Dominica's Natural Resources and Economy
Dominica's Natural Resources and Economy
0 Introduction
The risk for future generations of Dominicans lies in under-valuing the country’s
remarkable, common resource base and, by doing so, inadvertently allowing it to
deteriorate and devolve into a diminished habitat for Dominicans in the future.
The island is volcanic in origin with much of it formed as little as 20,000 – 40,000 years
ago. The topography is characterized by very rugged and steep terrain extending above
1500 meters in elevation over much of the country. The cone of Morne Diablotin (1730
m) dominates the topography of the northern half of the island whilst a chain of
mountains, including Morne Trois Piton (1424 m), Morne Micotrin, Morne Anglais, and
Morne Plat Pays extends through the south of the island. The peaks of all these
mountains are less than 7 km from the sea. The more gently sloping (flatter) areas are
restricted primarily to the river valleys, the coastal areas of the Northeast, and the Bell’s
Wet area in the center of the island. Given its mountainous terrain, the island is blessed
with an abundance of water including perennial streams, rivers, lakes and waterfalls.
The rich and diverse natural resource base and mostly unspoiled landscape have led to
Dominica being known as the “Nature Island of the Caribbean”. However, these
resources are coming under increasing pressures from the islands economic development
efforts based primarily on agriculture (bananas), agro-processing, manufacturing and
more recently tourism. Thus, it is this particular combination of a challenging physical
environment and the overarching dependence of the population on the land for their
socio-economic well being which, more than anything else has guided the course of
Dominica’s history, its economic development and patterns of land and coastal zone
degradation.
1.0.1 Climate
1
Fig. 2 Rainfall data for Dominica: (1) recorded as average monthly rainfall for specific sites
and (2) shown at various elevations (e.g., numbers record inches of rain)
(source: adapted from Lang, 1967, as reprinted in Shankland Cox and Associates,
1971).
2
1.0.2 Vegetation and Soil Types
The island’s terrain and climate have given rise to a wide diversity of soils and vegetation
types that vary with the elevation and exposure to strong and steady trade winds.
Dominica’s undisturbed forests have been identified as the most extensive in the Lesser
Antilles (between 60 – 75% forest cover), while its rain forest is considered the finest in
the Caribbean. Stands of mature rain forest, montane thicket and elfin woodland, littoral
woodland, scrub woodland, grasslands, secondary rain forest, and swamps and wetlands
are found all over the island.
-
Essentially, Dominica’s soils are classified into eight major groups: Hydrogenic Soils,
Protosols, Young Soils, Allophanoid Clay Soils, Kandoid Soils, Smectoid Clay Soils,
Unstable Soils and “Other Clay” Soils. These soils are, generally, readily erodible since
they tend to be unconsolidated and friable.
In this situation, the small domestic market makes economic growth highly dependent on
exports. Over the last five years (1995 – 1999) real growth average 2.0% per annum,
and growth is estimated at less than 1% for the year 1999. Decline and stagnation
characterized the major productive sectors, agriculture and manufacturing and tourism
between the period 1995 –1999. At the same time, Government services contribution, the
second largest sub-sector of the economy, has been variable against the background of
worldwide reduction in aid flows (See Table 1).
3
1.1 Current Watershed/Water Resources Management Issues
Ø The absence of a coordinated mechanism at the national level for watershed and
water resource management.
Ø Absence of updated legislation and a lack of enforcement of existing legislation.
Ø Lack of data to assist in the decision-making process.
Ø Absence of critical human and financial resources to implement improved
management systems.
Dominica has an extensive operational and legislated protected areas system consisting in
the main of National Parks and Forest Reserves.
In this regard, Dominica’s protected areas system contains five (5) units, viz. two (2)
forest reserves the Northern Forest Reserve (13,528 ac) and Central Forest Reserve
(1,013 ac) and three (3) national parks, Cabrits National Park (13,313 ac), Morne Trois
Pitons National Park1 (16,898 ac) and Morne Diablotin National Park (8,242 ac).
The two forest reserves, and the two larger national parks, that is Morne Trois Pitons
National Park and the Morne Diablotin National Park protect the upper watershed of
several of Dominica’s larger rivers, including the Roseau River, Melville Hall River,
Layou River, Rosalie River and Pointe Mulatre River (See Figure 2), however, only a
small number of water catchments (about 5) are contained totally or partially within the
protected areas: these are namely Grand Fond, Londonderry, Roseau WA1, Dublanc and
Portsmouth. Importantly, the water catchment area providing water for hydro-electricity
generation is contained in part, within the Morne Trois Pitons National Park.
The three most significant Freshwater Ecosystems in Dominica are namely the:
4
Fig. 3 Important watersheds of Dominica (source: GOCD, 1976), showing the following MAJOR
BASINS: (1) Layou River; (2) Roseau River; (3) Clyde River; (4) Pagua River; (5) Castle
Bruce River; (6) Rosalie River and MINOR BASINS: (7) Indian River; (8) Blenheim River;
and (9) Hampstead River.
