0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views3 pages

Emissions and Revenue Trends 2012-2016

Uploaded by

iola
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views3 pages

Emissions and Revenue Trends 2012-2016

Uploaded by

iola
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016*

Revenues ($000s) $5,612.70 $5,877.12 $6,100.72 $6,434.88 $6,738.60


Gross Profit ($000s) $3,479.87 $3,702.59 $3,965.47 $4,247.02 $4,548.56
Scope 1 emissions
14,856 15,079 16,204 16,312 16,920
Kg CO2e
Scope 2 emissions
51,070 50,749 45,910 46,480 47,360
Kg CO2e
Total Scope 1 & 2 65,926 65,828 62,114 62,792 64,280

2050 end- Compound Emissions Emissions


Method point target Annual target 2020 target 2030
(Kg CO2e) Growth Rate (Kg CO2e) (Kg CO2e)

Absolute Contraction:
9,418.80 -5.28% 47,885 27,848
85% reduction by 2050

Value-Added:
85% reduction by 2050;
30,166 -2.07% 56,548 45,862
7% Company Growth;
3.5 Global GDP
Ave. Annual
Growth Rate
4.70%
6.90%
3.30%

-1.90%
-0.60%

Computing Future Emissions Target Levels using the Value-Added Method:


The equation for computing target levels of emissions using the value-added approach is:
Where:
· g = the company’s annual growth rate of gross profit
· G = the annual growth rate of global GDP
· CAGR = Compound Annual Growth Rate of carbon emissions to reach the desired 2°C target. The CAGR sh
For the example we have been using, and assuming the company’s Gross Profit is growing at 6% per year and t
=92.433 mtCo2
d 2°C target. The CAGR should be negative, so (1+CAGR) < 1.0.
wing at 6% per year and that global GDP is growing at 3.5% per year, the 2020 emissions would be:

You might also like