0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views6 pages

Understanding Logical Statements and Truths

Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views6 pages

Understanding Logical Statements and Truths

Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Lesson 5: The Language of Logic

This lesson introduces the basic concepts of elementary logic to


determine the truth or falsity of statements.

Source: [Link]

Logic

What is logic?

Logic is the study of correct thinking and reasoning. It uses principles and methods to
distinguish valid arguments from those that are not. It is the foundation for expressing logical
methods used to prove theorems, design computer software, and to solve mathematical
problems.
Logic is a tool for working with complicated statements. It illustrates the importance of
precision and conciseness. It allows us to determine the validity of an argument in and out of
mathematics. For lawyers, they use logic to communicate more effectively, construct
arguments, analyze legal contracts, and make decisions.
In logic, assertions are made by combining words and symbols in the form of sentences.
Such assertions are called statements or propositions, which are declarative sentences that are
either true or false – but not both.
A statement or proposition may be denoted by a variable like P, Q, R,…
Examples:
P: University of Northern Philippines is in Vigan City.
Q: Light is faster than sound.
R: 1 + 3 = 4.
S: 7 is an even number.

Simple and compound statement


A simple statement is a statement that conveys a single idea. A compound statement is
a statement that conveys two or more ideas. It is formed by connecting simple statements with
words and phrases such as and, or, if…then, if and only if, etc.

Examples:
1. 20 is divisible by 4.
2. Taylor Swift is a singer and Stephen Curry is a basketball player.
3. If a polygon has three sides, then it is a triangle.
4. Mark goes to gym or stays at home every Friday.

Statement 1 is a simple statement while statements 2, 3, and 4 are examples of


compound statements.
2

Logical Logical Connectives

Connecting simple statements with words and phrases such as and, or, if…then, and
if and only if created a compound statement. For instance, “My mother attends a meeting or
buys in a grocery store”. The word or is a connective for the two simple statements.
Logical connective is a word or symbol that joins two sentences to produce a new one.
George Boole uses symbols such as p, q, r, and s to represent simple statements and the
symbols ˄, ˅, ⁓, →, ↔ to represent connectives.

Logical Connectives and Symbols


Type
Statements Connective Symbolic Form
of Statement
not p not ⁓p negation
p and q and p˄q conjunction
p or q or p˅q disjunction
If p, then q If…then p→q implication/conditional
p if and only if q if and only if p↔q biconditional

Example1:
Let p: I review my lessons.
q: I play video games.
r: I go to the beach.
s: I get a reward.
The following are compound statements formed by using logical connectives. Write
the following statements:
a. q ˄ p
b. q ˅ r
c. ⁓ r
d. p → s
e. s ↔ p

Solutions:
a. I play video games and review my lessons.
b. I play video games or go to the beach.
c. I do not go to the beach.
d. If I review my lessons, then I get a reward.
e. I get a reward if and only if I review my lessons.

Example 2. Indicate the simple statements by p and q and express the compound statement
in symbolic form of the following compound statements.
a. John can program in C++ and he can program in Java.
b. If x is an even number then it is a multiple of 2.
3

Solution:
a. p: John can program in C++.
q: John can program in Java.
p ˄q
b. p: x is an even number.
q: x is a multiple of 2.
p→s

Exercise:
In every item, indicate what statements p, q, or r might stand for and then express
the item using the correct symbol (⋀, ⋁, →, ↔, ~).
1. r ≠ −10
2. 2 and -3 are rational zeroes of 𝑓.
3. y ≤ x
4. If x = y, then y = x.
5. Triangle ABC is a right triangle if and only if c 2 = a2 + b2.

