0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views2 pages

Sequences and Series Analysis Tutorial

real analysis tutorial 4

Uploaded by

Shannamae Yang
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views2 pages

Sequences and Series Analysis Tutorial

real analysis tutorial 4

Uploaded by

Shannamae Yang
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

MH3100 Real Analysis I AY 2023/24 S2

Tutorial 4: Sequences and Series III


16th February, Friday
Instructions to students: Please attempt these questions before your tutorial session,
so that you can have a meaningful session with your tutor.
1. Determine if each of the following series is convergent or divergent.
X 1
(a)
2n + n
X sin(n)
(b)
n2
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
(c) 1 − 2 + − 2 + − 2 + − 2 + · · ·
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
2. Determine if each of the following statements
P is true.
P P
(a) There are two divergent seriesP an and bn where an bn converges.
(b) PThere is a convergent series an and a bounded sequence {bn } such that
an bn diverges. P P
(c) There are twoPsequences {an } and {bn } where an and (an + bn ) both
converge but bn diverges.
(d) There is a sequence {an } satisfying 0 ≤ an ≤ n1 where (−1)n an diverges.
P

3. For each of the following propositions, provide either a short proof if it is true or a
counterexample P if it is false. P 2
(a) If a series an converges absolutely, then the series an also converges
absolutely. P
(b) P
If a series an converges and a sequence {bn } converges, then the series
an bn converges.
P P 2
(c) If a series an converges conditionally, then the series n an diverges.
P
4. Prove that if the series |aP
n | satisfies the Cauchy Criterion and the sequence {bn }
is bounded, then the series an bn satisfies the Cauchy Criterion. Do not use the
Comparison Test or the Absolute Convergence Test.
P
5. Given a series an and a strictly increasing sequence of natural numbers {nk },
the regrouping of the terms
(a1 + a2 + · · · + an1 ) + (an1 +1 + an1 +2 + · · · + an2 ) + (an2 +1 + an2 +2 + · · · + an3 ) + · · ·
P
leads to a series bk with the terms
bk := ank−1 +1 + ank−1 +2 + · · · + ank ∀k ∈ N,
where n0 denotesP0. P
Prove that if an converges to A, then bk converges to A.

1
2

Additional Questions (if time permits)


P
1. Use the Cauchy Criterion for Series to prove that if the series an is convergent
P
and the sequence {bn } is nonnegative and decreasing, then the series an bn is
convergent. Do not use the Monotone Convergence Theorem or the Algebraic
Limit Theorem for Series.
[Note: This is known as Abel’s Test.]

2. A close relative of infinite series is the infinite product, which is a formal expression
of the form ∞
Y
bn = b1 b2 b3 · · · .
n=1
This infinite product is understood in terms of its sequence of partial products {pn },
where for each n ∈ N
pn := b1 b2 b3 · · · bn .
In this question, we consider the special case of infinite products of the form
(1 + a1 ) (1 + a2 ) (1 + a3 ) · · · ,
where the sequence {an } is nonnegative.
(a) Find an explicit formula for the sequence of partial products in the case where
an = n1 and decide whether the sequence converges.
(b) P
Prove that the sequence of partial products converges if and only if the series
an converges.

3. The Alternating Series Test can be proved directly from the Nested Interval Prop-
erty.
(a) Given an alternating series
b1 − b2 + b3 − b4 + · · ·
with the sequence {bn } decreasing and converging to 0, construct a nested
sequence of closed and bounded intervals I1 ⊇ I2 ⊇ I3 ⊇ · · · such that for
each n, m ∈ N,
m ≥ n =⇒ sm ∈ In ,
where sm denotes the m-th partial sum of the alternating series.
(b) Hence use the Nested Interval Property to deduce a sum for the alternating
series.

Common questions

Powered by AI

If a series Σan converges absolutely, then the series Σ(a_n)^2 also converges absolutely. The reasoning behind this is that absolute convergence of Σan implies that the series formed by the absolute values of its terms is also convergent, which is a stronger condition than simple convergence. Therefore, the terms of a squared series are bounded by a series of positive terms that converges, ensuring convergence of Σ(a_n)^2 .

Absolute convergence is a stronger condition because it implies that the series formed from the absolute values of its terms also converges, rendering it immune to the ordering effects and oscillations typical in conditionally convergent series. Such absolute conditions guarantee convergence of related series transformations involving multiplicative or power-related operations by ensuring strictly positive limiting influences .

The infinite product of factors in the form (1 + 1/n) converges if and only if the series Σ(1/n) converges. However, the series Σ(1/n) diverges (this is the harmonic series), hence the product does not converge in this case .

Rearrangement of a conditionally convergent series can affect its sum because the alternating nature and varying signs of terms can lead to different sums depending on the order of addition. Riemann's Rearrangement Theorem states that a conditionally convergent series can be rearranged to converge to any given sum, or even diverge, by changing the order of terms, highlighting the sensitive dependence of the limit on term arrangement .

Regrouping terms of a convergent series Σan into blocks to form another series Σbk, where bk consists of multiple an terms, retains the convergence to the same limit. This result relies on the idea that regrouping does not alter the overall sum of the series because the terms still adhere to the series' properties that led to convergence in the original structure .

If the absolute series Σ|an| satisfies the Cauchy Criterion and the sequence {bn} is bounded, the series Σanbn satisfies the Cauchy Criterion. This is because the bounded nature of {bn} ensures that it cannot distort the limiting behavior of the absolute series significantly, thus preserving the sufficient conditions for the Cauchy Criterion over the original series even after multiplication .

There can be scenarios where a convergent series Σan and a bounded sequence {bn} combine to form a product series Σanbn that diverges. This can occur if the bounded sequence introduces oscillations or specific terms that impact the convergence criteria, even though individually neither contributes to divergence. For instance, a sequence that changes sign or zeroes out dominates convergence principles when combined with an otherwise convergent series .

For both Σan and Σ(an + bn) to be convergent while Σbn diverges, the key condition is that the convergence provided by Σan is sufficiently dominant, and its convergence rate largely unaffected by the divergence introduced by {bn}. This setup suggests that while an additive divergent sequence exists, its summation impact is neutralized or absorbed into the convergence constraints of Σan .

To prove convergence using Abel's Test, it is necessary to establish that the series Σan is convergent and the sequence {bn} is nonnegative and decreasing. Under these conditions, it can be shown using the Cauchy Criterion that Σanbn converges without the need for applying monotone convergence principles or algebraic transformations.

The Nested Interval Property can be used to prove convergence by constructing a sequence of nested intervals containing the partial sums of the alternating series, ensuring each successive interval is a subset of the previous. As the sequence {bn} in the series b1 - b2 + b3 - b4 + ... is decreasing and converges to zero, these intervals satisfy the conditions leading to the convergence of the series sum by showing eventual capture of all partial sums .

You might also like