5
1.1.3 Threats to Management of watersheds and Ecosystems
A number of serious threats are faced in the management of watersheds and ecosystems.
These are outlined below:
3. Database related problems – limited data on stream flows for example make effective
planning and management of the freshwater resources difficult.
4. Lack of public education and understanding of the critical role that watersheds and
ecosystems play in maintaining the ecological integrity of the island.
5. Lack of financial and human capital to effectively manage and monitor the resource.
The Water and Sewerage Act, Chap. 43:04 of the revised laws of Dominica states the
Government’s water policy. The Act generally speaks to the orderly and coordinated
development, use and conservation of Dominica’s water resources. It also makes the
DOWASCO responsible for the supply of water to all residents of the country.
The demand for water can be categorized as potable and non-potable. The potable
demand consists of the domestic, commercial and industrial demand whilst the non-
potable is inclusive of agricultural, fishing, laundering, hydro-electrical, religious and
baptismal, recreational to include swimming, boating, and commercial ecotourism
activities.
In order to satisfy the potable demand, DOWASCO currently extracts water from about
47 independent river intakes, providing a total capacity of over 10 million gallons per day
(10mgd). In this regard the 10 largest rivers namely; Indian, Picard, Layou, Roseau,
Blenheim, Hampstead, Clyde, Pagua, Castle Bruce and Risalie rivers all have average
annual flows in the order of 10mgd. The most important rivers are listed at (Figure 3).
Most of the rivers originate on the slopes of the central mountain ranges, whilst a few
originate as outcrops of underground springs along low-lying valleys. The largest of the
water systems has a supply capacity of over 4.3 million gallons per day (4.3mgd) for the
capital Roseau and its environs. This system serves a population of about 25 thousand
people. Two other systems have a supply capacity of about 1.4mgd, whilst the other
systems are much smaller serving communities with populations usually less than 1000.
In addition to these domestic supply systems, a system has been built particularly for bulk
6
water export, which is capable of delivering 6mgd at a special docking facility situated in
Newtown just north of the city center.
These supply systems are generally more than adequate to satisfy the demands of the
communities. These are estimated at about 60 gallons per head per day in urban areas
and declining to 45 gallons per head per day in rural areas. However, at some periods
during the dry season, intermittent shortages can be experienced in a few of the systems.
This is associated with the observation that in some streams dry weather flows are
estimated to drop as low as 30% of average wet weather flows. The period from January
to June is considered to be the drier half of the year although this distinction is less
pronounced in some years through the interior and the east coast than along the west
coast. In the months of April and May the occurrence of hot, dry spells tend to be more
persistent and more intense. During these dry spells water consumption increases due to
increased watering of lawns and backyard gardens, as well as longer and more frequent
bathing. The effect of this increased consumption is compounded by a reduction in
stream flows. In some streams dry weather flows have been estimated to drop as low as
30% of average wet weather flows.
“Water is a vital resource for human survival and economic development; as populations
and economies grow, water demand increases while the availability of the resource
remains constant…” (Mission Statement of the Integrated Water Resources Division of
the Sustainable Development Unit of the Inter-American Development Bank).
In Dominica the major competing uses of water are for agriculture, industry and
domestic supply. In this regard, the main users of Dominica’s abundant water resources
include the Dominica Water and Sewerage Company (DOWASCO) for supplying the
potable domestic and export water supply and the Dominica Electricity Services
(DOMLEC), for hydropower generation. The potable water supplied to domestic,
commercial and industrial users are given priority over all others in catchments where
competing demands exist. In practice all of DOWASCO’s intake structures are located
above the intakes of competing users. Other than the use for potable water and hydro
electricity generation individuals and communities living adjacent to streams and rivers
use those resources for a number of activities including cooking, drinking, bathing,
fishing, washing, farming/irrigation and nature-based tourism activities.
7
Additionally a few industries utilize adjacent watercourses for a range of processing
activities including bottling and mining.
With regards to hydro electricity generation DOMLEC uses well over 6mgd on average
in the hydropower generation system for its four (4) hydro-electricity plants, which
account for 48% of the generation capacity. The water catchments in the vicinity of the
Fresh Water Lake, Laudat and Trafalgar, are used to generate electricity in three of the
four power stations, however in these instances there is no competition with the potable
water supply since water is obtained from different water supply sources.
The DOWASCO operates a tariff system for the potable water supply. However, the
operating and maintenance costs (average production cost estimated at
US$1.13/1000 gallon) for all the small scattered water systems around the island are
not always recovered from revenue gained through service connections.
