FDI in related projects (Hartshorn & Lozoya, 2007).

Macroeconomic stability

Macroeconomic stability, characterized by low inflation rates, stable exchange rates, fiscal discipline,
sound monetary policies, and political stability, plays a pivotal role in attracting Foreign Direct
Investment (FDI) to developing [Link] and stable inflation rates reduce currency devaluation risk,
making countries more appealing to FDI (Blomström et al., 1994)Stable exchange rates provide
confidence that investments won't be eroded by currency devaluations, a key factor in attracting FDI
(Kumar & Pradhan, 2003).Fiscal discipline and effective debt management contribute to economic
stability, making countries lower-risk destinations for FDI (Chinn & Ito, 2006).Macroeconomic stability
often accompanies political stability, enhancing the attractiveness of a country for FDI (Busse & Hefeker,
2007).Managing external debt effectively and maintaining a low debt-to-GDP ratio contribute to
macroeconomic stability, reducing the risk of financial crises and encouraging FDI (Reinhart & Rogoff,
2010).
[Link] Constraints to Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) InFlows

One of the pressing development dilemmas confronting Nigerian leadership today involves the task of
enticing Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) into the country. In the past, several endeavors were undertaken
to enhance FDI inflows to Nigeria, but regrettably, these initiatives did not yield substantial results. These
previous efforts were ineffective due to their flawed conceptualization, inability to address the
fundamental obstacles hindering FDI, and their failure to grapple with the challenges posed by
globalization in the context of FDI in Nigeria. A multitude of factors have been identified as the primary
impediments to FDI inflows within the country.

Political instability

Political instability is a critical constraint that can impede the flow of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)
into developing countries. Frequent changes in government, policy uncertainty, legal vulnerabilities, civil
unrest, and high political risk perceptions deter foreign [Link] political transitions can lead to
policy uncertainty, making investors wary of potential abrupt changes in regulations (Busse & Hefeker,
2007).Countries experiencing civil unrest or conflict often see decreased FDI due to risks associated with
personnel and assets (Collier & Hoeffler, 2005).High perceived political risk increases the cost of capital
for FDI projects, impacting investor confidence (Wei, 2000).Economic policy volatility, linked to political
instability, disrupts business operations and increases uncertainty for investors (Borensztein et al., 1998).

Poor infrastructure

The deficiency in essential infrastructure, such as telecommunications, transportation, power supply, and
a skilled labor force, acts as a deterrent to foreign investment due to the heightened transaction costs it
imposes. Additionally, subpar infrastructure diminishes the overall productivity of investments,
discouraging their inflow. Asiedu (2002b) and Morrisset (2000) present findings indicating that robust
infrastructure has a favorable influence on FDI inflows into Africa. Conversely, Onyeiwu and Shrestha
(2004) discovered no conclusive evidence of infrastructure significantly affecting FDI flows to Africa.

Macroeconomic Instability

Instability in macroeconomic variables as evidenced by the high incidence of currency crashes, double
digit inflation, and excessive budget deficits, has also limited the region’s ability to attract foreign
investment. Recent evidence based on African data suggests that countries with high inflation tend to
attract less FDI (Onyeiwu and Shrestha, 2004).

Lack of policy transformation

In numerous African nations, identifying specific elements of government policies can be challenging.
This challenge arises, in part, from the frequent shifts in government and policies within the region,
coupled with a lack of transparency in macroeconomic policy. The deficiency in economic policy
transparency is concerning because it amplifies transaction costs, thereby diminishing the incentives for
foreign investment. Additionally, an unfavorable regulatory environment has contributed to the observed
low FDI levels in the region. Historically, domestic investment policies, such as those related to profit
repatriation and entry into certain sectors of the economy, were not conducive to attracting FDI (Basu and
Srinivasan, 2002).

GDP Growth and Market Size

Compared to numerous global regions, Africa experiences relatively modest growth rates in real per
capita output, and its domestic markets are relatively small in scale. This circumstance poses challenges
for foreign companies looking to capitalize on economies of scale, which, in turn, can discourage their
entry into the African market. Elbadawi and Mwega (1997) have demonstrated that economic growth
plays a pivotal role as a determinant of FDI inflows into the region.

