NAME: CINDY A.
GONZALEZ
QUALIFICATION:COOKERY NC II
CBC Validation Instrument
Part I – Course Design
1. Is the identified Course Title derived from the name arising out of the competency
analysis?
YES NO
If the answer is NO, please indicate your suggestions.
COURSE TITLE:
2. Is the stated Nominal Duration derived from the total number of nominal duration
per unit of competency from module of instructions?
YES NO
If the answer is NO, please indicate your suggestions.
NOMINAL DURATION:
3. Is the statement of the Course of Description explains the coverage and importance
of the course?
YES NO
If the answer is NO, please indicate your suggestions.
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
4. Is the identified Entry Requirements specifically defines the expected trainees entry
requirement?
YES NO
If the answer is NO, please indicate your suggestions.
ENTRY REQUIREMENTS:
5. Is the Course Structure in tabular form presented the Unit of Competency, Module
Title, Summary of Learning Outcomes and Nominal Duration?
YES NO
If the answer is NO, please indicate your suggestions.
COURSE STRUCTURE:
6. Is the Resources presented a list in tabular form summarizing the needed resources
(tools, equipment, materials, supplies)?
YES NO
If the answer is NO, please indicate your suggestions.
RESOURCES:
7. Is the Course Delivery presented a list summarizing the training methodology that is
based on the module content from the developed module of instruction?
YES NO
If the answer is NO, please indicate your suggestions.
COURSE DELIVERY:
8. Is the presented Assessment Method summarizes the list of assessment method
from the module of instruction?
YES NO
If the answer is NO, please indicate your suggestions.
ASSESSMENT METHOD:
9. Are the identified Trainers Qualification specifically presents a list of trainers
qualification found in the competency standard?
YES NO
If the answer is NO, please indicate your suggestions.
TRAINERS QUALIFICATION:
Part II- Module of Instruction
1. Is the identified Module Title in conformity with the Unit of Competency of competency
standard?
YES NO
If the answer is NO, please indicate your suggestions.
MODULE TITLE:
2. Does the statement of the Module Description clearly describe the module scope and
delimitation?
YES NO
If the answer is NO, please indicate your suggestions.
MODULE DESCRIPTION:
3. Are the identified Learning Outcomes clearly describes the objectives of the training
module and are SMART?
YES NO
If the answer is NO, please indicate your suggestions.
LEARNING OUTCOMES:
In my point of view , there are learning outcomes which must be separated .Such as, in
unit of competency 4, provide food and beverage order to [Link] payments and
conclude and close down dining area are included in this [Link] suggestion would
be ,Process payments and conclude and close down dining area must be another UC.
4. Are the identified Assessment Criteria clearly described how well the learners have
achieved the learning outcomes?
YES NO
If the answer is NO, please indicate your suggestions.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:
5. Are the identified Contents are derived from the evidence guide and in accordance with
YES NO
the performance criteria?
If the answer is NO, please indicate your suggestions.
CONTENTS:
6. Are the identified Conditions describes the needed resources for a learning outcome?
YES NO
If the answer is NO, please indicate your suggestions.
CONDITIONS:
7. Are the identified Training Methodologies selected based on the identified learning
contents?
YES NO
If the answer is NO, please indicate your suggestions.
TRAINING METHODOLOGIES:
8. Are the identified Assessment Methods derived from the method of assessment of
evidence guide and sometimes on the identified training methodology?
YES NO
If the answer is NO, please indicate your suggestions.
ASSESSMENT METHODS:
Part III – Overall Impression/Comment on the Competency-Based
Curriculum
After having gone over the draft Competency-Based Curriculum, what is your overall
rating as to its acceptability and validity based on the scale below: Please check one (1)
number only.
5 4 3 2 1 0
100% Valid Acceptable Totally
OVERALL comments on the Competency-Based Curriculum:
My overall rating is 5, because I believe the competency based curriculum
already provides a comprehensive learning criteria, methods and
approached which could help a lot to the potential [Link] , there
are maybe observable learning outcomes to be separated ,but it is not
hinder the used of already developed CBC which is evidently helpful in the
delivery of module of instruction in this specialization.