0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views2 pages

Lost Spring: Childhood and Dreams

Uploaded by

smex48179
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views2 pages

Lost Spring: Childhood and Dreams

Uploaded by

smex48179
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

LOST SPRING

State whether the following statements are true or false:

1. The author planned on building a school for the rag pickers. False
2. One of the boys had no chappals on because his mother had put them on a shelf out of his reach.
False
3. It is a tradition for rag pickers to stay barefoot. False
4. The bangle makers have no permits but they have ration cards because this gets their names on
voters’ lists. False
5. A rich boy presented Saheb with a new pair of shoes. False
6. Mukesh is proud of his home in Firozabad. True
7. The bangle makers are aware that child labour is illegal. False
8. The young men were excited at the idea of starting a cooperative. False

Answer these questions briefly:

1. a. Name the two boys that represent ‘stolen childhood’ in the text.
b. State the family background of each boy.
The two boys that represent stolen childhood in the text are Saheb-e-Alam and Mukesh.
Saheb belonged to a family of rag pickers from Seemapuri, Delhi. His family was originally from
Bangladesh but they had to leave the green fields of Dhaka due to the storms that destroyed their
crops and swept away their fields and homes.
Mukesh came from a family of bangle makers from Firozabad. Unlike the other children of
Firozabad, Mukesh had a dream of doing something different with his life. He did not want to remain a
bangle maker like most of the people in Firozabad. Mukesh’s dream was to be a motor mechanic.

2. The two boys have much in common and yet they view life very differently. What is the main
difference between them?
The main difference between Saheb and Mukesh is that Saheb does not have any dream of doing
something different with his life. He is satisfied and happy with rag picking and later when he is
working at a tea stall, he accepts his fate even though he is not happy anymore.
Mukesh, on the other hand, dreams of improving his life by doing something else other than making
bangles. He dreams of becoming a motor mechanic. Though the garage is far from his home, Mukesh
is determined to walk the distance in order to achieve his dream. Mukesh wants to change to a better
way of life which Saheb does not seem to display.

3. Do you think Saheb is happy working in the tea stall? Give a reason for your answer.
No, Saheb is not happy working in the tea stall because he is no longer his own master. Working in the
tea stall has taken away his freedom and his master is now the owner of the tea stall. He no longer has
the freedom to do whatever he likes with his time. The author notices that he has lost his carefree
look. Even though he is paid 800 rupees for his work and all his meals yet he feels that the canister he
carries is heavier than the plastic bag he used to carry as a rag picker.

4. How do you know that the women of Seemapuri are practical people?
The women of Seemapuri are practical people because they say that food is more important for
survival than an identity. Even though they live in Seemapuri as squatters and the living conditions are
extremely unhygienic and unhealthy compared to the clean and beautiful land of Bangladesh with its
green fields and clean rivers; at least in Seemapuri they still get food to feed their children. In
Seemapuri they live without an identity or permit but they are given ration cards which get their
names on voters’ lists and enable them to buy grain. Bangladesh may be clean but their families starve
as the fields yield no crops due to the floods.
5. a. Who is Mukesh?
Mukesh is a young bangle maker from Firozabad.
b. How is he different from all the other children?
He is different from the other children because he dreams of a better life for himself.
c. What is his dream?
Mukesh’s dream is to be a motor mechanic.
d. He has a plan to make his dream a reality. What is it?
He plans to achieve his dream of becoming a motor mechanic by going to a garage and learning.
e. Why is the author pleased with Mukesh?
The author is pleased with Mukesh because she sees a spark of daring in Mukesh who wants to be a
motor mechanic and plans to learn at a garage. She sees the determination in him to learn as he tells
her that he will walk to the garage even if it is far from his home.

6. List the hazards of working in a glass bangles industry.


The hazards of working in a glass bangles industry are:
 Men, women and children sit in dark rooms with extremely high temperatures and poor
ventilation.
 They sit inside these dark, dingy rooms for long hours causing them to lose the brightness of
their eyes.
 Most of the bangle makers become blind after spending years polishing the glass of bangles.
They do not have any protective gear to protect their eyes from the dust.
 Young boys and girls are made to sit in dark hutments next to lines of flames of flickering oil
lamps, welding pieces of coloured glass into circles of bangles. Their eyes are more adjusted
to the dark than to the light outside. That is why they end up losing their eyesight before they
become adults.

7. a. What is the new idea put to the bangle makers by the author?
The author suggests to the bangle makers to start a cooperative. In this way they can sell their
products directly to the market without having to go through the middlemen. These middlemen have
trapped their fathers and forefathers for many years. Organizing themselves into a cooperative will
allow them to earn more money and to come out of their poverty.
b. How do they react?
When this suggestion is made to the bangle makers, they are not open to the idea as they are
fearful of the middlemen and the police. They believe that if they organize themselves into a
cooperative, they will be hauled up by the police, beaten and dragged to jail for doing something
illegal.
c. Why do they react in this manner?
They react in this manner because there is no leader among them who can help them see things
differently. Their fathers are as tired as they are. They talk endlessly in a spiral that moves from
poverty to apathy to greed and to injustice.