The national water rates were last revised effective January 1998 and a schedule of this
current tariff is presented at Annex 1. These rates were not designed to reflect the
economic value of water but rather are more a function of affordability to pay, and the
need to encourage conservation. In this context, the tariff structure allows for public
standpipes to be paid for by the government of Dominica (GOCD), thereby giving free
access to members of the public who are unable or unwilling to subscribe to a private
connection.
Notwithstanding the stated importance of agriculture to the economy (25% GDP), the
bulk of Dominica’s agriculture is rain-fed. Irrigated agriculture presently accounts for
less than 1% of the estimated 52,256 acres of farmland.
Presently, there are plans by both the Ministry of Agriculture and the Dominica Banana
Marketing Corporation (DBMC) in particular, to bring approximately 1000 acres under
irrigation mainly to enhance productivity in banana2 and vegetable3 cultivations.
The main source of irrigation water is expected to be surface water either pumped or
gravity-fed from streams or rivers. Currently there are no measures in place with respect
to drainage linked to irrigation schemes.
2 In Castle Bruce and Londonderry in particular
3 In Grand Savanne, Warner, Marigot
8
Plans to irrigate the Castle Bruce farming catchment would require proper drainage so as to
restrict soil erosion and siltation of the Castle Bruce River.
The potential environmental impact of irrigation has been difficult to assess. This is due
to the small area under irrigation, and the minimal use to which most systems are utilized,
since water deficits for most crops usually only occur in February to May. Increased soil
salinity is not expected to occur due to the high rainfall experienced during the wetter
period of the year.
Island wide the per capita rate of production is estimated at about 137 gallons per day but
actual per capita consumption averages about 60 gallons in Roseau and its environs and
some 45 gallons per day in rural areas.
Water loss in the distribution system is a major factor contributing to wastage of this
important resource. It has been estimated that prior to commencement of the Roseau
Water and Sewerage Project in 2000, some 60% of the water supplied was lost to
leakages existing in the urban system. However, an EC 52 million-dollar project geared
at rehabilitating the ailing water and sewage system is expected to reduce wastage due to
leakages to a minimum. A universal phase-in, metering system for all consumers is
expected to drastically reduce wastage.
Metering has been adopted as a deliberate conservation policy. At present the majority of
customers are metered. However, the cost of implementing this system has been a
deterrent to its quick implementation
In one community (Giraudel) not served by a potable water system, extensive use is made
of the cistern system for collection and storage of water.
The abundance of the surface sources (47 intakes previously described in section 1.2) has
up to this point minimized the need to explore groundwater sources. In 1986 a drilling
exercise was conducted in the Giraudel area in an unsuccessful bid to locate an
alternative water source. Similarly hydrological studies undertaken to date, indicate that
aluminum deposits in the valleys for the most part form limited aquifers with low yields
of fresh water. The site of the old fort at the Cabrits overlooking Portsmouth bay has
evidence of an old well with a hand-pump, but no known use has been made otherwise of
ground water sources. However, some ground water is utilized in spring water
bottling (single commercial venture) and for the DOWASCO water supply systems
at Soufriere, Cockrane, and La Plaine.
9
1.3.1 Policies and Measures for Water Sources Protection
A number of policies and measures are in place to protect the island’s water sources from
degradation and contamination as a result of human activities. These are highlighted in
Table 2. A 1987 DOWASCO survey of its 43 watersheds in use at the time indicated that
very few of these were void of human activity. Thus, concern was expressed regarding
the level of pesticide and fertilizer use and the presence of human habitat and livestock in
watersheds. Clearly therefore, the high level of private land ownership within catchment
areas carries with it serious risks of water supply contamination.
The results of ongoing water quality monitoring suggest that effects of chemical fertilizer
and pesticides are not yet a threat to human health through the water supply. However,
this problem can be expected to increase as activities incompatible with maintaining an
uncontaminated water supply increase in the quest for economic development.
As provided for under the 1989 Water and Sewage Act, DOWASCO has recommended
that all the islands catchment areas be declared “Water Quality Control Areas”. There is
no guarantee however that these catchments will be protected since most of the 47 water
system utilize catchments which contain private lands. Indeed the Stewart Hall Water
Catchment which serves the most persons constitutes the country’s only protected forest
source as provided for under the 1958 Forest Ordinance.
Policy Year
However, water catchment areas (for domestic and hydro uses) located within the
boundaries of national parks and forest reserves receive full legal protection and normally
remain under natural vegetation cover.
10
1.3.2 Salt Water Intrusion
The total land area of Dominica is estimated at 74,851 hectares or 195,200 acres. The
Physical Planning unit estimates that approximately 53% of this land area is under forest
or conservation; another 34% under agriculture, 7% under settlement whilst 6% is
classified as wastelands.
Notwithstanding the fact that Dominica does not have a legislated land use policy or
zoning system a number of policies and regulations that speak specifically to the issue of
water resources management are existent. In this connection, approximately 20% of
Dominica’s forestlands are legally protected either as forest reserves or national parks.