High Dependence on Commodities

Numerous African nations depend on exporting a limited range of primary commodities as their main
source of foreign exchange earnings. Due to the substantial price volatility associated with these
commodities, these countries are particularly susceptible to shocks in their terms of trade. This
vulnerability elevates country risk, creating a discouraging environment for foreign investment.

[Link] Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Nigeria’s Economy

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) plays a crucial role in the economic development of Nigeria. It brings
capital, technology, and expertise, contributing to various sectors of the economy. FDI has the potential to
stimulate economic growth by increasing capital investment. It can result in higher production, job
creation, and improved productivity, which collectively contribute to economic expansion (Blomström &
Kokko, 2003).

[Link] Development:

FDI often leads to infrastructure development in sectors such as telecommunications, energy, and
transportation. This can improve the overall business environment and attract further investment
(Morrissey et al., 2005).

2. Technology Transfer:

Foreign investors bring advanced technology and managerial expertise to Nigeria. This knowledge
transfer can enhance the efficiency and competitiveness of domestic industries (UNCTAD, 2020).

3. Job Creation:

FDI inflows can create employment opportunities, reducing unemployment and poverty rates. The
establishment of new businesses and expansion of existing ones can lead to job growth (Asiedu, 2002).
[Link] Exchange Reserves:

FDI inflows contribute to Nigeria's foreign exchange reserves, helping stabilize the country's balance of
payments and providing a buffer against external shocks (Ajide & Ibrahim, 2017).

5. Government Revenue:

FDI can contribute to government revenue through taxes and royalties. The additional income can be used
for public investment in education, healthcare, and infrastructure (Karl, 2007).

[Link] of Exports:

FDI can promote export diversification by supporting the growth of non-oil sectors. This reduces
Nigeria's dependence on oil exports, making the economy more resilient to oil price fluctuations (IMF,
2020).

2.2.2 Economic Growth

Economic growth is a fundamental goal for countries worldwide. It represents an increase in the value of
goods and services produced within an economy over time and is measured through various [Link]
drives job creation, increases investment opportunities, and enhances technological innovation, leading to
overall prosperity within a nation (Smith, 2010).Economic growth is a crucial factor in improving the
standard of living and reducing poverty levels (Jones, 2002).A key advantage of continuous economic
growth is its favorable influence on the quality of life. With the expansion of the economy, people
typically encounter increasing incomes, enhanced employment prospects, and improved accessibility to
vital services like healthcare and education.

Furthermore, economic growth stimulates technological progress and innovation. Companies allocate
resources to research and development, resulting in the emergence of novel products and methodologies
that enhance efficiency and productivity. Consequently, this bolsters competitiveness on the international
stage.

An efficiently functioning economy that maintains steady growth likewise generates increased
government tax revenues. This empowers the government to allocate funds toward public infrastructure
endeavors, social welfare initiatives, and other projects that elevate the well-being of its citizens.
Additionally, economic growth frequently corresponds to a decline in poverty levels, as a greater number
of individuals transition from low-income situations to gain improved economic prospects.

Nevertheless, it is crucial to acknowledge that the advantages of economic growth do not reach every
stratum of society equally. Inequality may persist or even intensify if growth lacks accompanying
inclusive policies that guarantee fair access to its advantages. Moreover, unregulated growth may result in
environmental deterioration, the depletion of resources, and other sustainability issues.
In essence, although economic growth can make a substantial contribution to a nation's advancement, it
should be coupled with well-considered policies that emphasize social inclusiveness, environmental
sustainability, and the welfare of every citizen (Jones, 2002; Smith, 2010).

[Link] Influencing Economic Growth in Nigeria

Economic growth in Nigeria is influenced by a combination of factors that impact the country's
development trajectory. These factors encompass various aspects of the economy, policy environment,
and social dynamics. Additionally, the stability of the political environment plays a crucial role in
attracting foreign investment and promoting economic growth (Asongu et al., 2020).Reducing
dependence on oil and diversifying into non-oil sectors can enhance economic resilience and promote
sustainable growth (CBN, 2020).

