Governance and Organizational Theory
Governance and Organizational Theory
4. Non-Managerial Employees:
● Sales Representatives: Responsible for selling company products
or services to customers. Develops leads, negotiates contracts,
and maintains customer relationships.
● Production Supervisors: Supervises production line workers and
ensures adherence to safety and quality standards. Coordinates
with the production manager to optimize workflow.
● Marketing Assistants: Assists marketing manager in executing
marketing campaigns. Prepares promotional materials, manages
social media accounts, and analyzes campaign performance.
It is a fact that inside any company is a diverse group of people Some of the strategic aims of corporate governance consist
with their respective interests. Therefore, a system is required to create of:
and sustain good relationships among these people to avoid anyone being 1. Good corporate governance aims to ensure a higher degree of
cheated or exploited. Basically, this is the reason for the need to have transparency in an organization by encouraging full disclosure of
corporate governance. Technically speaking, corporate governance is transactions in the company accounts. Full disclosure includes compliance
a system of processes, policies, and rules that direct and control an with regulations and disclosing any information important to the
organization’s conduct for the good management of companies. shareholders. Transparency involves disclosure of all forms of
Corporate governance consists of the relationship between conflict of interest.
the numerous stakeholders involved and the goals for which the
corporation is directed. In modern business corporations, the chief 2. A strong corporate governance structure encourages accountability of
external stakeholder groups are shareholders, debt holders, trade the management to the company directors and the accountability of the
creditors, suppliers, customers, and communities affected by the directors to the shareholders. Through hiring independent directors, a
corporation’s activities. Internal stakeholders include the board of company aims to create good corporate governance. Any discrepancies in
directors, executives, and other employees. the company accounts or malfunctioning of the company are closely
watched by the board of directors. The board has a right to question
Corporate governance is also a process that aims to strategic decisions.
apportion corporate resources in a way that enhances value for all
stakeholders such as the shareholders, investors, employees, 3. A corporate governance structure ensures equitable treatment of all the
customers, suppliers, environment, and the community in general. It shareholders of the company. However, all shareholders deserve
also holds those in control to account by evaluating their decisions equitable treatment, and this equity is ensured by a good corporate
on transparency, inclusivity, equity, and responsibility. The World governance structure in any organization.
Bank defines governance as the exercise of political authority and the use
of institutional resources to manage society’s problems and affairs. 4. Corporate governance allows firms to evaluate their behavior before
The main objective of corporate governance is to put an end they are scrutinized by regulatory bodies. Companies with a strong
to the abusive somehow unlawful and improper activities of some corporate governance system are better able to limit their exposure to
entrepreneurs and business owners. At first, the main objective of regulatory risks and fines. An active and independent board can
successfully point out the loopholes in the company operations and state or federal law, face substantial fines from regulatory
help solve issues internally. agencies, and suffer reputational damage to the public.
5. The main objective of corporate governance is to protect the long-term ● Accountability issues - Accountability is necessary for effective
interests of the shareholders. Companies with strong corporate corporate governance. From the top-level executives to lower-tier
governance structures are seen to have higher valuation premiums employees, each level and division of the corporation should report
attached to their shares. This shows that good corporate governance and be accountable to one another as a system of checks and
is perceived by the market as an incentive for shareholders to invest balances. Above all else, the action of each level of the corporation
in the company. is accountable to the shareholders and the public. Without
accountability, one division of the corporation might endanger the
POTENTIAL CHALLENGES IN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE success of the entire company or cause stockholders to lose the
Good governance is an ideal that is difficult to achieve in its totality. desire to continue their investment.
Corporate governance is the term used to describe the balance ● Transparency - In order to be transparent, a corporation must
among participants in the corporate structure who have an interest in accurately report its profits and losses and make those figures
the way in which the corporation is run, such as executive staff, available to those who invest in the company. Over-inflating profits
shareholders, and members of the community. Corporate governance or minimizing losses can seriously damage the company’s
directly impacts the profits and reputation of the company, and having poor relationship with stockholders in that they are enticed to invest
policies can expose the company to lawsuits, fines, reputational damage, under pretenses. A lack of transparency can also expose the
and loss of capital investment. company to fines from regulatory agencies.