This protection is provided through the National Parks and Protected Areas Act of 1975,
which has the primary objectives of watershed protection, soil erosion control and
preservation of the island’s biodiversity. In addition a number of the policies highlighted
in Table 1 deal specifically with the issue of land use as it affects the water resource base
for example the Forestry Act (1949), the Stewart Hall Catchment Rules 1975, and the
Pesticide Control Act 1974.
A number of conflicts exist pertaining to the use of land resources within watersheds.
This, notwithstanding the multitude of laws and regulations existing on the statute books
(See Table 2). These conflicts are due fundamentally, to a lack of enforcement of the
regulations and the more pressing issue of private ownership of lands within the
country’s watersheds, in the context of limited available land area.
These conflicts are exemplified by activities occurring within the Stewart Hall Catchment
for which land use restrictions are established in law. The Stewart Hall Catchment Rules
prohibit agricultural cultivation and other activities, which may be detrimental to the
water supply. Though such activities are undoubtedly being carried out, not one violation
has been cited since the regulations were enacted. One problem has been the fact that the
original intention, which was provision of compensation to the owners of the land, was
never provided.
Another area of obvious potential conflict is with regard to mining. The competition for
use of available resources with regard to the mining of minerals within watersheds has
many socio-economic conflicts.
11
Clearly, the present conflictual system of land use and ownership in the watersheds is
negatively impacting on the ability of those agencies charged with water source
protection to effectively carry out their mandates.
1.5 Impacts of Climate Change and Natural Disasters on Watersheds and Coastal
Zones
Global warming, climate change and sea level rise are real issues, which have the
potential to severely affect both the coastal areas and critical watersheds of Dominica. In
recent times increasingly destructive hurricanes and storm surges have caused
tremendous damage to reef systems located in shallow waters. For example Hurricane
Lenny (November 1999), which was characterized by extremely high impact waves in
excess of 60 ft high took a toll on the inshore coral reefs of Dominica. It caused
transformation of the seabed and coastline. In some areas huge pieces of reef were ripped
from the seabed and tossed unto the beach causing severe loss of habitat to coastal
pelagic and reef fisheries. The resulting damage to the Fisheries Sector was estimated to
be in excess of EC$6m. In addition, coral bleaching has been noticed on many reefs in
Dominica. Some loss of diversity of coral species has occurred and to this end Dominica
is now involved in the deployment of underwater temperature recording devices as part
of its coral reef monitoring programme.
With regard to hurricanes, the defoliation and other forms of damage to vegetation canes,
probably leads to temporary changes in the hydrological cycle in affected watersheds.
What is clear is that the potential negative impacts of global climate change and natural
disasters will only serve to exacerbate the existing negative impacts on the watersheds
and coastal zones.
The National Disaster Preparedness Plan is particularly well developed for hurricanes.
The Plan is implemented by the office of Disaster Preparedness of the Ministry of
Communication and Works and the National Emergency Planning Organization (NEPO).
In the event of floods and other types of natural disaster the appropriate national response
systems will be activated by these organizations. However, the National Emergency
Planning Organization has responsibility to respond to all natural disasters, which may
occur. Currently a National Climate Change Adaptation Policy for dealing with the
potential negative impacts of climate change is being developed under component 4 of
the regional CPACC Project.
12
minimized due to infrequent floods and the steepness of the coastline, which leads to
deposition of the silt in deeper waters (absal plain).
The existing threats to life and property in the coastal zones arise from the fact that most
of the human settlements, industry, and infrastructure is located along the coastline and
are therefore more prone to flooding and the impacts of hurricanes and storms.
The lack of enforcement of building codes together with the unplanned and unregulated
developments, which have occurred in the coastal areas, pose a serious threat to life and
property. The implementation of poor agricultural practices and poor road cutting
techniques leads to landslides triggered by heavy rains, both in and out of the tropical
weather (hurricane) season, thereby posing a serious threat to the coastal zone.
No major transboundary threats are currently faced. However, the depletion of fish
resources due in particular to illegal fishing in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) is of
major concern.
Natural resource pollution within an island ecosystem can have severe negative impacts
on the health of the human, animal and plant organisms that inhabit the system. Within
the context of the Dominican situation improper solid waste, agricultural waste,
manufacturing and industrial waste disposal, are the major sources of both point and
non-point pollution of watersheds and the coastal zones.
Poor land management and agricultural practices - coupled with the very steep slopes
of Dominica, causes soil erosion and eventual sedimentation of the marine environment.
Indeed sedimentation is reported as posing the greatest threat to coastal degradation and
reduction of biodiversity in Dominica. Siltation is thought to adversely affect juvenile
13
fish with the increased abrasion leading to increased mortality. Non-point source
pollution resulting from the improper use and disposal of agricultural chemicals
(fertilizers, pesticides) is widely accepted as occurring, though the impacts are
unquantified to date.