Undoubtedly, there are additional factors that exert an impact on economic growth in Nigeria, including:

● Infrastructure Deficiency:
Inadequate infrastructure, including power supply, transportation networks, and broadband
access, hinders economic growth by increasing production costs and reducing productivity (World
Bank, 2019).

● Education and Human Capital:

Investments in education and human capital development are critical for economic growth. A
skilled and educated workforce enhances productivity and innovation (Olaniyan & Okemakinde,
2008).

● Fiscal and Monetary Policies:

Sound fiscal and monetary policies can stabilize the economy and promote growth. Prudent
management of government finances and monetary stability are essential (IMF, 2019).

● Demographic Factors: Population growth, urbanization, and demographic trends influence labor
supply, consumption patterns, and overall economic activity (United Nations, 2019).

● Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): Attracting FDI can bring in capital, technology, and managerial
expertise, contributing to economic growth (Asiedu, 2002).

● Institutional Strength: Well-functioning institutions, characterized by transparent governance,

adherence to the rule of law, and protection of property rights, establish a favorable climate for
investment and economic growth (Kaufmann et al., 2019).

● Technology and Innovation:Adoption of technological progress and the encouragement of

innovative practices have the potential to boost productivity and elevate economic growth
(Adekanye & Daramola, 2020).

[Link] For Assessing Economic Growth

Gross Domestic Product (GDP)

GDP measures the total value of goods and services produced within a country's borders over a specific
period. It is the most widely used tool for evaluating economic [Link] measures the total value of
goods and services produced within a country's borders over a specific period. It is the most widely used
tool for evaluating economic growth (Samuelson & Nordhaus, 2021).

Per Capita GDP:

Per Capita GDP divides GDP by the population, indicating the average income per person. It helps assess
the standard of living and economic well-being of a [Link] Capita GDP divides GDP by the
population, indicating the average income per person. It helps assess the standard of living and economic
well-being of a population (Mankiw, 2014).

Unemployment Rate

The unemployment rate measures the percentage of the labor force that is unemployed and actively
seeking work. A declining unemployment rate is often associated with economic growth (Brown, 2019).

Real GDP:

Real GDP adjusts GDP figures for inflation, providing a more accurate measure of economic growth by
accounting for changes in price levels over [Link] GDP adjusts GDP figures for inflation, providing a
more accurate measure of economic growth by accounting for changes in price levels over time
(Nordhaus, 2018).

In summary, there exists a complex interconnection between foreign direct investment (FDI) and
economic growth. FDI possesses the potential to make a favorable contribution to economic growth by
injecting capital, technology, and expertise. Nevertheless, its influence is contingent upon variables such
as the policies of the host country, its capacity to absorb FDI, and the specific sectors in which FDI
operates. Appreciating these intricacies holds significant importance for policymakers and researchers
striving to leverage the potential advantages of FDI for the sake of sustainable economic growth.

2.3 EMPIRICAL REVIEW

The body of research on Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) has been steadily growing, aiming to identify
the factors driving FDI and its effects. While there is a widespread acknowledgment that FDI has a
positive influence on economic growth, there exists no universal consensus among economists regarding
the key determinants of FDI. Consequently, empirical findings often exhibit a degree of complexity and
variation.

Borensztein et al. (1998) This seminal study conducted by Borensztein, De Gregorio, and Lee examined
the FDI-economic growth nexus across 69 countries over two decades. The findings suggested that FDI
inflows positively influence economic growth, particularly in countries with higher human capital and
developed financial markets.

Borensztein et al. (2002) This study by Borensztein, Gregorio, and Lee revisited the FDI-growth
relationship, focusing on its non-linear nature. Their findings indicated that while FDI has a positive
impact on growth, its effect is more pronounced in countries with a certain threshold of human capital and
financial development.