● Ethics violations - Members of the executive board have an
Here are the common pitfalls that corporate governance ethical duty to make decisions based on the best interests of the
policies should avoid. stockholders. Further, a corporation has an ethical duty to protect
● Conflict of interest - Avoiding conflict of interest is vital. A conflict the social welfare of others, including the greater community in
of interest within the framework of corporate governance occurs which they operate. Minimizing pollution and avoiding
when an officer or other controlling member of a corporation has manufacturing in countries that do not adhere to similar labor
other financial interests that directly conflict with the objectives of standards are examples of a way in which corporate governance,
the corporation. For example, a board member of a solar company ethics, and social welfare interlink.
who owns a significant amount of stock in an oil company has a ● Governance standards - A board should always produce
conflict of interest because, while the board he serves on unbiased rules and policies and disseminate those standards in the
represents the development of clean energy, they have a personal business. However, often some hard-headed managers may
financial stake in the success of the oil industry. When conflicts of sabotage good corporate governance at the operational level. This
interest are present, they deteriorate the trust of shareholders and negative act may leave the company unprotected against law
the public while making the corporation vulnerable to litigation. violations and damage to stakeholders’ reputations. Hence, there
● Oversight issues - Effective corporate governance requires the must be a clear enforcement mechanism consistently applied as a
board of directors to have substantial oversight of the company’s way to check and balance the actions of the operational managers.
procedures and practices. Oversight is a board term that ● Short-termism - To implement effective good corporate
encompasses the executive staff reporting to the board and the governance, it must need boards that can manage the company in
board’s awareness of the daily operations of the company and how continuing years to produce sustainable value for the company.
its objectives are being achieved. The board protects the interests This is problematic since there is a definite period for the directors
of the shareholders, acting as a check and balance against the to sit as part of the board. The result of the election would
executive staff. Without this oversight, corporate staff might violate determine whether directors would remain if re-elected or to leave
if not given the chance for another term. The short tenures could - Investor confidence in the stock market might be improved
deprive the board of long-term oversight and vital expertise. if all stock markets companies are required to comply with
● Diversity - Based on good judgment and practicality, boards recognized corporate governance rules.
should possess a good combination of skills and perspectives to ● Disadvantages:
ensure the success of any organization. However, only a few - The same rules might not be suitable for every company,
boards are very observant of this mix and instead only have because the circumstances of each company are different.
minimal standards such as age, gender, and race. The roles of the A system of corporate governance is too rigid if the same
boards are tough particularly because they need to generate rules are applied to all companies.
strong decisions, hence there must be a good mix of them inside - There are some aspects of corporate governance that
the boardroom. cannot be regulated easily, such as negotiating the
remuneration of directors, deciding the most suitable range
The TWO DISTINCT APPROACHES to Corporate Governance of skills and experience for the board of directors, and
Corporate governance is all about monitoring and controlling assessing the performance of the board and its directors.
management decisions and strategies all to the best interest of the
company’s stakeholders. 2. Principles-Based Approach
As a result of many companies going bankrupt in winding up Principles-based approach is grounded on the outlook that a
despite producing a healthy financial statement, Codes for corporate distinct set of rules is unfitting for every company. Circumstances of a
governance were established, and companies were expected to comply company can change every now and then.
with them. In a principles-based jurisdiction, legal force applies to the
There are two approaches to corporate governance regulations provisions of company laws, but additional listing rules are enforced
and companies can decide which of these principles to apply. on a “comply or explain” basis. If there is a reason why there is
1. Rules-Based Approach non-compliance, there should be an explanation for the shareholders.
In a rules-based, all provisions are legal rules, supported by Here are the common characteristics of a principle-based
law which attracts punishment from the law, if there is failure to approach, which are:
comply. Here are the usual characteristics of a rules-based approach, a. activities of entities must address major principles set out in codes
namely: of best practice
a. approved set of requirements b. not merely a box-ticking application
b. fast approach of ensuring conformity c. more demanding to avoid than rules- based approach
c. implements a checklist method d. easy to observe that entity is complying
d. clear difference between conformity and non-conformity e. directors are necessary to work in the entity’s best interest
e. easy to observe that entity is conforming f. more stretchy, and therefore better able to cope with different
f. lessening of flexibility on the part of management and auditors situations
g. challenging to set rules entirely for all situations g. easier defense for obvious breach principles
h. likely to misunderstand rules h. but principles may be construed in different ways
i. similar rules apply to all, whatsoever their sizes are
Principles are very beneficial in consenting organizations to
● Advantages: tailor-fit their interpretations of how best to apply new practices for the
- Companies do not have the choice of ignoring the rules. distinctive situations and operational realisms of their organization and
- All companies are required to meet the same minimum industry. This must therefore result in better, more applicable governance
standards of corporate governance. actions in comparison to minimum obedience with a set of basic rules.