Most of the land-based pollution from the manufacturing sector comes from the
quarries. This problem is most evident on the west coast of the island where quarry
operations, discharge their waste into the marine environment leading to siltation of coral
reefs and fishing bank.
1.8 Tourism
The tourism sector has the potential to have serious negative impacts especially on the
coastal areas. Coral reef destruction due to anchor damage is particularly evident in the
Portsmouth and Castaways areas. The magnitude of the damage is less in the
Soufriere/Scottshead Marine Reserve (SSMR) where such damage is subject to a
US$3000.00 fine.
The industry has inadequate infrastructure to handle their clientele, therefore, it competes
for resources with traditional users of coastal space and for use of that space for tourism
development. For example, water sports activities lead to displacement of fishermen
from traditional fishing grounds giving rise to social dislocation, and marginalisation of
fishermen.
• Coastal and marine pollution and degradation as a result of solid waste disposal.
• Loss of biodiversity and degradation of freshwater swamps, as a result of the
construction of tourism infrastructure on these lands.
• Soil compaction and erosion in watersheds and forest areas arising from visits to
scenic sites at numbers in excess of established carrying capacities.
1.9 Health
The single greatest source of marine pollution in Dominica is due to improper treatment
and disposal of sewerage. The discharge of untreated sewerage and other liquid waste
directly into the coastal and marine habitats has severe negative impact on biodiversity.
The turbidity caused by such suspended solids results in death of sea grass beds, marine
algae and other dependent organisms. Presently the new Roseau sewerage system will
14
result in the separated sewage being carried 300 ft out to sea, to reduce the level of
inshore pollution.
Measuring stations for rainfall and stream flows are few and in cases where they operate,
the records are not continuous. Rainfall records from Ridgefield estate, (privately
owned) and Melville Hall airport are the most continuous of these records. The Ministry
of Agriculture at various agricultural stations island-wide operates other rainfall stations,
and the Forestry Division of the Ministry of Agriculture maintains a few streamflow and
rainfall measuring stations. A few streamflow-measuring stations established by
DOWASCO in 1990, were damaged by storms and have not been operated recently.
In this connection, Iso-hyetal maps (See Figure 2) have been developed for Dominica, as
well as hydro-geological maps, however no hydrological models are known to exist for
determination of run-off, and estimates of total available water resource.
There are no specific organized training programs offered at the national level for water
resources management. Similarly, activities geared towards increasing stakeholder
participation, and costal zone public education and public awareness activities in water
resources management have been relatively insignificant at the national level. Instead,
these activities have traditionally been undertaken as reactions to specific problems or
highlighted public issues. In recent times however, DOWASCO has been preparing
programs to incorporate public input into design of all the recent major projects.
DOWASCO has also celebrated World Water Day and has used the occasion to
disseminate information and display exhibits on water conservation and environmental
protection.
The Forestry Division through its radio programs and field-based work also routinely
incorporates aspects of both watershed and coastal zone management. Similarly the
Division of Agriculture through its extension staff holds routine soil conservation
workshops for farmers.
It is perhaps however, the Fisheries Division through its outreach program, which has the
most organized educational program for resource base conservation particularly with
regard to freshwater ecosystems and the marine environment.
The Dominica Conservation Association through its public education program also
makes a significant contribution to public awareness and education on the subject,
particularly at the formal school system level.
15
It must be noted however that there is no formal structure or mechanism in place for
public consultation at the national level for policy formulation or plan preparation. As
such the previously described activities are not part of sustained and continuous programs
and have not been as successful as they otherwise could have been. The level of
personnel and resources committed to these activities has also been limited, thereby
further reducing their impact.
The institutional base of natural resource management in Dominica dates to the late
1940’s with the establishment of a Forestry Department in 1949. Over time, this
institutional base has widened to include a host of mainly government ministries and
departments, which have specific responsibilities for management of different aspects of
the island ecosystem. Table 3 highlights the wide range of players involved in watershed
and coastal zone management in Dominica.
The Ministry of Communication & Works (MOCW), the Ministry of Agriculture &
Environment (MOAE), and the Ministry of Health (MOH), share the major
responsibilities for water resource management in Dominica. The DOWASCO which
falls under the portfolio of the MOCW is charged under the Water and Sewerage Act,
Chap. 43:04 with the responsibility of water resource monitoring and assessment as well
as planning and organizing for efficient management of the islands water resources. The
DOWASCO has been granted exclusive license to supply water and to collect and
dispose of wastewater for the entire island.