Asiedu (2002) Asiedu's study explored the determinants of FDI flows to African countries and their
impact on economic growth. The research highlighted that FDI can positively influence economic growth,
but its effect depends on factors such as market size, human capital, and political stability.

Blomström and Kokko (2003) Blomström and Kokko's research focused on the impact of FDI on host
countries' total factor productivity (TFP) and economic growth. They found evidence that FDI contributes
to TFP growth, which in turn enhances economic growth in developing countries.

Alfaro et al. (2004) Alfaro, Chanda, Kalemli-Özcan, and Sayek examined the role of FDI in technology
diffusion and productivity growth. Their findings suggested that FDI contributes significantly to
technology transfer and economic growth in host countries, particularly those with well-developed
financial markets.

Carkovic and Levine (2005) Carkovic and Levine conducted an extensive study examining the
relationship between FDI and economic growth across 80 countries. Their research indicated a positive
association between FDI inflows and economic growth, emphasizing that the quality of a country's
institutions plays a crucial mediating role.

De Mello (1997) found positive effects of FDI on economic growth in both developing and developed
countries, but concludes that the long-run growth in host countries is determined by the spillovers of
knowledge and technology from investing countries to host countries.

Balasubramanyam et al. (1996) found support for their hypotheses that the growth effect of FDI is
positive for export promoting countries and potentially negative for import-substituting ones. Comparing
evidence from developed and developing countries.

In summary, the empirical examination of the relationship between foreign direct investment (FDI) and
economic growth in Nigeria reveals a multifaceted connection. A multitude of studies have delved into
this association, presenting a spectrum of findings. Some research suggests that FDI has made a positive
contribution to Nigeria's economic growth by facilitating technology transfer, job generation, and
increased capital inflow. Conversely, other studies underscore challenges such as resource misallocation,
limited local linkages, and potential adverse impacts on domestic industries. Furthermore, it becomes
evident that the influence of FDI on economic growth is contingent on variables such as government
policies, the quality of institutions, and the overall investment climate. In conclusion, the empirical
evidence suggests that FDI can play a role in enhancing Nigeria's economic growth, but the careful
consideration of various contextual factors is imperative to harness its beneficial effects optimally.
2.4 THEORETICAL REVIEW

The examination of foreign direct investment (FDI) and its influence on economic growth in Nigeria
entails a thorough investigation of the complex interplay between FDI inflows and their potential effects
on the nation's economic advancement. This inquiry delves into the diverse economic theories and models
that form the basis for understanding the relationship between FDI and growth. It takes into account
factors such as the accumulation of capital, the transfer of technology, the development of human capital,
and the integration of trade. Through a thorough review of the pertinent literature, this study aims to offer
a comprehensive grasp of the theoretical framework surrounding FDI and its implications for fostering
continuous economic growth in Nigeria.

Neoclassical Growth Theory

A fundamental concept in the field of economics asserts that enduring economic growth arises from the
accumulation of both physical and human capital, accompanied by advancements in technology (Solow,
1956).This theory assumes that there are diminishing returns to capital, meaning that as more capital is
added to an economy, the incremental increase in output becomes smaller. This concept suggests that
there is an optimal level of capital investment to maximize economic [Link] Solow growth model,
developed by economist Robert Solow in the 1950s, is a prominent neoclassical model. It incorporates the
concepts of capital accumulation, diminishing returns, and technological progress to explain economic
growth over [Link] theory emphasizes the role of physical capital (machinery, infrastructure, factories)
as a key driver of economic growth. It posits that the accumulation of capital leads to increased
production capacity, which, in turn, spurs economic growth.

This theory assumes that there are diminishing returns to capital, meaning that as more capital is added to
an economy, the incremental increase in output becomes smaller. This concept suggests that there is an
optimal level of capital investment to maximize economic growth.