THE AGENCY THEORY There are two situations which make efforts on resolving agency
The relationship between the agents and principals in the business conflicts all the more vital, which are:
is being examined in an agency theory. The agent represents the 1. Different risk desire
principal in a particular business transaction and takes decisions on Shareholders and managers differ in the level of risk they are
behalf of the principal in an agency relationship. Any agent is eager to assume. Shareholders do not participate the daily operations of
expected to disregard his self-interest in order to represent the best the company. On the other hand, managers are more futuristic and willing
interests of the principal. to assume greater risks because of their closeness to important
In a corporation set-up, the top executives are usually elected by information. The shareholders are intensely interested in increasing the
shareholders. The shareholders are the true owners of the company. An present and future value of their investments, whereas the top executives
agency relationship exists between the shareholders and the top are highly concerned in the sustainable growth of the company. Therefore,
executives who should act for the best interests of these owners. Any these differences in their interests and approaches form a sense of
incongruity among the desires of these two parties may cause suspicion and disagreement.
inefficiencies and financial losses leading to principal-agent problem.
2. Super self-centered executives
Using agency theory incentives could be design appropriately This situation is when the managers are just interested in providing
by identifying what best motivates agent to act. On the other hand, short-term performance to the owners to obtain their compensation hikes.
incentives that boost wrong behavior should deleted. Only those Generally, this is more common yet very risky condition.
incentives and rules that discourage moral threat should be maintained.
Developing better corporate policy for business could only be possible The AGENCY THEORY in CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
through knowing precisely the mechanisms that create problems. Agency theory in corporate governance refers to the
A very good example of agency theory is the manner in which relationship between shareholders and directors/management.
a government works. People elect their political representatives to ● Shareholders, as the true owners of the corporation, elect
manage the country in a manner that take advantage of their executives to act on their behalf. The theory aims to ensure that
interests. Normally, representatives from various political groups make decisions are made in the owners' interest. It is part of the broader
promise of changes to voters. However, most of the times upon topic of corporate governance, addressing the challenge of
assumption of office the masses find themselves cheated by their elected directors controlling a company while shareholders own it.
candidates who would turn out to be corrupt officials. In this case, the ● Agency theory is commonly used to understand executive
voters stand as principals who elect the government officials to perform as incentive alignment, board monitoring, and control of top
agents. managers.
The employees and employers of an organizations also display a THE STEWARDSHIP THEORY
common example of agency theory. The employees are employed to A steward is defined as someone who protects and take care of
work based on the objectives of the company. However, with the needs of others. Under stewardship theory, company top
increasing figure of corporate scandals showed that the relationship executives protect the interests of the owners or shareholders and
between employees and employers is not what is supposed to be. make decisions on their behalf. Their sole objective is to create and
Enormous financial and reputational harm are often caused by those maintain a successful organization so the shareholders prosper.
employees who have worked against the ethics of the organization. Often, Companies that embrace stewardship place the Chief Executive
these losses due to unethical employee’s practices may be irremediable. Officer (CEO) and Chairman responsibilities under one executive, with a
board comprised mostly of in-house members. This allows for intimate
knowledge of organizational operation and a deep commitment to business, this set-up helps to obviously know who is really in-charge or
success. responsible.
It is requisite that stewardship governance takes a Chief Executive
While profits energies any business, some companies may Officer (CEO) who is dependable and prepared to set his personal
consider themselves part of something greater. Stewardship theory holds interests only secondary for the interest of the company. Stewardship
that ownership does not actually own a company but simply hold it in trust. governance entails choosing the right personality that would lead the
This means that profit takes a second priority after meeting a company’s boardroom of the company.
design of honoring a founder’s primary vision. Often manager’s seek other
ends besides financials which could be in the form of a sense of worth, The stakeholder’s theory recognizes the needs of every segment
altruism, a good reputation, a job well-done, a feeling of satisfaction and a that comprises the company which consists of but not limited to the
sense of purpose. employees, suppliers and business partners with equal importance.
In the stewardship theory, managers innately seek to do a Here are some significant applications of stewardship theory in
good job, maximize company profits and bring good returns to corporate governance:
stockholders because they feel a strong duty to the company. They a. On Business - A company dedicated to a higher purpose will
do this essentially for the interest of the company and not for their attract customers who believe in similar purpose. On the other
own financial interest. Managers are not considered isolated hand, customers cautiously compare how the company truly
individuals but rather part of the company. Usually, the ego and operates against what it talks about stewardship in its corporate
sense of worth of managers are combined with the image of the governance. Any gap identified between action and talk will create
company based on the stewardship theory. a big impact on the customers.