The MOH is responsible for establishing water quality and treatment standards for the
island, and although specific standards for Dominica have never been established,
DOWASCO is expected to operate within the established guidelines of the World Health
Organization (WHO). In this regard, DOWASCO operates its own laboratory for
treatment and testing of water quality, and is monitored regularly by the Environmental
Health Division of the MOH. In addition, the Environmental Health Division of the
MOH has a responsibility to monitor source protection, water quality and water treatment
island-wide.
The Forestry Act (Section 5) charges the Forestry and Wildlife Division and the Lands
and Surveys Division of the MOAE to play important roles in the demarcation and
protection of water catchments, and in the regulation of activities within the forest
reserves and national parks.
Clearly therefore, both DOWASCO and the Forestry and Wildlife Division have a
responsibility for resource protection and conservation, since regulations for catchment
protection exist under both the Water and Sewerage Act (Section 13) and the Forestry
Act (Section 5). These Acts outline responsibilities for both agencies by way of
catchment control in the case of DOWASCO, and protection of reserves in the case of the
16
Forestry Division. It is important to note that the above regulations are currently being
reviewed with a view to achieve greater cohesion, and encourage compatibility and
clarification of the roles of the two agencies.
Pesticide Control Board Pesticides Control Act Enforcement of Pesticides Control Act and
(No. 15, 1974), as amended Regulations
(No. 4, 1987) with Regulations on
Labeling (1986) and Licensing and
Registration of Pesticides (1987)
17
Fisheries Development Fisheries Act (No. 11, 1987) Promotion and management of fisheries; fisheries
Division research; protection and management of marine
reserves
MINISTRY OF TRADE, INDUSTRY AND TOURISM
National Development National Development Corporation Promote and support tourism and industrial
Corporation Act (No. 17, 1988) development
MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATION AND WORKS
Ministry Water and Sewerage Act Issue water and sewerage licenses to the Dominica
(No. 17, 1989) Water and Sewerage Company Ltd.
The multiplicity of institutions charged with the responsibilities for watershed and coastal
zone management demands that some form of operational framework be defined and
institutionalized. However, to date no coordinating agency or mechanism has been
specifically set up for dealing with water resources management in the country.
Institutions charged with this responsibility continue to operate in an adhoc atmosphere,
with no clear lines of jurisdiction, resulting in overlap and duplicity of responsibilities,
inefficient operations and unsatisfactory levels of management of both the watershed and
coastal zone resources. This, in a situation where there are additional indications that
Dominica’s marine resources will be subjected to increased and varied demands in the
near future, in keeping with the requirements for an expanding tourism sector.
18
2.0 Current Coastal Area Management Issues
A number of critical coastal area management issues are easily identifiable. These are
briefly described below.
• Lack of Human Capacity – This is a major issue facing the efficient management of
coastal areas and resources. It is evident at several levels, for example, policymaking,
enforcement, and management of resources.
• Inadequate Research – a lack of human and institutional capacity, together with the
absence of equipment and research facilities results in very little specific research
being undertaken on coastal resources at the national level. For example, very limited
work is done on analysis of non-point pollution sources and their impact on the
coastal zone.
Dominica does not have extensive wetland, mangrove, sea grass, and coral reef habitats
due to the steep topography and rugged terrain characteristics of Dominica’s coast. The
country’s critical coastal and marine habitats are shown in Figure 4. These include the:
Dominica boasts two (2) marine protected areas in the Soufriere, Scottshead Marine
Reserve (SSMR) and the Cabrits Marine Park – which is a component of the Cabrits
National Park. Presently, there is no proper management structure of the Cabrits Marine
Park.
19
Fig. 4 Coastal and marine habitats of Dominica (source: Goodwin, 1985; Johnson, 1988)
20
2.1.1 Major Threats to Management of Coastal Habitats and Ecosystems
The major threats to the management of the islands coastal habitats and ecosystems
include:
In addition to these generic types of threats a number of threats associated with specific
habitats also exist. These are described below:
Tourism Development – Proposed land based tourism marina development around the
Cabrits National Park will transform wetlands with implications for coastal fish spp.
Therefore valuation of coastal resources are urgently required, to guide the decision-
making process in such situations.
User Conflict – Implementation of a new management structure for the SSMR has
greatly reduced user conflict. However, greater education of users is required, as well as
financing to implement management programs.
Many types of living and non-living marine resources are significantly exploited for food,
infrastructural development and recreation. These are described below.
21
1. Corals – corals are extracted for tourism craft industry and commercial harvesting for
aquarium trade and reef restoration projects. A 1994 fisheries study describes the
status of the coral reefs of Dominica as being 75% healthy (Philbert 1994).
2. Gastropods - gastropods including conchs, land and sea crabs are heavily used in the
local cuisine. Land crabs however are protected from over hunting by the
implementation of a close season.
3. Seaweeds – seaweeds are harvested for both household and commercial seamoss
making.
4. Fish - the coastal waters of Dominica provide different types of habitat for many
species of fish. In particular the coral reefs around the island, which are located at
depths of between 10m and 60m, are endowed with a very wide diversity of species.