The Truth Table

The truth values of a compound statement are respectively determined by the truth
values of the original statements and the connectives used to form them. The decision of
accepting or rejecting a statement depends on the truth values of a proposition. An acceptable
statement is given a truth value “true” and unacceptable statement is given a truth value
“false”.

a. Negation.
If a proposition p is true, then the proposition ⁓ p is false. However, if p is false, then
⁓ p is true.
For example:
Let p: “I study at University of Northern Philippines.” be a true statement. Then, ⁓ p
is stated as “ I do not study at the University of Northern Philippines.” or “It is false that I
study at the University of Northern Philippines.” Which is a negation of the original
proposition p.

p q ~p ~q
T T F F
T F F T
F T T F
F F T T

The negation of the statement p is denoted by ~𝑝 where ~ is the symbol for “not”. The truth
value of the negation is always the reverse of the truth value of the original statement.
4

b. Conjunction
The conjunction of two statements p and q denoted by p ⋀ q is defined by the
following truth table.
p q p⋀q
T T T
T F F
F T F
F F F

The only condition for p ⋀ q to be a true statement is when both p and q are true.

c. Disjunction
The disjunction of two statements p and q denoted by p ⋁ q is defined by the
following truth table.

p q p⋁q
T T T
T F T
F T T
F F F

This means that the disjunction of two statements is only false when both p and q are
false.

d. Implication or Conditional
In a conditional statement, the truth of p implies the truth of q. If p is true, then q must
be true. The only way that this can fail (or be false) is when p is true while q is false. The truth
table of p → q is given in the following table.

p q p →q
T T T
T F F
F T T
F F T

If p, then q, denoted as 𝑝 → 𝑞 which is false only when p is true and q is false.

e. Biconditional
The biconditional statement p ↔ 𝑞, is defined by the following truth table.
p q p ↔𝐪
T T T
T F F
F T F
F F T

It is a compound statement “p if and only if q”, denoted as 𝑝 ↔ 𝑞 which is true only when
both p and q have the same truth values.
5

Summary of truth values of simple and compound statements using logical connectives
P q ~𝒑 ~𝒒 p⋀q p⋁q p →q p ↔𝐪
T T F F T T T T
T F F T F T F F
F T T F F T T F
F F T T F F T T

Example 1. Given the truth values of the propositions A, B, C, and D. If A is true, B is false,
C is true, and D is false, give the truth value of the following:
a. [(⁓A ⋀ B) → C ] ⋁ D
b. [ (A → B) → ⁓ C] ↔ [⁓ B → ⁓ ( C ⋀ D)]

Solutions:
We simply substitute the truth value of each proposition, i.e.
a. [(⁓A ⋀ B) → C ] ⋁ D
[(⁓T ⋀ F) → T ] ⋁ F
[(F ⋀ F) → T ] ⋁ F
(F → T) ⋁ F
T ⋁F
T

b. [ (A → B) → ⁓ C] ↔ [⁓ B → ⁓ ( C ⋀ D)]
[ (T → F) → ⁓ T] ↔ [⁓ F → ⁓ ( T ⋀ F)]
(F → F) ↔ (T → ⁓ F)
T ↔ (T → T)
T ↔T
T

Example 2. Construct a truth table for


a. [⁓ p → ( p ⋀ q)]
b. [ (p ↔ q) ⋁ (p → r)] → ⁓ (q ⋀ r)
Solution:
a. [⁓ p → ( p ⋀ q)]
Since it involves 2 propositions, there are 4 combinations.
p q ⁓p p⋀q [⁓ p → ( p ⋀ q)]
T T F T T
T F F F T
F T T F F
F F T F F
6

b. [(p ↔ q) ⋁ (p → r)] → ⁓ (q ⋀ r)
Since it involves 3 propositions, there are 8 combinations.

p q r (p↔q) (p→r) (p ↔ q)⋁(p→r) (q⋀r) ⁓(q⋀r) [(p↔q)⋁(p→r)]→⁓(q⋀r)


T T T T T T T F F
T T F T F T F T T
T F T F T T F T T
T F F F F F F T T
F T T F T T T F F
F T F F T T F T T
F F T T T T F T T
F F F T T T F T T

Exercise:
A. Give the truth value if A is false, B is true, C is false and D is true.
a. [(C → B) → ⁓ C] ↔ [B → (C ⋀ A)]
b. [(D ⋀ B) ⋁ (A ⋀ C)] ⋀ B
c. [(A ⋁ B) → C] → [ B → (A ⋁ B)]
B. Construct the truth table for the following:
a. [(p ⋁ q) → r] ⋀ [ (r ⋀ p) → r]
b. (r ⋀ p) ↔ [(p ⋁ q) → ⁓ p] ⋀ (p ⋁ q)

References:

Alejan, R. O. et al. (2018). Mathematics in the Modern World. Mutya Publishing House,
Inc. Malabon City.