Neoclassical Growth Theory also highlights the concept of the steady state, where an economy reaches a
balanced state of growth where the rate of investment equals the rate of depreciation, leading to a constant
level of output per capita (Solow, 1956). This steady state provides insights into the long-run behavior of
an economy and how it responds to changes in various factors, such as population growth or technological
[Link], neoclassical growth theory has faced criticisms. The model's assumption of
diminishing returns to capital alone cannot fully explain observed growth patterns, as it doesn't account
for the persistent growth rates seen in some economies (Jones, 2005). Moreover, it overlooks the role of
human capital, knowledge spillovers, and institutions in driving economic growth (Romer, 1986). To
address these limitations, endogenous growth theories have emerged. These theories, building upon
neoclassical foundations, emphasize the role of factors like education, research and development, and
innovation in promoting sustained growth (Romer, 1990; Lucas, 1988).

In modern economic scholarship, neoclassical growth theory continues to serve as a foundational

framework for comprehending the mechanisms of economic growth. Nevertheless, it has been enhanced
and expanded upon by subsequent theories that encompass a wider spectrum of factors affecting
long-term prosperity. Neoclassical growth theory offers a structure for comprehending the correlation
between foreign direct investment (FDI) and economic growth. According to the neoclassical theory, FDI
has the potential to exert a positive influence on economic growth through various avenues.

Capital Accumulation and FDI: Neoclassical growth theory emphasizes the role of capital accumulation
in promoting economic growth. FDI involves the inflow of foreign capital into a host country, which can
lead to increased capital stock and, in turn, boost economic output (Mankiw et al., 1992).

Technological transfer: Neoclassical theory recognizes technological progress as a driver of economic

growth. FDI can facilitate technology transfer from foreign firms to domestic industries, leading to
productivity improvements and economic expansion (Blomström & Kokko, 2003).

Human Capital Development: FDI can lead to skill development and training of local workers, improving
their human capital. This, in turn, enhances productivity and the overall quality of the labor force,
contributing to economic growth (Borensztein et al., 1998).

In summary, neoclassical growth theory proposes that FDI can have a substantial impact on fostering
economic growth by facilitating the accumulation of capital, transferring technology, developing human
capital, and intensifying competition. Nevertheless, the actualization of these advantages hinges on the
institutional and policy framework of the host country, along with its capability to efficiently absorb and
harness foreign capital and knowledge.

The Production Life Cycle Theory

The Production Life Cycle Theory is an economic concept developed by Raymond Vernon in the 1960s to
explain the internationalization and evolution of products in global [Link] invest abroad to
capitalize on lower production costs in the later stages of the product life cycle. This theory states that,
foreign direct investment (FDI) exists because of the search for cheaper cost of production. Stating that
many manufactured products will be produced first in the countries in which they were researched and
developed and these countries are typically [Link] the product life cycle, there is a
tendency for production to shift towards a more capital-intensive process, prompting producers to relocate
their production to foreign destinations. Consequently, a product that was initially introduced and
manufactured in a specific country, then exported from that same country, may eventually transform into a
product produced in a different foreign country and subsequently imported back into the original country
of [Link] Production Life Cycle Theory opined that the location and nature of foreign direct
investment (FDI) are influenced by the evolution of a product's life cycle. The theory outlines three
stages:

1. Introduction Stage: In the introduction stage, a new product is developed and introduced to the
market. Typically, it is produced in the home country of the innovating [Link] this stage, FDI
may not be a significant factor since the product is primarily produced domestically. Economic
growth is driven by domestic demand and innovation.
 2. Maturity stage: During the maturity stage, the product's sales stabilize, and competition
intensifies. To remain cost-competitive, firms may consider relocating production to countries
with lower labor and production costs.
FDI can become a more prominent factor in this stage as firms seek to optimize their production
processes. This can further stimulate economic growth in both home and host countries.

3. Standardization Stage: Eventually, the product becomes standardized and faces intense
competition, leading to cost considerations becoming more significant. The company then seeks
to reduce costs by relocating production to developing countries where labor and operational
expenses are lower.

While the Production Life Cycle Theory provides insights into the internationalization of products and its
implications for FDI, it is just one of many factors that influence economic growth. Other factors, such as
government policies, institutional quality, human capital, and innovation, also play crucial roles in
shaping a country's economic development and the impact of FDI on growth.