The Table 4 below shows the level of exploitation of major fisheries in Dominica.
The Fisheries Division has reported a decrease in the size and quantity of reef fish
being landed in recent years (Guiste et al 1993).
Deep Slope 67.3 tons Production has remained Has great potential for
Fisheries relatively steady over the increase in production
years at a low level of
exploitation
Coastal Pelagic 470.8 tons Shows an increasing trend Shows great potential
Fishery for development as it is
caught in large
quantities
There are four species of turtle found nesting in Dominican waters, namely the hawksbill
(Eretmochelys imbricata) (Linnaeus 1766), the green turtle (Chelonia mydas mydas)
(Linneus 1758), the loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) and the leather back turtle
(Dermochelys coriacea). These species are however protected by law and are not widely
utilized for food. However some illegal hunting for food does occur.
22
Dominica has developed a small whale watching industry where day trips are organized
for visitors and locals alike. The whales are located from about 0.5 miles to 4 miles from
the coastline.
Whales are not hunted in Dominica except for the pilot whale, which exist in great
abundance and is caught as an incidental catch. Fishermen on the island do not target
whale as part of their fishing practices, however, on rear occasions a pilot whale may be
landed.
The two main types of non-living resources utilized are sand and gravel.
Ø Sand and Gravel – The Beach Control Ordinance enacted in 1966, establishes a
system for managing removal of sand and stone from beaches. The Ordinance is
currently administered by the Physical Planning Unit and provides seldom-imposed
penalties for illegal removal of beach material. It is estimated that about 4.5% of
sandy beaches along the west coast are being mined by comparison with 20% on the
east coast. The mined materials are widely used in the construction industry.
Illegal beach mining has a negative impact on the coastline, further increasing the threat
posed by natural disasters and potential climate change impacts. Coral harvesting for
tourism craft leads to a net erosion of the beach profile, leading coastline to become more
susceptible to beach activity.
23
3.0 Integrating Watershed and Coastal Area Management
The need for integration of watershed and coastal area management in Small Island
States takes on critical significance in light of the real threats posed to the environmental
integrity of natural ecosystems by: growing populations, unsuitable development
practices, insufficient management attention and limited public understanding and
appreciation of the critical role these systems play in the sustaining of life.
In Dominica, the interactions of watersheds with coastal areas, and in particular, how
activities taking place in the watershed affect the coastal area are well borne out by
activities occurring in the Agricultural Sector.
Most of Dominica’s agricultural production occurs in the mountainous interior with very
few farms being located along the coast. The agricultural production system is
characterized by clear felling of forest, high use of agricultural inputs including
fertilizers, agric-pesticides and non-biodegradable inputs such as banana sleeving
materials.
The results of this agricultural productions system on the coastal area resources are: high
levels of sedimentation of coral reefs and sea grass beds, with the associated loss of
habitat and biodiversity; questionable levels of agricultural (non-point source) pollutants
reaching the marine environment and negatively impacting marine biodiversity. In this
regard, the Fisheries Division has in recent years been reporting reduced fish catches as
well as a reduction in the size of fish caught.
Based on the above discussion watershed and coastal area management should be
integrated, however, the management of watersheds and coastal areas remains
fragmented along sectoral lines. There is no holistic approach to the management of
these resources, rather sectoral and piece-meal approaches to management are pursued.
The need for coherence between the legislative framework developed for guiding the
management of watersheds and coastal zones with their attendant resources and the
enabling policy environment in which the framework operates cannot be over-
emphasised. This takes on added significance in the Dominican situation since several
agencies impact upon or are involved with the protection of the natural resource base,
each guided by its own policies and particular bits of legislation and regulations (See
Table 5). Most of the legislation was developed to address national problems of
watershed management and marine and coastal resources conservation and management.
From Table 4, it is clear that some of the legislation is outdated and does not reflect
current standards and indicators for natural resources management. Particular
deficiencies exist in relation to management responsibilities for watersheds, proper
24
protection of biodiversity, clearly enforceable laws regarding the issuing of permits and
carrying out of mining of any sort, especially sand.
In addition, the laws need to be consolidated in some more coherent manner rather than
being scattered throughout the law books. Environmental impact assessments for
developing projects involving dredging, shoreline or marine construction, removal of
mangroves, and large-scale land clearing of any sort should be made legal requirements.
The multitude of institutions involved in the uncoordinated attempts at watershed and coastal
zone management in Dominica has previously been highlighted in this paper. A few of the main
institutions involved and their roles are presented below:
25
d) National Development Corporation: industrial lands
Therefore, the improvement of the formal mechanisms within government for inter-
sectorial and inter-agency cooperation and coordination will have to be vigorously
pursued if any gains are to be made towards integrated watershed and coastal zone
management at the institutional level.