Aufmann,R.,et al. (2016). Mathematical Excursion 4th Edition. Cengage Learning, USA.

Nocon, R. C. & Nocon, E. G. (2016). Essential Mathematics for the Modern World. First
Edition. C & E Publishing, Inc. Quezon City.

Ymas, S. E. Jr. et al. (2006). Discrete [Link] Edition. Ymas Publishing House.

Zorilla, R. S. & Partible, F. G. (2018). Mathematics in the Modern World. Mutya Publishing
House, Inc. Malabon City.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Simple statements express a single idea and have clear truth values, while compound statements combine multiple simple statements with logical connectives, such as 'and', 'or', and 'if...then', thus conveying complex ideas. This difference impacts logical analysis as compound statements require evaluation of the constituent simple statements and the relationships between them using truth tables or logical frameworks to determine their overall truth value .

Logic aids in structuring arguments clearly and concisely, crucial for effective communication, particularly in law where arguments must be precise and well-founded. It helps delineate relationships between premises and conclusions, identifying flaws and strengths in arguments, and crafting persuasive, legally sound arguments. Lawyers use logical principles to analyze contracts, construct legal arguments, and communicate findings clearly .

A truth table for a conjunction, p ⋀ q, is true only when both p and q are true, while a biconditional truth table, p ↔ q, requires both p and q to have identical truth values for the statement to be true. These differences highlight that while conjunction focuses on simultaneous truth, biconditional ensures equivalence, underscoring the nature of logical dependences versus equivalencies in logical expressions .

Logical symbols provide a universal language to represent propositions succinctly, allowing for clearer communication and analysis of logical expressions. Symbols like ˄, ˅, →, and ↔ eliminate ambiguities inherent in natural language, facilitating precise mathematical operations, and enabling more efficient computation or theorem proving by abstracting complex statements into uniform, manipulable constructs .

Implication, or conditional logic, is critical in mathematical logic because it establishes a dependence between two propositions, typically structured as 'if p, then q' (p → q). This relationship is central to theorem proving, as implications form the backbone of deductive reasoning. They allow mathematicians to assert conclusions that follow logically from a set of premises, thus building complex mathematical arguments in a structured and verifiable manner .

Negation is significant because it reverses the truth value of a statement, allowing for the exploration of contrary possibilities of that statement. If a statement is true, its negation is false, and vice versa. This concept is fundamental in logical reasoning, as it helps individuals challenge assumptions and explore alternatives, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation of statements .

Logical connectives, such as 'and', 'or', 'if...then', and 'if and only if', play a crucial role in forming compound statements by connecting simple statements, thus providing precise relationships between them. By using symbols like ˄ for conjunction, ˅ for disjunction, → for implication, and ↔ for biconditional, logical connectives allow for clear expression and analysis of complex logical arguments, enhancing clarity and precision. This precision is imperative for determining the validity of arguments and is foundational in mathematics and computer science .

Evaluating compound logical statements through truth tables involves systematically analyzing all possible truth values of the individual simple statements involved to determine the overall truth value of the compound statement. This process is crucial as it validates arguments, elucidates logical relationships, and exposes potential fallacies, providing a comprehensive evaluation of logical constructs used in complex reasoning tasks .

Truth tables provide a methodical way to asses the validity of disjunction statements by enumerating all possible truth values of its constituent simple statements. In a disjunction, represented as p ∨ q, the statement is true unless both p and q are false simultaneously. By examining each combination of truth values for the simple statements, truth tables delineate the scenarios under which a disjunction holds true, ensuring that no possible combination is overlooked .

Biconditional statements, denoted as p ↔ q, express that two propositions are equivalent; both must share the same truth value for the biconditional to be true. They serve as a robust mechanism for defining equivalence, ensuring that the propositions are not only related but interchangeable in logical analysis, essential for proving logical equivalency in math and philosophy .

You might also like