Market Power Theory

Market Power Theory, also known as the Theory of the Multinational Enterprise (MNE), is an economic
theory that seeks to explain the existence and behavior of multinational corporations (MNCs) in the global
economy. Hymer's ideas laid the groundwork for understanding why firms engage in FDI to maintain and
enhance their market power (Hymer, 1960).The foundation of the Market Power Theory can be traced
back to the work of Stephen Hymer in the 1960s. He argued that MNCs possess a monopolistic
advantage, which includes unique intangible assets such as technology, brand reputation, and managerial
[Link] Market Power Theory is closely associated with internalization theory, which explains why
firms opt for FDI rather than relying solely on licensing or exporting.
Internalization theory argues that firms internalize their activities abroad to protect their proprietary
advantages and maintain control over their market power (Buckley and Casson, 1976).The Market Power
Theory also considers the behavioral aspects of MNCs, highlighting how firms may engage in strategic
actions to enhance their market power in foreign markets.

In summary, the market power theory provides a useful framework for understanding how FDI can be
driven by firms' desires to exploit market imperfections and establish monopolistic positions in foreign
markets, leading to changes in market concentration and competitive dynamics.

Eclectic Paradigm (OLI Framework)

The Eclectic Paradigm, also known as the OLI Framework, is an economic theory developed by John
Dunning in the late 20th century. The framework seeks to explain why firms engage in foreign direct
investment (FDI) by considering three key elements: Ownership-Specific Advantages (O),
Location-Specific Advantages (L), and Internalization Advantages (I).
Ownership-Specific Advantages (O): These are unique assets or advantages that a firm possesses, such as
technology, brand recognition, or managerial expertise. Firms engage in FDI when they can leverage
these advantages in foreign markets.

Location-Specific Advantages (L): These are the attributes and benefits of a foreign market, like a large
consumer base or favorable regulatory conditions. Firms invest in a foreign market when it offers
location-specific advantages that boost profitability.

Internalization Advantages (I): These benefits relate to conducting certain business activities within the
firm rather than relying on external market transactions. Firms may choose FDI when internalization
advantages, such as protecting proprietary knowledge or maintaining control, outweigh using external
markets.

The Eclectic Paradigm (OLI Framework) suggests that FDI occurs when a firm's ownership-specific
advantages can be combined with the location-specific advantages of a foreign market, considering the
benefits of internalizing certain activities. This framework helps explain the motivations and drivers of
FDI and remains influential in the field of international business.

Human Capital Theory

Human Capital Theory is an economic and sociological framework that emphasizes the role of education,
training, skills, and knowledge in enhancing an individual's and a society's economic productivity and
overall well-being

According to the Human Capital Theory, investments in education and skill development lead to an
increase in the quality of the labor force, which in turn attracts foreign direct investment (FDI) and
contributes to economic growth (Smith, 2008)
It is often seen as an intangible asset that individuals accumulate over their lifetimes through education,
training, work experience, and personal development. When a country invests in its human capital
through education, training, and skill development, it creates a more productive and innovative workforce.
This skilled workforce becomes an attractive asset for foreign investors seeking a competitive advantage.
FDI, in turn, often flows to countries with a well-educated and skilled workforce. Foreign investors are
more likely to establish operations in countries where they can access a labor force capable of
contributing to their business goals and driving technological advancement. As foreign direct investment
(FDI) grows, it introduces capital, technology, and managerial expertise, all of which have the potential to
result in enhanced productivity, expanded employment prospects, and increased capacity for exporting.
The connection between the theory of human capital, FDI, and economic growth can be ascribed to these
elements.

Education and skills policies: Countries that prioritize education and skill development policies can create
a positive feedback loop. As the quality of education improves, the workforce becomes more attractive to
foreign investors, which in turn can lead to increased FDI and economic growth.
Knowledge Transfer: Foreign direct investment (FDI) frequently entails the transmission of technology,
managerial methods, and knowledge from the home country to the host country. A proficient workforce is
more adept at assimilating and implementing these novel technologies and practices, which can stimulate
innovation and enhance productivity within local industries.