There are several models that a company may use to operate b. On Employees - Company’ stewardship attitude can be clearly
using stewardship theory, which could be in the form of: seen at an instant by employees on the way they are treated.
a. operating with as little negative impacts as possible against the Employees may possibly have higher expectations when a
environment or the Earth, company operates with profitability as the motive. Although,
b. supporting human and animal rights; employees with identical vision would prefer to stay with a
c. abstaining from using products made a sweatshops (business company and perform excellently to attain company’s goals though
employing workers at low wages, for long hours, and under poor they may have higher pay in other companies. When employees
conditions); sense that they are part of something greater, a strong and
d. renouncing products testing on living subjects; and concrete practice of stewardship improves drive and determination.
e. honoring the belief of servant leadership c. On Customers - Likewise, just like employees, when customers
sense that they are part of something greater, they may likely
Often these models mentioned above are likely to be subjective, stay connected with businesses that are stewardship-driven.
which give management a bit of headache in identifying the borderline Even if the prices for goods and services become higher, they
concerning socially responsible and irresponsible behavior. would remain loyal to these businesses. Yet, stewardship
standpoint may also dismay some possible customers by mistake.
The STEWARDSHIP THEORY in CORPORATE GOVERNANCE This situation would likely happen when the cause is not favorable
Clearly, the main purpose of the stewardship theory of to customers or when management becomes strident about their
governance is to satisfy shareholders. With a single leader, a strong beliefs.
channel is formed to convey business requirements to the
shareholders and vice versa. During difficult situations faced by the
THE STAKEHOLDER THEORY endure should be proportionate to the benefits they have earned in the
Stakeholder theory states that the purpose of a business is to company. Not all these costs are purely financial, so they may be
create value for wider group stakeholders other than just demanding to measure.
shareholders. This theory considers the corporate environment as a
network of interconnected groups, all of which are required to be pleased 5. Agency principle - This principle reflects on the manager of a company
to sustain the health and success of the company in the long-term. as its agent and hence has responsibilities to the stakeholders and also
A stakeholder refers to any individual or group of individuals who the shareholders.
can affect or be affected by any actions done by a business. It consists of
those who work in its stores, those who work and live close to its factories, 6. The principle of limited immortality - This principle ensures the
those who do business with it, and even of competitors, as the company success of the company and its owners similarly for a longer time period.
may form the setting in its industry. Although it is impossible for a company to be immortal, but it must and can
remain in existence for a length of time.
The stakeholder theory was coined originally by Edward
Freeman as he recognized such as an important element of In stakeholder’s theory, a company must not lose sight of
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Corporate Social each person involved in its success. For, instance a company should
Responsibility is a concept that places bigger responsibilities on always treat its employes well. Projects that may have harmful effects on
companies in the form of economic, legal, ethical or even communities around a business location should not be continued or the
philanthropic. Freeman’s theory advocates that a company’s genuine company may likely fail. Any company that desires to survive and continue
success comes from satisfying all its stakeholders, not only those to have positive growth should not ignore its stakeholders instead they
who might gain profit from its stock. must be completely satisfied.
Here are the categories of stakeholders inside the company,
According to Freeman, there are six principles that must direct the namely:
connection between the stakeholders and the corporation, which are: ● ORGANIZATIONAL Stakeholders
1. The principle of entry and exit - Based on the principles, there must Organizational stakeholders are those people that are
be clear-cut and transparent rules and policies such as hiring employees present inside the company. They have a direct interest in how the
and terminating their employment. company is robust and healthy to seek advantages and benefits
from it. The staff and employees as well as the stockholders and
2. The principle of governance - This principle considers the manner of the managers are the main stakeholders here. All these people are
modifying the rules about the relationship between the stakeholders and interested in the smooth operations of a company which could be
the company. supported by a CSR policy.
● ECONOMIC Stakeholders
3. The principle of externalities - This is about how a group that does In this group, the customers in addition to bankers,
not gain from the actions of the company has to undergo some problems creditors and suppliers are the most important stakeholders. These
because of the said actions. Additionally, it suggests that anybody who people function as the essential boundary between the company
has to shoulder the costs of other stakeholders has the right to turn into a and the bigger societal environment. Customers are regarded as
stakeholder too. Somebody who is affected by a business develops into a very important because without their loyal customers a company
stakeholder. may not even exist.