26
4.0 National Action Program to Improve Integrated Management of Watersheds and
Coastal Areas
Table 6 below summarizes the major activities that could form part of the national action
program to improve integrated management of watersheds and coastal areas.
Valuation of Coastal Resources - The results of the ongoing research work under
component 7 of the CPACC Project, to value coastal and marine resources within an area
stretching from Roseau to Scottshead in the South, should be continued and expanded to
cover the entire island.
Data Collection - The paucity of available data on all aspects of Watershed and Coastal
Zone Management suggest that a well thought out, expansive data collection system
needs to be instituted.
Public Awareness - The national program could build on the Fisheries Division’s marine
environmental education programmes aimed at primary and secondary schools, as well as
the general public, which has brought about an awareness of the importance of coastal
and marine resources and the need to conserve biodiversity, in general.
27
Table 6: Summary of National Action Program
28
5.0 Major Recommendations for the Regional Action Program
5.0.1 Institutional
1. Institutional Capacity building for both National and Regional organizations involved
in Watershed and Coastal Zone Management for example staff training.
9. That CEHI as the designated lead agency for fresh water resources management in
the region seeks to mobilize the requisite funding in support of these
recommendations. (Should not be limited to the GEF)
5.0.2 Legislative
29
5.0.3 Information Exchange
1. That an online network of National Project Coordinators be set up, similar to that
operating for Ozone Officers – for dissemination of information.
3. Coming out of this exercise a listing of regional experts on watershed and coastal
zone management be prepared and disseminated among participating countries.
5.0.4 Financial
1. Funded program for community based reforestation programs within the context of
sustainable rural livelihoods and overall sustainable development.
5.0.5 General
3. In preparation of this project that a review of similar Regional Projects for example
“Conserving Biodiversity and Preventing Land Degradation in Small Island
Ecosystems in the Caribbean “ (GEF, Block B PDF being sought), to avoid duplicity
and enhance chances of securing multi-lateral funding.
30
5.0 ANNEX 1. WATER RATES
METERED SUPPLY
Domestic
• Fixed service charge per month $10.00
• For 0 – 1000 gallons per month 8.80
• For more than 1000 gallons per month 8.80 per 1000 gallons
Stand Pipes
• Fixed service charge per month $ 20.00
• Flat rate per stand pipe per month 270.00
UNMETERED SUPPLY
• For property with one fixture $25.00 per month
• For property with more than one fixture 42.00 per month
SEWERAGE
• Flat Rate $10.60 per month
MICELLANEOUS CHARGES
Reconnection Fee
• Sewer & Water $100.00
• Service call for turning on water $100.00
31
Bibliography
CCA, 1991. Dominica Country Environmental Profile. U.S. Agency for International
Development, Bridgetown, Barbados.
Evans, P.G.H., 1986. Dominica Multiple Land Use Project. Ambio Vol. 15 No. 2, pp 82-89.
James, A. and Gallion, A., 1990. The Utilization of Non-Wood Forest Products in Dominica.
Caribbean Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp 4-12.
FAO, 1998. Forestry Policies in the Caribbean. Volume 2: Reports of 28 selected countries
and territories. FAO Forestry Paper 137/2.
Clarke, P., 1994. Conservation Status of the Flora and Fauna of Dominica. Island Resources
Foundation (IRF).
James, A., 1990. Freshwater Swamps and Mangrove Species (Revised Edition), Forestry and
Wildlife Division, Ministry of Agriculture. Dominica.
OAS/OECS, 1998. Institutional Analysis in the area of Natural Resource Management. The
Case of Dominica.
Pollard, Duke E.E. et al., 1991. Environmental Laws of the Commonwealth Caribbean –
Analysis and Needs Assessment. Commercial Law Monograph Series No. 1
Caribbean Law Institute, University of the West Indies, (UWI) Barbados.
Johnson, T., 1988. Biodiversity and Conservation in the Caribbean: profiles of selected islands
International Council for Bird Preservation (ICBP), Monograph No. 1, Cambridge, UK.
Varty, N. et al., 1992. Proposed Morne Diablotin National Park – Draft Management and
Development Plan (1993-2003) International Council for Bird Preservation (ICBP).
Prins, P., 1987. Forestry Policy and Administration 1987-1997 Natural Resources and Rural
Development Project. Commonwealth of Dominica. Dept. Reg. Dev., OAS, Washington,
DC.
DeMilde, R., 1987. Inventory of the Exploitable Forests of Dominica. FAO, Rome.
Lausche, B., 1986. Dominica National Legislation related to Natural Resource Management.
Country Legal Report No. 1. OECS-NRMU, Castries, St. Lucia.
Rainy, W., et al., 1987. Dominica (West Indies) Banana Industry Rehabilitation: A Pesticide
Assessment Island Resources Foundation (IRF), St. Thomas, VI.
32