Skilled workforce attraction: A nation boasting a well-educated and highly skilled workforce becomes an
appealing choice for foreign investors. Proficient workers can contribute to heightened efficiency and
superior production quality, resulting in cost reductions and increased competitiveness for foreign
enterprises establishing operations in that particular country.

Economic Diversification: FDI can lead to the diversification of a country's economy by introducing new
industries and sectors. A skilled workforce can quickly adapt to these new opportunities, leading to a
more dynamic and resilient economy.

Job Creation and Income Generation: FDI can lead to job creation, which improves employment
opportunities and increases income levels in the host country. A skilled workforce is better positioned to
take advantage of these job opportunities, leading to higher incomes and improved living standards.

In summary,Human Capital Theory emphasizes the value of education, training, and skill development as
investments that can lead to higher individual earnings, increased productivity, and societal economic
development. It plays a crucial role in shaping educational policies, workforce development strategies,
and discussions about the future of work and lifelong learning.

Export Oriented Growth Theory

Export-Oriented Growth Theory is an economic concept that emphasizes the role of international trade
and exports as a driver of economic growth and development for countries. This theory suggests that
countries can achieve higher rates of economic growth and improve their standards of living by focusing
on producing goods and services for export [Link] engaging in international markets, nations can
capitalize on their comparative advantages, access larger consumer bases, and enhance competitiveness.

Attracting foreign direct investment (FDI) is often a complementary strategy to export-oriented growth.
FDI can bring in capital, technology, and managerial expertise, which further enhances a country's ability
to produce exportable goods and [Link], FDI often fosters linkages between local firms and
multinational corporations, facilitating knowledge transfer and technology [Link] summary,
Export-Oriented Growth Theory suggests that countries can achieve economic growth and development
by focusing on exporting goods and services to international markets.

In conclusion, the theoretical review of the connection between foreign direct investment (FDI) and
economic growth delves into the intricate relationship between these two elements. FDI denotes
investments made by foreign entities in the economy of a host country, often encompassing the
establishment of new enterprises or the acquisition of existing ones. The influence of FDI on economic
growth has been a topic of substantial research.
 Reference

UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). (2020). "World Investment Report
2020: International Production Beyond the Pandemic." United Nations.

Moosa, Imad A. "Foreign direct investment: Theory, evidence and practice." Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.

Anyanwale, A. B. "Impact of foreign direct investment on economic growth in Nigeria: a co-integration

analysis." Global Journal of Social Sciences 6.1 (2007): 1-20.

Alfaro, Laura, Areendam Chanda, Sebnem Kalemli-Ozcan, and Selin Sayek. "FDI and economic growth:
the role of local financial markets." Journal of International Economics 64.1 (2004): 89-112.

World Bank. "Global Development Finance 1999: Analysis and Summary Tables." World Bank
Publications, 1999.

Ayanwale, A.B. (2007). FDI and economic growth, evidence from Nigeria. AERC Research Paper 165,
African Economic Research Consortium, Nairobi.

Balasubramanyam, V.N., Salisu, M., & Sapsford, D. (1996). Foreign Direct Investment and Growth in EP
and IS Countries. Economic Journal, 106, 92-105

Nurudeen, A. & Abu, U. (2010). Government Expenditure and Economic Growth in Nigeria, 1970-2008:
A Disaggregated Analysis. Business Economics Journal, 4, 1-11.

Nwankwo, A. (2006). Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment Inflow in Nigeria. 6th Global
Conference on Business and Economic. USA; Gutman Conference [Link]-9742114-6-X. October
15-17,

Obayori, J.B, Obayori, E.L., Inimino, E.E & Tubotamuno, B. (2016). Sectoral Inflow of Foreign Direct
Investment and Economic Growth in Nigeria: A Co-integration Analysis. International Journal of Current
Research. 8(3), 27806-27811