Common questions

Powered by AI

'Lost Spring' challenges traditional views on child labor and poverty by highlighting the systemic and socio-economic structures that perpetuate these issues. It depicts the futility of mere legal prohibition of child labor without addressing underlying economic compulsions. The narrative underscores the lack of opportunities and deep-seated power dynamics, such as those imposed by middlemen, which bind families to poverty despite legal frameworks. By focusing on individual stories, it emphasizes the need for comprehensive socio-political reforms and grassroots empowerment as opposed to simplistic punitive measures, thus provoking reevaluation of policies aimed at eradicating child labor .

Saheb's transition from a rag picker to a tea stall worker has a marked psychological impact by stripping away his sense of freedom and autonomy. As a rag picker, Saheb enjoyed a degree of independence despite the harshness of his work. His new role in the tea stall, although providing a stable income, takes away his independence, making him subject to the command of the stall's owner. This shift results in a loss of his cheerful demeanor and sense of self, indicating that financial security alone does not equate to happiness if it comes at the cost of personal autonomy .

The working conditions in the glass bangle industry have a detrimental impact on the lives of the workers, especially the children. These conditions include long hours spent in poorly ventilated, dark rooms, which expose workers to high temperatures and cause them to gradually lose their eyesight. Children are particularly affected as they work next to flickering oil lamps, causing their eyes to adjust to the dim light, resulting in premature blindness. The lack of protective gear exacerbates these health issues, impacting their quality of life and depriving them of educational opportunities, trapping them in a cycle of poverty and labor .

The women of Seemapuri prioritize basic survival over personal identity, reflecting a practical and pragmatic approach to life. They value food security over traditional or personal identity aspects, as evidenced by their willingness to live without legal documentation in Seemapuri under unhygienic conditions. Despite the lack of identity or official residence status, they utilize the provision of ration cards, which allows them to access food and be included in voters' lists, underscoring their emphasis on practical necessities over identity .

Saheb-e-Alam comes from a family of rag pickers who migrated from Bangladesh to escape natural calamities, leading to a life focused on immediate survival rather than long-term aspirations. This background influences his contentment with any minor stability, reflecting a lack of dreams for a future outside his given circumstances. Conversely, Mukesh's background in a family of bangle makers in Firozabad provides him with insight into labor exploitation, fueling his determination to escape the cyclical poverty associated with the trade. His familial interactions and socio-economic awareness motivate him to seek a different path as a motor mechanic, demonstrating a proactive life outlook .

Environmental adversity significantly shapes the lives of Seemapuri residents by forcing them to prioritize immediate survival needs over long-term stability or identity. Displacement due to environmental disasters, like those experienced by Saheb's family in Bangladesh, necessitates settling in precarious, unhygienic conditions. This adversity compels the residents to exist in a state of legal invisibility while adapting to resource scarcity. It instills a practical focus on securing daily sustenance, often at the cost of broader aspirations, reinforcing cycles of poverty and preventing social mobility .

Mukesh dreams of becoming a motor mechanic, which distinguishes him as he aspires to break away from his family's traditional occupation of bangle making in Firozabad. Despite the challenges, Mukesh is determined to achieve his dream by walking to a garage to learn the craft, showcasing his drive to improve his life independently. In contrast, Saheb, who comes from a family of rag pickers, lacks a similar vision for a different life. Although he transitions from rag picking to working in a tea stall, he does not express any ambition beyond his current circumstances, indicating a resignation to his fate .

Bangle makers face significant challenges such as fear of middlemen and potential police brutality when attempting to start a cooperative. These challenges are significant because the entrenched power of middlemen and legal ambiguities discourage any initiative to alter traditional selling structures, trapping the workers in a cycle of exploitation. Furthermore, the absence of leadership to guide and motivate them to organize into effective cooperatives exacerbates the situation, making it difficult for them to collectively improve their economic conditions .

Potential solutions to help Mukesh achieve his dream include providing access to vocational training programs that remove economic barriers, such as subsidies or scholarships for technical education. Mentorship from experienced mechanics could also offer guidance and encouragement, fostering a supportive environment. Additionally, microfinance initiatives or community workshops on entrepreneurship could empower Mukesh with the resources and skills to pursue his aspirations. Partnerships with local NGOs might also facilitate job placements post-training, ensuring a sustainable path away from his community's traditional occupation .

Forming a cooperative among the bangle makers could potentially be an effective strategy for economic empowerment by allowing them to bypass exploitative middlemen and sell their products directly to the market. This approach could improve their income and lift them out of poverty. However, the effectiveness is compromised by the fear and reluctance of the workers due to potential legal repercussions and lack of leadership. Without overcoming these fears and organizing cohesively, the idea remains unimplemented, indicating that external support or leadership might be necessary for the cooperative to succeed .

You might also like