In modern businesses, creating a loyal and long-term
4. The principle of contract costs - Each group to a contract should relationship with customers should be the primary task of a
either endure identical amounts when it comes to cost or the cost, they company. This is the reason why some companies establish CSR
policy, firstly the nurture customers’ loyalty and secondly to 3. Role and responsibilities of the board - The board requires adequate
differentiate its brand from the rest. Identifying itself as a valuable pertinent skills and understanding to appraise and challenge management
company to customers is vital particularly to those companies in performance. It also needs acceptable size and suitable levels of
the mass-consumer field. objectivity and commitment.
● SOCIETAL Stakeholders 4. Integrity and ethical behavior - in selecting corporate officers and
These stakeholders regulate the business setting under board members one of the fundamental requirements is integrity.
which the companies function. Government agencies, regulators, Companies have to fashion a code of conduct for their directors and
communities and the environment itself are the major players here. executives that encourages ethical and accountable decision making.
Obviously, a company is required to follow the laws and to respect
certain issues the society is involved. A company will not go wrong 5. Disclosure and transparency - Companies must explain and make
in its business dealings when it has a good relationship with these transparent to the public the roles and responsibilities of board and top
stakeholders. management in order to offer stakeholders with a level of accountability.
They should also write and implement distinct procedures to freely
The STAKEHOLDER THEORY in CORPORATE GOVERNANCE authenticate and protect the truthfulness of the company’s financial
Stakeholder theory states that the purpose of a business is to reports. There should be timely and balance release of substantial matters
create value for wider group stakeholders other than just shareholders. about the company so that investors are sure to receive clear and factual
This theory considers the corporate environment as a network of information.
interconnected groups, all of which are required to be pleased to
sustain the healthy and success of the company in the long-term. There is an assurance of good corporate governance following
A stakeholder refers to any individual or group of individuals who these principles that is accommodating to all the needs of all the
can affect or be affected by any actions done by a business. It consists of stakeholders of the company.
those who work in its stores, those who work and live close to its factories,
those who do business with it, and even of competitors, as the company
may form the setting in its industry.
Corporate governance enhances stakeholder value by ensuring transparency, accountability, equitable treatment, and strategic oversight . Mechanisms such as independent board oversight, full disclosure, and adherence to ethical standards are crucial to maintaining stakeholder trust and corporate integrity .
Centralized decision-making consolidates authority, enhancing consistent strategy and control, but may reduce responsiveness and innovation . Decentralized structures empower lower levels, fostering quicker decisions and adaptability, but may complicate strategic cohesion and increase variability in outcomes . Leadership must balance these aspects to align organizational goals with operational flexibility .
Functional structures promote specialization through distinct departments based on expertise, but may hinder cross-functional collaboration due to silo mentality . Matrix structures combine functional and divisional elements, enhancing collaboration across functions through dual reporting, but may introduce complexity and conflict .
Transparency and accountability ensure that decisions are made in the best interests of stakeholders, enhancing trust and compliance . Their absence can lead to unethical practices, poor decision-making, and diminished investor confidence, possibly resulting in legal repercussions and financial losses .
Stakeholder theory implies that businesses must prioritize value creation for all stakeholders, not just shareholders, influencing strategy to consider broader social and environmental impacts . Ethical responsibilities include transparent operations, equitable shareholder treatment, and minimizing negative societal effects, which guide sustainable business practices .
Network structures provide flexibility and scalability by leveraging external partnerships and alliances for expertise and resources, allowing rapid scaling and diverse capability access . Risks include dependency on partners, coordination difficulties, and potential control loss over key processes, which could threaten the organization's strategic alignment and reputation .
A divisional structure allows for focus on specific markets or products, enhances local adaptation and innovation, but may lead to resource duplication and coordination challenges . It suits organizations needing flexibility to respond to diverse market demands but may be less suitable for those requiring tight resource control or a unified corporate strategy .
High formalization limits employee autonomy by enforcing strict rules, which can slow decision-making as processes must adhere to codified procedures . Conversely, low formalization offers flexibility and speeds decision-making, as employees have more discretion in their roles .
Hierarchical structures support efficiency through clear authority lines and roles, allowing quick decision-making on strategic matters . However, they can limit adaptability due to bureaucratic processes, slow communication, and potential micromanagement, hindering response to external changes .
Key components of organizational structure include hierarchy, departments and units, roles and responsibilities, centralization vs. decentralization, span of control, and formalization . These components collectively shape decision-making by establishing the chain of command and reporting relationships, defining the authority levels, determining how decisions are centralized or decentralized, and setting the degree of autonomy and control through formal rules and procedures .